Delhi Court October 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Brajesh Rai vs.gurmeet Singh
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-01-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % BRAJESH RAI GURMEET SINGH RFA No.829/2018 1st October, 2018 Through: Mr. Deepak K. ..... Appellant Sharma, Advocate with Mr. Ashish Sharma, Advocate and Mr. Kunal Vashisht, Advocate (M. No.9911794319). versus Through: ..... Respondent CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. YES VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) Caveat No.910/2018 1. No one appears for the caveator. Caveat stands discharged. C.M. No.40484/2018(exemption) 2. Exemption allowed subject to just exceptions. C.M. stands disposed of. RFA No.829/2018 Page 1 of 7 RFA No.829/2018 and C.M. No.40483/2018(stay) 3. This Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) is filed by the defendant in the suit impugning the Judgment of the Trial Court dated 02.06.2018 by which the trial court has decreed the suit for recovery of Rs.14 lakhs with interest being the amount of loan given by the respondent/plaintiff to the appellant...
M/S Vasant Vihar Club vs.sukhbir Singh
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-01-2018
$~29 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:1. t October, 2018 + WP (C) 10371/2018 & CM Nos.404405-40406/2018 1. M/S VASANT VIHAR CLUB ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Inder Jit Singh, Adv. versus SUKHBIR SINGH Through: None ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR This writ petition assails an Award, dated 18th January, 2017 JUDGMENT (ORAL) passed by the Labour Court. The dispute, referred to the Labour Court, by the Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi, on 8th December, 2011 has been set out, by the Labour Court, in para 1 of the impugned Award, in the following terms : Whether Sh. Sukhbir Singh S/o Sh. Tapraj Singh is entitled for payment of salary of Assistant Electrician as fixed by the management w.e.f. 29.09.2008 if so, what directions are necessary in this respect. 2. Mr. Inder Jit Singh has raised a preliminary objection to the effect that the term of reference, thus extracted by the Labour Court, is not the term of reference...
Mayank Duggal & Ors vs.state ( Nct of Delhi) & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-01-2018
$~5 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + CRL.M.C. 4739/2018 Judgment delivered on:01.10.2018 MAYANK DUGGAL & ORS versus STATE ( NCT OF DELHI) & ANR ........ Petitioners ........ RESPONDENTS Mr. Ajay Kumar with Ms. Pooja Singh, Advocates. Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : For the... RESPONDENTS : CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA Mr. Panna Lal Sharma, APP for State. Mr. Nitin Mehta with Mr. Arpit Rawal, Advocates for R-2. SI Bhagat Singh, PS Ashok Vihar. JUDGMENT0110.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) Crl.M.A.32315/2018 (exemption) Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions. CRL.M.C. 4739/2018 1.... Petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.188/2015 under Sections 498A/4IPC, Police Station Ashok Vihar, based on a settlement. CRL.M.C. 4739/2018 Page 1 of 3 2. Subject FIR emanates out of matrimonial discord.... Petitioner No.1 is the husband of respondent No.2.... Petitioner Nos.2 and 3 are the father-in-law and mother-in-law of the respondent ...
Harish Kumar & Ors. Vs.state (n.c.t of Delhi) & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-01-2018
$~23 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + CRL.M.C. 4469/2018 Judgment delivered on:01.10.2018 HARISH KUMAR & ORS. ........ Petitioners versus STATE (N.C.T OF DELHI) & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Mr. Santosh Pratap with Mr. Parmod Kumar Gupta and Durga, Advocates. Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : For the... RESPONDENTS : CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA Mr. Kamal Kumar Ghai, APP for State. Mr. Dhruv Sharma with Ms. Gemini Sharma, Advocates for respondent No.2 with R-2 in person. ASI Govind Singh, PS Sangam Vihar. JUDGMENT0110.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.521/2008 under Sections 498A/4IPC, Police Station Sangam Vihar, based on a settlement. Learned counsel for the petitioners prays for an exemption for 2. Crl.M.C.4469/2018 Page 1 of 3 personal appearance of petitioner Nos.3 and 5, who are the husband of the sister and sister of the petitioner No.1 respectively, on the ground that they are permanent...
Surendra Kumar Jain vs.principal Commissioner of Income Tax (Central)- ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-01-2018
$~21 to 34 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:01. 10.2018 + W.P.(C) 4304/2018 & CM APPL.16759/2018 SURENDRA KUMAR JAIN versus ........ Petitioner PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL)-III, NEW DELHI & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS 22 + W.P.(C) 4305/2018 & CM APPL.16760/2018 SURENDRA KUMAR JAIN ........ Petitioner versus PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL)-III, NEW DELHI & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS 23 + W.P.(C) 4306/2018 & CM APPL.16761/2018 SURENDRA KUMAR JAIN ........ Petitioner versus PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL)-III, NEW DELHI & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS 24 + W.P.(C) 4307/2018 & CM APPL.16762/2018 SURENDRA KUMAR JAIN versus ........ Petitioner PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL)-III, NEW DELHI & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS 25 + W.P.(C) 4308/2018 & CM APPL.16763/2018 SURENDRA KUMAR JAIN ........ Petitioner versus W.P.(C) 4304/2018 & connected matters Page 1 of 15 PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL)-III, N...
Gyan Prakash (Now Deceased) Thr Lrs vs.union of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-01-2018
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:1. t October, 2018 LA.APP. 344/2017 GYAN PRAKASH (NOW DECEASED) THR LRS..... Appellant Through: Mr. Dhruv Madan, Adv. UNION OF INDIA ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Yeeshu Jain & Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Versus CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW Advs. This appeal under Section 54 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 1. impugns the order [dated 16th August, 2016 in LAC No.(81/16) of the Court of Additional District Judge (ADJ)-02 (South)]. on a Reference under Section 30-31 of the Act as well as the order [dated 5th September, 2017 in LAC No.8946/2016 also of the Court of ADJ-02 (South)]. of dismissal of an application filed by the appellant for review of the order dated 16th August, 2016.2. This appeal came up first before this Court on 13th November, 2017 when record of the Reference Court was ordered to be requisitioned. Upon the record being received, vide order dated 5th April, 2018, notice of the appeal was issued to the...
Virendra Jain vs.principal Commissioner of Income Tax (Central)-Iii, N ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-01-2018
$~22 to 34 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:01. 10.2018 % + W.P.(C) 4305/2018 & CM APPL.16760/2018 SURENDRA KUMAR JAIN ........ Petitioner versus PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL)-III, NEW DELHI & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS 23 + W.P.(C) 4306/2018 & CM APPL.16761/2018 SURENDRA KUMAR JAIN versus ........ Petitioner PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL)-III, NEW DELHI & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS 24 + W.P.(C) 4307/2018 & CM APPL.16762/2018 SURENDRA KUMAR JAIN ........ Petitioner versus PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL)-III, NEW DELHI & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS 25 + W.P.(C) 4308/2018 & CM APPL.16763/2018 SURENDRA KUMAR JAIN versus ........ Petitioner PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL)-III, NEW DELHI & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS 26 + W.P.(C) 4309/2018 & CM APPL.16764/2018 SURENDRA KUMAR JAIN versus ........ Petitioner PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL)-III, NEW DELHI & ANR. 27 + W.P.(C) 4310/2018 & CM APPL.16...
Ak Sharma, Intelligence Officer, Ncb vs.jyotin Vyas & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-01-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:6th September, 2018 Pronounced on:01. t October, 2018 + CRL.A. 77/1997 & Crl.M.A. 4123/2011 Through: Mr.Subhash AK SHARMA, INTELLIGENCE OFFICER, NCB.... Appellant with Mr.Shashwat Bansal, Advs. alongwith Rajiv, Investigating Officer, NCB. Bansal Mr. versus JYOTIN VYAS & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Ghanshyam Sharma, Adv. for R3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA1 ORDER On 30.10.1987, a criminal complaint (160/1/87) was instituted before the Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, New Delhi by the predecessor in office of the appellant Intelligence Officer of Narcotic Control Bureau (NCB) seeking criminal action against the three respondents on the allegations that they had committed offences punishable under Sections 22 and 29 read with Section 22 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (for short, the NDPS Act). The cognizance on the said criminal complaint was taken and the respondents stood ...
Arun Krishnan and Anr. Vs.union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-01-2018
$~ * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on:26. 04.2018 Judgment Pronounced on:01. 10.2018 W.P.(C) 2665/2018, C.M. APPL.10866/2018 ARUN KRISHNAN AND ANR. Petitioners Through: Sh. Gaurav Bhardwaj, Advocate. Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .Respondents Through: Ms. Monika Arora, Standing Counsel for JNU with Mr. Harsh Ahuja, Mr. Kushal Kumar and Mr. Vibhu Tripathi, Advs. Mr. Chander Shekhar, Adv. for UGC. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.CHAWLA S.RAVINDRA BHAT, J.The writ petition is partly allowed. For detailed judgment WP(C) 3032/2017 may be referred to. S. RAVINDRA BHAT (JUDGE) A.K.CHAWLA (JUDGE) OCTOBER01 2018...
Ganga Saran vs.the Oriental Insurance Company Ltd & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-01-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: October 01, 2018 + MAC.APP. 968/2015 THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED Through: Mr. A. K. Soni, Advocate ..Appellant Versus GANGA SARAN & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Ghanshyam Thakur, Advocate + MAC.APP. 808/2018 For R-1 1. GANGA SARAN .....Appellant Through: Mr. Ghanshyam Thakur, Advocate Versus THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD & ORS Through: Mr. A.K. Soni, Advocate ....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) Impugned Award of 25th August, 2015 grants compensation of `3,37,493/- with interest @ 9% per annum to Ganga Saran (hereinafter referred to as the Injured), aged 45 years, on account of grievous MAC.APP. 968/2015 MAC.APP. 808/2018 Page 1 of 7 injuries suffered by him in a vehicular accident, which took place on 4th February, 2009.2. In the above captioned first appeal, The Oriental Insurance Company Limited (henceforth referred to as the Insurer) seeks recovery rights against drive...
- ‹ Prev
- 68
- 69
- 70
- 71
- 72
- 73
- 74
- 76
- 77
- 78
- Next ›
- Last »