Delhi Court December 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Devesh Kumar vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-21-2018
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:19. h December, 2018 Decided on:21. t December , 2018 BAIL APPLN. 2760/2018 DEVESH KUMAR Represented by: Mr. R.K. Wadhwa, Mr.Vishesh Wadhwa, Ms. Meenal Duggal, Advs. ........ Petitioner STATE versus Represented by: Ms. Meenakshi Chauhan, APP for ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA State.1. FIR No.556/2018 was registered at PS Rajouri Garden on 9th September, 2018 on the complaint of Ram Singh who stated that he was working at Monu Tea Shop near ESI Hospital,. On 9th September, 2018 at around 4.30 AM in the morning he was sitting on the footpath having a cigarette/ bidi at Ring Road towards ESI Hospital side, Bali Nagar Cut. On the same footpath Shukla, Manoj and Noora were sleeping. In the meantime a white colour car came at a high speed from Punjabi Bagh side. The driver of the said car was drunk and rammed the car over the footpath. The said car after hitting tree turned upside down due to which all four of...
Saurabh Arora & Ors vs.the State ( Nct of Delhi ) & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-21-2018
* + 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: December 21, 2018 Crl.M.C. 6625/2018 & Crl.M.A. 50694/2018 SAURABH ARORA & ORS .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Varun Mittal and Mr. Anish Sharma, Advocates THE STATE ( NCT OF DELHI ) & ANR Versus .....Respondents Through: Mr. M.S. Oberoi, Additional Public Prosecutor for State with ASI Harish Chander Respondent No.2 in person with Ms. Monika Arora and Ms. Amrita Sharma, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.700/2015, under Sections 406/498-A/34/509 of IPC, registered at Police Station Kirti Nagar, Delhi is sought on the basis of Settlement of 14th May, 2018 (Annexure P-2) arrived at Counselling Cell, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi.2. Notice.3. Mr. M.S. Oberoi, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, accepts notice for respondent No.1-State and Ms. Monika Arora, Advocate, accepts notice on behalf of respondent No.2.4. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondentState submits that respond...
Ge Genbacher Gmbh and Co. Vs.cit (International Taxation), Delhi-I
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-21-2018
* + + + + ITA6272017 & connected matters (INTERNATIONAL ........ RESPONDENTS Page 1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:24. 05.2018 Pronounced on:21. 12.2018 ITA6272017; ITA6282017; ITA6292017; ITA6712017; ITA6742017, C.M. APPL.29470/2017; ITA6752017, C.M. APPL.29471; ITA6772017 GE ENERGY PARTS INC. COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION), DELHI-I Versus ...... Appellant INCOME TAX (INTERNATIONAL ........ RESPONDENTS ITA6432017; ITA6462017; ITA6552017; ITA6692017 & ITA6852017 Versus ...... Appellant GE GENBACHER GMBH & CO. COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION), DELHI-I ITA6442017; ITA6522017, C.M. APPL.29312/2017; ITA6532017; ITA6662017 & ITA8372017 (INTERNATIONAL ........ RESPONDENTS INCOME TAX Versus GE ENGINE SERVICES MALAYSIA SDN BHD....... Appellant COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION), DELHI-I ITA6452017; ITA6542017; ITA6572017; ITA6682017; ITA6842017 & ITA6882017 (INTERNATIONAL ........ RESPONDENTS INCOME TAX GE PACKAGED POWER INC. COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION), DELHI-I Versus INCOME TAX ...... App...
d.b. Corp. Ltd. Vs.dainik Divya Bhaskar & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-21-2018
$~3 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:21. t December, 2018 D.B. CORP. LTD. CS(COMM) 1061/2018 ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Rahul Malhotra, Advocate (M- 9899218215) versus DAINIK DIVYA BHASKAR & ANR. Through: None. ..... Defendants CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.(Oral) The Plaintiff has filed the present suit seeking permanent injunction in 1. respect of the trademark DAINIK BHASKAR and DIVYA BHASKAR. The case of the Plaintiff is that it is a recognized media company and has several publications by the name DAINIK BHASKAR, DIVYA BHARTI, SAURASHTRA SAMACHAR, DNA etc. The marks DAINIK BHASKAR and DIVYA BHASKAR have been in use since 1958 according to the Plaintiff. The Plaintiff also uses two domain names/trade name www.dainikbhaskar.com and www.divyabhaskar.com. The Plaintiff has several trademarks registered for various derivatives of the said marks i.e. DAINIK BHASKAR, DAINIK BHASKAR GROUP, DIVYA BHASKAR in classes 16, 41, 42, 35 and 38...
M/S. Brightstar Telecommuncations India Ltd. Vs.m/s. Iworld Business S ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-21-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + ARB.P. 662/2017 Judgment Reserved:11. 9.2018 Judgment Pronounced:21.12.2018 + + M/S BRIGHTSTAR TELECOMMUNICATIONS INDIA LTD. Through Mr. Ashwini Kumar, Sr. Adv with Mr. Harsh Kaushik, Ms. Savita Panda and Mr. K. Tama, Advs. ........ Petitioner versus M/S IWORLD DIGITAL SOLUTIONS PRIVATE. LTD. ..... Respondent Through Mr. Abhishek Manu Singhvi, Sr. Adv with Mr. Pulkit Deora, Mr. Roopesh Singh Bhardwaj, Mr. Nikhil Rohtagi and Mr. Nikhil Kohli, Advs. ARB.P. 663/2017 M/S BRIGHTSTAR TELECOMMUNICATIONS INDIA LTD. Through Mr. Ashwini Kumar, Sr. Adv with Mr. Harsh Kaushik, Ms. Savita Panda and Mr. K. Tama, Advs. ........ Petitioner versus M/S IWORLD BUSINESS SOLUTIONS PRIVATE. LTD. ..... Respondent Through Mr. Abhishek Manu Singhvi, Sr. Adv with Mr. Pulkit Deora, Mr. Roopesh Singh Bhardwaj and Mr. Nikhil Kohli, Advs. O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 526/2017 M/S BRIGHTSTAR TELECOMMUNICATIONS INDIA PRIVAT LTD ........ Petitioner ARB. P. No.662-663/2017 & OMP(I)(Comm...
Ge Aircraft Engine Services Ltd. Vs.cit (International Taxation), Delh ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-21-2018
* + + + + ITA6272017 & connected matters (INTERNATIONAL ........ RESPONDENTS Page 1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:24. 05.2018 Pronounced on:21. 12.2018 ITA6272017; ITA6282017; ITA6292017; ITA6712017; ITA6742017, C.M. APPL.29470/2017; ITA6752017, C.M. APPL.29471; ITA6772017 GE ENERGY PARTS INC. COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION), DELHI-I Versus ...... Appellant INCOME TAX (INTERNATIONAL ........ RESPONDENTS ITA6432017; ITA6462017; ITA6552017; ITA6692017 & ITA6852017 Versus ...... Appellant GE GENBACHER GMBH & CO. COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION), DELHI-I ITA6442017; ITA6522017, C.M. APPL.29312/2017; ITA6532017; ITA6662017 & ITA8372017 (INTERNATIONAL ........ RESPONDENTS INCOME TAX Versus GE ENGINE SERVICES MALAYSIA SDN BHD....... Appellant COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION), DELHI-I ITA6452017; ITA6542017; ITA6572017; ITA6682017; ITA6842017 & ITA6882017 (INTERNATIONAL ........ RESPONDENTS INCOME TAX GE PACKAGED POWER INC. COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION), DELHI-I Versus INCOME TAX ...... App...
Icri Research Pvt. Ltd. Vs.bon Lon Securities Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-21-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CO.APP. 30/2018 & CM APPL. 54351/2018 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sunil Choudhary, Advocate. ..... Respondent Through: None. $~23 * + ICRI RESEARCH PVT. LTD. versus BON LON SECURITIES LTD. CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA ORDER2112.2018 % SANJEEV NARULA, J.: CM APPL. 54350/2018 (exemption) 1. Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. CM APPL. 54351/2018 2. For the reasons stated in the application, the delay in filing the appeal is condoned and the application is disposed of. CO.APP. 30/2018 3. The Appellant, ICRI Research Pvt. Ltd., has filed the present Appeal under Section 483 of the Companies Act, 1956 being aggrieved by the order CO.APP. 30/2018 Page 1 of 11 dated 25th September, 2018 passed by the Company Judge wherein a Provisional Liquidator has been appointed in respect of the Appellant Company. Factual Background 4. In order to decide the present petition, it will be apposite to note certain relevant facts.5....
Balwan & Anr. Vs.gnct of Delhi Through Its Cheif Secretary and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-21-2018
$~5 to 11 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 5647/2016 RAM DEVI AND ORS ........ Petitioners Through: Mr.Shekhar Gupta and Mr.Ankit Jain, Advocates. Versus GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS Through: Mr.Sumit Jidani, Adv. for R-1. Mr.Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel for LAC/L&B Deptt. Mr.Arun Birbal and Mr.Sanjay Singh, Advocates for DDA. ........ RESPONDENTS + W.P.(C) 6290/2016 & CM APPL.25777/2016 OM PRAKASH & ORS ........ Petitioners Through: Mr.Shekhar Gupta and Mr.Ankit Jain, Advocates. Versus GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI THROUGH ITS CHIEF SECRETARY & ORS Through: Mr.Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel for LAC/L&B Deptt. Ms.Nazia Parveen for Mr.Sanjeev Sagar, Standing Counsel for DDA. ........ RESPONDENTS + W.P.(C) 6292/2016 & CM APPL.25781/2016 SURENDER SINGH RANA & ORS ........ Petitioners Through: Mr.Shekhar Gupta and Mr.Ankit Jain, versus Advocates. W.P.(C) 5647/2016 & connected matters Page 1 of 12 + + GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI THROUGH ITS CHIEF SECRETARY & ORS Through: Ms.N...
Surender Pratap Pandey & Ors. Vs.the State ( Nct of Delhi) & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-21-2018
* + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: December 21, 2018 CRL.M.C. 6583/2018 MANOJ KUMAR & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Yogesh Kaushik, Advocate Versus THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Izhar Ahmed, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent- State... RESPONDENTS No.2 to 4 & 6 in person with Mr. Rahul Sharma, Advocate CRL.M.C. 6603/2018 SURENDER PRATAP PANDEY & ORS. Through: Mr. Rahul Sharma, Advocate ........ Petitioners Versus THE STATE ( NCT OF DELHI) & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Neelam Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent- State Respondent No.2 in person with Mr. Yogesh Kaushik, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Crl.M.C. 6583/2018 Crl.M.C. 6603/2018 Page 1 of 4 1. In the above captioned first petition, quashing of FIR No.980/2014, whereas in the above captioned second petition, quashing of FIR No.979/2014, both registered at police station Neb Sarai, Delhi is sought....
Retail Royalty Company vs.northern Harrier Lifestyles Private Limited ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-21-2018
* % + RETAIL ROYALTY COMPANY FAO2042016 & C.M. APPL. 17173/2016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgement delivered on:21. 12.2018 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Pritesh Kapur, Ms. Sujata Chaudhri and Mr. Ryan Wilson, Advs. Versus NORTHERN HARRIER LIFESTYLES PRIVATE LIMITED AND ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Satish Pandey and Mr. Rajesh Kumar Maurya, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI NAJMI WAZIRI, J This appeal impugns an order dated 22.04.2016 which declined the appellants an interim injunction against the respondents, from using American Fox Outfitters trademark and logo. The learned counsel for the appellant, upon instructions, does not press the claim apropos the respondents Fox logo vis-a-vis their own Eagle logo. The appellants are registered trademark owners of American Eagle Outfitters for the last 40 odd years internationally and have applied for registration of their trademark in India. They claim to be amongst the leading multinational fashion and cl...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »