Delhi Court December 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Sandeep Kumar vs.union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-18-2018
$~1,2,3,4 & 5 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 5607/2015 SANDEEP KUMAR UNION OF INDIA & ORS Through: Ms. Garima Sachdeva, Advocate. ........ Petitioner versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Rajesh Kumar Gogna, CGSC with Ms. Liu Gangamei, Mr. Akhilesh Kumar and Mr. Perala Upendra for Sai, Respondent No.1. Advocate + With W.P.(C) 5679/2015 AJEET SINGH UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Through: Ms. Garima Sachdeva, Advocate. ........ Petitioner versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mrs. Bharathi Raju, CGSC for Respondent Nos. 1 to 3. + With W.P.(C) 5695/2015 KRISHNA MURARI ........ Petitioner Through: Ms. Garima Sachdeva, Advocate. versus W.P.(C) 5607/2015 & Connected matters Page 1 of 10 UNION OF INDIA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Archana Gaur, Advocate for + UOI. With W.P.(C) 5699/2015 Through: Ms. Garima Sachdeva, Advocate. ........ Petitioner versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Rakesh Kumar, CGSC. GOPAL LAL JAT UNION OF INDIA & ORS. + HET RAM UNION OF INDIA AN...
Om Prakash Lamba & Ors. Vs.state & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-18-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: December 18, 2018 + CRL.M.C. 6444/2018 & Crl.M.A. 49997/2018 OM PRAKASH LAMBA & ORS. Through: Mr. Ashish Tanwar & ........ Petitioners Mr. Lovinder Chaudhary, Advocates Versus STATE & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Neelam Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State with SI Shiv Kumar.... RESPONDENTS No.2 & 3 in person with Mr. S.Chaturvedi, Advocate CRL.M.C. 6459/2018 & Crl.M.A. 50050/2018 RAKESH @ BUNTI & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. S.Chaturvedi, Advocate Versus STATE & ANR. Through: Mr.M.P.Singh, Additional Public ........ RESPONDENTS Prosecutor for respondent No.1- State with SI Shiv Kumar. Respondent No.2 in person with Mr. Ashish Tanwar & Mr. Lovinder Chaudhary, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR + Crl.M.Cs. 6444/2018 & 6459/2018 Page 1 of 4 ORDER (ORAL) 1. In the above captioned first petition, quashing of FIR No.150/2012, whereas in the above captioned second petition, qua...
R K Millen & Company (India) Pvt Ltd & Anr vs.national Building Constr ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-18-2018
$~53 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of order:18. 12.2018 + FAO(OS) (COMM) 305/2018 R K MILLEN & COMPANY (INDIA) PVT LTD & ANR ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Dhruv Surana, Mr. Ashish Choudhary, Advocate versus NATIONAL BUILDING CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION LTD ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Debarshi Bhadra, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN PRATEEK JALAN, J.(Oral) % CAV No.1191/2018 Since the respondent has been represented through counsel - Mr.Debarshi Bhadra, therefore the caveat stands discharged. C.M. Appl. No.53325/2018 (Condonation of delay of 24 days) By this application, the appellant seeks condonation of delay of 24 days in preferring the appeal. For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed and the delay of 24 days in filing the appeal is condoned. The application stands disposed of. FAO (OS) (COMM) 305/2018 Page 1 of 6 FAO(OS) (COMM) 305/2018, C.M. Appl. No.53326-53327/2018 1. The appellant is aggr...
The Commissioner of Police vs.gayatri & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-18-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Reserved on:13. h December, 2018 Pronounced on:18. h December, 2018 + CM(M) 371/2015, CM APPL.No.7826/2015 THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE Through: Ms.Warisha Farasat, Advocate SI Manish Tyagi, PS-Gandhi Nagar ........ Petitioner versus GAYATRI & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Aman Bakhshi, Advocate for standing Mr.Gaurang Kanth, counsel for EDMC CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGESH KHANNA YOGESH KHANNA, J.1. This petition challenges the impugned order dated 28.08.2014 passed by the learned Civil Judge who while disposing of the civil suit between the two private parties have given certain directions to the Commissioner of Police to organize training programmes for the police officials and also to take action against the SHO concerned. The only short question raised before me is if in a lis between the two private parties, can a trial court travel beyond the pleadings to pass such like directions since is not exercising writ jurisdiction.2. ...
Govt of Nct of Delhi vs.m/s Hurryson Enterprises
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-18-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on :28. h September, 2018 Date of decision :18th December, 2018 + O.M.P. 608/2008, I.As. 13043/2018, 13044/2018 & 13045/2018 GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Sanjay Dewan, Advocate. (M:9811036782) Mr. Yadvinder Singh, Executive Engineer, PWD. (M:9717754877) versus M/S HURRYSON ENTERPRISES ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Hemant Chaudhri and Mr. Arjun Bhaskar, Advocates. CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.JUDGMENT I.A. 13045/2018 (for condonation of delay) 1. This is an application seeking condonation of delay in filing I.A. 13043/2018 for restoration. For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed. I.A. is disposed of. I.A. 13043/2018 (for restoration) 2. This is an application seeking restoration of the Petition. For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed. I.A. is disposed of. O.M.P. 608/2008 3. The present petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conc...
Om Marubeni Logistics Private Limited (In vol.liqn.) Vs...........
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-18-2018
$~CP-37 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:18. 12.2018 CO.PET. 25/2018 OM MARUBENI LOGISTICS PRIVATE LIMITED (IN VOL.LIQN.) Through Mr. Kunal Sharma, Adv., ....... Petitioner CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH on behalf of OL JAYANT NATH, J.(ORAL) 1. This is a company petition, preferred under Section 497 (6) of the Companies Act, 1956 (herein referred to as the Act), by the Official Liquidator (OL). The prayer made in the petition is that the subject company i.e., OM MARUBENI LOGISTICS PRIVATE LIMITED (herein referred to as the said company), may be wound up and finally dissolved from the date of the filing of the instant petition.2. The record shows that the said Company in issue was incorporated on 04.01.2008, with the Registrar of Companies (ROC), NCT of Delhi and Haryana. The Corporate Identity Number of the said Company is U63090DL2008PTC172298.3. The registered office of the said Company in issue is stated to be situated within the territory of th...
Ntpc Vidyut Vyapar Nigam Ltd. Vs.precision Technik Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-18-2018
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI O.M.P. (COMM) 481/2016 Reserved on:27. 11.2018 Date of decision :18. 12.2018 NTPC VIDYUT VYAPAR NIGAM LTD. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Vikas Singh, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Bharat Sangal, Ms.Isha Gupta, Ms.Babita Kushwah, Ms.Srishti Banerjee, Advs. versus PRECISION TECHNIK PVT. LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Sandeep Sethi, Sr. Adv. with Ms.Kavita Jha, Ms.Devika Jain, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA1 This petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) has been filed by the petitioner challenging the Arbitral Award dated 08.05.2015 passed by the Arbitral Tribunal adjudicating the disputes that have arisen between the parties in relation to the Power Purchase Agreement (PPA) dated 10.01.2011 executed between the parties.2. The dispute between the parties is on the encashment of the Performance Bank Guarantee by the petitioner, which the petitioner has encashed in part, re...
Mohd. Gulfam Hussain & Ors. Vs.state & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-18-2018
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: December 18, 2018 CRL.M.C. 6464/2018 & Crl.M.A. 50055-56/2018 MOHD. GULFAM HUSSAIN & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Bharat Bhushan, Advocate Versus STATE & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. M.P.Singh, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1- State with HC Arvind... RESPONDENTS No.2 & 3 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR1 Quashing of ORDER (ORAL) FIR No.386/2018, under Sections 325/308/354/354A/506/5IPC, registered at police station Aman Vihar, Delhi is sought on the basis of Memorandum of Understanding of 2nd July, 2018 (Annexure-P/5) and on the ground that the misunderstanding which led to registration of the FIR, now stands cleared between the parties.2. Mr. M.P.Singh, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State accepts notice and submits that respondents No.2 & 3, present in the Court have been identified to be the complainant party of FIR in question by HC Arvind on the basis...
Arun Mohan & Ors. Vs.state Govt of Nct of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-18-2018
* + 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: December 18, 2018 Crl.M.C. 4144/2018 ARUN MOHAN & ORS. Through: Mr. Jagdev Singh, Advocate ........ Petitioners Versus STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Izhar Ahmed, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent- State with ASI Rajbir... RESPONDENTS No.2 & 3 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.445/2018, under Sections 3IPC, registered at police station Mangol Puri, Delhi is sought on the basis of Compromise Deed of 9th August, 2018 (Annexure-P-2) and also on the ground that the misunderstanding which led to registration of the FIR, now stands cleared between the parties.2. Mr. Izhar Ahmed, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State accepts notice and submits that respondents No.2 is the complaint of FIR in question and respondent No.3 is the injured and they both are present in the Court and have been identified to be so by ASI Rajbir on t...
.Sandeep vs.state n.c.t. Of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-18-2018
$~R-42 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:-"IS"* December, 2018 + CRL.A. 288/2002 . SANDEEP Appellant Through; Mr. Harsh Prabhakar, Ms. Anjana Prabhakar & Mr. Anirudh Tanwar, Advs. with appellant in custody versus STATE N.C.T. OF DELHI Respondent Through: Mr. Amit Ahlawat, APP for the State. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. In the wake of daily dairy No.12/A (Ex.PW-3/A) recorded at 11 a.m. in police station Mayapuri, on the ^sis of input received from police control room on the wireless network, about a^.person suspected to be involved in pick pocketing being beaten up by public persons in front of Mayapuri Petrol Pump, Head Constable Narpal Singh (PW-4) went to the place of incjdent with Constable Mahender Singh (PW-6). They statedly came across Satpal Mehta (PW-2) on the basis of whose statement (Ex.PW-2/A), first information report (FIR) No.232/1998 was registered (Ex.PW-3/B) for offences under Sectionsof the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC). It is allege...
- ‹ Prev
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- Next ›
- Last »