Delhi Court December 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Jasdeep Singh Kalsi vs.the State & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-18-2018
+ IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on: December 06, 2018 Judgment delivered on: December 18, 2018 FAO(OS) 15/2018 & CM. No.3021/2018 JASDEEP SINGH KALSI Through: Mr. Raman Kapur, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Mohit Khanna, Adv. ..... Appellant versus THE STATE & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Sanjeev Sindhwani, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Aman Nandrajog, Adv. for R-2 AND + FAO(OS) 19/2018 & CM. No.3261/2018 JASDEEP SINGH KALSI ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Raman Kapur, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Mohit Khanna, Adv. versus THE STATE & ORS Through: Mr. Sanjeev Sindhwani, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Aman Nandrajog, Adv. for R-2 ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO FAO (OS) Nos. 15/2018 & 19/2018 Page 1 of 37 JUDGMENT V. KAMESWAR RAO, J1 These two appeals have been filed by S. Jasdeep Singh Kalsi challenging the order of the learned Single Judge in TEST.CAS. Nos. 57/2009 and 40/2016, whereby the learned Single Judge has granted probate of the Will...
Bhupender Singh Tomar and Anr vs.m/s Prasanna Purple Mobility Solution ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-18-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RFA No.1017/2018 + % BHUPENDER SINGH TOMAR AND ANR .....Appellants 18th December, 2018 Through: Mr. Shiv Ram Singh, Advocate (Mobile No.9990671101). versus M/S PRASANNA PURPLE MOBILITY SOLUTIONS (PVT) LTD ..... Respondent CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) C.M. Appl. No.53197/2018 (for exemption) 1. Exemption allowed, subject to just exceptions. C.M. stands disposed of. C.M. Appl. No.53198/2018 (for delay) 2. For the reasons stated in the application the delay of 30 days in re-filing the appeal stands condoned, subject to just exceptions. RFA No.1017/2018 Page 1 of 8 C.M. stands disposed of. RFA No.1017/2018 and C.M. Appl. No.53196/2018 (for stay) 3. This Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) is filed by the defendants in the suit impugning the Judgment of the trial court dated 29.08.2018 by which the trial court has decreed the s...
Gopal Lal Jat vs.union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-18-2018
$~1,2,3,4 & 5 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 5607/2015 SANDEEP KUMAR UNION OF INDIA & ORS Through: Ms. Garima Sachdeva, Advocate. ........ Petitioner versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Rajesh Kumar Gogna, CGSC with Ms. Liu Gangamei, Mr. Akhilesh Kumar and Mr. Perala Upendra for Sai, Respondent No.1. Advocate + With W.P.(C) 5679/2015 AJEET SINGH UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Through: Ms. Garima Sachdeva, Advocate. ........ Petitioner versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mrs. Bharathi Raju, CGSC for Respondent Nos. 1 to 3. + With W.P.(C) 5695/2015 KRISHNA MURARI ........ Petitioner Through: Ms. Garima Sachdeva, Advocate. versus W.P.(C) 5607/2015 & Connected matters Page 1 of 10 UNION OF INDIA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Archana Gaur, Advocate for + UOI. With W.P.(C) 5699/2015 Through: Ms. Garima Sachdeva, Advocate. ........ Petitioner versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Rakesh Kumar, CGSC. GOPAL LAL JAT UNION OF INDIA & ORS. + HET RAM UNION OF INDIA AN...
Ms. Saumya Chopra vs.university of Delhi and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-18-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:14. h December, 2018 Pronounced on:18. h December, 2018 + W.P.(C) 12929/2018 MS. SAUMYA CHOPRA Through: ........ Petitioner Ms. Vandana Sehgal, Adv. with Mr. Iqram Govind Singh, Advs. versus UNIVERSITY OF DELHI AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Mohinder J.S. Rupal, Adv. with Ms. Slomita Rai, Adv. for University of Delhi + W.P.(C) 9718/2018 & CM APPLs. 37885-37886/2018, 40576/2018 SURBHI GUPTA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Rakesh Tikku, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Subhash Garg, Adv. versus UNIVERSITY OF DELHI & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Mohinder J.S. Rupal, Adv. with Ms. Slomita Rai, Adv. for University of Delhi ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Naveen Kr. Singh, Adv. + W.P.(C) 10266/2018 ANSHUMAN JEESU W.P.(C) 12929/2018 & connected matters versus UNIVERSITY OF DELHI AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Page 1 of 20 Through: Mr. Mohinder J.S. Rupal, Adv. with Ms. Slomita Rai, Adv. for University of Delhi RAHUL KUMAR GUPTA +...
Carrefour Wc&c India Pvt. Ltd (In Vol. Liqn.) Vs...........
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-18-2018
$~CP-34 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision:18. 12.2018 + CO.PET. 24/2018 CARREFOUR WC&C INDIA PVT. LTD (IN VOL. LIQN.) ...... Petitioner Through Ms. Ruchi Sindhwani, Sr. Standing Counsel and Ms. Megha Bharara, Advocates for OL. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(ORAL) 1. This petition is filed under section 497(6) of the Companies Act, 1956 (herein referred to as the Act) by the Official Liquidator (OL), seeking voluntary winding up of the Company CARREFOUR WC&C INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED (IN VOL. LIQN.)(herein referred to as the said company).2. The said Company was incorporated under the provisions of the Act with the name Carrefour WC&C India Private Limited with Registrar of Companies (ROC), NCT of Delhi & Haryana at Delhi on 19.09.2007 with an authorized capital of Rs. 5,00,000 (Rupees Five Lakh only) divided into 50,000 (Fifty Thousand) equity share of Rs. 10/- (Rupees Ten) each. The authorized share capital was subsequently increased vide...
Coaster Shoe Company Pvt. Ltd vs.mrs. Harpreet Kaur
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-18-2018
$~24 * + O.M.P.(COMM.) 365/2018 & I.A. Nos.11322-23/2018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision :18. h December, 2018 COASTER SHOE COMPANY PVT. LTD ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Darpan Wadhwa, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Abhishek Mishra and Ms.Caveri Birbal, Advs. MRS. HARPREET KAUR versus ..... Respondent Through Mr.Sudhir Nandrajog, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Aman Nandrajog, Ms.Shreya Nair and Mr.Arjun Nanda, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA NAVIN CHAWLA, J.(Oral) 1. This petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) has been filed by the petitioner challenging the Arbitral Award dated 13.04.2018 passed by the Sole Arbitrator adjudicating the disputes between the parties.2. The respondent had filed a Civil Suit, being CS(OS) 3138/2014, titled as Smt. Harpreet Kaur v. Coaster Shoes Pvt. Ltd., before this Court praying for eviction and mesne profit against the petitioner. The petitioner, in turn, filed an applica...
Anil Kumar Sharma vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-18-2018
* + 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: December 18, 2018 Crl.M.C. 6228/2018 & Crl.M.A. 49155/2018 ANIL KUMAR SHARMA Through: Mr. Ashish Gautam, Advocate ........ Petitioner Versus STATE & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. M.P.Singh, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State with ASI Ajay Kumar Respondent No.2/complainant in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.720/2016, under Sections 406/408/420/120- B/34 of IPC, registered at police station Nihal Vihar, Delhi is sought on the basis of Settlement Deed of 15th November, 2017 (Annexure P-2 colly).2. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that respondents No.3 & 4 are proforma parties and this is not disputed by learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State.3. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State submits that Vivek Garg, complainant of the FIR in question, is present in the Court and he has been identified to be so, by ASI Ajay Ku...
Sanjeev Bansal vs.indraprastha Apollo Hospital and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-18-2018
$~67 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 10451/2018 SANJEEV BANSAL Through: Mr ........ Petitioner Sanjay K. Chadha, Advocate along with petitioner in person. versus INDRAPRASTHA APOLLO HOSPITAL AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr Lalit Bhasin, Ms Ratna Dwivedi Dhingra and Ms Chandni Sadara, Advocates for R-1. Mr K. G. Sharma, Advocate for R-2, 6 and 7. Mr S. S. Ray and Ms Pusshp Gupta, Advocates for R-3. Mr Siddharth Bawa and Mr Shyamal Anand, Advocates for R-4. Mr T. Singhdev and Mr Abhijit Chakravarty, Advocates for R- 9/MCI. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU % ORDER1812.2018 VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The petitioner has filed the present petition, inter alia, praying as under: a. Issue a Writ of Certiorari or any other appropriate Writ or Direction quashing the Order dated W.P.(C) 10451/2018 Page 1 of 12 26.05.2018 passed in Appeal No.MCI-211(2)(36- Appeal)/2017-Ethics/ 117953 by Medical Council of India, Pocket-14, Sector-8, Dwarka, New Delhi- 110075 and cancel t...
Dharampal Satyapal Sons Pvt Ltd vs.mr. Satish Kumar & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-18-2018
$~OS-3 * % + Present: Mr.Siddhant Chamola, Ms.Vaishali Mittal and Ms.Mrinali IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(COMM) 405/2017, IAs.6860 and 14528/2017 DHARAMPAL SATYAPAL SONS PVT LTD MR. SATISH KUMAR & ORS Date of Decision:18. 12.2018 ..... Defendants ...... Plaintiff versus Menon, Advs. for the plaintiff. Defendants are ex parte CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(ORAL) 1. This present suit is filed by the plaintiff against the defendants seeking relief for permanent injunction restraining the defendants, their proprietors/partners/directors, employees, etc from reproducing or using the packaging/getup/layout of offending trade mark PULSE candies in all flavours in lable/cartons/packaging/trade dress which is being used either as a trademark/trade dress or in any other manner whatsoever that may amount to passing off its trademark/trade dress of the plaintiff. Other connected reliefs are also sought.2. The brief facts are that the plaintiff has established ...
Parvesh Jain vs.idbi Bank Ltd & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-18-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of decision:18. h December, 2018 W.P.(C) 13687/2018 & CM. Nos. 53360/2018 and 53361/2018 PARVESH JAIN ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Ajay Jain, Adv. versus IDBI BANK LTD & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Sidhartha Barua, Adv. with Ms. Adity Gupta, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO V. KAMESWAR RAO, J.(ORAL) CM. No.53360/2018 Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions. Application stands disposed of. W.P.(C) 13687/2018 1. The challenge in this petition is to the order dated December 18, 2017 passed by the DRAT in Misc. Appeal No.145/2017 whereby the Tribunal has allowed the appeal filed by the IDBI Bank Limited and set aside the following order of the DRT:-"Heard both sides on interim relief. It is submitted that the security applicant is only entitled to 85 sq. yds. out of the property covered under the mortgage. W.P.(C) No.13687/2018 Page 1 of 8 the counsel The counsel for the secur...
- ‹ Prev
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- Next ›
- Last »