Delhi Court November 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Devendra Singh vs.union of India and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-13-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 6085/2017 Through: Dr.Vijendra Mahndiyan with Ms.Pallavi Awasthi, Advocate. ........ Petitioner versus $~28 & 29 * + ARVIND JATAV UNION OF INDIA AND ORS + DEVENDRA SINGH UNION OF INDIA AND ORS CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Ajay Digpaul, CGSC with Ms.Madhuri Dhingra, Advocate for R1 to R3. W.P.(C) 6242/2017 Through: Dr.Vijendra Mahndiyan with Ms.Pallavi Awasthi, Advocate. ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Ajay Digpaul, CGSC with Ms.Madhuri Dhingra, Advocate for R1 to R3. ORDER1311.2018 % Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. The issue in both these petitions is a common one. It concerns the non- W.P.(C) 6085/2017 & W.P.(C) 6242/2017 Page 1 of 8 grant of House Rent Allowance (HRA) to the... Petitioners, who are working as Sub Inspectors with the Central Industrial Security Force (CISF).2. As far as Mr.Arvind Jatav the... Petitioner in W.P.(C) 6085 of 2017 is concerned, he wa...
Amravati Bhaskar vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-13-2018
$~5 & 6 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + BAIL APPLN. 1952/2017 Judgment delivered on:13. 11.2018 + ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent AMRAVATI BHASKAR STATE versus BAIL APPLN. 2431/2017 SATISH BHASKAR STATE versus Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : For the Respondent : Mr.Santosh Singh Bagga, Adv. Ms.Hirein Sharma, Addl. PP for the State with SI Mohd.Imteyaz Alam, P.S.Shahbad Dairy. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT1311.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioners seek anticipatory bail in FIR No.493/2017, under BAIL APPLN. 1952/2017 & 2431/2017 Page 1 of 3 Section 323/354/365/506/509 IPC, Police Station Shahbad Dairy.2. Allegations in the FIR are that the complainant was sitting in her house on the stairs when the accused petitioners are alleged to have come and assaulted her and misbehaved with her.3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have been falsely i...
Sudesh Chhikara vs.state (Govt. Of Nct of Delhi) and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-13-2018
$~39 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 11703/2018 & CM No.45292/2018 SUDESH CHHIKARA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr Mukesh Anand with Mr Krishan Kumar, Mr Y. Grover, Advocates. versus STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) AND ORS......... RESPONDENTS Through: Mr Tarveen Singh Nanda, Mr Ashish Gumber, Advocates for R-4. Mr Vikas Yadav, in person with R-5. ASI Sukhbir Singh, P.S. Tilak Nagar. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU % ORDER1311.2018 VIBHU BAKHRU, J The petitioner has filed the present petition impugning an order dated 1. 09.10.2018 passed by respondent no.2 (the Divisional Commissioner), whereby the petitioners appeal under Rule 22(3)(4) of the Delhi Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Rules, 2009 as amended by the Delhi Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens (Amendment) Rules, 2016 (hereafter the said Rules) was rejected as not maintainable.2. The said appeal was dismissed as the Divisional Commissioner was of the view that a...
M/S. Powergrid Corporation of India Limited vs.m/s. g.e.t. Power Limit ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-13-2018
$~4 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:13. 11.2018 ARB.P. 734/2017 M/S. POWERGRID CORPORATION OF INDIA LIMITED ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Jeshna Sanvel, Mr. Christcher E. And Mr. Rajat Agnihotri, Advs. versus M/S. G.E.T. POWER LIMITED, Through None. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER RAJIV SHAKDHER, J.(ORAL) 1 This is a petition seeking appointment of an Arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (in short 1996 Act). 2 Notice in this petition was issued on 20.11.2017. After several attempts, it appears that the respondent has been served. Despite service, there was no appearance on behalf of the respondent. On the previous date i.e. 25.10.2018, the matter had to be adjourned as the main counsel for the petitioner was not available. However, it was recorded in the very same order that as per the affidavit of service filed by the petitioner, the respondent has been served. 3 Briefly, the case of the p...
Sushma vs.union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-13-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 2439/2003 & CM APPL. 12575/2018 Reserved on :8. h March, 2018 Date of decision:13. h November, 2018 1. SUSHMA Through: versus Mr. S.P. Chadha, Adv. ........ Petitioner UNION OF INDIA & ORS ...... RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Suruchi Suri, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT % Vasudev Prasad, the late husband of the petitioner (referred to, hereinafter, as Prasad, for convenience), joined Indian Airlines Limited (Respondent No.2 herein) on 25th March, 1974 as a cleaner. His services were confirmed in the post of cleaner with effect from 22nd October, 1974. He was promoted as foreman-A vide order dated 31st December, 1997.2. On the allegation that he was aiding in the retrieval, from the aircraft, of 88 gold biscuits valued at 10 lakhs each, which were being said to be smuggled into India from Sharjah by two persons, Prasad was arrested on 27th June, 2000. Following thereupon, Prasad was placed under deemed suspensi...
Baljinder Singh vs.sadhu Singh & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-13-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:13. h November, 2018. % + FAO(OS) 167/2018, CM Nos. 47076/2018 & 47077/2018 BALJINDER SINGH ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Raman Gandhi, Mr. Ravnee Singh and Ms. Harsha Sharma, Advs. versus SADHU SINGH & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO V. KAMESWAR RAO, J.(ORAL) CM No.47077/2018 (for exemption) Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions. Application stands disposed of. FAO(OS) 165/2018 1. The present appeal has been filed by the appellant challenging the order of the learned Single Judge in IA No.12530/2017 in CS(OS) 583/2017 dated January 10, 2018, whereby the learned Single Judge has dismissed the said IA praying for ad interim ex parte injunction.2. That facts as noted from the record are that the appellant, who is the plaintiff in the aforesaid suit, claims that the suit property FAO(OS) 167/2018 Page 1 of 6 being 2113/164 Tri Nagar, Delhi belonged to...
Sh. Pramod Kumar vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-13-2018
$~35 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + SH. PRAMOD KUMAR BAIL APPLN. 2639/2018 ........ Petitioner Judgment delivered on:13. 11.2018 versus STATE Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : ..... Respondent Mr. G.S. Chaturvedi and Mr. Surjeet Singh, Advs. For the Respondent : CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA Mr. Hirein Sharma, Addl. PP for the State with SI Pankaj JUDGMENT1311.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner seeks regular bail in FIR No.27/2018 under Sections 392/3of the IPC registered at Police Station Sarai Rohilla, Delhi. Subsequently, Sections 411/120-B of the IPC have been added. Status report has been filed and the same is taken on record.2. Allegations against the petitioner are that the complainant was BAIL APPLN. 2639/2018 Page 1 of 3 going in a small goods van when three persons on a motorcycle came in front of above said van and stopped it. It is contended that thereafter they started beating the complainant and made hi...
Hemant Tyagi vs.uco Bank & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-13-2018
$~49 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:13. h November, 2018 CM No.46618/2018, Review... Petitioner.409/2018 in + W.P.(C) 8500/2016 HEMANT TYAGI Through: None ........ Petitioner versus UCO BANK & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Sarfaraz Khan, Adv. for Review... Petitioner-UCO Bank CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT(ORAL) Review Petition 409/2018 1. This petition seeks review of the judgment dated 27th September, 2018, passed by me in WP(C) 8500/2016. Mr. Sarfaraz Khan appearing for the review petitioner submits only two grounds, to justify his prayer for review, which, according to him, have not been considered by this Court while passing the judgment under review. The first is that the claim of the petitioner was barred by limitation. The second is that no writ petition would lie for a relief such as that which was claimed by the petitioner and granted by this Court.2. On the first point, learned counsel candidly accepts that there is no...
Jai Prakash vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-13-2018
$~R-29A IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + Decided on:13. h November, 2018 CRL. APPEAL No.409/2000 JAI PRAKASH STATE ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Prag Chawla & Ms.Ruchi Kapur, Advs. with appellant in person. versus Through: Mr. K.S. Ahuja, APP for the ..... Respondent State. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. The appellant was arrested during the course of investigation into first information report (FIR) no.48/1995 of police station Nangloi, involving offences punishable under Sections 398/3of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) on 06.02.1995. He along with four others were sent up for trial on conclusion of investigation into the said case, the others being Rajesh @ Raja, Susheel Kr. Tyagi, Krishan Kumar and Anjesh Jain @ Ravinder Jain. The case eventually came up before the court of sessions (sessions case No.102/1997) where the question of charge was considered. The trial judge found that there was no evidence to put Susheel Kr. Tyagi, Krishan Kumar and Anjesh Ja...
Amardeep Kujur vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-13-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on :1. t September, 2018 Pronounced on :13. h November, 2018 + Crl.A. 252/2016 AMARDEEP KUJUR STATE Through : Mr. Anuj Kapoor, Adv. Appellant (DHCLSC) versus Through : Mr. G.M. Farooqui, APP Respondent for the State CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT1 While travelling the rocky terrain of criminal justice- dispensation, the court is, at times, confronted with the necessity to negotiate between the apparently conflicting considerations of ensuring that an offence, ex facie revolting in nature, does not go unpunished, and, at the same time, that the innocent is not subjected to the unbending rigour of the law. This case is one such. The Facts 2. On 13th December, 2012, S, a 7-year-old male child, was admitted in the Ashiyana Boys Home, Alipur. He remained there till Crl.A.252/2016 Page 1 of 69 11th January, 2013. During his sojourn at the Ashiyana Boys Home, S was, as the evidence has revealed and as is undisputed, so...
- ‹ Prev
- 42
- 43
- 44
- 45
- 46
- 48
- 49
- 50
- 51
- 52
- Next ›
- Last »