Delhi Court October 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Manish Sahni vs.state of Nct of Delhi & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-30-2018
$~16 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:-"30th October, 2018 + CRL.M.C. 5511/2018 & Crl.M.A. 35241/2018 MANISH SAHNI Through: ........ Petitioner versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Amit Ahlawat, APP for the State with SI Dharamvir Singh, AIU Cell, New Delhi. Mr. Amresh Yadav, & Mr. Shivnath Kumar, Advs. for R-3 to 6 along with R-3 & 4 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. The petitioner is facing prosecution in the criminal case arising out of the final report (charge-sheet) under Section 173 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) submitted on conclusion of investigation into first information report No.157/2014 of police station Parliament Street on the accusations of he having committed offences punishable under Sections 279 and 304 A of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC), the gravamen whereof is that he had indulged in rash or negligent driving of motor vehicle on a public road, such act having resulte...
Kamaldeep vs.the State ( Gnct of Delhi) & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-30-2018
........ Petitioner Judgment delivered on:30.10.2018 BAIL APPLN. 1146/2018 MAHESH CHAND $~10 & 11 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + + THE STATE ( GNCT OF DELHI) & ORS THE STATE ( GNCT OF DELHI) & ORS versus BAIL APPLN. 1148/2018 KAMALDEEP versus ........ RESPONDENTS ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Mr. Pankaj Tiwari with Mr. B.L. Sharma, Advocates. For the Respondent : Ms. Meenakshi Dahiya, APP for the State SI Ashish Kumar, PS Bhajanpura. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT3010.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioners seek anticipatory bail in FIR No.678/2017 under Sections 323/341/3IPC, Police Station Bhajan Pura.2. The allegations in the FIR are that the complainant along with his family were walking on the streets when the petitioners and the co- BAIL APPLN. 1146/2018 & BAIL APPLN. 1148/2018 Page 1 of 3 accused are alleged to have started beating them, consequent to which, they...
Rajpal vs.the State (Gnct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-30-2018
* % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on:01. t October, 2018 Judgment delivered on:30. h October 2018 + BAIL APPLN.2123/2018 RAJPAL versus THE STATE (GNCT OF DELHI) ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner: Mr. Lohit Ganguly, Advocate For the Respondent: Mr. Kamal Kumar Ghai, APP for the State. SI Manoj, PS Alipur. Mr. Vijay Aggarwal, Advocate for complainant. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.1.... Petitioner seeks regular bail in FIR No.36/2017 under Sections 302/341/3IPC, Police Station Alipur.2. The allegations in the FIR are that the complainant has a property dispute with one Braham Singh. On the night of the incident, the complainant came to his house, when co-accused Hari Prakash came from behind and started beating him. Thereafter, the other co- accused including the petitioner are alleged to have come and threatened that they would kill him. His father on hear...
Dinesh Chand @ Dinesh Kumar & Anr. Vs.sanjay Solanki
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-30-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RFA No.558/2018 & CM No.28370/2018 (stay) 30th October, 2018 + % DINESH CHAND @ DINESH KUMAR & ANR. SANJAY SOLANKI versus Through: Mr. R.S.Bhalla, Advocate (Mobile No.9971730965). ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Birender Singh, ..... Respondent CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA Advocate. To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) is filed by defendants in the suit impugning the Judgment of the Trial Court dated 02.04.2018 by which the Trial Court has dismissed the leave to defend application and has decreed the suit filed by the respondent/plaintiff/landlord for an amount of Rs.3,04,850/- along with interest at 8% per annum. RFA5582018 Page 1 of 6 2. The facts of the case are that the respondent/plaintiff/landlord filed the subject suit pleading that he and the two appellants being defendant nos. 1 and 2, entered into a Rent Agr...
Dr. Bushra Parveen vs.university of Delhi and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-30-2018
$~86 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 11743/2018 DR. BUSHRA PARVEEN... Petitioner Through: Mr. Rakesh Dhingra, Advocate Versus UNIVERSITY OF DELHI AND ORS.... RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Mohinder J.S.Rupal, Mr. Prang Newmai & Ms. Slomita Rai, Advocates for respondent No.1 Mr. Jasmeet Singh, Advocate for respondent No.2-UOI CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR % ORDER3010.2018 C.M. 45485/2018 (u/S151CPC) Allowed subject to all just exceptions. W.P.(C) 11743/2018 For the relief sought in this petition, a Representation (Annexure P-13) was made on 25th October, 2018. As per the averments made in this petition, there is no response to the said Representation. In the facts and circumstances of this case, it is deemed appropriate to dispose of this petition with direction to respondent-University to pass a speaking order on petitioners Representation of 25th October, 2018 (Annexure P-13) within six weeks and its fate be made known to Page | 1 petitioner within two weeks ther...
Rachit Malhotra vs.one97 Communications Limited
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-30-2018
$~15 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(OS) 183/2018 RACHIT MALHOTRA ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Rakesh Kumar, Ms. Isha Khanna, Mr. Hetish Raj Singh and Mr. Anam Ahmad, Advs. Versus ONE97 COMMUNICATIONS LIMITED ..... Defendant Through: Mr. Nakul Mohta, Mr. Gurtejpal CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW Singh and Mr. Lalit Mohan, Advs. ORDER3010.2018 % IA No.12140/2018 (u/O VII R-11 CPC) 1. The counsel for the applicant/defendant and the counsel for the non- applicant/plaintiff have been heard.2. The plaintiff has instituted this suit for specific performance of the contract/letter dated 1st December, 2008 for transfer of 4178 equity shares of the applicant/defendant in favour of the plaintiff in reference to the Employees Stock Option (ESOP) Scheme, 2008 issued by the applicant/defendant and in the alternative for recovery of compensation of Rs.4,38,69,000/-.3. The counsel for the applicant/defendant has urged three grounds for rejection of the plaint. Firstly, it...
Gaurav Goel vs.shiv Shankar Singhal
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-30-2018
$~A-14 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:30. 10.2018 CS(OS) 468/2018 % + GAURAV GOEL SHIV SHANKAR SINGHAL versus ..... Plaintiff Through Mr.Rishi Agrawala, Adv. ..... Defendant Through Mr.S.C.Singhal and Mr.Yashwant, CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH Advs. % IA No.12814/2018 ORDER3010.2018 1. This application is filed under Order 39 Rule 1 & 2 CPC seeking an ex-parte ad-interim injunction restraining the defendant, his agents, servants, legal heirs, attorneys, representative, employee, friends associates etc. from parting with possession or creating any third party interest in respect of the land in Khasra Nos.2(2-10) and 2(1-1), Village Masudabad, Najafgarh, New Delhi and the land admeasuring 650 Sq.Yds bearing No.21- 30, Lala Rati Ram Park, Tuda Mandi, Najafgarh, New Delhi.2. The plaintiff has filed the present suit seeking a decree of declaration declaring that the plaintiff is the owner of the suit premises being 710 Sq. Yds. out of Khasra Nos.24/2(2-1...
Vikas Tokas @ Vicky vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-30-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.A. 1197/2013 Reserved on:11. h October, 2018 Decided on:30. h October, 2018 INDERJEET .....Appellant Through: Mr. Javed Alvi with Mr. Subrat versus Chouhan, Advocates. STATE ....Respondent Through: Mr. Hirein Sharma, APP for the State. + CRL.A. 1534/2013 VIKAS TOKAS @ VICKY .....Appellant Through: Mr. Ram Singh Soni & Mr. Ashok Kumar Soni, Advocates. versus STATE ....Respondent Through: Mr. Hirein Sharma, APP for the State. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE VINOD GOEL JUDGMENT Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. These two appeals are directed against the judgment dated 16th July, 2013 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-II, South District, Saket Courts in Sessions Case No.50/2011 arising out of FIR No.139/2011 registered at Police Station (PS) Vasant Vihar convicting both Appellants Crl. A. Nos. 1197/2013 & 1534/2013 Page 1 of 28 for the offence punishable under Section 302 read with 34 IPC and additionally Appellant Vikas Tokas @ ...
Ikechukwu Chukwubuikem Stanley vs.narcotic Control Bureau
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-30-2018
$~46 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:30. 10.2018 CRL.REV. P. 948/2018 IKECHUKWU CHUKWUBUIKEM STANLEY ........ Petitioner versus NARCOTIC CONTROL BUREAU Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Mr. Vikas Gautam, Adv. ..... Respondent For the... RESPONDENTS : None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA % ORDER3010.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) Crl. M.A. 35249/2018 (Exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. CRL. REV. P. 948/2018 1.... Petitioner impugns order on charge dated 11.09.2018 whereby the trial court has framed a charge against the petitioner of having contravened the provision of Section 8 of the NDPS Act and accordingly framed charge against the petitioner under Section 21, 23 and 29 of the NDPS Act.2. A complaint was filed by the respondent contending that secret information was received that a parcel booked with DHL Express Pvt. Ltd. for Spain might contain narcotics substance. CRL.REV.P.948/2018 Page 1...
Saket Singh & Ors. Vs.girdhari Lal
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-30-2018
* % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on:9. h October, 2018 Judgment delivered on:30. h October, 2018 + CRL.M.C. 2306/2013 SAKET SINGH & ORS GIRDHARI LAL + CRL.M.C. 2307/2013 RAHUL GUPTA GIRDHARI LAL + CRL.M.C. 241/2014 DEBABRATA MISHRA versus versus versus GIRDHARI LAL ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner: Mr. Ankur Aggarwal and Mr. Nitin Sharma, Advs in Crl.M.C.2306/2013 Mr. Omung Gupta and Mr. Naresh Kaushik, Advs. in Crl.M.C.2307/2013 Mr. J.P. Mishra, Adv. in Crl.M.C.241/2014 For the Respondent: Mr. Vijay Kr. Singh, Adv. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA Crl M.C23062013, Crl.M.C.2307/2013 & Crl.M.C.241/2014 Page 1 of 10 JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.CRL.M.C. 2306/2013 & Crl. M.A. 8876/2013 (stay), 4574/2014 (for bringing on record additional facts); CRL.M.C. 2307/2013 & Crl. M.A. 8879/2013 (stay) & CRL.M.C. 241/2014 & ...
- ‹ Prev
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- Next ›
- Last »