Delhi Court November 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Bakeer Bhai vs.yashwant Gupta
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-27-2018
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:27. 11.2018 F.A.O. No.539/2018 BAKEER BHAI ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Mukesh M. Goel, Advocate. Versus YASHWANT GUPTA Through: None. ....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL VINOD GOEL, J.(ORAL) C.M. No.59197/2018 (for exemption) Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application is disposed of. F.A.O. No.539/2018 & C.M. No.49196/2018 (for stay) 1. The impugned order dated 03.10.2018 passed by the court of learned Additional District Judge-13, Central District, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi (ADJ) dismissing the application of the appellant (defendant) under Order IX Rule 13 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) for setting aside the ex-parte judgment and decree dated 05.06.2018 in Civil Suit No.16778/2016 is the subject-matter of challenge in this appeal.2. The brief facts of the case are that the respondent (plaintiff) instituted a civil suit for recovery of Rs.19,11,340/...
George Manjuran vs.union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-27-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:14. h November 2018 Decided on:27. h November 2018 + W.P.(C) 2671/2016 R P SANWAL .....Petitioner Through: Mr. V.K. Garg, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Ankur Chhibber, Ms. Noopur Dubey & Mr. Bhanu Gupta, Advocates. versus .....Respondents Through: Ms. Maninder Acharya, ASG with UNION OF INDIA & ORS. + W.P.(C) 2668/2016 Mr. Rakesh Kumar, CGSC for UOI. PRAKHAR TRIVEDI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. V.K. Garg, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Ankur Chhibber, Ms. Noopur Dubey & Mr. Bhanu Gupta, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Maninder Acharya, ASG with + W.P.(C) 743/2015 Mr. Rakesh Kumar, CGSC for UOI. MANJIT SINGH .....Petitioner Through: Mr. V.K. Garg, Sr. Advocate with W.P.(C) 2671/2016 & connected matters Page 1 of 23 Mr. Ankur Chhibber, Ms. Noopur Dubey & Mr. Bhanu Gupta, Advocates. versus .....Respondents Through: Ms. Barkha Babbar with Mr.Het UNION OF INDIA & ORS. + W.P.(C) 2672/2016 Shah, Advocates for UOI. C...
Srishti Arogyadham Pvt Ltd vs.punjab National Bank & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-27-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision:27. h November, 2018 + W.P.(C) 12299/2018, CM No.47696/2018 SRISHTI AROGYADHAM PVT LTD Through: Mr. Rajeeve Mehra, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Niti A. Sachar, Adv. versus ........ Petitioner PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK & ANR Through: Mr. Rajinder Wali, Adv. for R1 ........ RESPONDENTS Mr. Sanjeev Sagar, Adv. and Ms. Nazia Parveen, Adv. for R2 CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO V. KAMESWAR RAO, J.(ORAL) 1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner challenging the order dated October 18, 2018 passed by the learned Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal, Delhi (in short DRAT) which rejected the M.A. No.630/2016, filed by the petitioner for waiver of the pre-deposit of 50% of the amount which had been demanded from the appellant by the respondent No.1 Bank or as determined by the DRT, whichever is less.2. The facts as noted from the record are that the petitioner was sanctioned credit facility of `8.20 cror...
T N Veeraraghavan vs.union of India and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-27-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:15th November, 2018 Pronounced on:27. h November,2018 LPA2462018 & C.M. No.18028/2018 + T N VEERARAGHAVAN ..... Appellant Through: Mr V. Shekher, Senior Advocate with Mr Kamal Kumar Pandey and Mr Deepak Goel, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr Sarat Chandra, Advocate for R-1 Mr Saurav Agrawal, Ms Aakriti Dawar, Mr Vibhu Anshuman and Mr Anshuman Chowdhury, Advocates for R-2. + LPA2492018 & C.M. No.18045/2018 BONTHA PRASADA RAO ..... Appellant Through: Mr V. Shekher, Senior Advocate with Mr Kamal Kumar Pandey and Mr Deepak Goel, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr Sarat Chandra, Advocate for R-1 Mr Saurav Agrawal, Ms Aakriti Dawar, Mr Vibhu Anshuman and Mr Anshuman Chowdhury, Advocates for R-2. + LPA2502018 & C.M. No.18050/2018 P.K BAJPAL ..... Appellant Through: Mr V. Shekher, Senior Advocate LPA2462018 & connected matters Page 1 of 22 with Mr Kamal Kumar Pande...
M/S Sapient Consulting Pvt. Ltd. Vs.state of Nct of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-27-2018
$~10 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 491/2015 Decided on:-"27th November, 2018 M/S SAPIENT CONSULTING PVT. LTD. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Akhil Anand, Adv. with Mr. Aayush Malhotra, Adv. Versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR.... RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. K.S. Ahuja, APP for the State CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. The second respondent was concededly engaged by the petitioner company as managing director on 10.08.2000. It is an undisputed case of both sides that the petitioner company (the employer) had arranged for residential accommodation for the second respondent (the employee) by taking a premises described as Rama Farm, Mangla Puri, Mehrauli, Delhi (the leased premises) on rent from its owner (the landlady) by a lease agreement dated 05.12.2002, the lease being for a period of two years commencing from 15.01.2003. The employer company terminated the services of the second respondent w.e.f. 30.07.2003 by serving a notice to that effect u...
Adesh Tyagi vs.pooja Tyagi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-27-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % ADESH TYAGI POOJA TYAGI RFA No.953/2018 27th November, 2018 Through: Versus Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Arun Kumar Tewari, Advocate (9873039189) ..... Respondent CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) CM No.49022/2018 (Exemption) Exemption allowed subject to just exceptions. CM stands disposed of. CM No.49023/2018 (delay in re-filing) For the reasons stated in the application, delay in re-filing is condoned, subject to just exceptions. CM stands disposed of. RFA No.953/2018 Page 1 of 6 RFA No.953/2018 & CM No.49021/2018 (stay) 1. This Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) is filed by the defendant in the suit impugning the Judgment of the trial court dated 27.02.2018 by which the trial court has dismissed the leave to defend application filed under Section XXXVII Rule 3(5) of CPC and decreed the suit for recovery of Rs. 26 lakhs ...
Sohan Singh Talwar vs.s Kuldeep Singh Talwar & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-27-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on :12. h October, 2018 Date of decision :27th November, 2018 + CS (OS) 1941/2014 SOHAN SINGH TALWAR Through: Mr. G. K. Sharma, Advocate. versus ..... Plaintiff S KULDEEP SINGH TALWAR & ANR. ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Amiet Andlay and Mr. Arun K. Sharma, Advocates. (M:9891685368) CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.JUDGMENT1 Late Sardar Parkash Singh Talwar, who migrated to India after partition was married to Smt. Harbans Kaur, who is Defendant No.4. She did not have any children. Thereafter, he married Smt. Agya Kaur and they had three sons and one daughter. Plaintiff Sardar Sohan Singh Talwar, Defendant No.1- Mr. Kuldeep Singh Talwar and Defendant No.2- Shri Rajinder Singh Talwar are the three sons. Defendant No.5- Smt. Trilochan Kaur was the daughter. Both wives of Sh. Parkash Singh Talwar are alive.2. Plaintiff has instituted the present suit for permanent injunction, rendition of accounts, partition, decl...
M/S Krishna Construction Co vs.delhi State Industrial and Infrastructu ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-27-2018
$~34 & 35 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:27. h November, 2018 + + DELHI STATE INDUSTRIAL & INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD O.M.P. 1567/2014 ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Moni Cinmoy, Mr. Arvind Kumar Pandey, Mr. Ajay Tiwari, Advocates (M-986088168) with Mr. Jatinder Kr. Sharma, E.E versus M/S THE KRISHNA CONSTRUCTION COMPANY..... Respondent Through: Mr. Raman Kapur, Senior Advocate with Mr. Varun Kapur, Advocates (M-9910032035). M/S KRISHNA CONSTRUCTION CO AND O.M.P. 56/2015 ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Raman Kapur, Senior Advocate with Mr. Varun Kapur, Advocates (M-9910032035). versus DELHI STATE INDUSTRIAL AND INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Moni Cinmoy, Mr. Arvind Kumar Pandey, Mr. Ajay Tiwari, Advocates (M-986088168) with Mr. Jatinder Kr. Sharma, E.E. CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.(Oral) 1. M/s The Krishna Construction Company was awarded a contract for Construction of Boundar...
M/S Stallion Security vs.union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-26-2018
$~17 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:31. 10.2018 Pronounced on:26. 11.2018 + W.P.(C) 3309/2018 & CM Appl. Nos. 12989-12990/2018 M/S STALLION SECURITY ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Sudhanshu Tomar, Adv. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Vinod Diwakar, CGSC with Mr. Kashish Bajaj, Adv. for R-1 to 3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN % 1. This writ petition concerns a tender (No.NIC/PTS/2017/07) issued by the National Informatics Centre, New Delhi (NIC) on May 08, 2017 for provision of housekeeping and pest control services at its headquarters in New Delhi (hereafter, the subject tender).2. The petitioner and the fourth respondent No.4 herein (viz., R. K. Jain & Sons Hospitality Services Pvt. Ltd- hereafter RKJ) participated in the subject tender and were found technically qualified. In fact, the petitioner was providing these services to NIC under a rate contract d...
Himalya @ Raja Sinha vs.state of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-26-2018
$~18 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:26. 11.2018 BAIL APPLN. 2359/2018 HIMALYA @ RAJA SINHA versus STATE OF DELHI ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : For the Respondent: Mr.Ishwar Singh, Adv. Mr. Hirein Sharma, APP for the State with ASI Paras Ram, P.S.Vijay Vihar CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT2611.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in FIR No.545/2016 Police Station Vijay Vihar, initially registered under Sections 323/341/5of the IPG. Subsequently, Section 354B and 325 of the IPC have been added.2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated. He submits that the subject FIR emanates out of a dispute between the two families. Further, it is contended that there is no allegation in the FIR that any offence punishable under Section 354 IPC was committed by the petitioner. Learned counsel for ...
- ‹ Prev
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- Next ›
- Last »