Delhi Court December 2018 Judgments

Browse smarter

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.

AI Brief & Ask
Semantic AI Search
Devil's Bench

Try free for 7 days Semantic AI Search

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

Dec 28 2018

M/S. Living Media India Ltd. & Anr. Vs.raghubir Singh Thakur and Ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Dec-28-2018

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: November 28, 2018 (i) + W.P.(C) 3167/2015 (ii) + W.P.(C) 6294/2016 & C.M. 25790/2016 (iii) + W.P.(C) 6295/2016 & C.M. 25792/2016 (iv) + W.P.(C) 6296/2016 & C.M. 25794/2016 & C.M. 25078/2017 (v) + W.P.(C) 6297/2016 & C.M. 25796/2016 (vi) + W.P.(C) 6298/2016 & C.M. 25798/2016 (vii)+ W.P.(C) 6300/2016 & C.M. 25802/2016 (viii)+ W.P.(C) 6301/2016 & C.M. 25804/2016 (ix) + W.P.(C) 6302/2016 & C.M. 25806/2016 (x) + W.P.(C) 6303/2016 & C.M. 25808/2016 M/S. LIVING MEDIA INDIA LTD. & ANR. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Puneet Kumar Verma, Advocate Versus (i) GOVERNMENT OF NATIONAL CAPITAL OF (ii) (iii) (iv) (v) (vi) (vii) (viii) (ix) (x) TERRITORY OF DELHI & ORS. SANJAY KUMAR AND ORS. CHANDAN KUAMR AND ORS. PRITHVIRAJ AND ORS. RAJU CHAUHAN AND ORS. SHASHIKANT MISHRA AND ORS. RAM KUMAR AND ORS. RAMESH PRASAD AND ORS. RAJENDER SINGH AND ORS. RAGHUBIR SINGH THAKUR AND ORS. ....... RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. K. Viswanath, Advocate for responde...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 28 2018

M/S. Living Media India Ltd. & Anr. Vs.prithviraj and Ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Dec-28-2018

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 28 2018

M/S. Living Media India Ltd. & Anr. Vs.chandan Kuamr and Ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Dec-28-2018

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 28 2018

M/S. Living Media India Ltd. & Anr. Vs.rajender Singh and Ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Dec-28-2018

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 26 2018

Abhinav Singh & Ors. Vs.jyoti, Inspector & Ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Dec-26-2018

$~ * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:26. h December, 2018 54869/2018 + W.P.(C) 14039/2018 & CM nos. 54817/2018, 54820/2018, ABHINAV SINGH & ORS. Through: Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Senior Advocate with Mr. Shashwat Sharma, Adv. ....... Petitioners versus JYOTI, INSPECTOR & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Harpeet Singh, Adv. for R-1 to 8. Mr. Ripu Daman Bhardwaj, CGSC and Mr. T.P. Singh, Sr. Central Government Counsel for UOI. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI JYOTI SINGH, J.(ORAL) 1. The present writ petition is filed under Articleof the Constitution of India seeking quashing and setting aside the order dated 19.12.2018 passed by the learned Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi, whereby the learned Tribunal has stayed the declaration of result of the regular DPC for 2019 in OA No.4640/2018.2. The facts relevant and necessary for adjudication of the present petition are as follows:-"W.P.(C)14...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 24 2018

Rinki Gupta vs.the State and Ors

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Dec-24-2018

* + + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: December 19, 2018 CRL.M.C. 2079/2017 CRL.M.C. 2080/2017 CRL.M.C. 2081/2017 SACHIN KUMAR ASHOK RAJAN AGARWAL RINKI GUPTA Through: Mr. Kawal Nain and Mr. Rohit .....Petitioners Dadwal, Advocates versus THE STATE AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Ms. Neelam Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent- State Mr. M.P. Singh, Additional Public Prosecutor Mr. Manish Sharma, Mr. Prnay Raj Singh, Advocates for respondents 2 to 4 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) In the above captioned three petitions, the challenge is to the impugned order of 30th January, 2017 vide which petitioners revision petitions have been dismissed by observing that the rejection of petitioners prayer under Section 156 (3) of Cr.P.C is justified, as no Crl.M.C. 2079-81/2017 Page 1 of 3 evidence is required to be collected by the police and the matter is pending before the trial court for recording of pre-summoning evidence. At the out...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 21 2018

Rohit Kumar vs.the State ( Govt. Of Nct of Delhi ) & Anr.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Dec-21-2018

* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:21. 12.2018 CRL.M.C. 3033/2018 ROHIT KUMAR ........ Petitioner versus THE STATE ( GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI ) & ANR........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the Respondent : : Mr.Nusrat Hossain, Adv. with petitioner in person Ms. Neelam Sharma, APP SI Manisha Sharma, PS Aman Vihar. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.1.... Petitioner seeks quashing of FIR582016 under Section 376/354D/366 IPC, Police Station Aman Vihar.2. The allegations in the FIR are that the prosecutrix/respondent No.2 became friends with the petitioner. Their friendship continued for 4 5 months where after the petitioner is alleged to have proposed and express his love for her.3. It is alleged that on false promise of marriage, the petitioner made physical relationship with her on 15.11.2015 and thereafter also CRL.M.C. 3033/2018 Page 1 of 8 they continued to make physical re...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 21 2018

Ram Parkash @ Bittoo vs.state

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Dec-21-2018

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on :1. t November, 2018 Date of decision :21. t December, 2018 + CRL.A.899/2002 & CRL.M.A.35006/2018 RAM PARKASH @ BITTOO ..... Appellant STATE Through: Mr. Sumer Sethi and Ms. Dolly Sharma, Advocates with Appellant in person. (M:8860292911) versus ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Meenakshi Chauhan, APP with SI Ranbir Singh (M:9899402748) P.S. Nangloi. CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.JUDGMENT1 The present appeal has been filed by the Appellant, Ram Parkash @ Bittoo challenging his conviction vide judgment and sentence dated 25th January, 2002 under Section 304B and 498A read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. it is relevant to note that the trial court record, in the present case, is not available. Repeated attempts were made to reconstruct the record especially as the appeal was of the year 2002. However, the trial court finally submitted a report saying that the record is not traceable in the Tis Hazari C...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 21 2018

Ram Devi and Ors vs.govt of Nct of Delhi and Ors

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Dec-21-2018

$~5 to 11 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 5647/2016 RAM DEVI AND ORS ........ Petitioners Through: Mr.Shekhar Gupta and Mr.Ankit Jain, Advocates. Versus GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS Through: Mr.Sumit Jidani, Adv. for R-1. Mr.Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel for LAC/L&B Deptt. Mr.Arun Birbal and Mr.Sanjay Singh, Advocates for DDA. ........ RESPONDENTS + W.P.(C) 6290/2016 & CM APPL.25777/2016 OM PRAKASH & ORS ........ Petitioners Through: Mr.Shekhar Gupta and Mr.Ankit Jain, Advocates. Versus GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI THROUGH ITS CHIEF SECRETARY & ORS Through: Mr.Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel for LAC/L&B Deptt. Ms.Nazia Parveen for Mr.Sanjeev Sagar, Standing Counsel for DDA. ........ RESPONDENTS + W.P.(C) 6292/2016 & CM APPL.25781/2016 SURENDER SINGH RANA & ORS ........ Petitioners Through: Mr.Shekhar Gupta and Mr.Ankit Jain, versus Advocates. W.P.(C) 5647/2016 & connected matters Page 1 of 12 + + GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI THROUGH ITS CHIEF SECRETARY & ORS Through: Ms.N...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 21 2018

Nazim vs.state

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Dec-21-2018

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: December 21, 2018 + CRL.REV.PET.11& Crl.M.A.50747/18, Crl.M(B)20NAZIM Through: Mr. Humza Islam, Mr. Khalid ........ Petitioner Akhtar and Mohammad Shadam, Advocates versus STATE CORAM: ..... Respondent Through: Mr. M.P.Singh, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) 1.... Petitioner alongwith his two co-accused was tried for the offence under Section 3of IPC in FIR No.270/2008, registered at P.S.Jamia Nagar, Delhi. After trial, petitioner alongwith co-accused was convicted for the offence under Section 323/3of IPC and sentenced to Simple Imprisonment for three years with fine of `5,000/- each by the trial court vide order of 20th August, 2018.2. Appellate Court vide impugned judgment of 10th December, 2018 has maintained the conviction of petitioner and his co-accused for the aforesaid offence, but has reduced their sentence from Simple Imprisonment for three years to Rigorous ...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

‹ Prev
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Next ›
Last »

Delhi Court December 2018 Judgments

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.