Delhi Court December 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Abdul Samad Shaikh & Ors. Vs.state & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-20-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. 5482/2018 Date of Order: December 20, 2018 ABDUL SAMAD SHAIKH & ORS. Through: Mr. M.Hasibudding, Advocate .....Petitioners versus STATE & ORS. Through: Dr. M.P. Singh, Additional Public .....Respondents Prosecutor with SI C.P. Singh... RESPONDENTS No.2 & 3 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.198/2013, under Sections 323/324/3+ 1. IPC, registered at police station Jamia Nagar, Delhi is sought on the ground that misunderstanding which led to registration of the FIR, now stands cleared between the parties.2. Mr. M.P.Singh, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State accepts notice and submits that respondents No.2 & 3, present in the Court have been identified to be the complainant/injured party of FIR in question by SI C.P. Singh on the basis of identity proof produced by them.3.... RESPONDENTS No.2 & 3, present in the Court, submit that the dispute between the parties has been am...
Shiv Charan Sharma vs.state (Govt. Of Nct Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-20-2018
$~26 & 27 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + + BAIL APPLN. 1813/2017 & Crl.M.A.48936/2018 Judgment delivered on:20. 12.2018 SHIV CHARAN SHARMA versus STATE (GOVT OF NCT DELHI) BAIL APPLN. 1817/2017 ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent ........ Petitioner versus SH MANOJ SHARMA STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : For the Respondent CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA Ms. Kusum Dhalla, APP for the State. SI Sandeep, Police Station North Rohini. Mr. S.A. Khan, Adv. for the Central Bank of India. Ms. Chanan Parwani with Mr. Samar Kachwaha, Advs for the complainant. Mr. Vivek Sharma, Adv. : ..... Respondent JUDGMENT2012.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL)... Petitioners seek anticipatory bail in FIR No.296/2016 under Page 1 of 6 1. BAIL APPLN.1813/2017 & BAIL APPLN.1817/2017 Sections 420/120B IPC, Police Station North Rohini.2. The allegations in the FIR are that the complainant is an owner of a property bearing No.G-23/183, ...
Sanjay vs.state (Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-20-2018
$~20 & 21 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.A. 501/2002 Decided on:20. h December, 2018 SHYAM KALI &ORS. ..... Appellants Through: Mohd. Nasir Tabrez and Mr. J.Alam, Advocates versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Kewal Singh Ahuja, APP with SI Ranjit Singh + CRL.A. 502/2002 SANJAY ..... Appellant Through: Mohd. Nasir Tabrez and Mr. J.Alam, Advocates versus STATE (N.C.T. OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Kewal Singh Ahuja, APP with SI Ranjit Singh CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. These appeals brought a challenge to the judgment of the court of Sessions and order passed in its wake whereby the appellants were Crl.A501502/2002 Page 1 of 21 held guilty on charge of having subjected the victim to cruelty in matrimonial home, one of them being also convicted for the offence of dowry death and punishments awarded for the same.2. Santosh Kumari, daughter of Ram Dulare (PW6), a retired employee of Delhi Electricity Supply Undertakin...
Gail (India) Limited vs.deepak Fertilizers & Petrochemicals Corporatio ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-20-2018
$~25 & 26 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:20. 12.2018 + + ARB. A. (COMM.) 3/2018 & IA No.1065/2018 O.M.P. (COMM) 31/2018 & IA No.1063/2018 GAIL (INDIA) LIMITED ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Sanjay Jain, Sr. Adv. with Ms.Gunjan Arora, Mr.Sumit Arora & Ms.Rhea Verma, Advs. versus DEEPAK CORPORATION LIMITED FERTILIZERS & PETROCHEMICALS ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Vivek Kholi, Ms.Prerna Kohli, Jain, Ms.Divyya Ms.Pankhuri Kapur & Ms.Neetika Bajaj, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA NAVIN CHAWLA, J.(Oral) 1. The present Arbitration Appeal has been filed by GAIL (INDIA) Limited (hereinafter referred to as the petitioner) challenging the order dated 05.09.2017 passed by the Sole Arbitrator, holding therein that the claims of the petitioner insofar as they relate to the Gas Sales and Transportation Contract dated 10.05.2006 (hereinafter referred to as the GSTC, 2006) executed between the parties are non-arbitrable and in any case barred by Law of Limitat...
Mangal Mal vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-20-2018
* + 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: December 20, 2018 CRL.M.C. 6517/2018 MANGAL MAL Through: Mr. A.K.Sheoran, Advocate ........ Petitioner Versus STATE & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. M.S.Oberoi, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State with WSI Vinod Kapoor Respondent No.2 in person with Mr. Hem Kumar, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.731/2014, under SectionsIPC registered at police station Vasant Vihar, New Delhi is sought on the basis of Memorandum of Understanding of 4th December, 2018 (Annexure P-5).2. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State submits that respondent No.2 is the complainant of the FIR in question and she is present in the Court and she has been identified to be so, by WSI Vinod Kapoor. Complainant submits that Memorandum of Understanding of 4th December, 2018 (Annexure P-5) has been acted upon and affirms the contents of her affidavit supporting this petition ...
Frontline (Ncr) Business Solutions Private Limited vs.indian Agricultu ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-20-2018
$~ 7 & 8 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:20. 12.2018 + W.P. (C) 8041/2018 + W.P. (C) 9274/2018 FRONTLINE (NCR) BUSINESS SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED LUXRA ENTERPRISES PVT. LTD. ........ Petitioner ........ Petitioner versus INDIAN AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Present:-"Mr. Saurabh Prakash, Mr. Kunal Gosain & Mr. Utsav for in petitioner Jain, Advs for petitioner in W.P. (C) 8041/2018. Mr. M.S. Vinaik, Adv. W.P.(C) 9274/2018. Mr. Gagan Mathur & Mr. Varun Kumar, Advs. for Respondent No.1 in W.P.(C) 8041/2018. Mr. Rajesh Kumar Gogan & Mr. Perala Upendra Sai, Advs. for R-2 in W.P.(C) 8041/2018 & 9274/2018. Mr. Vivek Goyal, CGSC with Mr. Pawan Pathak, Adv. for R-3/UOI in W.P. (C) 9274/2018. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN PRATEEK JALAN, J (OPEN COURT) % 1. These two petitions concern the same tender for security services issued by the Indian Agricultural Research Institute [hereinafter referred to...
Spriha Choudhary vs.central Board of Secondary Education & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-20-2018
$~18 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:20. h December, 2018 + W.P.(C) 9434/2017 % 1. SPRIHA CHOUDHARY ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Sanjay Sharawat with Mr. Divyank Rana, Adv. versus CENTRAL BOARD OF SECONDARY EDUCATION & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Ashok Kumar, Adv. for CBSE CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT (ORAL) 20.12.2018 The controversy in issue in this writ petition is short and, detailed arguments of both sides having been heard, and with consent of parties, the writ petition is being decided finally.2. The petitioner was born on 30th March, 1997. At the time of her admission in the Respondent No.2school, her date of birth was reflected, in the enrolment form, as 30.03.1997. Subsequently, in the parents-data form filled in, issued by the school in 2001-2002, as well as in the progress report of the petitioner in her nursery class, her date of birth was reflected as 30.03.1997, and the same W.P.(C) 9434/2017 Page 1 of 12 dat...
Riazuddin vs.govt. Of Nct of Delhi & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-20-2018
$~19 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 5661/2015, C.M. No.10188/2015, C.M. No.31355/2017 & C.M. No.2777/2018 RIAZUDDIN ........ Petitioner Through: Ms. Sona Babbar, Advocate for Mr. Peeyoosh Kalra, Advocate for LR No-1(d) of the... Petitioner. Mr. Hetish Raj Singh, Advocate for LR-1(a), (b) and (c). GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Rajiv Bansal, Senior Counsel with Mr. Dhanesh Relan, Ms. Kamna Singh and Ms. Parul Panthi, Advocates. Mr. Ashish Pradhan, Advocate for Mr. Siddharth Panda, Advocate for LAC/L&B. Ms. Harsha Sharma, Advocate for applicant. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA % Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.: ORDER2012.2018 1. The prayer in the present petition is that the entire land acquisition proceedings pertaining to two plots K-16 and K-16 in Hauz Khas Enclave, both admeasuring 1250 sq. yds. each, comprised in Khasra No.569/297 W.P.(C) 5661/2015 Page 1 of 12 situated in the revenue estate of village Kharera, Del...
Shri Ved Prakash Garg Trading as M/S Parul Food Products vs.m/s Gurude ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-20-2018
35 $~ * + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(COMM) 1219/2018 & I.A. Nos. 15189/2018 AND151912018 SHRI VED PRAKASH GARG TRADING AS M/S PARUL FOOD PRODUCTS Through: Mr. Umesh Mishra, Advocate ..... Plaintiff versus M/S GURUDEV INDUSTRIES Through: None Date of Decision:20. h December, 2018 ..... Defendant CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J: (Oral) 1. It is pertinent to mention that the present suit has been filed for permanent injunction restraining infringement of trademark and passing off of trade mark, copyright, damages, delivery up, etc. The prayer clause is reproduced hereinbelow:-"32. It is, therefore, most respectfully prayed to this Honble Court that a decree be passed in favour of the plaintiff and against the defendant to the following effects:-"(a) That this Honble Court may kindly be pleased to restrain the defendant, its proprietor, partners, associates, sister concerns, dealers, distributors, manufacturers through itself and through servants,...
Vinod Yadav & Ors. Vs.the State (Nct of Delhi) & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-20-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: December 20, 2018 + CRL.M.C. 6524/2018 & Crl.M.A. 50307/2018 1. VINOD YADAV & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. A.K.Mehta, Advocate Versus THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Neelam Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.-State with SI Arun Kumar Respondent No.2 in person with Mr.U.A.Khan & Mr. Sharukh Khan, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.386/2018, under Sections 420/506/120-B IPC, registered at police station Ghazipur, Delhi is sought, on the premise that the misunderstanding amongst the parties, which led to registration of FIR in question, stands cleared now.2. Upon notice, Ms. Neelam Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State submits that respondent No.2 is the complainant of FIR in question and he is present in the Court and he has been identified to be so, by SI Arun Kumar.3. Respondent No.2 /Complainant submit...
- ‹ Prev
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- Next ›
- Last »