Delhi Court October 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Arun Mitter vs.assistant Commissioner of Income Tax (Acit)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-01-2018
$~10 to 13 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:-"1st October, 2018 + CRL.M.C. 602/2015 & Crl.M.A. 2345/2015 + RAKSHIT JAIN ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Balbir Singh, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Yudhister Singh, Mr. Akhil Sachar, Ms. Monica Benjamin & Mr. Manoj Singh, Advocates. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (ACIT) versus Through: Mr. Puneet Rai, Standing ..... Respondent counsel with Mr. S. Singh, Advocate CRL.M.C. 603/2015 & Crl.M.A. 2348/2015 M/S MGF DEVELOPMENTS LTD. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Balbir Singh, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Yudhister Singh, Mr. Akhil Sachar, Ms. Monica Benjamin & Mr. Manoj Singh, Advocates. Versus ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ( ACIT) ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Puneet Rai, Standing counsel with Mr. S. Singh, Advocate Crl. M.C. No.602/2015 & conn. Page 1 of 12 + + CRL.M.C. 606/2015 & Crl.M.A. 2353/2015 SHRAVAN GUPTA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Balbir Singh, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Yudhister Singh, Mr. Akhil Sachar, Ms. Monica Benjamin ...
Ashok Kumar Gupta & Ors vs.state (Govt of Nct of Delhi) & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-01-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:07. h September, 2018 Pronounced on:01. t October, 2018 + CRL.M.C. 4905/2016 & Crl.M.A.20305/2016 ASHOK KUMAR GUPTA & ORS ........ Petitioners Through: Mr.Mukul Gupta, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Vibhor Garg, Mr.Tushar Gupta, Mr.Deepanshu Panwar and Mr.Nishank Tyagi, Advs. Versus STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Ashish Dutta, APP for State. Mr.Sanjeev Manchanda Mr.Harish Chawla, Advs. for R-2. and CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER1 On 18.07.2015, sometime before 10.30 a.m., one Chander Shekhar son of Dharampal Singh, aged about 31 years, resident of Mohan Garden, New Delhi was run over by a railway train at a place between railway stations of Shahbad Mohammadpur and Bijwasan, the death statedly being found to be suicidal. First information report (FIR) no.2was registered on 23.08.2015 by police station Sarai Crl. MC49052016 Page 1 of 41 Rohilla Railway Station for offence under Section 306 read wi...
Sh Anil Chaudhry vs.yakult Danone India Pvt Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-01-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on :27. h August, 2018 Date of decision :1st October, 2018 + CS (OS) 616/2017, I.A. 2232/2018 & 9146/2018 SH ANIL CHAUDHRY ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Ajay Sharma and Ms. Poonam Lau, Advocates. versus YAKULT DANONE INDIA PVT LTD. ..... Defendant Through: Mr. Raj Shekhar Rao, Mr. Tanuj Bhushan, Ms. Nandita Chauhan & Ms. Advocates. (M:8800491497). Kruttika, CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.JUDGMENT1 The Plaintiff- Shri Anil Chaudhary was appointed as a CFO and Company Secretary of the Defendant company on 16th January, 2007. He continued in the employment of the Defendant company until September, 2010. The Defendant company is a joint venture between Yakult Honsha Company Ltd., Japan and Danone Probiotics, Singapore, which in turn is a subsidiary of Group Danone, France.2. The brief background of the present suit is that imports of machinery were made by the Defendant in the year 2007-08. The Directorate of Reven...
M/S. Vini Cosmetics Pvt. Ltd. Vs.m/s. Abhay Enterprises & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-01-2018
$~4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision :1st October, 2018 + CS (COMM) 1417/2016 M/S. VINI COSMETICS PVT. LTD. ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Ajay Amitabh Suman, Mr. Pankaj Kumar and Mr. Kapil Giri, Advocates. (M:9990389539) versus M/S. ABHAY ENTERPRISES & ORS. ..... Defendants Through: Ms. Pratishtha Vij, Mr. P. Hansranjan and Mr. Prawal, Advocates for D-1. (M:9971919461) CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.(Oral) 1. Plaintiff has filed the present suit for permanent injunction restraining passing off, infringement of trademark, infringement of copyright, rendition of accounts etc. The case of the Plaintiff is that it is engaged in the manufacturing and marketing of various kinds of cosmetics and proprietary products, lotions, talcum powder, powder (make up), creams, deodorant, styling gel, perfume, shaving cream, soap, shampoo, bleaching preparations etc.2. One of the products being manufactured and sold by the Plaintiff is the GLAM-UP LABEL pow...
Centre for Public Interest Litigation vs.union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-01-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on: September 24, 2018 Judgment delivered on: October 01, 2018 + W.P.(C) 5235/2018, CM No.34109/2018 CENTRE FOR PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION Through: Mr. Prashant Bhushan, Adv. with Mr. Pranav Sachdeva, Adv. ........ Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS Through: Mr. Kirtiman Singh, CGSC with ..... Respondent Mr. Waize Ali Noor, Mr. Prateek Dhanda and Mr. Vikramaditya Singh, Advs. for UOI Mr. A.S. Chandhiok, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Ritesh Kumar & Ms. Ramya Kutty, Advs. for R-2 Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Rishi Agarwal, Adv. for R3 CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO JUDGMENT V. KAMESWAR RAO, J CM No.34109/2018 (under Section 151 CPC on behalf of respondent No.1 seeking condonation of 42 days delay in filing the affidavit and taking the same on record. For the reasons stated in the application, the delay of 42 days in filing the affidavit is condoned. The affidavit is taken on record. Applicatio...
Sh. Vimal Khanna vs.state (Govt. Of Nct Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-01-2018
$~40 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:01. 10.2018 CRL.M.C. 4996/2018 SH. VIMAL KHANNA versus STATE (GOVT. OF NCT DELHI) Advocates who appeared in this case: ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent For the... Petitioner : Mr. Sanjay Khanna, Ms. Pragya Bhushan and Ms. Sonam Bhardwaj, Advs. For the... RESPONDENTS: Mr. Panna Lal Sharma, Addl. PP for the State with W/SI Manoj Kumari CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT0110.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) Crl. M.A. 33255/2018 (Exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. CRL.M.C. 4996/2018 & Crl. M.A. 33256/2018 (stay) 1. Issue Notice. Notice accepted by learned Addl PP for the State. With the consent of parties matter is taken up for final disposal today itself. CRL.M.C. 4996/2018 Page 1 of 5 2. The petitioner impugns order dated 24.07.2017 whereby the application of the petitioner under Section 311 Cr. P.C. seeking an opportunity to cross-examine the prosecutrix was dismissed.3. The pet...
Students Federation of India and Ors. Vs.union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-01-2018
$~ * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on:26. 04.2018 Judgment Pronounced on:01. 10.2018 W.P.(C) 3032/2017, C.M. APPL.13252/2017 STUDENTS FEDERATION OF INDIA AND ORS. Petitioners Through: Sh. Gaurav Bhardwaj, Advocate. Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .Respondents Through: Ms. Monika Arora, Standing Counsel for JNU with Mr. Harsh Ahuja, Mr. Kushal Kumar and Mr. Vibhu Tripathi, Advs. Mr. J.P. Sengh, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Manoj R. Sinha, Ms. Manisha Mehta, Ms. Vaishali Tanwar and Ms. Mrigna Shekhar, Advs. for UGC. + W.P.(C) 2665/2018, C.M. APPL.10866/2018 ARUN KRISHNAN AND ANR. Petitioners Through: Sh. Gaurav Bhardwaj, Advocate. Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .Respondents Through: Ms. Monika Arora, Standing Counsel for JNU with Mr. Harsh Ahuja, Mr. Kushal Kumar and Mr. Vibhu Tripathi, Advs. Mr. Chander Shekhar, Adv. for UGC. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.CHAWLA W.P.(C) 3032/2017 & connected matter Page 1 of 35 S.RAVINDRA BHAT, J.Fac...
The Oriental Insurance Company Limited vs.ganga Saran & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-01-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: October 01, 2018 + MAC.APP. 968/2015 THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED Through: Mr. A. K. Soni, Advocate ..Appellant Versus GANGA SARAN & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Ghanshyam Thakur, Advocate + MAC.APP. 808/2018 For R-1 1. GANGA SARAN .....Appellant Through: Mr. Ghanshyam Thakur, Advocate Versus THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD & ORS Through: Mr. A.K. Soni, Advocate ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) Impugned Award of 25th August, 2015 grants compensation of `3,37,493/- with interest @ 9% per annum to Ganga Saran (hereinafter referred to as the Injured), aged 45 years, on account of grievous MAC.APP. 968/2015 MAC.APP. 808/2018 Page 1 of 7 injuries suffered by him in a vehicular accident, which took place on 4th February, 2009.2. In the above captioned first appeal, The Oriental Insurance Company Limited (henceforth referred to as the Insurer) seeks recovery rights against drive...
Govind Lal & Ors vs.state ( Nct of Delhi) & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-01-2018
$~4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + CRL.M.C. 4730/2018 Judgment delivered on:01.10.2018 GOVIND LAL & ORS ........ Petitioner versus STATE ( NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Mr. Santosh Pratap with Mr. Parmod Kumar Gupta and Ms. Durga, Advocates. For the... RESPONDENTS : Mr. Hirein Sharma, APP for State. ASI Suresh Kumar, PS New Usman Pur. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT0110.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) Crl.M.A.32251/2018 (exemption) Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions. CRL.M.C. 4739/2018 1. The petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.402/2016 under Sections 498A/4IPC and Section 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, Police Station New Usmanpur, based on a settlement. CRL.M.C. 4730/2018 Page 1 of 3 2. The subject FIR emanates out of matrimonial discord.... Petitioner No.1 is the husband of respondent No.2.... Petitioner Nos.2 and 3 are the father-in-law and mother-in-law of the r...
Sudesh Sethi vs.strategic Infotech Systems Pvt Ltd & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-01-2018
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:1. t October, 2018. RSA1452018 & CM No.40652/2018 (for stay) SUDESH SETHI ..... Appellant Through: Mr. S.C. Arora, Adv. Versus STRATEGIC INFOTECH SYSTEMS PVT LTD & ORS Through: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW ........ RESPONDENTS CM No.40653/2018 (for exemption).1.2. Allowed, subject to just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. RSA1452018 & CM No.40652/2018 (for stay) 3. This Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) impugns the judgment and decree [dated 24th July, 2018 in RCA No.61308/2016 of the Court of Additional District Judge-13 (Central)]. allowing the First Appeal under Section 96 of the CPC preferred by the respondents/defendants against the judgment and decree [dated 24th January, 2012 in Suit No.2(Case ID C0185572003) of the Court of Civil Judge]. allowing the suit of the appellant/plaintiff for recovery of Rs.1,05,650/- in the sum of Rs.90,...
- ‹ Prev
- 68
- 69
- 70
- 71
- 72
- 73
- 74
- 75
- 76
- 78
- Next ›
- Last »