Delhi Court November 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Union of India & Ors. Vs.p.b. Singh
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-28-2018
$~11 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Reserved on:01. 11.2018 Pronounced on:28. 11.2018 W.P.(C) 8910/2014 UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through : Mr.Arun Bhardwaj, Adv. versus P.B. SINGH Through : Mr. S.P. Singh, Sr. Adv. with Mr. P.B. ..... Respondent Singh, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J.1. The Union Government (hereafter UOI) is aggrieved, and by this writ petition, challenges an order of the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) which held that a vacancy in the post of Additional Secretary in the Ministry of Law and Justice is to be filled by seniority and not on the basis of selection through a committee constituted for the purpose.2. The respondent (hereafter the applicant) was the senior-most Joint Secretary and Legal Counsel (JS& LC hereafter) in the Legislative Department, Ministry of Law and Justice. He claimed entitlement to hold the post of Additional Secretary in the Legislati...
Banwari Lal vs.state (Delhi Admn.)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-28-2018
$~R-1 to 23 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:25. h September, 2018 Pronounced on:28. h November, 2018 CRL.A. 152/1996 SHAMBIR & ORS ..... Appellant Through: Mr. M.L.Yadav and Mr. Karan Dahiya, Advocates Versus Through: Mr. H.J.S. Ahluwalia, Special PP ..... Respondent Through: Mr. M.L.Yadav, Advocate ..... Appellant Versus Through:Mr. H.J.S. Ahluwalia, Special PP ..... Respondent ..... Appellant Through: Mr. M.L.Yadav, Advocate Versus Through: Mr. H.J.S. Ahluwalia, Special PP ..... Respondent STATE CRL.A. 154/1996 RAMJI LAL STATE CRL.A. 155/1996 RAM BALI STATE CRL.A. 156/1996 and Crl.M.A.8358/2014 ..... Appellant Page 1 of 79 + + + + SHIV LAKHAN Crl.A1521996 & connected + + + + STATE CRL.A. 157/1996 JOKHU STATE CRL.A. 158/1996 Through: Mr. M.L.Yadav, Advocate Versus Through: Mr. H.J.S. Ahluwalia, Special PP ..... Respondent Through: Mr. M.L.Yadav, Advocate ..... Appellant Versus Through: Mr. H.J.S. Ahluwalia, Special PP ..... Respondent UDAY PAL SINGH ..... Appella...
Sundera Murthi & Ors. Vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-28-2018
$~R-1 to 23 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:25. h September, 2018 Pronounced on:28. h November, 2018 CRL.A. 152/1996 SHAMBIR & ORS ..... Appellant Through: Mr. M.L.Yadav and Mr. Karan Dahiya, Advocates Versus Through: Mr. H.J.S. Ahluwalia, Special PP ..... Respondent Through: Mr. M.L.Yadav, Advocate ..... Appellant Versus Through:Mr. H.J.S. Ahluwalia, Special PP ..... Respondent ..... Appellant Through: Mr. M.L.Yadav, Advocate Versus Through: Mr. H.J.S. Ahluwalia, Special PP ..... Respondent STATE CRL.A. 154/1996 RAMJI LAL STATE CRL.A. 155/1996 RAM BALI STATE CRL.A. 156/1996 and Crl.M.A.8358/2014 ..... Appellant Page 1 of 79 + + + + SHIV LAKHAN Crl.A1521996 & connected + + + + STATE CRL.A. 157/1996 JOKHU STATE CRL.A. 158/1996 Through: Mr. M.L.Yadav, Advocate Versus Through: Mr. H.J.S. Ahluwalia, Special PP ..... Respondent Through: Mr. M.L.Yadav, Advocate ..... Appellant Versus Through: Mr. H.J.S. Ahluwalia, Special PP ..... Respondent UDAY PAL SINGH ..... Appella...
Shiv Gandhi vs.trust Hafiz Nazir Ahmed & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-28-2018
$~23 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order:28. 11.2018 C.R.P. 134/2018 & CM No.26909/2018 SHIV GANDHI ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.P.D. Gupta, Sr. Advocate with Mr.Abhishek Gupta, Advocate along with petitioner in person. Versus TRUST HAFIZ NAZIR AHMED & ANR. ....Respondents Through: Ms.Shashi Saxena, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL The impugned order dated 17.04.2018 passed by the court of 1. learned Additional District Judge-14, Central District, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi (ADJ) in CS DJ No.610539 of 2016, is the subject matter of challenge in this Civil Revision Petition.2. The petitioner/plaintiff has been a tenant in occupation of a shop admeasuring 7.9 x 7.3 x 44.6 situated on the ground floor of property bearing No.5772/1, Ward No.13, Main Road, Sadar Bazar, Delhi-110006 (suit premises), as shown in red colour in the site plan annexed with the plaint and bounded as under: - North-Others property. South-Main Road, Sadar Bazar. C.R.P. 134/201...
E Ramesh Kumar vs.union of India and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-28-2018
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:20th November, 2018 Pronounced on:28. h November, 2018 W.P.(C) 6138 /2017 PAWAN KUMAR & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr Ankur Chhibber and Mr Bhanu Gupta, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr Ravi Prakash, CGSC with Mr Varun Pathak, Advocates for R-1 to 6. + G. VENKATESAN ........ Petitioner Through: Mr Ankur Chhibber and Mr Bhanu W.P.(C) 10739/2017 Gupta, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr Harish Garg and Mr Sarfaraz Ahmad, Advocates for R-1, 3 and 4. Mr Narender Mann, SPP for CBI with Mr Manoj Pant, Advocates for CBI. + DEVENDER SINGH AND ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr Ankur Chhibber and Mr Bhanu W.P.(C) 7702/2017 Gupta, Advocates.. W.P.(C) 6138 and connected matters Page 1 of 17 UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS versus Through: Mr Rakesh Kumar, Advocate for UOI. Mr Narender Mann, SPP for CBI with Mr Manoj Pant, Advocates for CBI ...
Arun Chopra vs.kaka-ka Dhaba Pvt Ltd & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-28-2018
$~8 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:28. h November, 2018 + CS(COMM) 728/2018 ARUN CHOPRA ..... Plaintiff Through: Ms. Shobhana Takiar, Advocate. (M:9810962950) versus KAKA-KA DHABA PVT LTD & ORS ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Akhil Sibal, Senior Advocate with Mr. Hiren Kamod and Mr. Rahul Vidhani, Advocate for D-1 to 6. (M:9811545888) CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.(Oral) I.As. 4382/2014 (u/O XXXIX Rules 1 &2 CPC) & 9392/2014 (u/O XXXIX Rule 4 CPC) 1. The Plaintiff has filed the present suit for infringement of registered trademark and other reliefs. The Plaintiffs case is that it adopted the trademark Kake Da Hotel which is operating from Shop No.74 Municipal Market, Connaught Circus, New Delhi-110001. It is claimed in the plaint that the name was adopted in 1931 when the said name was used for a restaurant which was started in Lahore, Pakistan. Post partition, the founder of the Plaintiff, late Shri Amolak Ram Chopra shifted to Delhi a...
Praveen vs.state (Govt. Of Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-28-2018
$~4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:28. 11.2018 BAIL APPLN. 558/2018 PRAVEEN ........ Petitioner versus STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : For the Respondent : Mr. M.L. Yadav, Advocate. Mr. Hirein Sharma, APP for the State. SI Anu, PS Mansarovar Park. Ms. Anu Narula, Advocate for the complainant. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT2811.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in case FIR No.446/2017 under Sections 376/354-D/5IPC, Police Station Man Sarovar Park. Settlement Deed dated 01.03.2018 has been executed between the parties. Consequent to the settlement, the complainant has married the petitioner.2. The petitioner was granted interim protection by order dated 12.03.2018 subject to joining investigation. BAIL APPLN. 558/2018 Page 1 of 3 3. Learned counsel appearing for the complainant submits that the petitioner has married t...
Dans Energy Pvt Ltd vs.ge Power India Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-28-2018
$~39 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI DANS ENERGY PVT LTD FAO(OS) (COMM) 279/2018 Date of Decision:28. h November, 2018 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Akhil Sibal, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Vineet Tayal and Mr. P.T.Vasandani, Advs. versus GE POWER INDIA LTD ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Anish Kapur, Ms. Divya Bhalla & Mr. Dhritiman Roy, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI SANJIV KHANNA, J.(ORAL): CM APPL. No.49434/2018 (exemption) Allowed subject to all just exceptions. CM APPL. No.49433/2018 & CM APPL. No.49435/2018 These applications for condonation of delay of 8 days in filing and 2 days in re-filing are allowed as the counsel for the respondent, who appears on advance notice, does not oppose the prayers. FAO(OS) (COMM) 279/2018 & CM APPL. 49432/2018 This intra-court appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 ('A&C Act', for short) read with Section 18 of the Commercial Courts, Commercial Division and C...
Flamagas, S a & Anr vs.mr Ojas B Shah
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-28-2018
$~2 * + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS (COMM) 99/2017 & I.A. 15219/2015 FLAMAGAS, S A & ANR Through versus Ms. Herinder Kaur Brar, Advocate. ..... Plaintiffs MR OJAS B SHAH Through None. Date of Decision:28. h November, 2018 ..... Defendant CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J: (Oral) 1. Present suit has been filed for permanent injunction restraining infringement of trademark, copyright, passing off, rendition of accounts and other reliefs against the defendant. The prayer clause in the present suit is reproduced hereinbelow:-"39. It is therefore, respectfully prayed that this Honble Court may be pleased to grant the following reliefs in favour of the Plaintiff: a) A decree for permanent injunction restraining the Defendant, their distributors, dealers, stockists, retailers, servants, agents and all others acting from manufacturing, sale, selling, advertising and directly or indirectly dealing in any products which are identical or deceptively similar...
M/S Tuff Drilling Pvt. Ltd. Vs.punjab National Bank & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-28-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of decision:28. h November, 2018 W.P.(C) 4828/2017 M/S TUFF DRILLING PVT. LTD. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Sanjeev Bhandari, Adv. versus PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO V. KAMESWAR RAO, J.(ORAL) 1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for the following reliefs:"In view of the facts and circumstances explained above and in the interest of justice it is therefore most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to: (a) Allow the present writ petition with costs; (b) Issue a Writ of Certiorari or any other appropriate Writ thereby quashing and setting impugned order dated 09.05.2017 (ANNEXURE A-1) and more particularly W.P.(C) No.4828/2017 Page 1 of 12 directions contained in order dated 09.05.2017 passed by Ld. DRAT, Delhi whereby the petitioner has been directed to deposit and amount of Rs.40.00 cores...
- ‹ Prev
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- Next ›
- Last »