Delhi Court November 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-2 vs.m/s Caraf Builders & Constructions ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-13-2018
$~57 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + ITA12602018 Date of decision:13. h November, 2018 PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-2 ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Zoheb Hossain, St. Standing Counsel with Ms.Sampurna Sanyal and Mr.Piyush Goyal, Advs. versus M/S CARAF BUILDERS & CONSTRUCTIONS PVT. LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Ms.Devika Jain, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI SANJIV KHANNA, J.(ORAL) CM No.46986/2018 (seeking condonation of delay) This is an application seeking condonation of 36 days delay in re- filing the appeal. Learned counsel for the respondent-assessee has appeared on advance notice and does not oppose the application. The application is accordingly allowed. ITA12602018 This appeal by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short the Act) in the case of M/s. Caraf Builders & ITA No.1260/2018 Page 1 of 10 Construction Pvt. Ltd. ('respondent-assessee' for short) relates to the Assessment Year 2...
Rajinder Pal Singh vs.the State Govt. Of Nct of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-13-2018
$~23 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:13. 11.2018 CRL.REV.P. 155/2018 RAJINDER PAL SINGH ........ Petitioner versus THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Mr. Pradeep Teotia with Mr. Harmeet Singh, Advocates with petitioner in person. ........ RESPONDENTS For the... RESPONDENTS : Ms. Kusum Dhalla, APP for the State. Mr. K. Venkatraman with Mr. Anil Jasyal and Mr. Neeraj, Advocates for respondent with respondent in person. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT1311.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) CRL.REV.P. 155/2018 & Crl.M.(Bail) 342/2018 1.... Petitioner impugns judgment dated 13.02.2018, whereby, the Appellate Court rejected the appeal of the petitioner impugning judgment of conviction dated 05.06.2017 and order on sentence dated 30.06.2017.2.... Petitioner was convicted of an offence under Section 138 Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881 and sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment ...
Uoi vs.gajraj Singh & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-13-2018
$~21 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:13. h November, 2018 + W.P.(C) 6487/2002 UOI ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Bhagwan Swarup Shukla, CGSC with Mr.Kamaldeep & Mr.Shravan Kumar Shukla, Advocates versus GAJRAJ SINGH & ORS. ..... Respondent Through: Mr.K.C.Mittal, Ms.Ruchika Mittal & Mr.Amit Prakash Shahi, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN S.RAVINDRA BHAT, J.(ORAL) ORDER1311.2018 The petitioner, Union of India is aggrieved by the findings of the % 1. Central Administrative Tribunal [hereinafter referred as CAT]. which the respondent/officer approached complaining of arbitrariness in terms of promotion.2. The brief facts are that the respondent [hereinafter referred to as applicant]. was working as Assistant Commissioner of Police [hereinafter referred to as ACP]. on ad-hoc basis from 16.11.1990 against a regular vacancy. The cadre strength of ACPs was increased to 278 from the W.P.(C) 6487/2002 Page 1 of 4...
r.k. Sharma vs.union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-13-2018
$~21. * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:13. 11.2018 % W.P.(C) 4760/2018 & C.M. No.18339/2018 R.K. SHARMA Through: Mr. Prateek Tushar Mohanty and Mr. Tushar Ranjan Mohanty, Advocates ........ Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ..... Respondent CORAM: Through: Mr. Arun Bhardwaj, CGSC and Mr. Nikhil Bhardwaj, Adv. with Mr. Amardev Bahlwal, Section Officer HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A. K. CHAWLA VIPIN SANGHI, J.(ORAL) The petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 21.02.2017 passed by the 1. Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT/ Tribunal) in O.A. No.38/2014. The petitioners claim for ante-dating his second financial upgradation benefit under the MACP scheme from 01.09.2008 to 01.01.2006 has been rejected by the tribunal.2. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he limits his claim to preponement of the date of grant of second financial upgradation under the MACP scheme to 01.01.2006, and he does not claim a...
Shiv Kant vs.union of India and Others
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-12-2018
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.5890/2018 & CM.22952/2018 & 43730-33/2018 Reserved on:2. d November, 2018 Date of decision:12. h November, 2018 SHIV KANT Through Mr. Gopal Jain, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Amit Dubey & Mr. Jayant Mehta, Advocates. versus ........ Petitioner UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS .....Respondents Through Mr. Dev. P. Bhardwaj, CGSC & Ms. Akanksha Mishra, Advocate for respondent Nos. 1, 2 and 16. Ms. Purti Marwaha & Ms. Henna George, Advocates for the respondent-J.K. Jute Mills Company Limited. Ms. Geeta Luthra, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Ujjawal Jain & Mr. Prateek Yadav, Advs for respondent No.4. Mr. Gaurav Kejriwal & Mr. Atanu Mukherjee, Advocates for respondent No.7. Mr. Ashok Kumar Jain & Mr. Karan Khanna, Advocates for respondent No.8. Mr. G.S. Narula, Mr. Bhavit Yadav, Mr. Kushal Mangal & Ms. Shefali Chopra, Advocates for respondent Nos. 9 and 10. Mr. Avneesh Garg & Ms. Vaishali Dixit, Advocates for the applicant/impleader. CORAM: HO...
Lilu Kumar vs.devyani Mungali & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-12-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:12. h November, 2018. % + FAO(OS) 165/2018, CM Nos. 46745-46746/2018 LILU KUMAR Through: Mr. Sudhir Nandrajog, Sr. Adv. with ..... Appellant Ms. Mercy Hussain, Adv. versus DEVYANI MUNGALI & ORS Through: None. ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO V. KAMESWAR RAO, J.(ORAL) CM. No.46745/2018 (for exemption) Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions. Application stands disposed of. FAO(OS) 165/2018 1. The present appeal has been filed by the appellant challenging the order dated 25th September, 2018 in IA No.12903/2018 in CS(OS) No.3646/2014 passed by the learned Single Judge whereby the learned Single Judge has dismissed the said IA seeking recall of order dated 17th October, 2016 whereby the application being IA No.8108/2016 for restoration of the Suit was dismissed. FAO(OS) 165/2018 Page 1 of 6 2. It is the submission of Mr. Sudhir Nandrajog, learned Sr. Counsel appeari...
Swarup Group of Industries & Anr vs.national Agricultural Cooperative ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-12-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:12. h November, 2018 O.M.P. (COMM) 491/2016 SWARUP GROUP OF INDUSTRIES & ANR ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Mohit Chaudhary & Ms. Shrishti Gupta, Advocates (M-9810663997). versus NATIONAL AGRICULTURAL COOPERATIVE MARKETING FEDERATION OF INDIA ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Aaditya Vijay Kumar, Ms. Akshita Katoch, Advocates (M- 8384024970) with Mr. Anurag Tiwari, Law officer. $~21 * + CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.(Oral) The present petition has been filed challenging the award dated 31st 1. December, 2013 by which the Ld. Sole Arbitrator has directed the... Petitioners herein to pay to the Claimant a sum of Rs.92,88,46,688/-. The award is brief and is set out herein below: 1. During the meetings held on 29th June, 2012 and 9th October, 2012, Mr. Guruswarup Srivastava (Respondent No.2 and owner of Respondent No1) appearing before the Tribunal admitted in categorical terms that the total amount payable by ...
Jatinder Singh & Ors. Vs.state (Govt. Of Nct of Delhi) & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-12-2018
$~25 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 4624/2016 Decided on:-"12th November, 2018 JATINDER SINGH & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. M.A. Karthik, Advocate versus STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Kewal Singh Ahuja, APP for the State with SI Amit Sehrawat Mr. Manish Phogat, Adv. for-2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. The second respondent was married to the first petitioner on 21.02.2011 in accordance with the provisions of Special Marriage Act, 1954. On 23.02.2012, she lodged first information report (no.67/2012) with police station Hari Nagar alleging offences punishable under Section 498A, 34 IPC against her husband (first petitioner), his brother (second petitioner), his mother (third petitioner) and his father (fourth petitioner). On conclusion of investigation, police filed report under Section 173 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr. PC) on which cognizance was taken, the said matter being pen...
Rahul Kulshreshtra vs.triveni Media Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-12-2018
$~CP-18 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:12. 11.2018 CO.PET. 15/2012 RAHUL KULSHRESHTRA ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Pankaj Bhatia, Mr.Dhruv Surana and Mr.Ashish Chaudhury, Advs. TRIVENI MEDIA LTD versus ..... Respondent Through Mr.Harish Malhotra, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Sanjay S.Chhabra, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(ORAL) 1. This petition is filed under section 433(b), (e), (f), 434 and 439 of the Companies Act, 1956 seeking winding up of the respondent company. The case of the petitioner is that the petitioner is the ex employee of the respondent company. He joined the respondent company on 01.06.2007 as Chief Executive Officer in terms of appointment letter dated 30.3.2007. It is pleaded that the respondent company stopped giving salary to the petitioner all of a sudden from September 2008 onwards on the plea that the respondent company was going into losses and that the salary would be paid as soon as funds are available. It i...
Mohammed Ilyas Abha M a vs.union of India and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-12-2018
$~ *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:12. h November, 2018 + W.P.(C) 3063/2018 % 1. MOHAMMED ILYAS ABHA M A Through: Mr. Usman Khan, Adv. ........ Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Anil Soni, CGSC with Mr.Abhinav Tyagi, Adv. for R-1. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT (ORAL) The petitioner, who is pursuing his Post Graduate Diploma in Management at the Indian Institute of Management, Rohtak, registered for the Scholarship Programme of the Ministry of Minority Affairs, known as the Merit-cum-Means Scholarship Programme.2. This scholarship programme avowedly is intended for the educational empowerment of six notified Minority Communities i.e. Muslim, Christian, Sikh, Buddhist, Jain and Parsi. Under the said Scheme, scholarship is awarded to students pursuing technical and professional courses at under graduate and post graduate levels.3. For the purposes of the present petition, it is not necessary to enter ...
- ‹ Prev
- 45
- 46
- 47
- 48
- 49
- 51
- 52
- 53
- 54
- 55
- Next ›
- Last »