Delhi Court November 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Rajesh Gullah vs.sangeeta Sethi & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-27-2018
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on :26. h October, 2018 Date of decision :27th November, 2018 RAJESH GULLAH CS (OS) 539/2014 ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. P. S. Bindra, Ms. Rishika Arora and Ms. Asmita, Advocates. (M:9811034970) versus SANGEETA SETHI & ANR. ..... Defendants Through: Ms. Sonali Malhotra, Advocate. (M:9818024129) CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.JUDGMENT1 The Plaintiff Mr. Rajesh Gullah has filed the present suit for specific performance and permanent injunction against Mrs. Sangeeta Sethi and Mr. Sannil Sethi (hereinafter Defendants).2. The basis of the suit is an agreement to sell dated 12th October, 2010 entered into between the Plaintiff and the Defendants. The said agreement is admitted between the parties and is marked as Ex.PW-1/2. The agreement is duly signed by the Plaintiff and the Defendants. The agreement relates to property no.2, Road No.40, Punjabi Bagh (West), New Delhi, admeasuring about 365 sq. yds. (hereinaft...
Delhi State Industrial & Infrastructure Development Corporation Ltd vs ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-27-2018
$~34 & 35 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:27. h November, 2018 + + DELHI STATE INDUSTRIAL & INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD O.M.P. 1567/2014 ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Moni Cinmoy, Mr. Arvind Kumar Pandey, Mr. Ajay Tiwari, Advocates (M-986088168) with Mr. Jatinder Kr. Sharma, E.E versus M/S THE KRISHNA CONSTRUCTION COMPANY..... Respondent Through: Mr. Raman Kapur, Senior Advocate with Mr. Varun Kapur, Advocates (M-9910032035). M/S KRISHNA CONSTRUCTION CO AND O.M.P. 56/2015 ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Raman Kapur, Senior Advocate with Mr. Varun Kapur, Advocates (M-9910032035). versus DELHI STATE INDUSTRIAL AND INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Moni Cinmoy, Mr. Arvind Kumar Pandey, Mr. Ajay Tiwari, Advocates (M-986088168) with Mr. Jatinder Kr. Sharma, E.E. CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.(Oral) 1. M/s The Krishna Construction Company was awarded a contract for Construction of Boundar...
Prakhar Trivedi vs.union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-27-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:14. h November 2018 Decided on:27. h November 2018 + W.P.(C) 2671/2016 R P SANWAL .....Petitioner Through: Mr. V.K. Garg, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Ankur Chhibber, Ms. Noopur Dubey & Mr. Bhanu Gupta, Advocates. versus .....Respondents Through: Ms. Maninder Acharya, ASG with UNION OF INDIA & ORS. + W.P.(C) 2668/2016 Mr. Rakesh Kumar, CGSC for UOI. PRAKHAR TRIVEDI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. V.K. Garg, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Ankur Chhibber, Ms. Noopur Dubey & Mr. Bhanu Gupta, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Maninder Acharya, ASG with + W.P.(C) 743/2015 Mr. Rakesh Kumar, CGSC for UOI. MANJIT SINGH .....Petitioner Through: Mr. V.K. Garg, Sr. Advocate with W.P.(C) 2671/2016 & connected matters Page 1 of 23 Mr. Ankur Chhibber, Ms. Noopur Dubey & Mr. Bhanu Gupta, Advocates. versus .....Respondents Through: Ms. Barkha Babbar with Mr.Het UNION OF INDIA & ORS. + W.P.(C) 2672/2016 Shah, Advocates for UOI. C...
Gurtej Singh Batth vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-27-2018
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on :29. h September, 2018 Pronounced on :27. h November, 2018 Crl.A.39/2015 GURTEJ SINGH BATTH ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Saahila Lamba, Adv. STATE versus Through: Mr. Satish Aggarwala, Adv. . ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT This appeal assails judgment, dated 14th August, 2014, passed 1. by the learned Special Judge (NDPS), whereby the appellant stands convicted of having committed the offences contemplated under Section 21(c) and 23(c) read with Section 28 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (hereinafter referred to as the NDPS Act), and the consequent order, dated 19th August, 2014, whereby the appellant stands sentenced, for the said offence, to 10 years rigorous imprisonment with fine of 1 lakh and default simple imprisonment of 3 months, for each of the aforementioned offences, the sentences being directed to run concurrently.2. The issue in controversy stands c...
Malti Singh vs.union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-27-2018
$~17 * + MALTI SINGH IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 1130/2017 ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Maninder Dubey, Advocate. UNION OF INDIA & ORS versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Bhagwan Swarup Shukla, CGSC with Mr. Kamaldeep and Mr. Shravan Kumar Shukla, Advoactes for UOI. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA % ORDER2711.2018 Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. The... Petitioner, who was nearly 72 years old at the time of filing of the present writ petition, and is now 74 years old, is the widow of the late Mr. Sitaram Singh who was employed as an Upper Divisional Clerk (UDC) in the Border Roads Organization (BRO).2. The... Petitioner approached this Court, aggrieved by the action of the Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances & Pension, Government of India in recovering from her savings bank account with the State Bank of India (SBI) a sum of Rs.1,68,990/- on 8th April 2016. She was intimated by letter dated 20th May 2016 that it had been determined that a t...
Abdul Majeed & Anr vs.hammad Ahmed & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-27-2018
$~27, 28 & 37 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + + Reserved on:17. 09.2018 Pronounced on:27. 11.2018 FAO(OS) 278/2017 & CM Nos.38675/2017, 45939-40/2017, 7340/2018, 19001/2018, 25788-89/2018, 29888-89/2018 ABDUL MAJEED & ANR ..... Appellants versus HAMMAD AHMED & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS FAO(OS) 280/2017 & CM APPL. 38914/2017, 18987/2018 ABDUL MAJEED & ANR versus HAMMAD AHMED & ORS ..... Appellants ........ RESPONDENTS + CONT.CAS(C) 706/2018 & CM APPL. 38048/2018 ABDUL MAJEED & ANR. ..... Appellants versus ........ RESPONDENTS HAMMAD AHMED & ANR. Present : Mr. C.S. Vaidyanathan, Sr. Advocate and Mr. Parag P. Tripathi, Sr. Advocate, with Mr. Simran Mehta, Mr. Saket Sikri, Ms. Aakansha Kaul, Mr. Gaurav Sarin, Mr. Pawan Upadhyay and Mr. Rishabh Kapur, Advocates for the petitioners in all matters. Mr. Kailash Vasdev, Sr. Adv. with Mr. L.S. Rawat, Ms.Limayinla Jamir, Ms. Mohita Srivastava and Mr. Bobby Lau, Advs. for R-1 in item nos. 27 & 28. Mr. Dayan Krishnan, Sr. Adv. with Mr....
Narinder Kumar Arora & Ors. Vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-27-2018
$~11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:-"27th November, 2018 CRL. M.C. 1993/2015 NARINDER KUMAR ARORA & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Varun Gupta for Ms. Pratiti Rungta, Adv. versus + STATE & ANR. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. K.S. Ahuja, APP for the State with SI Durgadas, PS Saket. Ms. Manmeet Arora & Ms. Pavitra Kaur, Advs. for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. On the criminal complaint (CC No.10/01/2012) of the second respondent, the Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate (South District) directed the station house officer of police station Saket to register first information report and carry out investigation as per law, in wake of which directions FIR No.108/2013 was registered on 01.04.2013 by police station Saket and investigation taken up for offence under Section 420 Indian Penal Code (IPC), to which offences punishable under Sections 468 and 471 IPC have been added later, material in support of such additional offences stat...
K S Rathore vs.union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-27-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:14. h November 2018 Decided on:27. h November 2018 + W.P.(C) 2671/2016 R P SANWAL .....Petitioner Through: Mr. V.K. Garg, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Ankur Chhibber, Ms. Noopur Dubey & Mr. Bhanu Gupta, Advocates. versus .....Respondents Through: Ms. Maninder Acharya, ASG with UNION OF INDIA & ORS. + W.P.(C) 2668/2016 Mr. Rakesh Kumar, CGSC for UOI. PRAKHAR TRIVEDI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. V.K. Garg, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Ankur Chhibber, Ms. Noopur Dubey & Mr. Bhanu Gupta, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Maninder Acharya, ASG with + W.P.(C) 743/2015 Mr. Rakesh Kumar, CGSC for UOI. MANJIT SINGH .....Petitioner Through: Mr. V.K. Garg, Sr. Advocate with W.P.(C) 2671/2016 & connected matters Page 1 of 23 Mr. Ankur Chhibber, Ms. Noopur Dubey & Mr. Bhanu Gupta, Advocates. versus .....Respondents Through: Ms. Barkha Babbar with Mr.Het UNION OF INDIA & ORS. + W.P.(C) 2672/2016 Shah, Advocates for UOI. C...
Bontha Prasada Rao vs.union of India and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-27-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:15th November, 2018 Pronounced on:27. h November,2018 LPA2462018 & C.M. No.18028/2018 + T N VEERARAGHAVAN ..... Appellant Through: Mr V. Shekher, Senior Advocate with Mr Kamal Kumar Pandey and Mr Deepak Goel, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr Sarat Chandra, Advocate for R-1 Mr Saurav Agrawal, Ms Aakriti Dawar, Mr Vibhu Anshuman and Mr Anshuman Chowdhury, Advocates for R-2. + LPA2492018 & C.M. No.18045/2018 BONTHA PRASADA RAO ..... Appellant Through: Mr V. Shekher, Senior Advocate with Mr Kamal Kumar Pandey and Mr Deepak Goel, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr Sarat Chandra, Advocate for R-1 Mr Saurav Agrawal, Ms Aakriti Dawar, Mr Vibhu Anshuman and Mr Anshuman Chowdhury, Advocates for R-2. + LPA2502018 & C.M. No.18050/2018 P.K BAJPAL ..... Appellant Through: Mr V. Shekher, Senior Advocate LPA2462018 & connected matters Page 1 of 22 with Mr Kamal Kumar Pande...
Mohit Mahajan vs.foundation for Innovation and Technology Transfer (Fi ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-27-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:14. h November 2018 Decided on:27. h November 2018 + LPA6632016 & CM APPL. 44465/2016 MOHIT MAHAJAN Through: Mr. .... Appellant Krishnan, Santhosh Advocate. FOUNDATION FOR INNOVATION AND TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER (FITT) & ORS. versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Rahul Narayan, Advocate for... RESPONDENTS 1 and 2. Mr. Bhagwan Swarup Shukla, CGSC with Mr. Kamaldeep and Mr. Sharvan, Advocates for Respondent 3. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA JUDGMENT Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. This appeal is directed against the judgment dated 26th August, 2016 passed by the learned Single Judge dismissing the Appellants Writ Petition (C) No.7502/2016. This appeal raises important questions of law concerning the interpretation of the word establishment under Section 2(k) of the Disabilities (Equal Opportunities, Protection of Rights and Full Participation) Act, 1995 (the PWD Act) and Section 47 thereof. LPA No.663/2016 Page 1 of 25 ...
- ‹ Prev
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- Next ›
- Last »