Delhi Court October 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Gokul Projects vs.cyclone Energy Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-01-2018
$-14 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:1. t October, 2018 O.M.P. (COMM) 343/2018 GOKUL PROJECTS ........ Petitioner Through: Ms. Madhumita Bhattacharjee, versus Advocate. CYCLONE ENERGY PVT. LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. A.K.Rudra, Advocate with Mr.Vishweshar Mishra, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA NAVIN CHAWLA, J.(Oral) 1. This petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred as Act) has been filed challenging the Interim Award/Order dated 25.05.2018 passed by the Sole Arbitrator, dismissing the application of the petitioner seeking permission to file its counter claim in the arbitration proceedings.2. The Arbitrator had been appointed by this Court on an application filed by the respondent under Section 11 of the Act. On 08.09.2017, the Arbitrator passed a procedural order directing the respondent to file its statement of claim on or before 15.09.2017 and directing the petitioner to file it...
Raj Kumar Sharma vs.union of India and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-01-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:01. 10.2018 + W.P.(C) 5966/2010 & CM Nos. 11746/2010 & 38144/2018 RAJ KUMAR SHARMA Versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR Advocates who appeared in this case: ...Petitioner ...Respondents Mr Atul Batra and Ms ShreyaMathur. For the... Petitioner: For the... RESPONDENTS: Mr Amit Mahajan, CGSC. CORAM HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU VIBHU BAKHRU, J JUDGMENT1 The petitioner has filed the present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, inter alia, praying that writ in the nature of mandamus be issued directing respondent no.2 (hereafter L&DO) to allot/regularize the plot measuring 204 sq. yards adjacent to plot no.13/15, Tihar-I, Subhash Nagar, New Delhi. The petitioner claims that the said area, measuring 204 sq. yards (hereafter referred to as the adjacent plot), forms a part of the plot of land bearing no.13/15, Tihar-I, Subhash Nagar, New Delhi (hereafter the plot in question). It is the petitioners case that similar ...
New Delhi Municipal Council vs.manohar Stone Crushing Co. & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-01-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RFA No.341/2006 + % NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL1t October, 2018 ..... Appellant Ms. Malvika Trivedi and Mr. Pawan Kr. Bansal, Advocates. (9810096538) Through: versus MANOHAR STONE CRUSHING CO. & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) is filed by the plaintiff in the suit impugning the Judgment of the Trial Court dated 21.12.2005 by which the trial court has dismissed the suit for recovery of an amount of Rs.19,04,094/- claimed as damages by the appellant/plaintiff, from the respondent no.1/defendant no.1/seller/supplier of stone dust and stone RFA3412006 Page 1 of 9 grit on account of breach of contract by respondent No.1/defendant no.1 in failing to supply the contracted quantity of stone dust and stone grit.2. The facts of the case are that the responde...
Inderjeet Sisodia & Ors vs.the State & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-01-2018
$~42 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + CRL.M.C. 4998/2018 Judgment delivered on:01.10.2018 INDERJEET SISODIA & ORS THE STATE & ANR versus ........ Petitioners ........ RESPONDENTS Mr. Alok Singh and Mr. Abhishek Singh, Advs. Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioners : For the... RESPONDENTS : CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA Mr. Raghuvinder Verma, Addl. PP for the State with ASI Satya Pal Singh Mr. Ajay Kumar, Adv. for R-2 JUDGMENT0110.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) Crl. M.A. 33266/2018 (Exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. CRL.M.C. 4998/2018 1.... Petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.217 of 2009 under Sections 498A/4IPC registered at Police Station Pandav CRL.M.C. 4998/2018 Page 1 of 3 Nagar, East Delhi, based on a settlement.2. 3. Subject FIR emanates out of matrimonial discord. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the parties have settled their disputes through the process of mediation held before Delhi Mediation Cen...
Shailender Singh & Anr. Vs.state Delhi Admn.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-01-2018
$~34 + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL. APPEAL No.140/2002 Decided on:-"1st October, 2018 SHAILENDER SINGH & ANR. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Abhay Kumar & Mr. Ashok Kumar Verma, Advs. versus STATE DELHI ADMN. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Ravi Nayak, APP for the State with SI Shrikrishna, PS Hari Nagar. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. The first information report (FIR) No.459/1997 was registered on 24.06.1997 on the complaint of Paramjeet Singh (PW-1), resident of C-26, Tihar Camp, New Ashok Nagar, New Delhi regarding an incident that had occurred at his said residence at about 11.15 p.m. on 23.06.1997. Two persons including said Paramjeet Singh (PW-1) had been injured in the incident, the other Amarjeet Singh (PW-7) being his brother, Babli (PW-3) the wife of their brother being an eye witness, the crime reported having statedly been committed by the appellants, they being sons of maternal uncle of the victims and consequently well known.2. On t...
Naveen Kumar & Anr vs.the State of Delhi & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-01-2018
$~15 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + CRL.M.C. 1780/2018 Judgment delivered on:01. 10.2018 NAVEEN KUMAR & ANR versus THE STATE OF DELHI & ANR ........ Petitioners ........ RESPONDENTS Mr. Pritam Kumar with Mr. Rajesh Pandey, Advocates Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioners: For the... RESPONDENTS: CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA Ms. Neelam Sharma, APP for the State. SI Manish, PS Palam Village. JUDGMENT0110.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) Crl.M.A.6386/2018 (for condonation of delay in re-filing) For the reasons stated in the application, the application is allowed. The delay of 188 days in re-filing the petition is condoned. CRL.M.C. 1780/2018 1.... Petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.140/2015 under Sections 463/465/415/417/4IPC, Police Station Palam Village. CRL.M.C. 1780/2018 Page 1 of 3 2. The allegations against the petitioners are that the petitioners had taken money for securing admission in B.Ed. course in M.D. University.3. Parties w...
Sh. Loveleen vs.state of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-01-2018
$~56 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + CRL.M.C. 5011/2018 Judgment delivered on:01. 10.2018 ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS SH. LOVELEEN versus STATE OF DELHI & ANR. Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : For the... RESPONDENTS: Mr. Virender Tyagi, Adv. with petitioner in person. Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, Addl. PP for the State with IO Mr. Harish Kumar, Adv. for R-2 with R-2 in person. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT0110.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) Crl. M.A. 33319/2018 (Exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. CRL.M.C. 5011/2018 The petitioner seeks quashing of FIR No.1688 of 2014 under 1. CRL.M.C. 5011/2018 Page 1 of 3 Sectionsof the IPC registered at Police Station Narela, Delhi, based on a settlement.2. Respondent No.2 is wife of the petitioner. Subject FIR was registered consequent to a quarrel that took place between the husband and wife.3. Learned counsel for the parties submit that the parties have settle...
M/S Mgf Developments Ltd. Vs.assistant Commissioner of Income Tax (Aci ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-01-2018
$~10 to 13 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:-"1st October, 2018 + CRL.M.C. 602/2015 & Crl.M.A. 2345/2015 + RAKSHIT JAIN ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Balbir Singh, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Yudhister Singh, Mr. Akhil Sachar, Ms. Monica Benjamin & Mr. Manoj Singh, Advocates. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (ACIT) versus Through: Mr. Puneet Rai, Standing ..... Respondent counsel with Mr. S. Singh, Advocate CRL.M.C. 603/2015 & Crl.M.A. 2348/2015 M/S MGF DEVELOPMENTS LTD. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Balbir Singh, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Yudhister Singh, Mr. Akhil Sachar, Ms. Monica Benjamin & Mr. Manoj Singh, Advocates. Versus ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ( ACIT) ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Puneet Rai, Standing counsel with Mr. S. Singh, Advocate Crl. M.C. No.602/2015 & conn. Page 1 of 12 + + CRL.M.C. 606/2015 & Crl.M.A. 2353/2015 SHRAVAN GUPTA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Balbir Singh, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Yudhister Singh, Mr. Akhil Sachar, Ms. Monica Benjamin ...
Mohd. Rizwan & Ors. Vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-01-2018
$~43 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + CRL.M.C. 5001/2018 Judgment delivered on:01.10.2018 MOHD. RIZWAN & ORS. STATE & ANR. versus ........ Petitioners ........ RESPONDENTS Ms. Meenakshi Agarwal and Ms. Shobhana Tanwar, Advs. Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioners : For the... RESPONDENTS : CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA Mr. Panna Lal Sharma, Addl. PP for the State with SI Vikas JUDGMENT0110.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) Crl. M.A. 33266/2018 (Exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. CRL.M.C. 4998/2018 1.... Petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.191 of 2016 under Sections 498A/406/323/5IPC registered at Police Station Khyala, Delhi, based on a settlement. Subject FIR emanates out of matrimonial discord.2. CRL.M.C. 5001/2018 Page 1 of 3 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the parties have settled their disputes through the process of mediation held before Delhi Mediation Centre, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi on 23.02.2018...
Sh. Baljinder Singh vs.sh. Sadhu Singh & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-01-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI date of decision:01. 10.2018 $~OS-7 * % + CS(OS) 583/2017 SH. BALJINDER SINGH ..... Plaintiff Through Mr.Raman Gandhi and Ms.Harsha Sharma, Advs. Through Mr.Amit Sanduja, Adv. for D-9 to 12 ..... Defendant versus SH. SADHU SINGH & ORS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH J.(ORAL) IA125302017 1. This application is filed seeking ad interim ex parte injunction to restrain the defendants from further creating any interest in favour of any third party or acting upon on the basis of preliminary decree dated 16.07.2013 and final decree dated 18.12.2015 passed by this court in CS(OS)303/2018 2. The facts of this case are that the plaintiff claims that the suit property being 2113/164 Tri Nagar, Delhi belonged to his grandmother late Smt.Sant Kaur. The grandmother executed a Will in favour of the applicant on 22.2.1996 whereby she bequeathed her entire property in favour of the applicant. Late Smt.Sant Kaur passed away on 13.8.1996.3. On 6....
- ‹ Prev
- 68
- 69
- 70
- 71
- 72
- 73
- 74
- 75
- 77
- 78
- Next ›
- Last »