Delhi Court November 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Anil Chauhan @ Sandeep vs.the State Govt of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-15-2018
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:19. h July, 2018 Decided on:15. h November, 2018 CRL.A. 692/2017 ANIL CHAUHAN @ SANDEEP ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr. Islam Khan, Advocate. versus THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Represented by: Ms. Rajni Gupta, APP for the State with SI Narasi Prasad, PS Hazrat Nizamuddin. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.1. By the present appeal, Anil Chauhan @ Sandeep challenges the impugned judgment dated 8th May, 2017 convicting him for the offences punishable under Sections 186/307/174A IPC read with Sections Arms Act and the order on sentence dated 15th May, 2017 directing him to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of three months for the offence punishable under Section 186 IPC, rigorous imprisonment for a period of five years and to pay a fine of 5,000/- and in default of payment of fine to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of three months for the offence punishable under Section 30...
Rajesh Verma vs.sachin Sharma
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-15-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on :12. h November, 2018 Date of decision :15. h November, 2018 RSA1332018 & CM APPL. 43956/2018 RAJESH VERMA ..... Appellant Through Mr. Ashok Gurnani, Advocate. Versus SACHIN SHARMA ..... Respondent Through: Mr. S.C. Singhal, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA JUDGMENT ANU MALHOTRA, J.1. The appellant vide this Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 as amended has assailed the judgment dated 26.02.2016 of the learned Senior Civil Judge/Rent Controller, South West, Dwarka Courts, New Delhi and the judgment of the First Appellate Court of the learned Additional District Judge- 03, South West, Dwarka Courts, New Delhi in Regular Civil Appeal No.54614/2016 which upheld the judgment dated 26.02.2016 of the learned Senior Civil Judge/Rent Control, South West, Dwarka Courts, New Delhi whereby the suit filed by the plaintiff thereof arrayed as the RSA1332018 Page 1 of 29 respondent ...
Dr. Jacqueline Jacinta Dias & Ors. Vs.union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-15-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Reserved on:03. 10.2018 Pronounced on:15.11.2018 W.P.(C) 4116/2015 DR. JACQUELINE JACINTA DIAS & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Sachin Datta, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Ankita Patnaik and Ms. Rijuta Mohanty, Advs. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Barkha Babbar and Mr. Het Shah, Advs. with Lt. Col. Navin Kaul, AD Camps for respondents. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.CHAWLA S.RAVINDRA BHAT, J.1. The petitioners seek appropriate relief for quashing of the merit list dated 08.12.2004 as well as the appointment orders issued to the respondent nos.4 to 40 (hereafter as contesting respondents) to the post of Oral Dental Surgeons in the Army Dental Corps.2. On 12.07.2014, an advertisement was published, for recruitment to the Army Dental Corps on Short Service Commission (SSC) basis; the total vacancies advertised were 37 in the Dental Corps. The advertisement stipulated that the ...
Balajee Coal Carriers Ltd and Anr vs.union of India and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-15-2018
$~75 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI LPA5562012 BALAJEE COAL CARRIERS LTD AND ANR ..... Appellants Ms. Preeti Singh & Mr.Gagan Deep Sharma, Advocates. Through: Mr. Mahabir Singh, Sr.Advocate with versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS Through: Mr.Vivek Goyal, CGSC for UOI with Mr.Pawan Pathak, Advocate. Mr.Hamendra Sharma, Advocate with Mr.Karan Singh Bhati, Advocate for R2 to R4. ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA % Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.: ORDER1511.2018 1. This appeal is directed against the judgment dated 17th May 2012 passed by the learned Single Judge dismissing the Appellants WP (C) 2549 of 2012 on the ground that this Court lacks the territorial jurisdiction to entertain the petition.2. The background facts are that a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) was entered into between the Director General of Re-settlement (DGR) and the Coal India Ltd. (CIL) keeping in view the scheme formulated to raise Ex-servicemen Coal Transportation Companies f...
North Delhi Municipal Corporation vs.santosh Kumar Sharma and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-15-2018
$~26, 29, 30 & 36 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of decision : November 15, 2018 W.P.(C) 8704/2017 with CM No.35693/2017 (stay) (Arising out of the order passed in OA27122016) NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Gaurang Kanth, Advocate with Ms. Biji Rajesh, Ms. Eshita Baurah and Mr. Diwanker Sethi, Advocates. versus SANTOSH KUMAR SHARMA AND ORS. Vijay Through: Mr. ........ RESPONDENTS and Sharma Sharma Bhardwaj Ms.Swagati, Advocate for R-1. Mr. Arun Bhardwaj, CGSC with Mr.Shashwat and Mr.Nikhil and Ms.Gauraan, Advocates for UOI. Mr. Kumar Singh, Standing Counsel for EDMC/R Mr. Advocate. Abhaya Behera, Rajesh K. + W.P.(C) 637/2018 with CM APPL. 2760/2018 (for stay) (Arising out of the order passed in OA40662016) NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Gaurang Kanth, Advocate with Ms. Biji Rajesh, Ms. Eshita Baurah and Mr. Diwanker Sethi, Advocates. versus W.P.(C) 8704/2017 & connected matters Page 1 of 8 DR. R...
Nitin Garg vs.arvind Tyagi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-15-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % NITIN GARG RFA No.626/2017 15th November, 2018 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Advocate (M. No.9811394417). ARVIND TYAGI versus ..... Respondent Through: None. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) is filed by the plaintiff in the suit impugning the Judgment of the trial court dated 20.12.2016 by which trial court has dismissed the suit for recovery of Rs. 11 lakhs filed by the appellant/plaintiff against the respondent/defendant being the balance amount due to the appellant/plaintiff out of the friendly loan RFA No.626/2017 Page 1 of 5 of Rs. 15 lakhs given by the appellant/plaintiff to the respondent/defendant.2. It may be noted that suit has been dismissed although the respondent/defendant was exparte in the suit and the appellant/plaintiff led evidence and proved his cas...
Nv Distilleries Pvt. Ltd. Vs.frost Falcon Distilleries Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-15-2018
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:15. h November, 2018 CS(COMM) No.1170/2018 NV DISTILLERIES PVT. LTD. .... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Pradeep Chhindra, Mr. Nikhil Singh & Mr. Parinay T. Vasandani, Advs. Versus FROST FALCON DISTILLERIES LTD. ...Defendant Through: Mr. Mohan Jain, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Chirojit Mukherjee & Ms. Prabhleen Kaur, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW IA No.14948/2018 (of the defendant under Order VII Rules 10 and 11 of the CPC) 1. The applicant / defendant, in this suit for permanent injunction restraining infringement of trade mark, copyright, passing off and for ancillary reliefs seeks, return / rejection of the plaint on the ground of this Court not having territorial jurisdiction to entertain the suit.2. The senior counsel for the applicant / defendant was heard at length on 30th October, 2018 when this application came up first before this Court. However, on that date, on the request of the senior counsel for the appli...
Haldiram Bhujiawala Ltd vs.m/s Haldiram India Pvt Ltd & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-15-2018
$~44 & 47 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CM(M) 1313/2018 Date of Order:15. 11.2018 HALDIRAM BHUJIAWALA LTD ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Saurav Agarwal, Mr. Akhil Sachar, Mr. Kapil Rastogi, Ms. Aakriti Dawar & Mr. Vibhu Anshuman, Advocates versus M/S HALDIRAM INDIA PVT LTD & ORS ....... RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Sanjiv Sindhwani, Sr. Advocate along with Mr. Neeraj Grover, Mr.Naveen Grover and Mr. Gurinder Singh, Advocates. + CM(M) 1383/2018 HALDIRAM BHUJIAWALA LTD ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Saurav Agarwal, Mr. Akhil Sacher and Mr. Kapil Rustagi, Advocates M/S HALDIRAM INDIA PVT LTD & ORS ...... RESPONDENTS versus Through: Mr. Sanjiv Sindhwani, Sr. Advocate along with Mr. Neeraj Grover, Mr.Naveen Grover and Mr. Anmol Chadha, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL CM No.47391/2018 (exemption) in CM(M) 1383/2018 1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. CM(M) 1313/2018 & 1383/2018 Page 1 of 5 2. The application is disposed of. CM(M) 1313/2018, CM No.45118/201...
Commissioner of Income Tax-Iii vs.shyam Telelink Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-15-2018
$~1-3 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI INCOME TAX APPEAL No.70/2013 % Date of decision:15. h November, 2018 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-III ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Asheesh Jain, Sr. Standing Counsel with Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Advocate. versus SHYAM TELELINK LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Piyush Kaushik, Advocate. INCOME TAX APPEAL No.73/2013 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-III ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Asheesh Jain, Sr. Standing Counsel with Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Advocate. versus SHYAM TELELINK LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Piyush Kaushik, Advocate. INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1069/2017 PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-8 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Asheesh Jain, Sr. Standing Counsel with Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Advocate. versus SISTEMA SHYAM TELESERVICES LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Piyush Kaushik, Advocate. ITA Nos.70/2013, 73/2013 & 1069/2017 Page 1 of 17 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI SANJIV KHANNA, J.These appeals by the Rev...
Food Corporation of India, Moga vs.janata Rice Mills
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-15-2018
$~5 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:15. h November, 2018 + O.M.P. 883/2012 FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA, MOGA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Mohan Lal Sharma, Advocate (M-9811537909). versus JANATA RICE MILLS ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Kumar Dushyant Singh & Mr. (M- Siddharth Dutta, Advocates 9811433704). CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.(Oral) The present petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and 1. Conciliation Act, 1996 challenges the award dated 25th June, 2012 passed by the Learned Sole Arbitrator.2. The... Petitioner Food Corporation of India (hereinafter, FCI) and M/s Janata Rice Mills (hereinafter miller) had entered into a milling agreement dated 14th November, 1994. Under the said contract, the miller was to mill the paddy and supply rice to the FCI. FCI had supplied 36,029 bags (23,388.05 quintals) of superfine variety and 4,480 bags (2,910.20 quintals) of fine variety to the miller for milling. The due date for milli...
- ‹ Prev
- 36
- 37
- 38
- 39
- 40
- 42
- 43
- 44
- 45
- 46
- Next ›
- Last »