Delhi Court November 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Shan Mohammad vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-29-2018
$~3 & 4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + + Judgment delivered on:29. 11.2018 BAIL APPLN. 2061/2017 NOOR HASAN versus STATE BAIL APPLN. 2063/2017 SHAN MOHAMMAD STATE versus ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Mr.J.S.Arya, Advocate. For the Respondent : Mr. Hirein Sharma, APP for the State. SI Naveen Dahiya, P.S.South Avenue. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT2911.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioners seek anticipatory bail in FIR No.31/2017, under Sections 419/420468/120B read with Section 66D of the Information Technology Act, P.S.South Avenue.2. Allegations against the petitioners are that petitioners had assured the complainant for securing Government jobs against consideration.... Petitioners are alleged to have taken a total sum of Rs.6 lakhs from the BAIL APPLN. 2061/2017 & 2063/2017 Page 1 of 2 complainant and his associates.3. The parties h...
Sew Infrastructure Ltd. & Anr. Vs.state of Nct of Delhi & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-29-2018
$~41 to 45 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + + + Decided on:29. h November, 2018 CRL.M.C. 6032/2018 & Crl.M.A. 48331-33/2018 SEW INFRASTRUCTURE LTD & ANR ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Mohit Mathur, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Jitendra Kr. Jha, Adv. versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR ....... RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Amit Ahlawat, APP for the State. CRL.M.C. 6033/2018 & Crl.M.A. 48334-36/2018 SEW INFRASTRUCTURE LTD. & ANR. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Mohit Mathur, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Jitendra Kr. Jha, Adv. versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Amit Ahlawat, APP for the State. CRL.M.C. 6034/2018 & Crl.M.A. 48337-39/2018 SEW INFRASTRUCTURE LTD & ANR ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Mohit Mathur, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Jitendra Kr. Jha, Adv. versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Amit Ahlawat, APP for the State. Crl. M.C. No.6032/2018 & conn. Page 1 of 5 + + CRL.M.C. 6035/2018 & Crl.M.A. 48340-42/2018 SEW INFRASTRUCTURE LTD & A...
Premier Nutrition vs.industrial Progressive (India) Limited & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-29-2018
$~ * + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(COMM) 1371/2016 & I.A. 9229/2014 PREMIER NUTRITION ..... Plaintiff Through: Ms. Girija Krishan Varma, Advocate versus INDUSTRIAL PROGRESSIVE (INDIA) LIMITED & ORS. Through: None. ..... Defendants Date of Decision:29. h November, 2018 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J (Oral) 1. Present suit has been filed for permanent injunction restraining infringement of trade marks, infringement of copyright, delivery up of goods, rendition of accounts and damages.2. The prayer clause in the present suit is reproduced hereinbelow:-"(i) A decree of permanent injunction restraining the Defendant Nos. 1 & 2 by itself as also through their individual proprietors, partners, directors, agents, affiliates, employees, representatives, distributors, retailers, developers, subsidiaries, assigns, heirs, successors and all others acting for and on their CS (COMM) 1371/2016 Page 1 of 9 behalf from using, selling, soliciting, exporting, di...
Deept Sarup Agarwal vs.s. Randhir Singh Chandhok & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-29-2018
$~OS-21 * % + CS(OS) 535/2017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:29. 11.2018 ..... Plaintiff DEEPT SARUP AGARWAL Through Mr.Vaibhav Sethi and Mr.Rahul Kumar, Advs. versus S. RANDHIR SINGH CHANDHOK & ORS ..... Defendants Through Mr.Tanmaya Mehta, Mr.Anurag Sahay and Mr.Raghav Wadhwa, Advs. for D-1. Mr.Amit Sethi, Adv. for D-2. Mr.P.S.Bindra, Adv. with Ms.Rishika Arora, Adv.for D-3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(ORAL) IA No.14829/2018 and 14830/2018 1. This application IA148292018 is filed by defendant No.2 seeking modification/rectification of the order of this court dated 09.10.2018. IA No.14830/2018 is filed by defendant No.3 with a somewhat similar prayer, namely, to modify the order of this court dated 09.10.2018.2. The facts of the matter are within a narrow compass. The plaintiff entered into an Agreement to Sell on 06.02.2017 with late Sh. Prehlad Singh Chandhok regarding the suit property. It was agreed that the total consideration ...
Reza Daru Pars Company & Ors vs.nani Pharmaceuticals Pvt Ltd & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-29-2018
$~21 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(COMM) 194/2016 REZA DARU PARS COMPANY & ORS ..... Plaintiffs Through: Mr. Rajiv Kumar Tripathi and Mr. Hare Ram Tiwary, Advs. Versus NANI PHARMACEUTICALS PVT LTD & ANR ..... Defendants CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW Through: None. ORDER2911.2018 % IA No.16262/2108 (of plaintiffs for video recording of evidence) 1. The plaintiffs had earlier filed IA No.14776/2018 which had come up before this Court on 29th October, 2018, when the counsel for the defendant No.1 as well as the counsel for the defendant No.2 had appeared on advance notice and the prayer was allowed but the relief not granted and the application rejected owing to the plaintiffs having not mentioned the Co- ordinator at the remote end for the purpose of video recording of evidence.2. The counsel for the plaintiffs in this application states that the Co- ordinator at the remote end is not required to be mentioned and has to be appointed by the Court and has c...
Osa Vendita Pvt. Ltd. Vs.bausch & Lomb India Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-29-2018
$~2 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI ARB.P. 485/2018 Date of decision :29. h November, 2018 OSA VENDITA PVT. LTD. ....... Petitioner Through: Ms.Karuna Nundy, Mr.Anivesh Bhardwaj, Ms.Krishna Parkhani, Mr.Ishaan Kakri, Advs. versus BAUSCH & LOMB INDIA PVT. LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Ms.Mukti Chaudhary, Ms.Tejaswini, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA NAVIN CHAWLA, J.(Oral) 1. This petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) has been filed by the petitioner seeking the appointment of an Arbitrator for adjudicating the disputes that have arisen between the parties in relation to the Distributorship Agreement dated 24.09.2003 executed between the Bausch & Lomb Eyecare (India) Private Limited, which is now the respondent herein, and Mr. Arvindam Mukherjee and Mr. Ravi Kant Thakkar, who jointly formed a partnership under the name and style of M/s Om Sai Agencies. ARB.P. 485/2018 Page 1 2. The Distribut...
Basistha Narayan Chaudhary vs.union of India and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-29-2018
$~8 & 9 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + + + Date of Decision: November 29, 2018 W.P.(C) 11919/2016 SHIV MANGAL RAI ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Puneet Taneja, Advocate. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Arti Bansal, Advocate. W.P.(C) 11936/2016 BASISTHA NARAYAN CHAUDHARY Through: Mr. Punjeet Taneja, Advocate. ........ Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Arti Bansal, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.CHAWLA A.K.CHAWLA, J.(ORAL) Two senior Indian nationals, now aged about 70 years, are once again 1. before this Court by way of writ petitions viz. W.P.(C) 11919/2016, Shiv Mangal Rai vs. Union of India & ors and WP(C) 11936/2016, Basistha W.P.(C.) Nos. 11919/2016 & 11936/2016 Page 1 of 12 Narayan Chaudhary vs. Union of India and ors. They seek issuance of the writs of certiorari and mandamus to the respondents for being released the pensionary benefits having served ...
Dr Kanika Gupta vs.central Bureau of Investigation
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-29-2018
$~13, 11, 12 & 46 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:29. h November, 2018 + CRL.REV.P. 726/2014 and Crl. M.A. 18454/2014 RAGHAV KALRA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Khalila Ansari and Mohammad Akhtar, Advocates versus STATE THR. CBI ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjeev Bhandari, SPP with Mr. Prateek Kumar, Advocate + CRL.M.C. 912/2015 and Crl. M.A. 3454/2015 Dr. DEEPTI MANGALA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. S.S. Kulshreshtra, Sr. Advocate with Mr. A.S. Kulshreshtra, Mr. Ajeet Pandey, Mr. Lalit Kumar and Mr. K.K. Sharma, Advocates versus CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION .... Respondent Through: Ms. Rajdipa Behura, SPP + CRL.M.C. 717/2018 and Crl. M.A. 2573/2018 DR KANIKA GUPTA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Dayan Krishnan, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Harsh Khanna, Mr. Sandeep Khanna and Ms. Aakashi Lodha, Advocates versus Crl.RP7262014 & connected Page 1 of 11 CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjeev Bhandari, SPP with Mr. Prateek Kumar, Advo...
Lalit Kumar & Ors. Vs.state (Nct of Delhi) & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-29-2018
$~30 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:29. h November, 2018 CRL.REV.P. 139/2018 LALIT KUMAR & ORS versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI)& ANR ........ Petitioners ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Mr. Vikram Panwar with Mr. Vikas Walia and Mr. Suyash Sinha, Advocates. For the Respondent: Ms. Kusum Dhalla, APP for the State. Mr. Bipin Kumar Jha, Advocate. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT2911.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) CRL.REV.P. 139/2018 & Crl.M.A.3126/2018 (stay) 1.... Petitioners impugn order on charge dated 04.01.2018, whereby, charge has been framed against the petitioners under Section 498A/323/307/5IPC. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that though the 2. CRL.REV.P. 139/2018 Page 1 of 6 petitioners are innocent and are not liable to be charged for any offence, he restricts his prayer to the framing of charge under Section 307 IPC as prima facie from the perusal of the record no...
Pritika Fashions Pvt Ltd & Ors vs.state & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-29-2018
$~7 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:29. h November, 2018 CRL.REV.P. 629/2014 PRITIKA FASHIONS PVT LTD & ORS ....... Petitioners Through: Mr. Khowaja Siddiqui, Adv. versus ....... RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Ashish Dutta, APP for the STATE & ORS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR State/R-1 Mr. Ravi Dagar, Adv. for R-2 CHANDER SHEKHAR, J.(ORAL) CRL.M.A. 33858/2018 1. The petitioner No.2 has moved the present application for exemption from surrendering and granting suspension of sentence during the pendency of the present revision petition.2. In the present case, the learned Metropolitan Magistrate announced the judgment on 19.2.2014 and passed the order on sentence on 28.2.2014. The relevant portion of the order on sentence dated 28.2.2014 is reproduced below: the convict No.1 i.e. Pritika Fashions is sentenced to pay fine of Rs. 34,00,000/- as compensation to the complainant u/s 357(3) Cr.P.C. Convict No.2 is sentenced to simple imprisonment of 3 month...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »