Delhi Court December 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Sh. Amit Jain & Ors. Vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-20-2018
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. 6128/2018 Date of Order: December 20, 2018 SH. AMIT JAIN & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Pradeep Kr. Sharma and Ms. Bharti Rani, Advocates versus STATE & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. M.S.Oberoi, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State with SI Nitin Respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) 1. Quashing of FIR No.398/2015, under Sections 498-A/4of IPC, registered at police station Farsh Bazar, Delhi is sought on the basis of Memorandum of Understanding of 5th March, 2018 arrived at Delhi Mediation Centre, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi and on the ground that petitioner-husband and respondent No.2-wife are living together happily.2. Mr. M.S.Oberoi, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State accepts notice and submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is complainant/first-informant of the FIR in question and she has been identified to be so by SI Nitin on the bas...
Rajesh vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-20-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved On:10. 12.2018 Judgment Pronounced On:20. 12.2018 CRL. A. 323/2015 RAJESH ..... Appellants Through Ms. Saahila Lamba, Advocate Versus STATE ..... Respondent Through Ms. Radhika Kolluru, APP CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL HONBLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL JUDGMENT SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J1 The present appeal under section 374(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as 'Cr.P.C') assails the judgment and order of conviction and order on sentence dated 27.10.2014 and 31.10.2014 Crl. A. 323/2015 Page 1 of 30 respectively, in Sessions Case No.62/1/2010, titled as 'State vs. Rajesh s/o Chandan Singh', emanating from FIR No.57/2010 (hereinafter referred to as the 'subject FIR').2. By way of the impugned judgment and order of conviction and order on sentence dated 27.10.2014 and 31.10.2014 respectively, Rajesh (hereinafter referred to as 'Appellant') was convicted and sentenced under the provisi...
Arvind Singh vs.neeraj
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-20-2018
$~23 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:20. 12.2018 CRL.REV.P.476/2015 & Crl.M.A.10884-10886/2015 & 29358/2018 ARVIND SINGH NEERAJ versus ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the Respondent : Mr.Rahul Rohtagi, Adv. with petitioner in person. : Mr.Arvind Kumar, Adv with respondent in person. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT2012.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner impugns order dated 29.08.2014 whereby the petition filed by the petitioner impugning order dated 28.06.2013 of the Trial Court awarding maintenance to the respondent and the two children was dismissed.2. Parties were referred to mediation, however, the mediation could not succeed. Subsequently, parties once again attempted to settle their disputes and finally their disputes have been settled. CRL.REV.P. 476/2015 Page 1 of 3 Settlement Deed dated 20.12.2018 has been executed.3. Parties are present in p...
Ganga Ram vs.ganga Ram
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-20-2018
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Crl.M.C.6543/2018 Date of Order: December 20, 2018 GANGA RAM STATE & ANR. Through: Mr. Jaspreet Singh, Advocate ........ Petitioner versus Through: Mr. .....Respondents Izhar Ahmad, Additional Public Prosecutor for State with SI Vikram Singh, PS Karawal Nagar, Delhi. Mr. Ram Kumar, Advocate with Respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR1 Quashing of ORDER (ORAL) FIR No.343/2013, under Sections 323/452/354/509/506/427 IPC, registered at police station Karawal Nagar, Delhi is sought on the basis of Settlement Deed of 6th December, 2018 (Annexure-P-2) and also on the ground that the misunderstanding which led to registration of the FIR, now stands cleared between the parties.2. Mr. Izhar Ahmed, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State accepts notice and submits that respondents No.2 is the complaint of FIR in question, who is present in the Court and has been identified to be so by SI Vikram Singh on the ba...
Naveen & Anr. Vs.state (Govt O Nct of Delhi) & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-20-2018
* + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: December 20, 2018 CRL.M.C. 5936/2018 NEETU & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr.O.P.Aggarwal, Advocate Versus STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. M.S.Oberoi, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State with SI Rajinder CRL.M.C. 6156/2018 NAVEEN & ANR. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr.O.P.Aggarwal, Advocate Versus STATE (GOVT O NCT OF DELHI) & ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. M.P.Singh, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State with SI Rajinder CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) 1. In the above captioned first petition, quashing of FIR No.910/2014, whereas in the above captioned second petition, quashing of FIR No.903/2014, both registered at police station Malviya Nagar, New Delhi is sought. FIR No.910/2014 has been registered for offences under Sections 323/354/4IPC and FIR No.903/2014 has been registered for offences under Sections 323/354/506/5IPC. Both th...
Rahul Modi vs.union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-20-2018
#10 & 11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Order delivered on:20. 12.2018 W.P.(CRL) 3842/2018 RAHUL MODI UNION OF INDIA & ORS W.P.(CRL.) 3843/2018 MUKESH MODI versus versus ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS ..... Petitioner UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ..Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioners : Mr. Kapil Sibal, Sr. Advocate and Mr. Sudhir Nandrajog, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Aditya Singla, Mr. Pallav Gupta and Mr. Adit Pujari, Advocates in W.P.(CRL.) 3843/2018 Mr. Siddharth Aggarwal, Advocate with Ms. Supriya Juneja, Ms. Chestha Jetley and Mr. Krishna Multani, Advocates in W.P.(CRL) 3842/2018 For the... RESPONDENTS : Ms. Maninder Acharya, ASG with Mr. Anurag Ahluwalia, CGSC, Mr. Amit Mahajan, CGSC, Ms. Tejaswita Sachdeva, Mr. Viplav Acharya, Mr. Harshul Chaudhary, Advocates Mr. Saud Ahmed, Joint Director, SFIO, Mr. P.C. Maurya, Mr. Prashant Baliyan and Mr. Ajeet Shrivastava, SFIO Officers W.P.(CRL.) 3842/2018 & 3843/2018 Page 1 of 23 CORAM: HON'BLE MR...
The Pr Commissioner of Income Tax-6 vs.nucleus Steel Private Limited
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-20-2018
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI INCOME TAX APPEAL No.978/2018 Reserved on :8. h October, 2018 Date of decision:20. h December, 2018 THE PR COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-6 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, Advocate. versus NUCLEUS STEEL PRIVATE LIMITED ..... Respondent Through: Nemo. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR SANJIV KHANNA, J.: We had heard arguments on the point of admission to examine whether the expression genuineness in the context of the present case has been examined and decided by way of judicial pronouncements. The question of genuineness arises in the present case in somewhat a peculiar situation for the Revenue does not dispute payment of Rs.67.50 crores to the respondent-assessee by M/s Unitech Limited on the ground of identity, creditworthiness and even transfer of money. Genuineness is disputed for the reason that the explanation given by the respondent-assessee for receipt of the amount, i.e. agreemen...
Coastal Projects Limited& Anr. Vs.ifci Limited & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-20-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~ * % + LPA6412016 and CM Nos. 42466-42467/2016, 42469/2016 Reserved on:04. h July, 2018. Date of Decision:20. h December, 2018 &12846/2017 COASTAL PROJECTS LIMITED& ANR.... APPELLANTSSh.Rajshekhar Through: Rao, Ms.Mani Gupta, Ms.Yukti Anand, and Mr.Sameer Dawar, Advocates. versus IFCI LIMITED & ANR ...Respondents Through: Mr. Bindra, Ms.Rishika Arora, Mr.Bhuvnesh and Mr.Sani Abbot, Advs. for IFCI P.S. + LPA6422016 and CM No.42509/2016 RAJEEV DHINGRA ...Appellant Through: Mr.Dayan Krishnan, Sr. Adv. with Ms.Mani Gupta and Ms.Aakashi Lodha, Advs. versus IFCI LIMITED & ORS ...Respondents Through: Mr. Bindra, Ms.Rishika Arora, Mr.Bhuvnesh and Mr.Sani Abbot, Advs. for IFCI P.S. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR CHANDER SHEKHAR, J.1. By this common judgment, we shall dispose of the above-said LPA6412016 & LPA6422016 Page 1 of 20 two Letters Patent Appeals wherein the appellants have challenged the order date...
Mahle Filter Systems India Private Limited vs.mobis India Limited & An ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-20-2018
15 $~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(COMM) 20847/2015, 23316/2015, 949/2017 363/2018 & I.A.Nos.12284/2015, 18716/2015, MAHLE FILTER SYSTEMS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED ..... Plaintiff Through Mr.Rahul Beruar with Ms.Jyotsana Sinha, Advocates. versus MOBIS INDIA LIMITED & ANR ..... Defendants Through Mr.Manish Biala with Mr.Devesh % Ratan and Mr.Ashutosh Upadhyaya, Advocates. Date of Decision:20. h December, 2018 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J: (Oral) 1. Present suit has been filed by plaintiff seeking declaration against groundless threat of legal proceedings for infringement of defendants trade mark and damages, and permanent injunction etc.2. The relevant facts of the present case are that the plaintiff is the exclusive licensee in India of the trademarks MAHLE and PUROLATOR and manufactures and sells automobile and industrial filters including oil and air filters under the said trademarks. The air filters manufactured by the plaintiff are differen...
Rohit Bhargava & Ors. Vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-20-2018
* + 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: December 20, 2018 CRL.M.C. 6528/2018 & C.M. 50325/2018 ROHIT BHARGAVA & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Jitender Gupta & Mr. Deepak Rohilla, Advocates Versus STATE & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Izhar Ahmed, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State with WSI Kailah Kain Respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.23/2017, under Sections 498A/4of IPC, registered at police station Vasant Vihar, New Delhi is sought by petitioners on the basis of mediated settlement of 15th October, 2018 arrived at Counseling Cell, Family Courts, New Delhi (Annexure B).2. Upon notice, Mr. Izhar Ahmed, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State accepts notice and submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is complainant/first-informant of the FIR in question and she has been identified to be so, by WSI Kailash Ken.3. Counsel for petitioners submit...
- ‹ Prev
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- Next ›
- Last »