Delhi Court November 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Newhilla K Marak vs.union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-27-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:27. h November, 2018 LPA6532018, CAV10832018, CM Nos. 49045-49048/2018 % + NEWHILLA K MARAK ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Avijit Bhattacharjee, Adv. with Mr. Ajoy Kr. Ghosh, Ms. Upma Shrivastava & Mr. Abhay Kant Mishra, Advs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Vinod Diwakar, CGSC for R-1 & R-2 Ms. Aprajita mukherjee, Adv. for R-3 CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO V. KAMESWAR RAO, J.(ORAL) CAV10832018 Learned counsel for the caveator has put in appearance. Caveat stands discharged. CM No.49047/2018 Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions. Application stands disposed of. CM No.49045/2018 (delay of 18 days in filing the appeal) For the reasons stated in the application, the delay of 18 days in filing the appeal stands condoned. Application stands disposed of. LPA6532018 1. The challenge in the appeal is to the order dated September 25, 2018 whereby the learned S...
P. Sasi vs.union of India & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-27-2018
$~11 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: November 27, 2018 % W.P.(C.) No.9994/2017 with CM APPL.40758-59/2017 P. SASI ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Sriram J.Thalapathy, Advocate with Mr. Shilp Vinod and Mr.Pushkin Rajkumar, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR .....Respondents Through: Ms. Abha Malhotra, Advocate with Mr. Abhishek Kamal, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.CHAWLA A.K. CHAWLA, J.(ORAL) 1. Instant writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has come to be preferred by the petitioner extending challenge to the orders dated 06.05.2014 and 28.07.2015 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi, in short 'CAT', in OA No.1497/2009 and the RA No.152/2014 in OA No.1497/2009 respectively. Concisely, the facts relevant 2. the petitioner has been working as an Assistant in MGO Branch/Army Headquarters and during the course of such employment, a departmental to the in...
Ajay Kumar & Anr vs.harka Bahadur Gurung
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-27-2018
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RSA No.163/2018 Judgment reserved on :15. 11.2018 Date of decision :27. 11.2018 AJAY KUMAR & ANR ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Pawan Sharma, Advocate versus HARKA BAHADUR GURUNG Through: ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA JUDGMENT ANU MALHOTRA, J.1. The appellant vide the present second appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, as amended assails the impugned judgment dated 03.08.2018 of the learned ADJ-02, Waqf Tribunal/ New Delhi District, Patiala House Courts, New Delhi in RCA/DJ No.77/2017 vide which the first appeal filed by the appellants herein against the impugned judgment dated 16.08.2017 of the Civil Judge-02, PHC, New Delhi District, New Delhi in CS No.57219/2016 (Old No.CS1282013), - was dismissed.2. Vide the judgment dated 16.08.2017 of the Civil Judge-02, PHC, New Delhi, the suit for possession, mandatory and permanenet injunction filed by Harkh Bahadur Gurung as plaintiff thereof ar...
Ravi Dev Yadav Thr. Avinash Yadav (Parokar) vs.state of Nct Delhi and ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-27-2018
#9 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:27. h November, 2018 W.P.(CRL) 1387/2018 RAVI DEV YADAV THR. AVINASH YADAV (PAROKAR) ........ Petitioner versus STATE OF NCT DELHI & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the... RESPONDENTS : Mr.Ajay Khanna, Adv : Mr.Rahul Mehra, SC with Mr.Chaitanya Gosain, Advocate for State with Insp. Sanjeev Mandal, PS Cannaught Place. Mr.P.Venkat Reddy and Mr.Prashant Tyagi, Advs for R-2 & 3 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL JUDGMENT SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J (ORAL) 1. The present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been instituted praying for the following reliefs:-"a. Issue a writ of habeas corpus or any other direction directing the respondent to produce the petitioner in this Honble court; b. Issue a writ of mandamus or any other direction directing the W.P. (Crl.) 1387/2018 Page 1 of 7 respondent to initi...
R Krishnan vs.union of India & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-27-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:15th November, 2018 Pronounced on:27. h November,2018 LPA2462018 & C.M. No.18028/2018 + T N VEERARAGHAVAN ..... Appellant Through: Mr V. Shekher, Senior Advocate with Mr Kamal Kumar Pandey and Mr Deepak Goel, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr Sarat Chandra, Advocate for R-1 Mr Saurav Agrawal, Ms Aakriti Dawar, Mr Vibhu Anshuman and Mr Anshuman Chowdhury, Advocates for R-2. + LPA2492018 & C.M. No.18045/2018 BONTHA PRASADA RAO ..... Appellant Through: Mr V. Shekher, Senior Advocate with Mr Kamal Kumar Pandey and Mr Deepak Goel, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr Sarat Chandra, Advocate for R-1 Mr Saurav Agrawal, Ms Aakriti Dawar, Mr Vibhu Anshuman and Mr Anshuman Chowdhury, Advocates for R-2. + LPA2502018 & C.M. No.18050/2018 P.K BAJPAL ..... Appellant Through: Mr V. Shekher, Senior Advocate LPA2462018 & connected matters Page 1 of 22 with Mr Kamal Kumar Pande...
Voltas Ltd vs.vishal Dua & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-27-2018
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI VOLTAS LTD. Date of decision:27. h November, 2018. CS(COMM) 152/2016 ..... Plaintiff Through: Ms. Asavari Jain, Ms. Geetanjali Visvanathan and Mr. Nischal Anand, Advs. ..... Defendants Versus VISHAL DUA & ANR. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW1 Through: Mr. Umesh Mishra, Adv. The plaintiff has sued the two defendants namely Vishal Dua and Damini Enterprise, for permanent injunction restraining infringement of trade mark VOLTAS and passing off and for ancillary reliefs.2. The suit came up first before this Court on 1st March, 2016 when, while issuing summons/notice thereof, vide ex-parte ad-interim order, the defendants restrained from using the mark VOLTAS in any manner whatsoever and commission issued to visit the premises of the defendants and to make an inventory of the electric irons and/or other products bearing the mark VOLTAS.3. The defendants appeared in response to the summons issued and filed a written statement to whi...
Smt. Shashi Gupta & Ors. Vs.state & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-27-2018
$~22 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:-"27th November, 2018 CRL.M.C. 5940/2018 and Crl.M.A.48033-48036/2018 + SMT. SHASHI GUPTA & ORS. STATE & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Shesh Datt Sharma, Adv. Versus... RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. K.S. Ahuja, APP for the State CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. On the criminal complaint (CC No.58769/16) of the second respondent (complainant) the metropolitan magistrate held pre- summoning inquiry in the course of which several witnesses were examined including the complainant appearing as CW-1. The metropolitan magistrate, by her order dated 16.11.2017, short shrifted the issue by observing that the dispute was civil in nature and no cognizable offence had been disclosed, thereby dismissing the complaint.2. The second respondent (complainant) challenged the said order in the court of sessions invoking its revisional jurisdiction by petition (Crl.Rev.No.2/2018). The revisional court allowed the petition, by ...
Union of India vs.divyanshu Patel
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-27-2018
$~ * + W.P.(C) 12598/2018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision :27. 11.2018 UNION OF INDIA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr Ruchir Mishra with Mr. Sanjiv Kr. Saxena, Mr. Mukesh Kr. Tiwari, Mr. Ramneek Mishra and Mr. Abhishek Rana, Adv. for UOI versus DIVYANSHU PATEL ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Ankur Chibber with Mr. Vikram Hegde, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. CHAWLA VIPIN SANGHI, J.(ORAL) CAV No.1081/2018 Learned counsel for the caveator has appeared. Accordingly, the caveat stands discharged. C.M. No.48964/2018 Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. W.P.(C.) No.12598/2018 Page 1 of 17 W.P.(C) 12598/2018 with C.M. Nos. 48962, 48963, 48695/2018 1. The Union of India has preferred the present writ petition to assail the order dated 25.07.2018 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi (the Tribunal) in O.A. No.579/2018 preferred by the respondent. T...
Chattu Lal vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-27-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on:26. 10.2018. Date of decision :27. 11.2018 CRL.APPEAL5242017 CHATTU LAL STATE Through: Ms. Aishwarya Rao, Advocate. ..... Appellant (DHCLSC) versus ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Kusum Dhalla, APP for State. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA JUDGMENT ANU MALHOTRA, J.1. The appellant Chattu Lal vide this present appeal under Section 374(2) of the Cr.P.C., 1973 assails the impugned judgment of conviction and order on sentence dated 12.07.2016 and 26.07.2016 respectively by the Court of the Learned ASJ-01, Rohini Courts, Delhi in SC No.579in relation to FIR No.226/13, PS Bhalswa Dairy, whereby the appellant herein was convicted for the offence punishable under Section 6 of the POCSO Act, 2012 and under Section 376(2)(i)(l) of the Indian Penal Code, 1850 and who vide order on sentence dated 26.07.2016 was sentenced to Rigorous Imprisonment for a period of 15 years and a fine of Rs.5,000/- under Section 6 of the POCSO Act, 20...
p.k Bajpal vs.union of India & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-27-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:15th November, 2018 Pronounced on:27. h November,2018 LPA2462018 & C.M. No.18028/2018 + T N VEERARAGHAVAN ..... Appellant Through: Mr V. Shekher, Senior Advocate with Mr Kamal Kumar Pandey and Mr Deepak Goel, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr Sarat Chandra, Advocate for R-1 Mr Saurav Agrawal, Ms Aakriti Dawar, Mr Vibhu Anshuman and Mr Anshuman Chowdhury, Advocates for R-2. + LPA2492018 & C.M. No.18045/2018 BONTHA PRASADA RAO ..... Appellant Through: Mr V. Shekher, Senior Advocate with Mr Kamal Kumar Pandey and Mr Deepak Goel, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr Sarat Chandra, Advocate for R-1 Mr Saurav Agrawal, Ms Aakriti Dawar, Mr Vibhu Anshuman and Mr Anshuman Chowdhury, Advocates for R-2. + LPA2502018 & C.M. No.18050/2018 P.K BAJPAL ..... Appellant Through: Mr V. Shekher, Senior Advocate LPA2462018 & connected matters Page 1 of 22 with Mr Kamal Kumar Pande...
- ‹ Prev
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- Next ›
- Last »