Delhi Court December 2018 Judgments

Browse smarter

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.

AI Brief & Ask
Semantic AI Search
Devil's Bench

Try free for 7 days Semantic AI Search

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

Dec 31 2018

Amit Kumar vs.kanika Hajika

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Dec-31-2018

$~12 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RFA10462018 & CM No.54958/2018 AMIT KUMAR ..... Appellant KANIKA HAJIKA Through: Mr. T.R. Kashyap, Advocate. versus Through: Mr. Abhishek Harjika, Advocate with ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA Respondent in person. % ORDER3112.2018 SANJEEV NARULA, J.: CM No.54959/2018 (exemption) 1. Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Cav No.12224/2018 2. Since the Caveator has put in appearance, the Caveat stands discharged. RFA10462018 & CM No.54958/2018 3. The present appeal has been filed by the Appellant-Defendant, assailing the preliminary decree and judgment dated 30th November, 2018 in the case bearing Suit No.6032/2018 titled Kanika Hajika v. Amit Kumar whereby the learned Additional District Judge, Delhi has decreed the suit, on an RFA10462018 Page 1 of 16 application filed by the Respondent-Plaintiff under Order 12 Rule 6 Code of Civil Procedure (hereinafter referred to as CPC) with respect to property...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 30 2018

Kuldeep Kumar vs.union of India and Ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Dec-30-2018

$~24 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 2233/2018 Through Mr. Ankur Chhibber, Advocate ........ Petitioner KULDEEP KUMAR UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Gaurang Kanth, Advocate Mr. Brajesh Kumar, Advocate CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA % ORDER3011.2018 Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. The... Petitioner, who joined the Indo-Tibetan Border Police (ITBP) as Constable (GD) on 7th September 1989, seeks the quashing of the order dated 16th October 2017 issued by the... RESPONDENTS rejecting the... Petitioners request for notional promotion to the rank of Head Constable (HC) with effect from 22nd October 2007.2. It appears that during the pendency of the present petition, the... RESPONDENTS themselves withdrew the aforementioned order dated 16th October 2017 by a subsequent order dated 24th April 2018 and granted the... Petitioner notional promotion as HC with effect from 26th November 2011. The... Petitioner, however, seeks notion...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 29 2018

Subhash Chander Rana vs.jitender Verma

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Dec-29-2018

* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI R.C.Rev. No.588/2015 and CM Nos. 25663/2015 & 913/2016 Judgment reserved on :18. 07.2018 Date of decision : December 29th, 2018 SUBHASH CHANDER RANA ..... petitioner Through: Mr. Virendra Singh, Advocate versus JITENDER VERMA ..... Respondent Through: Ms.Swati Rathi with Mr.Pawan Kumar, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA JUDGMENT ANU MALHOTRA, J.CM No.25663/2015 1. Along with the petition is CM No.25663/2015 vide which the petitioner has sought condonation of 78 days delay in filing the petition, submitting to the effect that he had earlier handed over the certified copies of the impugned order which was dated 5.5.2015 which he applied on 23.5.2015 and the Revision Petition was to be filed in July, 2015 but the petitioner suffered from Hyper Tension and being a diabetic also suffered a minor heart attack and had to be treated and thus as his family members had been advised not to discuss anything with the petitioner which may r...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 29 2018

Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd vs.udaibir Singh & Ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Dec-29-2018

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI * + W.P.C No.4119/2014 and CM PPL.8270/2014, 22870/2017 and 47013/2017 Judgment reserved on :03. 04.2018 Date of decision : December 29th, 2018 BHARAT HEAVY ELECTRICALS LTD......... Petitioner Through: Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Senior Advocate with Mr. A.K.Roy, Advocate versus UDAIBIR SINGH & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Asha Jain Madan, Advocate for R-1 to 164 Mr. R.K. Saini, Adv. for R-165- 166. Mr. Arun Bhardwaj, CGSC for R-167-168. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA JUDGMENT ANU MALHOTRA, J.1. The petitioner Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd. vide this petition under Articles 226 & 227 of the Constitution of India seeks the setting aside of the Reference made vide order No.L-42011/55/2013-IR (DU) dated 25.07.2013 vide which the Central Government opined that an industrial dispute exists between the employer in relation to the W.P.(C) 4119/2014 Page 1 of 48 management of the BHEL House and their workmen in respect of the matter specified in...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 29 2018

N K Rai vs.central Board of Investigation

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Dec-29-2018

$~37 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:29. 11.2018 +CRL.M.C. No.6023/2018 & Crl.M.A. 48310/2018 (Exemption) N K RAI Through Ms.Shreya Bhatnagar, Adv. ..... PETITIONER versus CENTRAL BOARD OF INVESTIGATION .... RESPONDENT Through Ms.Rajdipa Behura, Spl.P.P., CBI with Ms.Hansika Sahu, Adv. & Mr.Mohan Kumar, Inspector. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI REKHA PALLI, J (ORAL) 1. Vide the present petition, the petitioner, the Superintendent of Customs, Customs House, Kolkata seeks quashing of the order dated 23rd April, 2015 passed by the learned Special Court, P.C. Act, (CBI)-06, Patiala House Courts, New Delhi. Under the impugned order, the learned Trial Court while considering the closure report filed by the respondent/CBI, had referred the matter to the respondent for further investigation under Section 173(8) Cr.P.C. with a direction that during the course of further investigation, the records of the case be also placed before the sanctioning authority for ...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 28 2018

M/S. Living Media India Ltd. & Anr. Vs.ram Kumar and Ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Dec-28-2018

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: November 28, 2018 (i) + W.P.(C) 3167/2015 (ii) + W.P.(C) 6294/2016 & C.M. 25790/2016 (iii) + W.P.(C) 6295/2016 & C.M. 25792/2016 (iv) + W.P.(C) 6296/2016 & C.M. 25794/2016 & C.M. 25078/2017 (v) + W.P.(C) 6297/2016 & C.M. 25796/2016 (vi) + W.P.(C) 6298/2016 & C.M. 25798/2016 (vii)+ W.P.(C) 6300/2016 & C.M. 25802/2016 (viii)+ W.P.(C) 6301/2016 & C.M. 25804/2016 (ix) + W.P.(C) 6302/2016 & C.M. 25806/2016 (x) + W.P.(C) 6303/2016 & C.M. 25808/2016 M/S. LIVING MEDIA INDIA LTD. & ANR. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Puneet Kumar Verma, Advocate Versus (i) GOVERNMENT OF NATIONAL CAPITAL OF (ii) (iii) (iv) (v) (vi) (vii) (viii) (ix) (x) TERRITORY OF DELHI & ORS. SANJAY KUMAR AND ORS. CHANDAN KUAMR AND ORS. PRITHVIRAJ AND ORS. RAJU CHAUHAN AND ORS. SHASHIKANT MISHRA AND ORS. RAM KUMAR AND ORS. RAMESH PRASAD AND ORS. RAJENDER SINGH AND ORS. RAGHUBIR SINGH THAKUR AND ORS. ....... RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. K. Viswanath, Advocate for responde...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 28 2018