Delhi Court October 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Kanhiya Lal vs.arun Tomar
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-01-2018
$~53 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:01. 10.2018 CRL.REV.P. 656/2018 KANHIYA LAL ARUN TOMAR versus ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Mr. Rajat Mathur, Advocate for Mr. Rajkumar Chandiwal, Adv. For the Respondent : None. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT0110.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) CRL.REV.P. 656/2018 & Crl. M. (Bail) 1228/2018 (suspension of sentence) 1.... Petitioner impugns order dated 21.07.2018 whereby the appeal of the petitioner against the order of conviction dated 08.02.2018 and order on sentence dated 27.03.2018 was dismissed.2.... Petitioner was convicted of an offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of one month and to pay compensation of Rs.5,50,000/- failing which to undergo further imprisonment of six CRL.REV.P. 656-2018 Page 1 of 3 months. The cheque amount being Rs.2,75...
Vinod Kumar Sood vs.bipin Gujral & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-01-2018
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:1. t October, 2018. RSA2982015, CM No.14646/2015 (for stay), CM No.5250/2018 (u/O XLI Rule 27 of the CPC) and CM No.5251/2018 (for exemption) VINOD KUMAR SOOD Through: Mr. Pramod Ahuja, Adv. ..... Appellant Versus BIPIN GUJRAL & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Samar Bansal, Mr. Devahuti Pathak, Mr. Manan Shishodia and Mr. Vinayak Mehrotra, Advs. Ms. Anju Gupta and Mr. Roshan Lal Goel, Advs. for SDMC/R-5. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW1 This Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) impugns the judgment and decree [dated 18th April, 2015 in RCA No.of the Court of Additional District Judge-02 (South- East)]. of dismissal of First Appeal under Section 96 of the CPC filed by the appellant against the judgment and decree [dated 16th April, 2014 in Civil Suit No.5(Case ID No.02406C0325332010) of the Court of Civil Judge-01 (South)]. only partly allowing the suit filed ...
Surendra Kumar Jain vs.principal Commissioner of Income Tax (Central)- ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-01-2018
$~22 to 34 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:01. 10.2018 % + W.P.(C) 4305/2018 & CM APPL.16760/2018 SURENDRA KUMAR JAIN ........ Petitioner versus PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL)-III, NEW DELHI & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS 23 + W.P.(C) 4306/2018 & CM APPL.16761/2018 SURENDRA KUMAR JAIN versus ........ Petitioner PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL)-III, NEW DELHI & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS 24 + W.P.(C) 4307/2018 & CM APPL.16762/2018 SURENDRA KUMAR JAIN ........ Petitioner versus PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL)-III, NEW DELHI & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS 25 + W.P.(C) 4308/2018 & CM APPL.16763/2018 SURENDRA KUMAR JAIN versus ........ Petitioner PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL)-III, NEW DELHI & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS 26 + W.P.(C) 4309/2018 & CM APPL.16764/2018 SURENDRA KUMAR JAIN versus ........ Petitioner PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL)-III, NEW DELHI & ANR. 27 + W.P.(C) 4310/2018 & CM APPL.16...
Usha Batra vs.m/s Ombir Creation Private Limited & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-01-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on: September 27, 2018 Judgment delivered on: October 01, 2018 + FAO(OS) 216/2017 USHA BATRA Through: Mr. Akshay Makhija with Ms. Seerat ..... Appellant versus Deep Singh & Mr. Ankit, Advs. M/S OMBIR CREATION PRIVATE LIMITED & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. A.K. Singla, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Rajesh Bansal, Mr. Vijay K. Gupta, Mr. Amit Khemka & Mrs. Ritu Bansal, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO JUDGMENT V. KAMESWAR RAO, J1 The appellants who are the legal heirs of the defendant no.3 in CS (OS) 650/2008 have preferred this intra-court appeal against the order dated 6th July, 2017 passed by the learned Single Judge, on the ground the learned Single Judge had denied them the right of preemption and directed them and the representative of the respondent No.1 to be present in the court to facilitate inter se bidding, if required.2. Some of the relevant facts are that on 7th April, 2008, a F...
Videocon Telecommunications Limited vs.ibm India Private Limited
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-01-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:01. 10.2018 + O.M.P. (COMM) 562/2016 & IA No.15462/2016 VIDEOCON TELECOMMUNICATIONS LIMITED ...Petitioner Versus... RESPONDENT:Mr Akhil Sibal, Senior Advocate with Mr Aniruddha Deshmukh, Mr Yashvardhan and Ms Tanvi Misra. :Mr Pramod Nair and Ms Manini Brar. IBM INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the Respondent CORAM HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J Introduction 1. The petitioner (hereafter VTL) has filed the present petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereafter the A&C Act), inter alia, impugning the arbitral award dated 06.08.2016 (hereafter the impugned award) delivered by the Arbitral Tribunal comprising of three arbitrators, namely, Mr R.C. Lahoti (Presiding Arbitrator), Mrs Sujata Manohar and Mr R.V. Raveendran (hereafter the Arbitral Tribunal).2. The impugned award was rendered in the context of disputes that...
Purshotam Behl vs.union of India and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-01-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:01.10.2018 + W.P.(C) 4521/2018, CM APPL174822018 & CM APPL289622018 PURSHOTAM BEHL versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS Present: Mr.Roopansh Purohit, Mr.Shaantanu Jain and Mr.Harsh Panwar, Advocates. Mr.Rajesh Gogna, CGSC for UOI. Ms.Gunjan Sinha Jain, Advocate for NHAI. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A. K. CHAWLA S.RAVINDRA BHAT, J.(ORAL) Writ petition is dismissed. For detailed judgment W.P.(C) 4520/2018 may be referred to. OCTOBER01 2018/ndn S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J A. K. CHAWLA, J...
Jahangir vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-01-2018
% + CRL.M.C. 5012/2018 JAHANGIR STATE & ANR. + CRL.M.C. 5015/2018 MANIK @ ELIYAS versus STATE & ANR. $~57& 58 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:01. 10.2018 versus ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioners: Mr. J.S. Kanwar, Advocate. For the... RESPONDENTS: Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, APP for the State in Crl.M.C. No.5012/2018 Mr. Kamal Kumar Ghai, APP for the State in Crl.M.C. No.5015/2018 SI Islamuddin, PS Seema Puri CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT0110.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) Crl.M.A.33320/2018 (exemption) in CRL.M.C. 5012/2018 Crl.M.A.33332/2018 (exemption) in CRL.M.C. 5015/2018 Exemptions are allowed subject to all just exceptions. CRL.M.C. 5012/2018 & Crl.M.C.5015/2018 Page 1 of 3 CRL.M.C. 5012/2018 & CRL.M.C. 5015/2018 1.... Petitioner in Crl.M.C.5012/2018 seeks quashing of FIR No.988/2014 under Sections 323/341/308 IPC, Police St...
Sh. Paras Kapil & Ors. Vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-01-2018
$~36 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + CRL.M.C. 4954/2018 Judgment delivered on:01.10.2018 SH. PARAS KAPIL & ORS. versus STATE & ANR. ........ Petitioners ........ RESPONDENTS Ms.Renu Kuhar, Advocate. Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : For the... RESPONDENTS : CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA Mr.Panna Lal Sharma, APP for the State. Ms.Neelam Yadav, Advocate for respondent No.2 with respondent No.2 in person. SI Ashish Kumar, PS Bhajan Pura. JUDGMENT0110.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.588/2016 under Sections 498A/4IPC and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, Police Station Bhajan Pura, based on the settlement.2. 3. Subject FIR emanates out of matrimonial discord. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the parties have settled their disputes and a Settlement/MOU dated 22.05.2018 has Crl.M.C.4954/2018 Page 1 of 3 been executed.... Petitioner No.1 and respondent No.2 have already been di...
Rahis Ahmed @ Bambaiya vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-01-2018
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:1. t October, 2018 W.P.(CRL) 2742/2018 RAHIS AHMED @ BAMBAIYA ........ Petitioner Represented by: Ms. Aishwarya Rao, Advocate. versus STATE Represented by: Mr. Rahul Mehra, Standing Counsel ..... Respondent and Mr. Sanjay Lao, Additional Standing Counsel for State. Mr. Ajay Kashyap, DG, Prisons, Mr.Prashant Kumar, OIC, Legal, and Mr.Amresh Goel, AS Legal. SI Ompal Singh, PS Khajuri Khas. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.(ORAL) 1. By this petition, petitioner seeks parole to re-establish social ties and also challenges the communication dated 23rd August, 2018 whereby his application was rejected for the reason the petitioner was granted three weeks furlough in July, 2017 which the petitioner had not availed.2. The petitioner has his own tale of sorrows to tell.... Petitioner filed an application for furlough before the competent authority and vide order dated 1st July, 2017 was granted first spell of furlough...
Mahesh Karwal vs. Satya Devi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-01-2018
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:1. t October, 2018. RSA2922016 MAHESH KARWAL ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Kamal Kapoor, Adv. Versus SATYA DEVI Through: Mr. Rajesh Karwal, son of ..... Respondent the respondent. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW1 This Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 impugns the judgment and decree [dated 29th April, 2016 in RCA No.13/2014 (Unique Case ID No.0121002014) of the Court of Additional Senior Civil Judge]. allowing the First Appeal under Section 96 of the CPC filed by the respondent / plaintiff against the judgment and decree [dated 11th February, 2014 in Suit No.1/2013 (Unique ID No.02401C0002142013) of the Court of Civil Judge-01 (West)]. of dismissal of the suit filed by the respondent / plaintiff for mandatory injunction directing the appellant / defendant to vacate the room, attached latrine in property bearing No.5/100, Top Floor (Third Floor), near Kawatra Tent House...
- ‹ Prev
- 68
- 69
- 70
- 71
- 72
- 73
- 75
- 76
- 77
- 78
- Next ›
- Last »