Delhi Court December 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Sudhir Kumar Gulati and Anr. Vs.union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-19-2018
$~10 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 13708/2018, CAV11942018 & CM Appl. Nos. 53517- Decided on:19. h December, 2018 53520/2018 SUDHIR KUMAR GULATI AND ANR. Through: Mr. S.R. Sharma, Advocate. ........ Petitioners versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Dr. Ashwani Bhardwaj & Mr.Gaurav Rohilla, Advocates for R-1 to 3. Mr. C. Mohan Rao, Advocate with Mr. Sharma, Advocate for Caveator/R-31. Lokesh Kumar CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN PRATEEK JALAN, J.(ORAL) % CAV11942018 As the respondents have entered appearance through counsel, the Caveat is discharged. CM APPL. Nos. 53517 & 53520/2018 (Exemption) The applications for exemption are allowed subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of in the aforesaid terms. CM APPL. No.53519/2018 This an application for placing on record additional documents. For the reasons stated therein, the application is allowed. W.P.(C) 13708/2018 Page 1 of 7 ...
Sanjay & Ors. Vs.state (n.c.t. Of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-19-2018
$~A-3 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decidedon:19*'^ December, 2018 .+ CRL. A. 673/2001 SANJAY & ORS. Appellants Through: Mr. Prag Chawla & Ms. Ruchi Kapoor, Advs. versus STATE (N.C.T. OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through: Mr. K.S. Ahuja, APP for the . State with SI Badlu Rar^ CdRAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE mK.GAUte ORDER ^QRALV1 Sessions Case No.716/199b; on'tiie/K^ investigation of first infoiThUtip^^i-epo^^^^^^^ The four appellants stood: trialj in the court of sessions (in gathered during 168/1992 of police station Janak Puri on the charge for the offence under Section 307 read with Section 34 of Indian Penal Code, 1860:-"(IPC), with additional charge under Section 25 Arrris' Act Having been framed against appellant Bhupender Kumar (A-2). The gravamen of the charge of attempt to commit murder by acts in furtherance of their common intention, was essentially, that on 17.03.1992 at about 9.30 p.m. in the vicinity of house No.25, Panchsheel Colony, Uttani Nagar Delhi, they had over...
Kapil Kumar Beri vs.the State of Delhi (n.c.t. Of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-19-2018
$~ + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL. A. 704/2001 Reserved on:31. t October, 2018 Pronounced on:19. h December, 2018 KAPIL KUMAR BERI ..... Appellant Through: Mr. D. Hasija Advocate with Mr. Anirudh Tyagi, Advocate versus THE STATE OF DELHI (N.C.T. OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, APP for the State with SI Ajay Misra, Police Station Delhi Cantt. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA1 JUDGMENT This appeal was instituted in September, 2001 to assail the judgment dated 10.08.2001 of the Additional Sessions Judge (ASJ) in Sessions Case No.257/1996 and the order on sentence dated 31.08.2001 passed in its wake whereby the appellant was held guilty and convicted on the charge for the offence punishable under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC), he having been awarded rigorous imprisonment for ten years with fine of Rs.5,000/- - in default further simple imprisonment for three months, with benefit of set off under Section 428 of the Code of Cri...
Suresh vs.delhi State Industrial & Infrastructure Development Corporat ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-19-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:19. 12.2018 + W.P.(C) 8479/2016 and CM APPL. 34948/2016 SURESH versus ........ Petitioner DELHI STATE INDUSTRIAL & INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD. Advocates who appeared in this case: ..... Respondent For the... Petitioner For the Respondent : Kumar Dushyant Singh, : Mr Satvik Varma and Mr Tanveer : Oberoi, CORAM HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU VIBHU BAKHRU, J JUDGMENT1 The petitioner has filed the present petition, inter alia, impugning a communication dated 04.01.2016 whereby the petitioner was informed that he is not eligible for allotment of a dwelling unit under the Second Rajiv Gandhi Housing Scheme (hereafter the Scheme). The earnest money of a sum of 32,000/- deposited by the petitioner was also returned under the cover of the said letter.2. The principal controversy to be addressed in the present petition is whether the petitioner is entitled for allotment of a flat under the Scheme. W.P.(C) 8479/2016 P...
National Highways Authority of India (Ministry of Road Transport and H ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-19-2018
$~11 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:19. 12.2018 + O.M.P. (COMM) 462/2018 NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA (MINISTRY OF ROAD TRANSPORT AND HIGHWAYS) ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Kanwarjeet Singh, Mr.Shekhar Kumar, Ms.Vandana Rani, Advs. versus PATEL-KNR (JV) ..... Respondent Through: Dr.Amit George, Mr.Rishabh Dheer, Mr.Swaroop George, Ms.Rajsree Ajay, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA NAVIN CHAWLA, J.(Oral) IA No.15412/2018 This is an application seeking condonation of eighteen days delay in re-filing of the petition. For the reason stated in the application, the delay is condoned and the application stands allowed. O.M.P. (COMM) 462/2018 Page 1 O.M.P. (COMM) 462/2018 1. This petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) has been filed by the petitioner challenging the Arbitral Award dated 07.06.2018 passed by the Arbitral Tribunal adjudicating the disputes that have arisen bet...
Mahesh Verma vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-19-2018
* + 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: December 19, 2018 CRL.M.C. 6492/2018 & Crl.M.A. 50173/2018 MAHESH VERMA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Nishant Rai, Advocate Versus STATE & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Asha Tiwari, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State with ASI Pardeep Kumar Respondent No.2 in person with Mr. Neeraj Kapoor & Mr. Vivek Singh, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.301/2018, under SectionsIPC, registered at police station Fatehpur Beri, New Delhi is sought on the basis of Settlement Agreement of 6th December, 2018.2. Upon notice, Ms. Ashal Tiwari, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State and Mr. Neeraj Kapoor, Advocate for respondent No.2, submit that respondent No.2 is the complainant of the FIR in question and he is present in the Court and he has been identified to be so, by ASI Pradeep Kumar. Complainant affirms the contents of his affidavit of 14th December, 2...
Court on Its Own Motion vs.raj Kumar Kasana
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-19-2018
#12 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CONT.CAS.(CRL) 12/2018 Judgment delivered on:19. 12.2018 COURT ON ITS OWN MOTION ........ Petitioner Versus RAJ KUMAR KASANA Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : ..... Respondent For the Respondent : Mrs. Kajal Chandra and Mr. Viren Kapur, Advocates with respondent in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL JUDGMENT SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J (ORAL) 1. The present criminal contempt was issued suo motu by this Court, in view of the circumstance that, the contemnor, the respondent herein, had instituted a Public Interest Litigation (hereinafter referred to as the said PIL), without making a fair and complete CONT.CAS.(CRL) 12/2018 Page 1 of 6 disclosure, as warranted in law, in relation to other proceedings pending between him and the respondents in the said PIL.2. A Division Bench of this Court presided over by Honble the Acting Chief Justice vide order dated 19.04.2018, no...
Vikas Wadhwa vs.pardeep Kumar & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-19-2018
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RFA No.786/2017 % VIKAS WADHWA19h December, 2018 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Rajesh Banati and Mr. Advocates Banati, Ankit (Mobile No.9810294894). PARDEEP KUMAR & ORS versus Through: Mr. Brahmanand ........ RESPONDENTS Gupta, Advocate for R-4 to 7 (Mobile No.9899194195). Mr. Ajay Kumar, Advocate for R-8 (Mobile No.9891454997). CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. YES VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) is filed by the plaintiff in the suit impugning the Judgment of the trial court dated 04.05.2017 by which the trial court has dismissed the suit filed by the appellant/plaintiff for recovery of possession of the suit property bearing No.D-213, JJ Colony, Shakur Pur, Delhi (hereinafter suit property). RFA No.786/2017 Page 1 of 22 2(i). The facts of the case are that the appellant/plaintiff pleaded that he had purchased the...
Granite Gate Properties Pvt. Ltd. Vs.principal Commissioner of Income ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-19-2018
$~6 and 7. * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI ITA Nos. 398/2017, 399/2017 Date of decision:19. h December, 2018 GRANITE GATE PROPERTIES PVT. LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Ajay Vohra, Sr.Adv. with Mr. Gaurav Jain and Mr. Aniket D. Agrawal, Advs. versus PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX..... Respondent Through: Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI SANJIV KHANNA, J.(ORAL) CM APPL. No.52227/2018 in ITA No.398/2017 (for placing on record additional documents) Learned counsel for the respondent-Revenue does not oppose this application for taking additional documents on record. Following additional documents relating to the assessment year 2012- 13 are taken on record-: (i) Copy of acknowledgment of income-tax returns filed for assessment year 2013. (ii) Copy of computation of income accompanying the income-tax return for assessment year 2012-2013. ITA Nos.398 & 399 of 2017 Page 1 of 18 (iii) Copy of audited...
Shri Prashant Sharma vs.north Delhi Municipal Corporation and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-19-2018
$~14 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 5472/2017 & CM APPL. 22990/2017 Date of Decision :-"19.12.2018 SHRI PRASHANT SHARMA Through Mr.Sukumar Mr.Sachin Gupta, Ms.Neeta Bahl, Advs. ........ Petitioner Susmobman, with versus NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through Ms.Mini Pushkarna, S.C. with Mr.Swagat Bhuyan, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI REKHA PALLI, J (ORAL) 1. The petitioner has filed the present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking inter alia quashing of an order dated 26.04.2017 vide which, on account of non-deposit of the requisite fee/relevant documents within seven days as per the terms and conditions of the Tender and License Agreement, not only was his LOI cancelled but even the earnest money of Rs.1,34,000/- deposited by him was forfeited. The petitioner also impugns an order dated 25.05.2017 passed by the respondents rejecting his representation dated 27.04.2017, whereby the petitioner ...
- ‹ Prev
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- Next ›
- Last »