Delhi Court November 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
M/S Tuff Drilling Pvt. Ltd and Ors. Vs.punjab National Bank and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-28-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision:28. h November, 2018 + W.P.(C) 3436/2018 M/S TUFF DRILLING PVT. LTD AND ORS. ....Petitioners Through: Mr. Sanjeev Bhandari, Adv. versus PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK AND ORS .Respondents Through: Mr. Pallav Saxena, Adv. for R1 CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO V. KAMESWAR RAO, J.(ORAL) 1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner challenging the order dated 26th March, 2018 passed by DRAT whereby the DRAT has directed as under: As noticed already, the public money involved in the matter stands recovered by the two banks and recovery of public money is the main objective behind the establishment of the DRTs. Keeping in mind this fact, I am of the view that ends of justice will be met in case the appellant's appeal itself is rejected for non- compliance of the direction of this Tribunal without going into the merits of the case. Further, the appellant Company is fined a sum of Rs.5 Lacs and t...
Vedanta Limited & Ors vs.directorate General of Foreign Trade & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-28-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:31. 07.2018 Pronounced on:28.11.2018 LPA482017, CM APPL. 2395/2017, CM APPL. 27489/2017 VEDANTA LIMITED & ORS ..... Appellants % + Through: Mr. C.A. Sundaram, Sr. Adv. Mr. Gopal Jain, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Anish Kapur & Mr. Dhritiman Roy, Advs. Versus DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF FOREIGN TRADE & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Tushar Mehta, Ld. ASG, Mr. Anurag Ahluwalia, CGSC, Ms. Tejaswita Sachdeva, Adv. with Mr. N.P. Puranik, Representative, Ms. Gandhi, Representative,Mr. Subhash, Representative. Mr. Nikhil Mundeja, Adv. for IOCL. Shipika CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT1 The present appeal impugns the findings and judgment of a learned single judge, rejecting a writ petition preferred by M/s Cairns (now succeeded by Vedanta Ltd, hereafter called Vedanta). Vedanta sought a direction to the Director General, Foreign Trade (hereafter DGFT) to itself regarding t...
Mukesh Kumar Sharma vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-28-2018
$~23 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:28. 11.2018 CRL.REV.P. 285/2016 MUKESH KUMAR SHARMA versus STATE & ANR. ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Mr. M.C. Sharma, Advocate with petitioner in person. Mr. Hirein Sharma, APP for the State. : For the Respondent CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT2811.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner impugns judgment dated 05.03.2016, whereby, the appeal of the petitioner impugning order on conviction dated 26.05.2015 and order on sentence dated 03.06.2015 was rejected.2. The petitioner was convicted of an offence under Section 138 Negotiable Instrument Act and sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment of 3 months and to pay a compensation of Rs.1,50,000/- and in default to further undergo simple imprisonment of 1 month. CRL.REV.P. 285/2016 Page 1 of 3 The subject complaint was with regard to two cheques of Rs.49,500/- each.3....
Sunil Kumar Sharma vs.kumari Manu Sharma & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-28-2018
$~23 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:28. h November, 2018 + MAT.APP.(F.C.)304/2018, CM No.49371/2018 (Stay) and 49372/2018 (Modification) SUNIL KUMAR SHARMA Through: Md. Azam Ansari, Adv. ..... Appellant versus KUMARI MANU SHARMA & ANR Through: None ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH G.S. SISTANI, J.(ORAL) MAT.APP.(F.C.) 304/2018 & CM No.49373/2018 (Delay of 1107 days) 1. This is an application filed by appellant/husband under Section 5 of the Limitation Act read with Section 151 of CPC seeking condonation of 1107 days delay in filing the present appeal. The reasons for the delay find mentioned in para 2.17 of the appeal which we reproduce below: 2.17 On 30.05.2016, impugned order although, passed by Ld. Family Court and appealable before Division Bench of this Honble Court in terms of Family Courts Act, 1984 was erroneously challenged by the appellants previous counsel Mr. Prakash Chandra, by way of...
Nanak Chand & Ors vs.samay Singh & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-28-2018
$~6 * + 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(OS) 370/2016 & IA No.8864/2016 (u/O XXXIX R-1&2 CPC) NANAK CHAND & ORS Through: Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Adv. ..... Plaintiffs Versus ..... Defendants Through: None. SAMAY SINGH & ANR CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW % The three plaintiffs viz. (i) Nanak Chand, (ii) Avar Singh and (iii) ORDER2811.2018 Mukesh have instituted this suit against the two defendants viz. (1)(a) Savitri, (b) Kanchan @ Kusum (c) Anita, (d) Chanchal, (e) Sunil and (f) Neeraj, being the heirs of defendant no.1 Samay Singh, and (2) Dharam Veer, for recovery of possession of land measuring 1 Bigha 14 Biswas of Khasra No.905/442 in village Saboli, Delhi, claimed to be in the ownership of the plaintiffs and in illegal use and occupation of the defendants, and for recovery of mesne profits and injunction.2. The suit came up first before this Court on 28th July, 2016 and since then is being repeatedly adjourned without summons thereof being ordered to be issue...
Taneja Vidyut Control Pvt. Ltd. Vs.master Nihal Singh Memorial Educati ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-28-2018
$~8 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + O.M.P. (T) (COMM.) 119/2018 Date of Decision:28. 11.2018 TANEJA VIDYUT CONTROL PVT. LTD. ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Ajit Kumar, Adv. alongwith Mr. Abhinav, AR in person. versus MASTER NIHAL SINGH MEMORIAL EDUCATION SOCIETY Through Ms. Kittu Bajaj, Adv. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER RAJIV SHAKDHER, J.(ORAL) I.A. No.15259/2018 1. Allowed, subject to just exceptions. O.M.P. (T) (COMM.) 119/2018 2.3. I have heard the learned counsel for the parties at length. Both the counsel are agreed that the best way to move forward is to appoint a new Arbitrator in the matter.4. However, let me give, in brief, the background in which this agreement has been arrived at.5. The petitioners entire case is that the work order in issue, was issued at the behest of a company by the name of Ambience Pvt. Ltd. The learned Arbitrator, it appears, did not disclose the fact (as revealed from the reply of the respondent) that he had ...
Manjit Singh vs.union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-27-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:14. h November 2018 Decided on:27. h November 2018 + W.P.(C) 2671/2016 R P SANWAL .....Petitioner Through: Mr. V.K. Garg, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Ankur Chhibber, Ms. Noopur Dubey & Mr. Bhanu Gupta, Advocates. versus .....Respondents Through: Ms. Maninder Acharya, ASG with UNION OF INDIA & ORS. + W.P.(C) 2668/2016 Mr. Rakesh Kumar, CGSC for UOI. PRAKHAR TRIVEDI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. V.K. Garg, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Ankur Chhibber, Ms. Noopur Dubey & Mr. Bhanu Gupta, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Maninder Acharya, ASG with + W.P.(C) 743/2015 Mr. Rakesh Kumar, CGSC for UOI. MANJIT SINGH .....Petitioner Through: Mr. V.K. Garg, Sr. Advocate with W.P.(C) 2671/2016 & connected matters Page 1 of 23 Mr. Ankur Chhibber, Ms. Noopur Dubey & Mr. Bhanu Gupta, Advocates. versus .....Respondents Through: Ms. Barkha Babbar with Mr.Het UNION OF INDIA & ORS. + W.P.(C) 2672/2016 Shah, Advocates for UOI. C...
Dr. Ratan Lal vs.hindu College & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-27-2018
HINDU COLLEGE & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Mr. Vikas Singh, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Lalit Bhasin, Ms. Chandni Sadana, Ms. Aashima Singhal and Mr. Rajeev Sharma, Advs for R-1. Ms. Aashima Singhal and Mr. Rajeev Sharma, Advs. for R-1. Mr. P.V. Kapur, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Lalit Bhasin, Ms. Chandni Sadana, Ms. Aasma Singhal and Mr. Rajeev Sharma, Advs. for R-2. Mr. Amit Bansal and Ms. Seema Dolo, Advs. for R-3. Mr. Neeraj, Adv. Sr. Panel Cousel, UOI with Mr. Sahaj Garg, Adv. for R-4. Mr. Rajeev Sharma, Adv. for R-6. $~50 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved:2. d November, 2018 Pronounced on:27. h November, 2018 + W.P.(C) 8865/2018 DR. RATAN LAL ........ Petitioner Through : Mr. Aditya Kumar Choudhary, Adv. with Mr. Amit Pratap Shaunak, Adv. Versus CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT The petitioner has preferred the instant petition for seeking the relief 1. as under:-"A. Issue an appropriate writ, direction or order move over in the nature of mandamus direct...
Vasu Dev Sharma vs.smt. Naina Gautam
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-27-2018
$~31 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:27. 11.2018 CRL.REV.P. 541/2017 & Crl. M.A. 11949/2017 & Crl. M.A. 3559/2018 VASU DEV SHARMA versus SMT NAINA GAUTAM ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Mr. Vijay Sharma, Adv. For the Respondent : Mr. Rahul Saxena, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA % ORDER2711.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner impugns order dated 10.07.2017 whereby the petitioner was directed to pay an amount of Rs. 1,80,000/- to the respondent in three equal monthly instalments.2. The challenge of the petitioner to order dated 10.07.2017 is that the said order was consequential to order dated 30.04.2016 wherein ad-interim maintenance of Rs. 15,000/- per month was assessed by the trial court. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner Page 1 of 3 3. CRL.REV.P5412017 has filed an application before the Trial Court seeking recall of order ...
Abdul Majeed & Anr. Vs.hammad Ahmed & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-27-2018
$~27, 28 & 37 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + + Reserved on:17. 09.2018 Pronounced on:27. 11.2018 FAO(OS) 278/2017 & CM Nos.38675/2017, 45939-40/2017, 7340/2018, 19001/2018, 25788-89/2018, 29888-89/2018 ABDUL MAJEED & ANR ..... Appellants versus HAMMAD AHMED & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS FAO(OS) 280/2017 & CM APPL. 38914/2017, 18987/2018 ABDUL MAJEED & ANR versus HAMMAD AHMED & ORS ..... Appellants ........ RESPONDENTS + CONT.CAS(C) 706/2018 & CM APPL. 38048/2018 ABDUL MAJEED & ANR. ..... Appellants versus ........ RESPONDENTS HAMMAD AHMED & ANR. Present : Mr. C.S. Vaidyanathan, Sr. Advocate and Mr. Parag P. Tripathi, Sr. Advocate, with Mr. Simran Mehta, Mr. Saket Sikri, Ms. Aakansha Kaul, Mr. Gaurav Sarin, Mr. Pawan Upadhyay and Mr. Rishabh Kapur, Advocates for the petitioners in all matters. Mr. Kailash Vasdev, Sr. Adv. with Mr. L.S. Rawat, Ms.Limayinla Jamir, Ms. Mohita Srivastava and Mr. Bobby Lau, Advs. for R-1 in item nos. 27 & 28. Mr. Dayan Krishnan, Sr. Adv. with Mr....
- ‹ Prev
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- Next ›
- Last »