Delhi Court November 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Rakesh Kumar Sharma vs.state & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-28-2018
$~9 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:28. 11.2018 BAIL APPLN. 1498/2018 RAKESH KUMAR SHARMA versus STATE & ORS. ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : For the Respondent : Mr.Y.S.Chauhan, Advocate. Ms.Kusum Dhalla, APP for the State with Insp.Ram Kishan, P.S.Dwarka North. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT2811.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in FIR No.182/2018 under Sections 380/4IPC, Police Station Dwarka.2. The allegations of the complainant in the subject FIR are that the complainant had purchased the subject flat from one Bishambhar, the father of the petitioner through an Agreement to Sell and is in possession of the flat and the petitioner is alleged to have come into the property, broken open the locks and attempted to remove the articles of the complainant. BAIL APPLN. 1498/2018 Page 1 of 3 3. Learned counsel for the petition...
Precious Sapphires Ltd. Vs.amira Pure Foods Private Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-28-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + EX.P. 330/2015 & E.A. No.387/2018 Reserved on:31. 08.2018 Date of decision:28. 11.2018 PRECIOUS SAPPHIRES LTD. ..... Decree Holder Through Ms.Shyel Trehan, Ms.Akshita Sachdeva and Ms.Sugandha Batra, Advs. versus AMIRA PURE FOODS PRIVATE LTD. ..... Judgement Debtor Through Mr.Akhil Sibal, Sr. Adv.with Mr.Deepak Khurana, Mr.Tejasv and Mr.Pradeep Chhindra, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA1 This enforcement petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking enforcement of the Foreign Award dated 04.04.2014 passed by the Sole Arbitrator under the London Maritime Arbitrators Association Rules at London.2. It is not disputed that when the present petition was filed, this Court had the pecuniary jurisdiction to entertain the same. Learned EX.P.No.330/2015 Page 1 senior counsel for the respondent has urged that with the promulgation of the Delhi High Court (Amendment) Act, 2015 (hereinafter referred to as the Delhi High Court Act), read wi...
Sheetal Prasad & Ors vs.state of Delhi.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-28-2018
$~R-1 to 23 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:25. h September, 2018 Pronounced on:28. h November, 2018 CRL.A. 152/1996 SHAMBIR & ORS ..... Appellant Through: Mr. M.L.Yadav and Mr. Karan Dahiya, Advocates Versus Through: Mr. H.J.S. Ahluwalia, Special PP ..... Respondent Through: Mr. M.L.Yadav, Advocate ..... Appellant Versus Through:Mr. H.J.S. Ahluwalia, Special PP ..... Respondent ..... Appellant Through: Mr. M.L.Yadav, Advocate Versus Through: Mr. H.J.S. Ahluwalia, Special PP ..... Respondent STATE CRL.A. 154/1996 RAMJI LAL STATE CRL.A. 155/1996 RAM BALI STATE CRL.A. 156/1996 and Crl.M.A.8358/2014 ..... Appellant Page 1 of 79 + + + + SHIV LAKHAN Crl.A1521996 & connected + + + + STATE CRL.A. 157/1996 JOKHU STATE CRL.A. 158/1996 Through: Mr. M.L.Yadav, Advocate Versus Through: Mr. H.J.S. Ahluwalia, Special PP ..... Respondent Through: Mr. M.L.Yadav, Advocate ..... Appellant Versus Through: Mr. H.J.S. Ahluwalia, Special PP ..... Respondent UDAY PAL SINGH ..... Appella...
Ram Kishan vs.state(govt.of Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-28-2018
$~R-1 to 23 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:25. h September, 2018 Pronounced on:28. h November, 2018 CRL.A. 152/1996 SHAMBIR & ORS ..... Appellant Through: Mr. M.L.Yadav and Mr. Karan Dahiya, Advocates Versus Through: Mr. H.J.S. Ahluwalia, Special PP ..... Respondent Through: Mr. M.L.Yadav, Advocate ..... Appellant Versus Through:Mr. H.J.S. Ahluwalia, Special PP ..... Respondent ..... Appellant Through: Mr. M.L.Yadav, Advocate Versus Through: Mr. H.J.S. Ahluwalia, Special PP ..... Respondent STATE CRL.A. 154/1996 RAMJI LAL STATE CRL.A. 155/1996 RAM BALI STATE CRL.A. 156/1996 and Crl.M.A.8358/2014 ..... Appellant Page 1 of 79 + + + + SHIV LAKHAN Crl.A1521996 & connected + + + + STATE CRL.A. 157/1996 JOKHU STATE CRL.A. 158/1996 Through: Mr. M.L.Yadav, Advocate Versus Through: Mr. H.J.S. Ahluwalia, Special PP ..... Respondent Through: Mr. M.L.Yadav, Advocate ..... Appellant Versus Through: Mr. H.J.S. Ahluwalia, Special PP ..... Respondent UDAY PAL SINGH ..... Appella...
Rajesh Kumar vs.vikram Rana
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-28-2018
$~20 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:-"28th November, 2018 + CRL.M.C. 1988/2016 and Crl. M.A. 8437/2016 RAJESH KUMAR ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. R.K. Kapoor, Ms. Rekha Giri and Ms. Shweta Kapoor, Advocates versus VIKRAM RANA ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sherafgon, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. The petitioner had filed a criminal complaint against the respondent on 18.09.2009 alleging offences under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (NI Act) having been committed. The respondent was acquitted by the Metropolitan Magistrate by judgment dated 24.02.2012 on the finding that the cheque in question was never issued in favour of Rajesh Sahni. The respondent, after such decision, moved an application under Section 340 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, alleging offences punishable under Sections 193, 196, 200, 209, 211 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 having been committed by the petitioner in respect of the cheque in q...
Matrix Infosoft Pvt. Ltd. Vs.planman Tecnologies (India) Pvt. Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-28-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved On:12. 9.2018 Judgment Pronounced On:28.11.2018 + O.M.P. (COMM) 38/2016 MATRIX INFOSOFT PVT. LTD. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Pramod B. Agarwala with Mr. Aayush Agarwala, Advs. versus PLANMAN TECNOLOGIES (INDIA) PVT. LTD...... Respondent Through: Mr. Hem C. Vashisht with Mr. Rahul Malik, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER RAJIV SHAKDHER, J.1. This petition filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereafter referred to as 1996 Act) is directed against the award dated 8.10.2015.2. Briefly, the challenge to the award arises in the background of the following facts:3. The petitioner, who, is the owner of the premises described as: Plot Nos. A-4 and A-29, Sector 9, Noida, admeasuring 1600 square meters, which includes a building constructed thereupon, admeasuring 38,000 sq.ft., (hereafter referred to as the subject property) had entered into a Memorandum of Understanding dated 20.6...
Sonu @ Kuldeep vs.state ( Govt. Of Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-28-2018
$~5 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:28. 11.2018 BAIL APPLN. 627/2018 SONU @ KULDEEP ........ Petitioner versus STATE ( GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : For the Respondent : Mr. M.L. Yadav, Advocate. Mr. Hirein Sharma, APP for the State. SI Anu, PS Mansarovar Park. Ms. Anu Narula, Advocate for the complainant. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT2811.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in case FIR No.446/2017 under Sections 376/354-D/5IPC, Police Station Man Sarovar Park based on a settlement between the complainant and the brother of the petitioner, a co-accused and the Settlement Deed dated 01.03.2018 has been executed. Consequent to the settlement, the complainant has married the brother of the petitioner.2. The petitioner was granted interim protection by order dated BAIL APPLN. 627/2018 Page 1 of 3 21.03.2018 subject to joining ...
Ntpc Limited vs.thiess Minecs India Pvt. Ltd. & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-28-2018
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI O.M.P. (COMM) 429/2017 Reserved on:06. 08.2018 Date of decision :28. 11.2018 NTPC LIMITED ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Vikas Singh, Sr. Adv. with Ms.Bani Dixit, Ms.Deepika, Mr.Kapish Seth, Ms.Srishti Bannerjee, Advs. versus THIESS MINECS INDIA PVT. LTD. & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.P.Chidambaram, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Dhruv Dewan, Mr.Rohan Batra, Ms.Harshita Choubey, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA1 This petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) has been filed by the petitioner challenging the Arbitral Award dated 24.07.2017 passed by the Arbitral Tribunal consisting of three Arbitrators. The Arbitral Tribunal has culled out the majority Award in the following words:-"1) The Claim Petition filed by the Claimants is partly allowed.2) The Counter Claim lodged by the Respondent is also partly allowed.3) The Claimant No.1 is held entitled to a declaration as...
Laxmi Kant Rai vs.shiv Prasad Rai & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-28-2018
$~46 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:-"28th November, 2018 + CRL.M.C. 3823/2015 and Crl. M.A. 48282/2018 LAXMI KANT RAI Through: Kanika Madan, Advocates Mr. Sarvesh Singh and Ms. ....... Petitioner versus SHIV PRASAD RAI & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. L.K. Verma, Ms. Bobby Verma and Mr. Ajay Verma, Advocates for R-3 & 4 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. The petitioner had instituted a criminal complaint case (CC181/14) in the court of the Metropolitan Magistrate alleging offence under Section 420 IPC having been committed by the first to fourth respondents. His application for direction to the police for investigation under Section 156(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) was dismissed by the Metropolitan Magistrate who, however, opted to take cognizance and hold pre-summoning inquiry.2. In the pre-summoning inquiry, the petitioner examined himself, as CW-1, also examining one Brijesh Kumar as CW-2. The Metropolitan Magist...
Becton Dickinson India Private Limited vs.union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-28-2018
$~ 1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:15. 11.2018 Pronounced on:28. 11.2018 + W.P.(C) 6964/2018 & CM APPL.Nos.26379 & 27902 of 2018 BECTON DICKINSON INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED Through: ........ Petitioner Sh.A.S.Chandhiok, Sr.Advocate with Sh.Ritesh, Ms.Vibha Dhawan, Ms.Alvia Ahmed and Sh.Tejaswi Chaudhary, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms.Maninder Acharya, ASG with Sh.Ravi Prakash, CGSC, Sh.Farman Ali, Sh.Sahil Sood, Sh.Harshul Choudhary and Sh.Viplav Acharya, Advocates. Ms.Tanya Mahajan, Respondent No.2. Sh.Vishal Tiwari and Sh.Abhimanyu Lall, Advocate for Respondent No.3. Sh.Chitta Ranjan Biswal in person, for Hindustan Syringes and Medical Devices Ltd. Advocate for CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN MR.JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN % 1. This writ petition concerns two tenders dated March 06, 2018 issued by the respondent for the supply of 0.1 ml Auto-Disabled W.P.(C) 6964/2018 Page 1 of 14 Syr...
- ‹ Prev
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- Next ›
- Last »