Delhi Court November 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Vasant Raj Pandit vs.rahul Jain
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-15-2018
$~22 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order:15. 11.2018 CM (M) No.1087/2018 VASANT RAJ PANDIT ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Jagdev Singh and Mr.Sachin Saini, Advocates. versus RAHUL JAIN ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Arun Kumar, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL Settlement agreement dated 13.11.2018 has been received from 1. the Delhi High Court Mediation and Conciliation Centre by which the matter has been amicably resolved and settled between the parties. It is worth mentioning that while considering the bail application No.689/2005 in a case registered against the petitioner vide FIR No.57/2005 under SectionIPC at Police Station Sarojini Nagar, on 15.04.2015, this Court has directed the petitioner to deposit Rs.30 lacs within four weeks with the Registry of this Court, without prejudice to the rights and contentions of the parties. This amount is stated to be lying deposited with the Registry of the Court. CM (M) No.1087/2018 Page 1 of 3 2. The re...
Renu Singh vs.rajiv Rastogi & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-15-2018
$~46 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order:15. 11.2018 CM(M) 1378/2018 RENU SINGH Through: Mr. Ankit Jain, Advocate versus ........ Petitioner RAJIV RASTOGI & ANR .... Respondent Through: None CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL CM No.47109/2018 (exemption) 1.2. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application is disposed of. CM(M) 1378/2018, CM No.47108/2018 (stay) 3. The impugned order dated 15.10.2018 passed by the Court of learned Additional District Judge-03, South District, Saket, New Delhi (ADJ) in Civil Suit bearing No.7973/2016 is the subject matter of challenge in this petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India.4. By this order, an application of the respondents/defendants under Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC), for taking on record the original Memorandum of Understanding dated 10.12.1993 and putting an exhibit thereon was allowed by the learned ADJ.5. The respondents/defendants have pleaded in their wr...
Arif vs.the State Govt of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-15-2018
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI ARIF Reserved on:5. h July, 2018 Decided on:15. h November, 2018 CRL.A. 927/2017 Represented by: Mr. M.R. Chanchal, Advocate. ..... Appellant versus THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Represented by: Ms. Meenakshi Dahiya, APP + WAHID for the State CRL.A. 1015/2017 Represented by: Mr. Prashant Diwan with Mr. Brajesh Dwivedi, Advocates. ..... Appellant versus THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Represented by: Ms. Meenakshi Dahiya, APP + ANSHU for the State CRL.A. 1132/2017 ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr. Sandesh Singh Bagga, versus Advocate. THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Represented by: Ms. Meenakshi Dahiya, APP + CRL.A. 5/2018 for the State NARENDER @ BHOLA ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr.V.K. Mishra, Advocate. versus CRL.A. 927/2017, 1015/2017, 1132/2017 &5/2018 Page 1 of 12 THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Represented by: Ms. Meenakshi Dahiya, APP for the State. CORAM: HON'B...
Food Corporation of India vs.central Information Commissioner & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-15-2018
$~18 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 11897/2016 & CM APPL. 46874/2016 FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA Date of decision:15. h November, 2018 ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Manoj, Standing Counsel with Ms. Aparna Sinha, Advocate. versus CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSIONER & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT Through: Mr. A.K.Roy, Advocate for R-2. JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. Vide the present petition, the petitioner has challenged order dated 24.10.2016 passed by the Central Information Commission whereby the petitioner was directing to provide the complete and categorical information, issue-wise to the respondent No.2 herein as per his RTI Application in accordance with the provisions of RTI Act, 2005 within 30 days from the date of the receipt of order with intimation to the Commission. It is further directed that if need be, Section 5(4) of the RTI Act 2005 may also be invoked in the matter.2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitione...
Saraswati Yadav vs.the State (Govt. Of Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-15-2018
$~4 & 5 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + BAIL APPLN. 391/2017 Judgment delivered on:15. 11.2018 + SARASWATI YADAV versus ........ Petitioner THE STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent BAIL APPLN. 478/2017 VANDANA KURICHH versus ........ Petitioner STATE THR. GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Mr. Sanjay Sharma with Ms.Richa Sharma, Advocates in Bail Appln. 391/2017 and Mr.Parmod Kumar Singhal, Adv. in Bail Appln. 478/2017. Ms. Meenakshi Dahiya, APP for the State with SI Aadesh, P.S.Prashant Vihar. Mr.D.K.Mishra, Adv. for the complainant. For the Respondent : CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT1511.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioners seek anticipatory bail in FIR No.56/2017, under Sections 323/326/356/379/3IPC, Police Station Prashant Vihar. BAIL APPLN. 391/2017 & BAIL APPLN. 478/2017 Page 1 of 3 2. Allegations in the FIR are that the complainant as well as the petitioners...
Bhupinder Singh & Anr vs.attar Singh & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-15-2018
$~193 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + FAO(OS) 230/2017 Date of decision:15. h November, 2018 BHUPINDER SINGH & ANR ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Sunil Dalal& Mr. Chandan Rai Chawla, Advs. versus ATTAR SINGH & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Madan Lal Sharma, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI SANJIV KHANNA, J.(ORAL): This order disposes of the intra-court appeal filed by Bhupinder Singh and Randhir Singh.2. The appellants, Bhupinder Singh and Randhir Singh, and the respondents, Attar Singh and Col. (Retd.) Yoginder Singh, are brothers.3. The respondents have filed CS(OS) No.10for partition of three immovable properties, bearing Nos. F-169 Village Katwaria Sarai, New Delhi, F-100 Village Katwaria Sarai, New Delhi and F-157,Village Katwaria Sarai, New Delhi. FAO(OS) 230 /2017 Page 1 of 5 4. Impugned order dated 10.07.2017 passed by the learned single Judge dismisses I.A. No.12324/2016 filed by the appellants for amend...
Sadachari Singh vs.shashi Mishra & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-15-2018
* + + + 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: November 15, 2018 CONT. CAS. (C) 518/2002 CONT. CAS. (C) 192/2008 CONT. CAS. (C) 125/2009 SADACHARI SINGH .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Amiy Shukla and Mr. Shakti Vardhan, Advocates versus SHASHI MISHRA & ORS. DR. MANGALA RAI & ORS. DR. MANGALA RAI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. S.S. Lingwal, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) In the above captioned three petitions, non-compliance of various interim orders in W.P. (C) 3792/2002 is alleged. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, these three petitions have been heard together and are being decided by this common order.2. Vide interim order of 30th September, 2002 respondents were directed to allow petitioner to participate in the interview. In the reply filed by respondents, it is asserted that upon receipt of fax message from the Headquarters, i.e. ICAR, on 1st October, 2002 in noon time, petitioner CONT. CAS. (C) 518/2002, 192/...
North Delhi Municipal Corporation vs.dr. Ram Naresh Sharma and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-15-2018
$~26, 29, 30 & 36 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of decision : November 15, 2018 W.P.(C) 8704/2017 with CM No.35693/2017 (stay) (Arising out of the order passed in OA27122016) NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Gaurang Kanth, Advocate with Ms. Biji Rajesh, Ms. Eshita Baurah and Mr. Diwanker Sethi, Advocates. versus SANTOSH KUMAR SHARMA AND ORS. Vijay Through: Mr. ........ RESPONDENTS and Sharma Sharma Bhardwaj Ms.Swagati, Advocate for R-1. Mr. Arun Bhardwaj, CGSC with Mr.Shashwat and Mr.Nikhil and Ms.Gauraan, Advocates for UOI. Mr. Kumar Singh, Standing Counsel for EDMC/R Mr. Advocate. Abhaya Behera, Rajesh K. + W.P.(C) 637/2018 with CM APPL. 2760/2018 (for stay) (Arising out of the order passed in OA40662016) NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Gaurang Kanth, Advocate with Ms. Biji Rajesh, Ms. Eshita Baurah and Mr. Diwanker Sethi, Advocates. versus W.P.(C) 8704/2017 & connected matters Page 1 of 8 DR. R...
Kusum vs.gurcharan Singh
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-15-2018
$~7 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgement:15. h November, 2018 + MAT.APP.(F.C.) 168/2016 & CM APPL422322016 KUSUM ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Ruchit Dugal, Advocate. versus GURCHARAN SINGH ..... Respondent Through: Mr. R.S. Chaggar, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH G.S. SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. Despite the matter having been passed over twice and called for third time, none has appeared in the matter on behalf of the counsel for the appellant.2. Mr. Chaggar, counsel for the respondent has taken us to the order sheets to show that on 13.07.2018, the matter was adjourned at the request of Mr. Gaurav Bharadwaj, Advocate, who claimed to have been recently engaged in the matter and time was sought to complete his file. Prior thereto, on 11.10.2017, the matter was adjourned as the arguing counsel was in some personal difficulty. On 09.10.2017, the matter was adjourned as none had appeared on behalf of the appellant and als...
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-8 vs.sistema Shyam Teleservices Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-15-2018
$~1-3 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI INCOME TAX APPEAL No.70/2013 % Date of decision:15. h November, 2018 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-III ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Asheesh Jain, Sr. Standing Counsel with Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Advocate. versus SHYAM TELELINK LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Piyush Kaushik, Advocate. INCOME TAX APPEAL No.73/2013 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-III ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Asheesh Jain, Sr. Standing Counsel with Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Advocate. versus SHYAM TELELINK LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Piyush Kaushik, Advocate. INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1069/2017 PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-8 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Asheesh Jain, Sr. Standing Counsel with Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Advocate. versus SISTEMA SHYAM TELESERVICES LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Piyush Kaushik, Advocate. ITA Nos.70/2013, 73/2013 & 1069/2017 Page 1 of 17 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI SANJIV KHANNA, J.These appeals by the Rev...
- ‹ Prev
- 35
- 36
- 37
- 38
- 39
- 41
- 42
- 43
- 44
- 45
- Next ›
- Last »