Delhi Court November 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Angad Singh Suri vs.central Board of Secondary Education and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-29-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:29. h November, 2018 + W.P.(C) 12541/2018 & CM APPL. 48662/2018 ANGAD SINGH SURI ........ Petitioner Through Ms. Himangi Kapoor, Ms. Prerna Sharma and Mr. Ankit Anand, Advs. versus CENTRAL BOARD OF SECONDARY EDUCATION AND ORS. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Atul Kumar, Adv. for R-1 JUDGMENT (ORAL) The petitioner completed his schooling from the Respondent % 1. No.1-school.2. At the time of his enrolment in the said school, his name was entered in his admission form, as Angad Singh Suri, his fathers name was entered as Pawandeep Singh Suri and his mothers name was entered as Awleen Kaur Suri.3. It appears that, till his 9th Class, the school records of the petitioner reflected his name and the name of mother and father as above i.e. as contained in the admission form.4. However, it is averred that, in the mark sheet issued by the respondent-CBSE for the 10th Board class undertaken ...
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax -2 vs.cincom Systems India Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-29-2018
$~ 2 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI ITA3652018 Date of decision:29. h November, 2018 PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -2..... Appellant Through: Mr.Asheesh Jain, Senior Standing Counsel for the Income Tax Department versus CINCOM SYSTEMS INDIA PVT. LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Kislaya Parashar and Mr.Umang Luthra, Advocates for the respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI SANJIV KHANNA, J.(ORAL): Present appeal under Section 260-A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 ('Act" for short) in the case of M/s. Cincom Systems India Pvt. Ltd. is directed against the order dated 16th June, 2017 passed by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal ('Tribunal' for short) and pertains to the assessment year 2008-09.2. The respondent-assessee, a company, was engaged in twin business of development and support of computer software of the parent company; and import and marketing of computer software and supplying the same to the end user. For the ass...
Dalip Singh & Ors vs.state & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-29-2018
$~17 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 4664/2015 Decided on:29. h November, 2018 DALIP SINGH & ORS ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Rajat Anaja and Mr. Muhammad Parbesh, Advocates versus STATE & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Kewal Singh Ahuja, APP for the State with ASI Dinesh Kumar Mr. Multan Singh, Advocate for R-2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. The first information report (FIR) no.2was registered by police station Sriniwaspuri, at the instance of the second respondent (complainant), allegations of offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 448, 380, 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) having been leveled against the petitioner. The police, after investigation, submitted report (charge-sheet) under Section 173 of the Code of the Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr. PC) to seek trial of the petitioners herein for the said offences. The Metropolitan Magistrate took cognizance on the said report and having secured the presence of the petit...
Kiran Infra Engineers Limited vs.northern Railways
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-29-2018
$~4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:29. 11.2018 + ARB.P. 169/2018 1. KIRAN INFRA ENGINEERS LIMITED ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Siddharth Sharma and Ms. Shruti versus Arora, Advs. NORTHERN RAILWAYS ..... Respondent Through Mr. Shivam Tripathi, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER % This is a petition filed under Section 11 of the Arbitration and ORDER2911.2018 Conciliation Act, 1996 (in short the Act) seeking appointment of an Arbitrator.2. 3. Upon notice being issued, reply has been filed by the respondent. Briefly, the following facts need to be noticed for adjudication of the instant petition.4. In and about 2010, the respondent floated a tender, inter alia, for S&T work at Prayag Ghat in connection with the provision of additional loop at Mehgawan, Khetasarai, Katehari Rudouli and Rasouli of Lucknow Division of Northern Railway. 4.1 The petitioner bid for the tender and was thereafter, declared successful.5. A Letter of Acceptance was, conseq...
Si /Gd Pramod Yadav & Ors. Vs.union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-28-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:15. h November 2018 Decided on:28. h November, 2018 + W.P.(C) 2197/2014 SI /GD PRAMOD YADAV & ORS. .....Petitioners UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Through: Mr. Ankur Chibber, Advocate. versus ....Respondents Through: Mr. Rajesh Kumar Gogna, CGSC with Mr. Upendra Sai & Mr. Akhilesh Kumar, Advocates. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA JUDGMENT Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. The present writ petition has been filed by 33 Sub Inspectors/General Duty (SI/GD) of the Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF) against the Director General of the CRPF (Respondent No.2), the Inspector General (Personnel) of the CRPF (Respondent No.3), and 634 private... RESPONDENTS (arrayed as Respondent Nos.4 to 637). It is prayed that the order dated 14th October 2013 issued by the Directorate General of the CRPF, whereby the claims of the... Petitioners in relation to their seniority in the rank of SI/GD were rejected, as well as the seniority list dated 27t...
Jeet Singh & Ors. Vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-28-2018
$~R-1 to 23 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:25. h September, 2018 Pronounced on:28. h November, 2018 CRL.A. 152/1996 SHAMBIR & ORS ..... Appellant Through: Mr. M.L.Yadav and Mr. Karan Dahiya, Advocates Versus Through: Mr. H.J.S. Ahluwalia, Special PP ..... Respondent Through: Mr. M.L.Yadav, Advocate ..... Appellant Versus Through:Mr. H.J.S. Ahluwalia, Special PP ..... Respondent ..... Appellant Through: Mr. M.L.Yadav, Advocate Versus Through: Mr. H.J.S. Ahluwalia, Special PP ..... Respondent STATE CRL.A. 154/1996 RAMJI LAL STATE CRL.A. 155/1996 RAM BALI STATE CRL.A. 156/1996 and Crl.M.A.8358/2014 ..... Appellant Page 1 of 79 + + + + SHIV LAKHAN Crl.A1521996 & connected + + + + STATE CRL.A. 157/1996 JOKHU STATE CRL.A. 158/1996 Through: Mr. M.L.Yadav, Advocate Versus Through: Mr. H.J.S. Ahluwalia, Special PP ..... Respondent Through: Mr. M.L.Yadav, Advocate ..... Appellant Versus Through: Mr. H.J.S. Ahluwalia, Special PP ..... Respondent UDAY PAL SINGH ..... Appella...
Sangu vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-28-2018
$~R-1 to 23 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:25. h September, 2018 Pronounced on:28. h November, 2018 CRL.A. 152/1996 SHAMBIR & ORS ..... Appellant Through: Mr. M.L.Yadav and Mr. Karan Dahiya, Advocates Versus Through: Mr. H.J.S. Ahluwalia, Special PP ..... Respondent Through: Mr. M.L.Yadav, Advocate ..... Appellant Versus Through:Mr. H.J.S. Ahluwalia, Special PP ..... Respondent ..... Appellant Through: Mr. M.L.Yadav, Advocate Versus Through: Mr. H.J.S. Ahluwalia, Special PP ..... Respondent STATE CRL.A. 154/1996 RAMJI LAL STATE CRL.A. 155/1996 RAM BALI STATE CRL.A. 156/1996 and Crl.M.A.8358/2014 ..... Appellant Page 1 of 79 + + + + SHIV LAKHAN Crl.A1521996 & connected + + + + STATE CRL.A. 157/1996 JOKHU STATE CRL.A. 158/1996 Through: Mr. M.L.Yadav, Advocate Versus Through: Mr. H.J.S. Ahluwalia, Special PP ..... Respondent Through: Mr. M.L.Yadav, Advocate ..... Appellant Versus Through: Mr. H.J.S. Ahluwalia, Special PP ..... Respondent UDAY PAL SINGH ..... Appella...
National Agricultrual Cooperative Marketing Federation of India Ltd. V ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-28-2018
$~84 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + EFA (OS) 18/2018 & CM APPL. 49130/2018 (for stay) NATIONAL AGRICULTRUAL COOPERATIVE MARKETING FEDERATION OF INDIA LTD. .... Appellant Through Mr. Sachin Dutta, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sunil J.Mathews, Mr. Aaditya Vijay Kumar, Ms. Liza Baruah, Ms. Akshita Katoch, Ms. Ayushi Kumar and Mr. Anurag Tiwari, Advocates. ALIMENTA S.A. versus ..... Respondent Through Mr. Arvind K. Nigam, Senior Advocate with Mr. Shaildendra Swaroop, Ms. Aparajita Swaroop, Mr. Mikhil Sharda and Mr. Mehtaap Singh Sandhu, Advocates. CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA ORDER2811.2018 % Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. This is an appeal by the National Agricultural Cooperative Marketing Federation (NAFED), the Judgment Debtor (JD), against an order dated 31st October, 2018 passed by the learned Single Judge in EA (OS) 392 of 2017 filed by Alimenta S.A. the Respondent Decree Holder (DH) for a direction to the JD to deposit the decretal amount with interest. EFA ...
Dr Ashwani Maichand vs.ravi Rai & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-28-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision:28. h November, 2018 + LPA5802018, CM Nos.42580-42582/2018 DR ASHWANI MAICHAND ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Nagendar Rai, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Abinash Kumar & Mr. Manoj Kumar, Advs. versus RAVI RAI & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Abhinav Shrivastava, Adv. with Mr. Rahul Gupta & Ms. Sana Kamra, Advs. for R-1 Mr. Praveen Khattar, Adv. for R- 3/DMC CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO V. KAMESWAR RAO, J.(ORAL) CM Nos.42581-42582/2018 Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions. Application stands disposed of. LPA5802018 1. The challenge in this appeal by Dr. Ashwani Maichand is, to the order / judgment dated August 20, 2018 passed in W.P.(C) No.10625/2017. Suffice it to state, vide the order / judgment dated LPA5802018 Page 1 of 11 August 20, 2018, the learned Single Judge has decided two writ petitions being W.P.(C) Nos. 10506/2017 and 10625/2017 both filed by Mr. Ravi Rai.2. The two wr...
Rakesh Kumar Sharma vs.state & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-28-2018
$~9 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:28. 11.2018 BAIL APPLN. 1498/2018 RAKESH KUMAR SHARMA versus STATE & ORS. ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : For the Respondent : Mr.Y.S.Chauhan, Advocate. Ms.Kusum Dhalla, APP for the State with Insp.Ram Kishan, P.S.Dwarka North. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT2811.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in FIR No.182/2018 under Sections 380/4IPC, Police Station Dwarka.2. The allegations of the complainant in the subject FIR are that the complainant had purchased the subject flat from one Bishambhar, the father of the petitioner through an Agreement to Sell and is in possession of the flat and the petitioner is alleged to have come into the property, broken open the locks and attempted to remove the articles of the complainant. BAIL APPLN. 1498/2018 Page 1 of 3 3. Learned counsel for the petition...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- Next ›
- Last »