Delhi Court November 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Wahid vs.the State Govt of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-15-2018
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI ARIF Reserved on:5. h July, 2018 Decided on:15. h November, 2018 CRL.A. 927/2017 Represented by: Mr. M.R. Chanchal, Advocate. ..... Appellant versus THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Represented by: Ms. Meenakshi Dahiya, APP + WAHID for the State CRL.A. 1015/2017 Represented by: Mr. Prashant Diwan with Mr. Brajesh Dwivedi, Advocates. ..... Appellant versus THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Represented by: Ms. Meenakshi Dahiya, APP + ANSHU for the State CRL.A. 1132/2017 ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr. Sandesh Singh Bagga, versus Advocate. THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Represented by: Ms. Meenakshi Dahiya, APP + CRL.A. 5/2018 for the State NARENDER @ BHOLA ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr.V.K. Mishra, Advocate. versus CRL.A. 927/2017, 1015/2017, 1132/2017 &5/2018 Page 1 of 12 THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Represented by: Ms. Meenakshi Dahiya, APP for the State. CORAM: HON'B...
Vandana Kurichh vs.state Thr. Govt. Of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-15-2018
$~4 & 5 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + BAIL APPLN. 391/2017 Judgment delivered on:15. 11.2018 + SARASWATI YADAV versus ........ Petitioner THE STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent BAIL APPLN. 478/2017 VANDANA KURICHH versus ........ Petitioner STATE THR. GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Mr. Sanjay Sharma with Ms.Richa Sharma, Advocates in Bail Appln. 391/2017 and Mr.Parmod Kumar Singhal, Adv. in Bail Appln. 478/2017. Ms. Meenakshi Dahiya, APP for the State with SI Aadesh, P.S.Prashant Vihar. Mr.D.K.Mishra, Adv. for the complainant. For the Respondent : CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT1511.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioners seek anticipatory bail in FIR No.56/2017, under Sections 323/326/356/379/3IPC, Police Station Prashant Vihar. BAIL APPLN. 391/2017 & BAIL APPLN. 478/2017 Page 1 of 3 2. Allegations in the FIR are that the complainant as well as the petitioners...
Sadachari Singh vs.dr. Mangala Rai & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-15-2018
* + + + 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: November 15, 2018 CONT. CAS. (C) 518/2002 CONT. CAS. (C) 192/2008 CONT. CAS. (C) 125/2009 SADACHARI SINGH .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Amiy Shukla and Mr. Shakti Vardhan, Advocates versus SHASHI MISHRA & ORS. DR. MANGALA RAI & ORS. DR. MANGALA RAI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. S.S. Lingwal, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) In the above captioned three petitions, non-compliance of various interim orders in W.P. (C) 3792/2002 is alleged. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, these three petitions have been heard together and are being decided by this common order.2. Vide interim order of 30th September, 2002 respondents were directed to allow petitioner to participate in the interview. In the reply filed by respondents, it is asserted that upon receipt of fax message from the Headquarters, i.e. ICAR, on 1st October, 2002 in noon time, petitioner CONT. CAS. (C) 518/2002, 192/...
North Delhi Municipal Corporation vs.dr. Satya Prakash Harit and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-15-2018
$~26, 29, 30 & 36 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of decision : November 15, 2018 W.P.(C) 8704/2017 with CM No.35693/2017 (stay) (Arising out of the order passed in OA27122016) NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Gaurang Kanth, Advocate with Ms. Biji Rajesh, Ms. Eshita Baurah and Mr. Diwanker Sethi, Advocates. versus SANTOSH KUMAR SHARMA AND ORS. Vijay Through: Mr. ........ RESPONDENTS and Sharma Sharma Bhardwaj Ms.Swagati, Advocate for R-1. Mr. Arun Bhardwaj, CGSC with Mr.Shashwat and Mr.Nikhil and Ms.Gauraan, Advocates for UOI. Mr. Kumar Singh, Standing Counsel for EDMC/R Mr. Advocate. Abhaya Behera, Rajesh K. + W.P.(C) 637/2018 with CM APPL. 2760/2018 (for stay) (Arising out of the order passed in OA40662016) NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Gaurang Kanth, Advocate with Ms. Biji Rajesh, Ms. Eshita Baurah and Mr. Diwanker Sethi, Advocates. versus W.P.(C) 8704/2017 & connected matters Page 1 of 8 DR. R...
Delhi Transport Corporation vs.m/s Neel Kanth Placement Services (Regd ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-15-2018
$~32 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:15. h November, 2018 + O.M.P. 500/2008 DELHI TRANSPORT CORPORATION ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Jyotindra Kumar, Advocate. (M:9971588963) versus M/S NEEL KANTH PLACEMENT SERVICES (REGD.) Through: None. ..... Respondent CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.(Oral) I.A. 4581/2017 (Delay in filing Restoration Application) 1. This application has been filed seeking condonation of delay of 101 days in filing of I.A. 4580/2017 for restoration of the petition. For the reasons stated in the application, the delay is condoned.2. I.A. is allowed. I.A. 4580/2017 (Restoration Application) 3. This is an application seeking restoration of OMP5002008 which was dismissed for non-prosecution on 2nd December, 2016. For the reasons stated in the application, OMP5002008 is restored.4. I.A. is allowed. O.M.P. 500/2008 5. The present petition has been filed under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 challengi...
M/S s.a Builders Ltd. Vs.m.c.d (Now Represented Delhi Jal Board)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-15-2018
$~31 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:15. h November, 2018 M/S S.A BUILDERS LTD. CS (OS) 1593/2011 ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Tarun Gupta and Ms. Madhumita Bose, Advocates. (M:9958062677) M.C.D (NOW REPRESENTED DELHI JAL BOARD) versus ..... Defendant Through: Ms. Kanika Agnihotri, Standing Counsel, DJB with Mr. Bhrigu Dhami and Mr. Preet Singh Oberoi, Advocates. CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.(Oral) 1. Present petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 challenges the award dated 5th May, 2011 passed by the learned Sole Arbitrator.2.... Petitioner - M/s S. A. Builders Ltd. (hereinafter Contractor) was awarded a contract for the construction of the 3rd Gravity Duct from RD3010to 5140 meters (Part B) at Okhla New Delhi.3. The contractual amount was Rs.1,79,99,995/-. The date of commencement of work was 12th January, 1984 and the work was to be completed, within 18 months i.e. by 11th July, 1985. The actual d...
Food Corporation of India vs.mahavir Rice and General Mills and Partne ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-15-2018
$~42 & 43 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:23. d October, 2018 O.M.P. (COMM) 333/2016 NEELAM SHARMA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Rajesh Chhetri, Mr. Pawan Upadhyay, Mr. Rajeev Chhetri & Ms. Meenakshi Rawat, Advocates (M- 9891675255). + + versus FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Paritosh Budhiraja, Ms. Surabhi Maheshwari & Mr. Ashwani Ahuja, Advocates for R-1 (M-9810100237). AND O.M.P.(COMM) 335/2016 FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Paritosh Budhiraja, Ms. Surabhi Maheshwari & Mr. Ashwani Ahuja, Advocates for R-1 (M-9810100237) versus MAHAVIR RICE AND GENERAL MILLS AND PARTNERS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Rajesh Chhetri, Mr. Pawan Upadhyay, Mr. Rajeev Chhetri & Ms. Meenakshi Rawat, Advocates for R3 (M-9891675255) . None for other... RESPONDENTS. CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.(Oral) OMP (COMM) 333/2016 has been filed on 9th July, 2012 challenging 1. the award dated 27th ...
National Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs.m/s Mmd Enterprises Thr. Its Prop. & An ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-15-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RFA No.528/2016 + % NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. 15th November, 2018 ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Shantha Devi Raman and Mr. Abhishek, Advocates (9868101409) versus M/S MMD ENTERPRISES THR. ITS PROP. & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: None CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) is filed by the defendant/insurance company impugning the Judgment of the trial court dated 30.03.2016 by which the trial court has decreed the suit for recovery of moneys filed by the respondents/plaintiffs on account of loss caused due to fire and which was covered by the insurance policy issued by the RFA No.528/2016 Page 1 of 8 appellant/defendant. A money decree has been passed for a sum of Rs. 3,53,724/- alongwith interest at 18% per annum. It may be noted that admittedly the policy was for insurance of goods...
Kamlesh Sharma vs.uoi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-15-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:13. 09.2018 Pronounced on:15. 11.2018 + W.P.(C) 1696/2010 KAMLESH SHARMA Petitioner Through: Sh. M.M. Sharma and Sh. Aditya Vashisth, Advocates. Versus UOI Through: Sh. Praveen Kumar Jain and Ms. Rashmi Kumar, Advocates with Mohd. Ayub and Sh. Harvesh Kumar, Assistant Director. .Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. CHAWLA MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT % 1. The reliefs claimed in these proceedings by the petitioner, are that a notification issued on 27.12.1991, excluding teachers working in Delhi Administration (hereafter GNCTD) schools from entitlement to allotment of accommodation in the Central General Pool of residential staff quarters, as discriminatory, and also, a consequential direction that the respondents should permit her to occupy the premises where she resides in (that had been originally allotted to her husband, who sought and was granted voluntary retirement in 2008).2. The pet...
Food Corporation of India Moga vs.shiv Shanker Trading Co Moga
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-15-2018
$~4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:15. h November, 2018 + O.M.P. 882/2012 FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA MOGA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Mohan Lal Sharma, Advocate (M-9811537909). versus SHIV SHANKER TRADING CO MOGA ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Kumar Dushyant Singh & Mr. (M- Siddharth Dutta, Advocates 9811433704). CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.(Oral) The present petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and 1. Conciliation Act, 1996 challenges the award dated 25th June, 2012 passed by the Learned Sole Arbitrator.2. The... Petitioner Food Corporation of India (hereinafter, FCI) and M/s Shiv Shankar Trading Co. (hereinafter miller) had entered into a milling agreement dated 14th November, 1994. Under the said contract, the miller was to mill the paddy and supply rice to FCI. FCI had supplied 34,471bags (23,666.33 quintals) of superfine variety and 2,370 bags (1,540.50 quintals) of fine variety paddy to the miller for milling. The ...
- ‹ Prev
- 33
- 34
- 35
- 36
- 37
- 39
- 40
- 41
- 42
- 43
- Next ›
- Last »