Delhi Court November 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
National Federation of the Blind vs.union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-12-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: November 12, 2018 % + W.P.(C) 3817/2018, CM Nos. 15143/2018, 18933/2018 & 18935/2018 NATIONAL FEDERATION OF THE BLIND ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. S.K. Rungta (Sr. Adv.) petitioner in person with Mr. Shivankur Shukla, Adv. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Dev. P. Bhardwaj, CGSC for R1 Ms. Monika Arora, SC (JNU) with Mr. Harsh Ahuja, Mr. Kushal Kumar, Ms. Vibha Tripathi, Advs. for R3/JNU with Mr. M.K. Pachori, Deputy Registrar for JNU CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO V. KAMESWAR RAO, J.(ORAL) 1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner Federation inter alia seeking relief that the selection to M.Phil / Ph.D and Ph.D. courses in respondent no.3 has to be on relaxed standards and on the basis of the marks obtained both in written examination and viva-voce.2. It is the submission of Mr. S.K. Rungta, learned Sr. Counsel / representative of the petitio...
Puran Chand vs.the Management of M/S Delhi Transport Corporation
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-12-2018
$~3 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI LPA2702016 PURAN CHAND ..... Appellant versus Through: Mr. Sourabh Ahuja, Advocate. THE MANAGEMENT OF M/S DELHI TRANSPORT CORPORATION ..... Respondent CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA Through: Mr. Fahad Imtiaz, Advocate. % ORDER1211.2018 1. This appeal under Clause 10 of Letters Patent Appeal read with Delhi High Court Act and Rules framed thereunder is directed against the judgment dated 3rd February 2016 passed in W.P. (C) 198/2004 whereby the Learned Single Judge has allowed the writ petition and set aside the order dated 26th May 2003 passed by the Presiding Officer, Industrial Tribunal-II, Karkardooma Courts. In allowing the writ petition, the learned Single Judge has granted approval to the management on its application under Section 33(2)(b) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (hereinafter referred to as the Act). Background 2. The brief facts relevant for disposal of the present appeal are that on 15th LPA270201...
Mrs. Rekha Kapoor vs.dr. Pawan Chandra & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-12-2018
$~OS-8 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:12. 11.2018 CS(OS) 178/2017 MRS. REKHA KAPOOR ..... Plaintiff Through Ms.Mala Goel, Adv. versus DR. PAWAN CHANDRA & ANR ..... Defendant Through Mr.Abhijat and Ms. Sanam Tripathi, Advs. for D-1. Ms.Manmeet Arora, Ms. Samapika Biswal and Mr. Tarang Gupta, Advs. for D-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(Oral) 1. On 27.04.2018 this court had framed the following issues:-"(i) Whether at all it is open to the defendants to lead evidence to the effect that notwithstanding the rent of the property being shown as income of the HUF, the property did not vest in the HUF?. OPD1&2 (ii) If the above issue is decided in favour of the defendants no.l&2, whether notwithstanding the rent of the property being shown as income of the HUF, the property was not vested in the HUF?. OPDl&2. (iii) Whether the HUF had any other assets, and if so, what all?. OPP (iv) Relief 2. This court had also ordered that issue No.(i...
M/S Luxottica Group s.p.a & Another vs.m/s Mify Solutions Pvt Ltd & Or ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-12-2018
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on :23. d July, 2018 Date of decision :12th November, 2018 CS(COMM) 453/2016 & I.As. 15914/2014, 5100/2018, 5101/2018 & O.A. 41/2018 M/S LUXOTTICA GROUP S.P.A & ANOTHER ..... Plaintiffs Through: Mr. Vinay Kumar Shukla, Advocate. versus M/S MIFY SOLUTIONS PVT LTD & ORS. ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Abhishek Anand Rai, Advocate. CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH JUDGMENT Prathiba M. Singh, J.1. The Plaintiff is a company engaged in the business of manufacturing and marketing a wide range of goods related to eyewear including lenses, sunglasses, optical frames and related goods. A company by name of M/s. Oakley Inc. was formed in the year 1975 which had created and coined the mark OAKLEY. The said word was used as part of the trade mark and as a trade name in relation to various goods, such as sports gear equipment, used in bikes and motorcycles, helmets, pads, motorcycle grips, number plates, elbow guards, chin guards, goggles etc. ...
Kishore Chand Joshi vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-12-2018
$~9 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:12.11.2018 CRL.REV.P. 627/2016 KISHORE CHAND JOSHI STATE versus ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Ms. Inderjeet Sidhu, Advocate. (DHCLSC) For the Respondent : Mr. Hirein Sharma, APP for the State. SI Rahul Kumar, PS Shakarpur. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT1211.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner impugns judgment dated 07.05.2016 of the Appellate Court, whereby, the Appellate Court has dismissed the appeal of the petitioner impugning judgment on conviction dated 29.10.2015 and partly allowed the appeal of the petitioner insofar as it related to order on sentence dated 29.01.2016.2.... Petitioner was convicted of an offence under Sections 304A/279 IPC. The Trial Court had sentenced the petitioner to undergo simple imprisonment of 15 months for the offence under Section 304A IPC and 5 months for the offence under Section...
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax -4, vs.international Coal Ventures Pvt. ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-12-2018
$~48 * + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI ITA11742018 Reserved on:29. h October, 2018 Pronounced on:12. h November, 2018 PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -4, ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Asheesh Jain, Sr. Standing Counsel for Income Tax Department. versus INTERNATIONAL COAL VENTURES PVT. LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Aneesh Mittal, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI SANJIV KHANNA, J.Having considered the order passed by the Commissioner of Income- tax (Appeals) and the questions raised, we deem it appropriate to issue notice to the respondent-assessee for due consideration of the issue. Issue notice to respondent by all modes, returnable on 21st January, 2019. SANJIV KHANNA, J.ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI, J.NOVEMBER12h, 2018 ssn ITA11742018 Page 1 of 1...
L’oreal vs.brandworld & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-12-2018
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on :24. h July, 2018 Date of decision :12th November, 2018 CS(COMM) 980/2016 & I.A. 24186/2014 LOREAL ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Rishi Bansal and Mr. Vinay Advocates. Shukla, Kumar (M:9654130460) versus BRANDWORLD & ANR. ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Nitin Sharma and Ms. Snehima Jauhri, Advocates for Defendant No.2 (M:9910739913) CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH JUDGMENT Prathiba M. Singh, J.1. The Plaintiff has filed the present suit seeking an injunction against use of the trademark LOREAL by the Defendants and sale of LOREAL products on the Defendants website www.ShopClues.com. The Plaintiff is engaged in the business of manufacture, distribution, 2. and sale of a wide range of hair care, skin care, eye care, cosmetics and beauty products including but not limited to perfumery preparation, cosmetics, preparations for colouring and bleaching the hair, hair dyes and tints, non-medicated preparations for the care and beauty of t...
Kawaljeet Bansal vs.kavita Jain & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-12-2018
$~139 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Order:12. 11.2018 CM (M) No.1366/2018 KAWALJEET BANSAL ........ Petitioner Through: Dr. Anurag Kumar Agarwal, Adv. and Mr. Umesh Mishra, Advs. versus KAVITA JAIN & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Shiv C. Garg, Adv. and Mr. G. Tyagi, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL CM APPL. 46769/2018 (exemption) 1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application is disposed of.2. CM(M) 1366/2018 3. The order dated 08.10.2018 passed by the Court of learned Additional District Judge-03, (Central) Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi (ADJ) dismissing the application of the petitioner under Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) for a direction to the respondent to deposit the conversion charges/parking charges qua the tenanted premises is the subject CM (M) No.1366/2018 Page 1 of 5 matter of challenge in this petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India.4. Admittedly, the petitioner/defendant has taken the...
Eastern Software Systems Pvt. Ltd. Vs.joy of Giving Global Foundation ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-12-2018
$~2 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:12. 11.2018 ARB.P. 27/2017 EASTERN SOFTWARE SYSTEMS PVT. LTD. Through Mr. Chandra Shekhar Yadav, Adv. ........ Petitioner versus JOY OF GIVING GLOBAL FOUNDATION & ANR ....... RESPONDENTS Through None CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER RAJIV SHAKDHER, J.(ORAL) 1. The record shows that service qua the respondents via publication stands completed. This is evident upon perusal of the order dated 8.10.2018 passed by the Joint Registrar (Judicial). 1.1 Despite service, there is no appearance on behalf of the respondents. The respondents are, accordingly, proceeded ex-parte.2. I may only note that respondent no.2 has been arrayed as a party to the present proceedings in his capacity as Director of respondent no.1 company. 2.1 Clearly, there was no necessity to implead respondent no.2 as a party to the present proceedings. 2.2 This aspect is conceded to by the counsel for the petitioner.3. That being said, it is the peti...
r.p. Garg vs.a.v. Impex
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-12-2018
* + % R.P. GARG IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RFA No.530/2006 12th November, 2018 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. R.M. Sinha and Mr. P.M. Sinha Advocates (Mobile No.9811478026). A.V. IMPEX versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rajesh Manchanda and Mr. Rajat Manchanda, Advocates. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) is filed by the defendant in the suit impugning the judgment of the trial court dated 22.07.2006 by which the trial court has decreed the suit of the respondent/plaintiff by passing a money decree for a sum of Rs. 9,15,055/- along with interest RFA No.530/2006 Page 1 of 12 at 8% per annum on account of goods (non-basmati rice) sold by respondent/plaintiff to the appellant/defendant.2. The facts of the case are that the respondent/plaintiff filed the subject suit pleading that the parties had entered into an Agre...
- ‹ Prev
- 47
- 48
- 49
- 50
- 51
- 53
- 54
- 55
- 56
- 57
- Next ›
- Last »