Delhi Court November 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
M/S Ram Abhoshan vs.m/s Pec Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-14-2018
+ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:14. h November, 2018 % FAO(OS) 154/2018 & CM. No.43148/2018 M/S RAM ABHOSHAN ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Tarun Gulati, Mr. Neil Hildreth and Mr. Rahul Jain, Advs. versus M/S PEC LTD Through: Mr. Rajesh Kumar Gautam and ..... Respondent Mr. Aakash Sehrawat, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO V. KAMESWAR RAO, J.(ORAL) CM No.43148/2018 (for exemption) Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions. Application stands disposed of. FAO(OS) 154/2018 1. This Intra-Court appeal has been filed by the appellant challenging the order dated August 07, 2018 passed by the learned Single Judge in OMP No.444/2015 whereby the learned Single Judge has dismissed the petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration FAO(OS) 154/2018 Page 1 of 10 & Conciliation Act, 1996 (for short Arbitration Act, 1996) filed by the appellant challenging the award of the Arbitral Tribunal dated April 28, 2015.2. The appellan...
Greenlight Planet India Pvt. Ltd. Vs.gee Lighting Technology
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-14-2018
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(COMM) 290/2018 GREENLIGHT PLANET INDIA PVT. LTD. ..... Plaintiff Through Mr. Ajay Sahni, Advocate with Mr. Ankur Sangal, Ms. Sucheta Roy and Ms. Richa Bhargava, Advocates. versus GEE LIGHTING TECHNOLOGY ..... Defendant Through Mr. Mohan Vidhani, Advocate with Mr. Ahul Vidhani, Mr. Ashish Singh and Mr. Saurabh Kumar, Advocates. % Reserved on :29. h October, 2018 Date of Decision:14. h November, 2018 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J: I.A. 21247/2015 1. Present application has been filed by the defendant under Order 7 Rule 11(d) CPC for rejection of the plaint.2. Mr. Mohan Vidhani, learned counsel for defendant submitted that the present plaint was liable to be rejected as the present suit for permanent injunction restraining passing off was barred under Order II Rule 2 CPC. He pointed out that in spite of filing the earlier suit being CS(OS) 3795/2014 CS (COMM) 290/2018 Page 1 of 4 for infringement of design, the p...
Jogender vs.dedicated Freight Corridor Corporation of India Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-14-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:14. 11.2018 + W.P.(C) 6597/2017 VIJAYA KUMAR ANUGANDULA versus Petitioner... RESPONDENTDEDICATED FREIGHT CORRIDOR CORPORATION OF INDIA LTD. + W.P.(C) 9279/2017 & CM No.37900/2017 WITH RAJ KUMAR Petitioner versus DEDICATED FREIGHT CORRIDOR CORPORATION OF INDIA LTD.(DFCCIL)... RESPONDENT+ W.P.(C) 11517/2017 & CM No.46952/2017 WITH VIKAS SINGHAL Petitioner versus DEDICATED FREIGHT CORRIDOR CORPORATION OF INDIA LTD. (DFCCIL)... RESPONDENT+ W.P.(C) 2167/2018 & CM No.8962/2018 WITH JOGENDER Petitioner versus W.P.(C) 6597/2017 and other connected matters Page 1 of 26... RESPONDENTDEDICATED FREIGHT CORRIDOR CORPORATION OF INDIA LTD. + W.P.(C) 2779/2018 & CM No.11231/2018 WITH KULDEEP KUMAR Petitioner versus DEDICATED FREIGHT CORRIDOR CORPORATION OF INDIA LTD. (DFCCIL)... RESPONDENT+ W.P.(C) 4278/2018 & CM No.16693/2018 WITH SANJAY KUMAR KHODABHAI PATEL Petitioner versus DEDICATED FREIGHT CORRIDOR CORPORATION OF INDIA LTD. (DFCCIL)...
Prince Roadlines vs.hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-14-2018
$~19 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision 14th November, 2018 + O.M.P. (COMM) 476/2016 PRINCE ROADLINES ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Bhopal Singh, Adv. versus HINDUSTAN PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD. .... Respondent Through Mr.J.P. Sengh, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Rikesh Singh, Ms.Mrigna Shekhar, Mr. R.L.Sinha, Mr.Shashi Pratap and Mr.Akash Mishra, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA NAVIN CHAWLA, J.(Oral) 1. This petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 has been filed by the petitioner challenging the Arbitral Award dated 11.08.2015 passed by the Sole Arbitrator adjudicating the disputes that had arisen between the parties in relation to the Bulk Transport Agreement dated 01.06.2009 executed between the parties. In terms of the said Agreement the petitioner had deputed five Tank Trucks bearing Nos.DL1GB5501 DL1GB4988 DL1GB6633 HR55 5126 and HR55 5767 with the respondent.2. It is the case of the respondent that based on suspicion of e...
Pankaj Paliwal vs.m/s Vian Infrastructure Ltd & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-14-2018
$~CP-20 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:14. 11.2018 CO.PET. 178/2012 PANKAJ PALIWAL M/S VIAN INFRASTRUCTURE LTD & ORS..... Respondent Through Mr.Rajiv Mishra, Adv. versus ........ Petitioner Through Ms.Ruchi Sindhwani, Sr.Standing Counsel for Official Liquidator Mr.Alok Bachawat, Mr.Shailendra Singh and Mr.Rachit Wadhwa, Advs. for bidder CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(Oral) CA No.1104/2018 1. This application is filed by Mr.Shashi Kumar under Rule 9 of the Company Court Rules, 1959 and section 446 of Companies Act read with section 151 CPC seeking a direction that the Official Liquidator may not take action for auctioning/selling the property/plot No.D1-67, Sector-2, Area 120 Sq.Yards situated in village Sheelki Dungri Tehsil Chaksu, District Jaipur, Rajasthan.2. The case of the applicant is that the property in question was purchased by the applicant on 10.12.2009 by a registered sale deed. In August 2018 the applicant came to kno...
Vijaya Kumar Anugandula vs.dedicated Freight Corridor Corporation of I ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-14-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:14. 11.2018 + W.P.(C) 6597/2017 VIJAYA KUMAR ANUGANDULA versus Petitioner... RESPONDENTDEDICATED FREIGHT CORRIDOR CORPORATION OF INDIA LTD. + W.P.(C) 9279/2017 & CM No.37900/2017 WITH RAJ KUMAR Petitioner versus DEDICATED FREIGHT CORRIDOR CORPORATION OF INDIA LTD.(DFCCIL)... RESPONDENT+ W.P.(C) 11517/2017 & CM No.46952/2017 WITH VIKAS SINGHAL Petitioner versus DEDICATED FREIGHT CORRIDOR CORPORATION OF INDIA LTD. (DFCCIL)... RESPONDENT+ W.P.(C) 2167/2018 & CM No.8962/2018 WITH JOGENDER Petitioner versus W.P.(C) 6597/2017 and other connected matters Page 1 of 26... RESPONDENTDEDICATED FREIGHT CORRIDOR CORPORATION OF INDIA LTD. + W.P.(C) 2779/2018 & CM No.11231/2018 WITH KULDEEP KUMAR Petitioner versus DEDICATED FREIGHT CORRIDOR CORPORATION OF INDIA LTD. (DFCCIL)... RESPONDENT+ W.P.(C) 4278/2018 & CM No.16693/2018 WITH SANJAY KUMAR KHODABHAI PATEL Petitioner versus DEDICATED FREIGHT CORRIDOR CORPORATION OF INDIA LTD. (DFCCIL)...
Union of India vs.m/s Panipat Foods Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-14-2018
$~28 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:14. h November, 2018 O.M.P. 441/2011, I.As. 64/2017 & 65/2017 UNION OF INDIA ........ Petitioner Through: Ms. Saroj Bidawat, Advocate. (M:9810340866) versus M/S PANIPAT FOODS LTD ..... Respondent Through: Mr. B.S. Maan and Mr. Rohan Nandal, Advocates. (M:9991999221) CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.(Oral) The petition has been filed challenging the award dated 12th October, 1. 2010 by which the claims of the Union of India were rejected by the learned Arbitrator.2. The present petition has a chequered history. This is the second round of litigation between the parties. The Union of India had placed a contract for supply of peas on the Respondent contractor-M/s. Panipat Foods Ltd in 1978. According to the Union of India, the entire contracted quantity of peas which were supplied went bad during the warranty period of one year. The... Petitioner had to lift back the quantity from its various depots acr...
Tyrist Enterprises & Anr. Vs.chairman Railways Board & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-14-2018
* + + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CONT.CAS(C) 24/2016 Date of Order: November 14, 2018 TYRIST ENTERPRISES & ANR. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Shatadri Chakaraborty, Mr. Surendera, Ms. Sonia Dubey & Mr. Anurag Singh, Advocates Versus CHAIRMAN RAILWAYS BOARD & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Jagjit Singh, Standing Counsel for Railways with Mr. Arnam Mullick, Mr. Joydeep Mazumdar & Ms. Priyata Chakraborty, Advocates Mr. Saquib Arbab & Mr. S.Ghosh, Advocates for SREI Equipment Finance Limited CONT.CAS(C) 398/2018 JAI BALAJI INDUSTRIES LTD & ANR. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Shatadri Chakaraborty, Mr. Surendera, Ms. Sonia Dubey & Mr. Anurag Singh, Advocates Versus S.K BISWAS & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Jagjit Singh, Standing Counsel for Railways with Mr. Arnam Mullick, Mr. Joydeep Mazumdar & Ms. Priyata Chakraborty, Advocates CONT.CAS(C) 690/2018 M/S MADHU TRANSPORT CO PVT LTD & ANR. .... Petitioners Through: Mr. Shatadri Chakaraborty, CONT.CAS(C) 2...
Manish Kumar Shukla vs.dedicated Freight Corridor Corporation of India ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-14-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:14. 11.2018 + W.P.(C) 6597/2017 VIJAYA KUMAR ANUGANDULA versus Petitioner... RESPONDENTDEDICATED FREIGHT CORRIDOR CORPORATION OF INDIA LTD. + W.P.(C) 9279/2017 & CM No.37900/2017 WITH RAJ KUMAR Petitioner versus DEDICATED FREIGHT CORRIDOR CORPORATION OF INDIA LTD.(DFCCIL)... RESPONDENT+ W.P.(C) 11517/2017 & CM No.46952/2017 WITH VIKAS SINGHAL Petitioner versus DEDICATED FREIGHT CORRIDOR CORPORATION OF INDIA LTD. (DFCCIL)... RESPONDENT+ W.P.(C) 2167/2018 & CM No.8962/2018 WITH JOGENDER Petitioner versus W.P.(C) 6597/2017 and other connected matters Page 1 of 26... RESPONDENTDEDICATED FREIGHT CORRIDOR CORPORATION OF INDIA LTD. + W.P.(C) 2779/2018 & CM No.11231/2018 WITH KULDEEP KUMAR Petitioner versus DEDICATED FREIGHT CORRIDOR CORPORATION OF INDIA LTD. (DFCCIL)... RESPONDENT+ W.P.(C) 4278/2018 & CM No.16693/2018 WITH SANJAY KUMAR KHODABHAI PATEL Petitioner versus DEDICATED FREIGHT CORRIDOR CORPORATION OF INDIA LTD. (DFCCIL)...
Nirmal Kumar Pathak vs.state (Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-14-2018
$~12 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:14. 11.2018 + BAIL APPLN. 2251/2018 NIRMAL KUMAR PATHAK versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : For the Respondent : Mr. S.N. Pandey, Advocate. Mr. Hirein Sharma, APP for the State. SI Manoj Kumar, PS Domestic Airport. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT1411.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner seeks regular bail in FIR No.44/2018 under Sections 420/468/471/467/174 IPC, Police Station Domestic Airport, IGI Airport.2. The allegations against the petitioner are that the petitioner had assured the complainant that his taxi would be attached with the Indigo Airlines and had given him documents executed allegedly by Indigo Airlines, which were found to be forged. Further, the signature on a cheque in the sum of Rs.84,775/- was found to be forged.3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitione...
- ‹ Prev
- 39
- 40
- 41
- 42
- 43
- 45
- 46
- 47
- 48
- 49
- Next ›
- Last »