Delhi Court November 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Madhav Jha & Anr. Vs.the State Govt. Of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-30-2018
$~5 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:30. 11.2018 BAIL APPLN. 367/2018 MADHAV JHA & ANR versus THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI ........ Petitioners ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Mr. R.C. Prakash, Mr. P.S. Tripathi, Mr. Mukesh Kumar Singh, Mr. Vani Vyas and Mr. Amit, Advs. For the Respondent: Mr. Hirein Sharma, Addl. PP for the State with SI Mohit Mr. Hemant Sharma and Mr. Siddharth Khare, Advs. for complainant CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT3011.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioners seek anticipatory bail in FIR No.422/2017 under Sections 448/3of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, Police Station Kapashera, Delhi.2. The allegations are that the complainant had purchased a property from one Keshav Jha son of Smt. Baikunthi Devi and paid the entire sale consideration in cash. Thereafter, after some time he BAIL APPLN. 367/2018 Page 1 of 3 found that the locks of the subject property ...
Rohtash Singh vs.state Govt. Of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-30-2018
$~9 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + BAIL APPLN. 971/2018 Judgment delivered on:30. 11.2018 ROHTASH SINGH versus STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Mr. Manoj Sharma, Adv. For the Respondent: Ms. Kusum Dhalla, APP for the State with SI Vijay Singh CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT3011.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in FIR No.105/2018 under Sections 380/448/4of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, Police Station Prashant Vihar, Delhi.2. The allegations in the FIR are that the some persons trespassed on to the complainants property and committed theft and removed CCTV installations as well as electricity meter.3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated and there is no evidence to connect the petitioner with the subject offence. By order dated 01.05.2018, the petitioner was granted...
Virgo Softech Ltd. Vs.national Institute of Electronics and Informatio ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-30-2018
$~3 to 6 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:30. h November, 2018 + + + + ARB.P. 749/2018 ARB.P. 750/2018 ARB.P. 752/2018 ARB.P. 753/2018 VIRGO SOFTECH LTD. ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Akhil Sacher and Ms.Sunanda Tulayan, Advs. versus NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ELECTRONICS AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY. Diwakar, Through Mr.Vinod alongwith Mr.Susheel Gabgotra, Addl. Director. ..... Respondent CGSC Kr. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA NAVIN CHAWLA, J.(Oral) I.A. No.16365/2018 (Delay) in ARB.P.749/2018 This is an application seeking condonation of 19 days delay in filing of the rejoinder. For the reasons stated in the application, the delay is condoned and application stands allowed. ARB.P.749/2018, 750/2018, 752/2018 & 753/2018 Page 1 ARB.P. 749/2018 ARB.P. 750/2018 ARB.P. 752/2018 ARB.P. 753/2018 1. These petitions under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) have been filed by the petitioner seeking appoint...
Anil Kumar vs.yogshri Chemicals Pvt Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-30-2018
$~13 to 15 (common order) IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:-"30th November, 2018 + CRL.M.C. 4213/2016 and Crl.M.A.17541-17542/2016 + SONIA MITTAL ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Tanmaya Mehta, Advocate with Mr. Rajeev Aggarwal, Mr. Sidhant Kr. Singh & Mr. Raghav Wadhwa, Advocates versus YOGSHRI CHEMICALS PVT LTD ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Manoj Sharma, Advocate with Mr. Kapil Kaushik, Mr. Alok Singh & Mr. Deepak Shukla, Advocates CRL.M.C. 4214/2016 and Crl.M.A.17544-17545/2016 ANIL KUMAR ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Tanmaya Mehta, Advocate with Mr. Rajeev Aggarwal, Mr. Sidhant Kr. Singh & Mr. Raghav Wadhwa, Advocates versus YOGESHRI CHEMICALS PVT LTD ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Manoj Sharma, Advocate with Mr. Kapil Kaushik, Mr. Alok Singh & Mr. Deepak Shukla, Advocates + CRL.M.C. 4216/2016 and Crl.M.A.17562-17563/2016 DARSHAN KUMAR Crl. M.C. No.4213/2016 etc. ........ Petitioner Page 1 of 8 Through: Mr. Tanmaya Mehta, Advocate with Mr. Rajeev Aggarwal, M...
Delhi Development Authority vs.engineering & Industrial Corporation Pv ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-30-2018
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:30. h November, 2018 RSA1532015 & CMs No.7545/2015 (u/O XLI R-27 CPC) & 24525/2017 (u/S151CPC) DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Rajiv Bansal, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Shlok Chandra, Mr. Ritesh Kumar Sharma, Kamna Singh and Ms. Khushboo, Advs. Versus ENGINEERING & INDUSTRIAL CORPORATION PVT LTD Through: Mr. Davinder Varma, Adv. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW1 On 9th July, 2018, after hearing the counsels, the following order was passed:-"1. This Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) impugns the judgment and decree [dated 26th July, 2008 in RCA No.39/2006 of the Court of Additional District Judge (ADJ), Delhi]. of dismissal of First Appeal under Section 96 of the CPC preferred by the appellant Delhi Development Authority (DDA) against the judgment and decree [dated 27th May, 2006 in Suit No.624/2006 of the Court of the Civil Judge, D...
Vinod Saini vs.the State (Govt. Of Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-30-2018
$~21 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:30. 11.2018 BAIL APPLN. 2250/2018 VINOD SAINI ........ Petitioner versus THE STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Mr. R.K. Gupta and Ms. Pushpa Gupta, Adv. For the Respondent: Mr. Hirein Sharma, APP for the State with SI H. Gangte CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT3011.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in FIR No.307/2018 under Section 3IPC, Police Station Vasant Vihar.2. The allegations in the FIR are that the complainant was walking on a road when he was accosted by a co-accused as he was celebrating the birthday with his friends and was under the influence of alcohol. The complainant was thereafter threatened by one of the co-accused with a knife and another co-accused is alleged to have removed Rs.15,000/- from his pocket and when he objected, it is alleged, the BAIL APPLN. 2250/2018 Pa...
Dr k.s Jawatkar vs.the Chancellor Jawaharlal Nehru University & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-30-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:30. h November, 2018 % + LPA5442017 DR K.S JAWATKAR Through: In person versus ..... Appellant THE CHANCELLOR JAWAHARLAL NEHRU UNIVERSITY & ORS Through: Ms. Monika Arora, SC for JNU with Mr. Harsh Ahuja, Mr. Vibhu Tripathi & Mr. Kushal Kumar, Advs. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO V. KAMESWAR RAO, J.(ORAL) 1. This Intra-Court appeal has been filed by the appellant challenging the order / judgment dated March 03, 2017 in W.P.(C) 884/2013 whereby the learned Single Judge has dismissed the writ petition and had imposed a cost of `60,000/- out of which `30,000/- shall be paid to the respondent No.4/employer/JNU and balance of `30,000/- to be deposited with Friendicoes, No.271 & 273, Defence Colony, Flyover Market, Jangpura Side, New Delhi-110024. The writ petition was filed by the petitioner with the following prayers:-"LPA5442017 Page 1 of 14 (a) Declare 1993 amendment to Clause ...
Om Prakash vs.state of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-30-2018
$~R-51 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:-"30th November, 2018 Crl. Appeal No.419/2002 OM PRAKASH ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. M.L. Yadav, Adv. versus + STATE OF DELHI Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Amit Ahlawat, APP for the State. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. Neelam, aged about 35 years, wife of the appellant herein, was indisputably living with him, and their children, in the first floor portion of property described as RZ-8K in Gali No.4, Indira Park, Palam Road, New Delhi. Sometime during the night of 11th and 12th September, 2000, she sustained injuries in the consequence of which she died, the death having been discovered in the morning of 12.09.2000 and brought to notice of local police vide DD No.10 A (Ex.PW-8/A). The matter was entrusted, for inquiry, to SI Rampal (PW-8) who accompanied by Constable Sabodh (PW-6) went to the place in question. They found the dead body lying in the said premises with some indication of struggle, this ...
Rohit vs.state (Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-30-2018
$~7 & 8 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:30. 11.2018 BAIL APPLN. 780/2018 ROHIT versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) + BAIL APPLN. 1042/2018 INDER versus STATE ( NCT OF DELHI) ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : For the Respondent: Mr. L.S. Saini and Mr. Lalit Saini, Advs. Mr. Hirein Sharma, APP for the State with SI Anita CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT3011.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioners seek anticipatory bail in FIR No.56/2018 under Sections 354/354-B/354-D/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, Police Station Chandni Mahal, Delhi. Section 8 of the POCSO Act was also added in respect of petitioner/applicant Inder. BAIL APPLN. 780/2018 & 1042/2018 Page 1 of 3 2. The allegations are that the petitioners are neighbours and that they misbehaved with the complainant and her daughter.3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners...
Vinoj v. V. and Ors vs.union of India and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-30-2018
$~63 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 10660/2016 VINOJ V. V. AND ORS ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Manoj V. George with Ms. Shilpa Liza George, Advocates. UNION OF INDIA AND ANR versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Manish Mohan, CGSC with Ms. Manisha Saroha, Advocate. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA % ORDER3011.2018 Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. With the consent of the parties, the writ petition is heard finally.2. There are 62... Petitioners in this writ petition. They were all appointed as Head Constables (DCPO) [HC (DCPO)]. in the Central Industrial Security Force (CISF). The post of HC was an entry level post with the pay scale of Rs.3,200-85-4,900 which is at par with the pay of Head Constables (HC) in other branches of the CISF including the Executive, Fire Service, and Administrative Branches. These recruitments happened in the years 1997- 2005. It has been pointed out that the promotional avenue for all HCs in the CISF was to the posts ...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »