Delhi Court November 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Krishan Kumar Rathi vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-15-2018
$~6 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:15. h November, 2018 + CRL.A. 953/2005 KRISHAN KUMAR RATHI Through: Mr. M.L. Yadav, Adv. ..... Appellant STATE versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr. K.S. Ahuja, APP for the State CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The appellant was employed at the relevant point of time (October, 1996) as personal assistant (PA) to the General Manager (GM) of Haryana Roadways in its office at Delhi. On 11.10.1996, he was apprehended in the course of a trap that had been laid by Inspector S.K. Banta (PW-10) of Anti Corruption Bureau (ACB) of Govt. of NCT of Delhi, in the wake of complaint (Ex.PW-6.A) that had been lodged with him by Dharam Chand (PW-6) about demand for illegal gratification. It is alleged that the appellant had received a total amount of Rs.3,000/- in the form of twenty-five currency notes (Ex.P-1 to P-25) each of denomination of Rs.100/- along with one currency note (Ex.P-26) of the denomination of Rs.500/-, on ...
Om Parkash Chhikara vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-15-2018
$~R-2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.A. 126/2000 Decided on:15. h November, 2018 OM PARKASH CHHIKARA ..... Appellant STATE Through: Mr. Dushyant Sisodiya, Advocate versus Through: Mr. Narender Mann, SPP for CBI with Mr. Manoj Pant, Advocate ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. The appellant was employed as Inspector in the office of Municipal Corporation of Delhi, his posting at the relevant point of time being in the Zonal Health Office of Shahdara, South Zone at Shalimar Park, Shahdara, Delhi. He was indisputably dealing with the matter arising out of an application (Ex. PW1/D2) dated 03.06.1994 submitted in the name of Sanjay Kumar (PW-3) son of the complainant Kulwant Singh (PW-1) for issuance of a municipal licence for running a shop (provisional store) in the name and style of Sanjay Di Hatti.2. On 19.12.1994, on the complaint (Ex. PW1/A) of Kulwant Singh (PW-1), Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) registered first information rep...
Young Friends & Co. & Ors. Vs.puri Investments
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-14-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:27. h September, 2018 Pronounced on:14. h November, 2018 + CM(M) 292/2009 YOUNG FRIENDS & CO. & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Abhijat & Mr. Abhishek Agarwal, Advs. versus PURI INVESTMENTS ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Dayan Krishnan, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Jeevesh Nagrath, Mr. Chitvan Singhal & Mr. Sanjeevi Seshadri, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA1 ORDER The petitioner, feeling aggrieved by the judgment dated 29.08.2007 of the Additional Rent Control Tribunal (ARCT) granting an order of eviction in favour of the respondent under Section 14(1)(b) of Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 (for short, DRC Act) had approached this court by the present petition presenting it initially as a second appeal under Section 39 of the DRC Act. The provision contained in Section 39, however, having been repealed by Section 17 CM(M) 292/2009 Page 1 of 35 of Delhi Rent Control (Amendment) Act, 1988 brought in force from 01.12.1988, upon ob...
M/S Middle East Onshore and Offshore Oil and Gas Equipment Fze vs.oil ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-14-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision:14. h November, 2018 + LPA6302018 M/S MIDDLE EAST ONSHORE AND OFFSHORE OIL AND GAS EQUIPMENT FZE ..... Appellant Through: Mr. S. Sharma and Ms. Priyanka Das, Advs. versus OIL AND NATURAL GAS CORPORATION LIMITED & ORS Through: Mr. A.C. Mishra and Ms. Pallavi ........ RESPONDENTS Dubey, Advs. for ONGC. CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO V. KAMESWAR RAO, J.(ORAL) CAV. No.1037/2018 As learned counsel for the caveator appears, caveat stands discharged. CM. No.47203/2018 and 47204/2018 (for exemptions) Exemptions allowed subject to all just exceptions. Applications stand disposed of. LPA6302018 1. The challenge in the Appeal is to the order dated 26th October, 2018 passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P.(C) 11171/2018 whereby the learned Single Judge has disposed of the LPA No.630/2018 Page 1 of 6 writ petition by directing the respondents to complete the enquiry as initiated against the appella...
Kanshi Nath & Ors vs.m/s National Trading Corporation & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-14-2018
$~4 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order:14. 11.2018 CM(M) 1134/2018 & CM3862538626/2018 KANSHI NATH & ORS ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Hirein Sharma, Adv. versus M/S NATIONAL TRADING CORPORATION & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Shiv Charan Garg, Adv. for R1 & R2. Mr. O.P. Saxena, Mr. R.V. Alagh, Mr. Vinod Jain, Advs. for R3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL % ORDER1411.2018 CM No.38626/2018 (delay in re-filing) 1. For the justifiable reason explained in the application, the delay in refiling the petition is condoned.2. The application stands disposed of. CM(M) 1134/2018 & CM386252018 (stay) 3. The impugned order dated 27.04.2018 passed by the Court of Learned Civil Judge-03, Central District, Tis Hazari Courts, CM (M) No.1134/2018 Page 1 of 4 Delhi (trial court) is the subject matter of challenge in this petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India.4. The respondents No.1 and 2/plaintiffs filed a suit for permanent injunction ag...
Kuldeep Kumar vs.dedicated Freight Corridor Corporation of India Ltd. ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-14-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:14. 11.2018 + W.P.(C) 6597/2017 VIJAYA KUMAR ANUGANDULA versus Petitioner... RESPONDENTDEDICATED FREIGHT CORRIDOR CORPORATION OF INDIA LTD. + W.P.(C) 9279/2017 & CM No.37900/2017 WITH RAJ KUMAR Petitioner versus DEDICATED FREIGHT CORRIDOR CORPORATION OF INDIA LTD.(DFCCIL)... RESPONDENT+ W.P.(C) 11517/2017 & CM No.46952/2017 WITH VIKAS SINGHAL Petitioner versus DEDICATED FREIGHT CORRIDOR CORPORATION OF INDIA LTD. (DFCCIL)... RESPONDENT+ W.P.(C) 2167/2018 & CM No.8962/2018 WITH JOGENDER Petitioner versus W.P.(C) 6597/2017 and other connected matters Page 1 of 26... RESPONDENTDEDICATED FREIGHT CORRIDOR CORPORATION OF INDIA LTD. + W.P.(C) 2779/2018 & CM No.11231/2018 WITH KULDEEP KUMAR Petitioner versus DEDICATED FREIGHT CORRIDOR CORPORATION OF INDIA LTD. (DFCCIL)... RESPONDENT+ W.P.(C) 4278/2018 & CM No.16693/2018 WITH SANJAY KUMAR KHODABHAI PATEL Petitioner versus DEDICATED FREIGHT CORRIDOR CORPORATION OF INDIA LTD. (DFCCIL)...
Reliance Cable Industries vs.commissioner of Gst (East) Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-14-2018
$~2&3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + + Date of Decision:14. 11.2018 CEAC452018, CM APPL. 35746/2018 RELIANCE CABLE INDUSTRIES ........ Petitioner versus COMMISSIONER OF GST (EAST) DELHI ..... Respondent CEAC462018, CM APPL. 35747/2018 RELIANCE CABLE INDUSTRIES ........ Petitioner versus Through: Mr. Rupesh Kumar, Advocate for the petitioner. COMMISSIONER OF GST (EAST), DELHI ..... Respondent Mr. Harpreet Singh, Senior Standing Counsel with Ms. Suhani Mathur, Adv. for respondent. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN S.RAVINDRA BHAT, J.(ORAL) 1. The question of law sought to be urged by the appellant in these two appeals is whether in regard to the total circumstances of the case, the Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) was justified in rejecting the appeal without appreciating the facts and evidence before it.2. The brief facts of the case are that on 08.08.2011, search and seizure proceedings were carried ou...
Darshan Kaur vs.union of India & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-14-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on: July 31, 2018 Judgment delivered on: November 14, 2018 + W.P.(C) 5022/2016, CM No.20973/2016 DARSHAN KAUR ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Rajesh Yadav, Ms. Ruchira Arora, Mr. Dhananjay Mehlawat versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Monika Arora, CGSC with Mr. Harsh Ahuja & Mr. Santosh Kumar Pandey, Advs. & Mr. Abhishek Biswas, Dy. L&DO CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO JUDGMENT V. KAMESWAR RAO, J1 The present petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayers: It is, therefore, most respectfully prayed that this Honble Court may kindly be pleased to issue: (a) a writ of certiorari or any other appropriate, writ, order or direction in the nature thereof thereby quashing the demand letter dated 23.02.2015, bearing demand ID:6748, raising a demand of Rs.2,72,28,392/- (Rupees Two Crores Seventy Two Lac Twenty Eight Thousand and Three Hundred Ninety Two Only), towards alleged W.P...
Smt. Swarn Kaur vs.smt. Poonam Arora & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-14-2018
$~OS-9 * + SMT. SWARN KAUR Mr. Joginder Sukhija, Adv. ..... Plaintiff Through Versus SMT. POONAM ARORA & ORS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH Through Defendants are ex- parte ..... Defendant IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(OS) 406/2017 Date of Decision:14. 11.2018 JAYANT NATH, J.(ORAL) 1. This is a suit filed for specific performance to direct the defendants to execute a sale deed in the favour of the plaintiff with respect to the agreement to sell dated 01.07.2011 for the property at Sardar Nagar, near C.C. Colony, Delhi, measuring 2100 sq. ft. Other connect reliefs are also sought.2. A perusal of the plaint shows that the plaintiff was offered to purchase a proposed first floor (front portion) without roof rights/terrace rights covered area measuring 2100 sq. ft comprising of 5 bedrooms, hall kitchen with proportionate rights of land underneath the new building along with common passage and stair case (herein referred to as the suit property) with pre-fitted water an...
Balinder Yadav vs.sh. Ram Saran Singh
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-14-2018
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RSA1602018. Judgment reserved on :12. 11.2018 Date of decision :14. 11.2018 BALINDER YADAV ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Rajeev Sharma, Advocate. versus SH. RAM SARAN SINGH ..... Respondent Through: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA JUDGMENT ANU MALHOTRA, J.1. The appellant seeks to assail the impugned judgment dated 29.9.2018 of the learned Additional District Judge-03 (West), Tis Hazari Courts in RCA No.612vide which the appeal filed by the appellant herein, who was arrayed as the defendant to the suit bearing No.SCJ608against the judgment dated 19.10.2016 of the Civil Judge-01(West), Tis Hazari Courts- was dismissed.2. The suit filed by the plaintiff arrayed as the respondent to the present appeal was one for recovery contending to the effect that the plaintiff/ respondent had lent a sum of Rs.2,65,000/- in cash to the defendant/appellant on 31.3.2018 on the request of the RSA1602018 Page 1 of 21 defendant/appellant to lend some...
- ‹ Prev
- 37
- 38
- 39
- 40
- 41
- 43
- 44
- 45
- 46
- 47
- Next ›
- Last »