Delhi Court November 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Seema Kumari vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-27-2018
$~13 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 4051/2016 Decided on:-"27th November, 2018 SEEMA KUMARI ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Purushottam Sharma Tripathi, Mr. Mukesh Kumar Singh, Mr. Amit, Ms. Vani Vyas & Mr. Mohit Kaushik, Advs. versus STATE & ANR. Through: Mr.Sanjeev Sabharwal, APP for ........ RESPONDENTS the State with ASI Ravinder Kumar, PS Pandav Nagar, Delhi. Dr. M.Y. Khan, Adv. for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. The petitioner was married to the second respondent on 22.02.2011 as per Hindu Rites and Ceremonies in New Delhi. Out of their cohabitation, a girl child took birth on 01.04.2012. It appears the marital relations turned sour and the petitioner (the wife) was constrained to approach the Crime against Women Cell (CAW) on 08.10.2013 with allegations of she having been subjected to cruelty on account of illicit demands of dowry by the second respondent (the husband). The said complaint eventually resulted in first information re...
R P Sanwal vs.union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-27-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:14. h November 2018 Decided on:27. h November 2018 + W.P.(C) 2671/2016 R P SANWAL .....Petitioner Through: Mr. V.K. Garg, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Ankur Chhibber, Ms. Noopur Dubey & Mr. Bhanu Gupta, Advocates. versus .....Respondents Through: Ms. Maninder Acharya, ASG with UNION OF INDIA & ORS. + W.P.(C) 2668/2016 Mr. Rakesh Kumar, CGSC for UOI. PRAKHAR TRIVEDI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. V.K. Garg, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Ankur Chhibber, Ms. Noopur Dubey & Mr. Bhanu Gupta, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Maninder Acharya, ASG with + W.P.(C) 743/2015 Mr. Rakesh Kumar, CGSC for UOI. MANJIT SINGH .....Petitioner Through: Mr. V.K. Garg, Sr. Advocate with W.P.(C) 2671/2016 & connected matters Page 1 of 23 Mr. Ankur Chhibber, Ms. Noopur Dubey & Mr. Bhanu Gupta, Advocates. versus .....Respondents Through: Ms. Barkha Babbar with Mr.Het UNION OF INDIA & ORS. + W.P.(C) 2672/2016 Shah, Advocates for UOI. C...
Leysliener Zandile Luthuli vs.directorate of Revenue Intelligence
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-27-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on :29. h September, 2018 Pronounced on:27. h November, 2018 Crl.A.1151/2014 + LEYSLIENER ZANDILE LUTHULI ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Inderjeet Sidhu, Adv.(DHCLSC) versus DIRECTORATE OF REVENUE INTELLIGENCE Through: Mr. Satish Aggarwala, ..... Respondent Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT The impugned judgment, dated 12th February, 2014, of the 1. learned Special Judge (NDPS), convicts the appellant of having committed an offence punishable under Section 21(c) of the Narcotics, Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (hereinafter referred to as the NDPS Act). The subsequent order on sentence, dated 17thFebruary, 2014, sentences her, for the said offence, to rigorous imprisonment of 10 years and a fine of 1 lakh.2. The law, as it has developed over time, entitles the appellant to acquittal. I do not intend, therefore, to burden this judgment with more facts than are necessary to understand the controversy ...
r.k.anand vs.addt.commissioner of Customs
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-27-2018
$~24 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.REV.P. 684/2002 & CRL.M.As.18436/2015, 18580/2015 Date of Decision:-"27.11.2018 R.K.ANAND ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Deepak Gandhi with Mr.Arhum Sayeed, Advs. versus ADDT. COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS Through Mr.Satish Aggarwala, Adv. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI REKHA PALLI, J (ORAL) 1. Vide the present petition, the petitioner seeks setting aside of the order dated 19.08.2002 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, upholding the conviction of the petitioner u/s 132 and 135(1)(a) of the Customs Act by the learned Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate by his order dated 09.04.2002.2. The relevant facts emerging from the record are that by an order dated 09.04.2002 passed by the learned Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, the petitioner was convicted of offences under sections 132 and 135(1)(a) of the Customs Act for evading customs duties payable on the import of certain household items. Th...
Shri k.r. Anand vs.navayuga Engineering Co Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-27-2018
$~13 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI O.M.P. (COMM) 27/2018 Date of decision :27. h November, 2018 SHRI K.R. ANAND ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Harish Malhotra, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Rajender Agarwal, Adv. versus NAVAYUGA ENGINEERING CO LTD ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Pranay Agarwala, Mr.Sarthak Gupta, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA NAVIN CHAWLA, J.(Oral) 1. This petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) has been filed by the petitioner challenging the Award dated 16.11.2017 by which the Sole Arbitrator has dismissed the claims filed by the petitioner on the ground of the same being barred by the Law of Limitation.2. The disputes between the parties had arisen out of the Sub Contract Agreement dated 10.12.2004 executed between the parties. The respondent had been awarded a Contract by the Public Works O.M.P. (COMM) 27/2018 Page 1 Department (PWD), Delhi for construction of bridge across river Ya...
Bhiwadi Polymers Ltd. Vs.raj Rani Gupta
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-27-2018
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:27. h November, 2018. CS(COMM) 677/2018 BHIWADI POLYMERS LTD. ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. M.K. Miglani and Mr. Jithin M. George, Advs. RAJ RANI GUPTA Versus ..... Defendant Through: Mr. Brijesh Kumar Gupta and Mr. Anshul Kumar, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW IA No.3074/2018 (of defendant u/O IX R-7 of CPC) 1.2. The counsels state that this application has been disposed of. To be not shown in the Cause List. IA No.3073/2018 (of the plaintiff under Order XXXIX Rules 1&2 CPC) 3.4. The application of the plaintiff for interim relief is for consideration. The plaintiff, a manufacturer inter alia of adhesives and glues under the trade mark Fevicol, has sued the defendant, a manufacturer of plastic containers, for permanent injunction restraining infringement of plaintiffs registered design No.203203 dated 20th February, 2006 with respect to plastic containers in which the goods of the plaintiff are sold.5. T...
A K vs.s S K
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-27-2018
$~6 & 7 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + MAT.APP.(F.C.) 48/2017 Date of Decision:27. 11.2018 A K S S K Through: Mr.Maninder Singh and Ms.Smriti ..... Appellant Asmita, Advocates. versus Through: Mr.Devinder ..... Respondent Chaudhary and + MAT.APP.(F.C.) 87/2018 & CM APPL. 17432/2018 Ms.Roopsi Sabharwal, Advocates. S S K A K Through: Mr.Devinder ..... Appellant Chaudhary and Ms.Roopsi Sabharwal, Advocates. versus Through: Mr.Maninder Singh and Ms.Smriti ..... Respondent Asmita, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) MAT.APP.(F.C.) 87/2018 & CM APPL. 17432/2018 1. This is an appeal under Section 19 of Family Courts Act, 1984 read with Section 28 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (hereinafter referred MAT. APP. (F.C.) Nos.48/2017 & 87/2018 Page 1 of 17 to as the Act) for setting aside judgment dated 21.12.2016 whereby a petition seeking grant of divorce on the ground of cruelty was dismissed and an alternate reli...
C H Sethuram vs.union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-27-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:14. h November 2018 Decided on:27. h November 2018 + W.P.(C) 2671/2016 R P SANWAL .....Petitioner Through: Mr. V.K. Garg, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Ankur Chhibber, Ms. Noopur Dubey & Mr. Bhanu Gupta, Advocates. versus .....Respondents Through: Ms. Maninder Acharya, ASG with UNION OF INDIA & ORS. + W.P.(C) 2668/2016 Mr. Rakesh Kumar, CGSC for UOI. PRAKHAR TRIVEDI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. V.K. Garg, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Ankur Chhibber, Ms. Noopur Dubey & Mr. Bhanu Gupta, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Maninder Acharya, ASG with + W.P.(C) 743/2015 Mr. Rakesh Kumar, CGSC for UOI. MANJIT SINGH .....Petitioner Through: Mr. V.K. Garg, Sr. Advocate with W.P.(C) 2671/2016 & connected matters Page 1 of 23 Mr. Ankur Chhibber, Ms. Noopur Dubey & Mr. Bhanu Gupta, Advocates. versus .....Respondents Through: Ms. Barkha Babbar with Mr.Het UNION OF INDIA & ORS. + W.P.(C) 2672/2016 Shah, Advocates for UOI. C...
Divya Sharma vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-27-2018
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:27. h November, 2018 CRL.REV. P. 698/2017 DIVYA SHARMA STATE versus ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner: Mr. Ashwin Vaish with Mr. Vinod Pandey, Advocates. For the Respondent: Mr. Panna Lal Sharma, APP for the State. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.1.... Petitioner impugns judgment dated 06.05.2017, passed by the Appellate Court, whereby, the appeal of the petitioner, impugning judgment of conviction dated 12/16.11.2013 has been dismissed. By the impugned judgment dated 12.11.2013, petitioner has been convicted of an offence under Section 25 of the Arms Act.2. The allegations against the petitioner are that the petitioner had accompanied her mother to Tihar Jail to visit an inmate. At the time of scanning, 17 live cartridges were recovered from the bag of the petitioner. Out of the 17 cartridges, 6 were used and 11 were...
Sarvesh Security Services Pvt Ltd vs.centre for Development of Telemat ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-27-2018
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RFA No.462/2017 % SARVESH SECURITY SERVICES PVT LTD27h November, 2018 ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Sheha Singh, Advocate (Mobile No.9999151328). versus CENTRE FOR DEVELOPMENT OF TELEMATICS ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Balaparameshwari K., No.(Mobile Advocate 9810818668). CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) is filed by the plaintiff in the suit impugning the Judgment of the trial court dated 16.01.2017 by which the trial court has rejected the suit plaint as time barred under Order VII Rule 11 CPC. In fact, when a suit is dismissed as time barred, the RFA No.462/2017 Page 1 of 5 judgment would actually be under Order XII Rule 6 CPC and not under Order VII Rule 11 CPC vide Prem Lata Nahata and Another v. Chandi Prasad Sikaria, (2007) 2 SCC551 2. The subject suit was filed by the appell...
- ‹ Prev
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- Next ›
- Last »