Delhi Court October 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Varsha Pandey vs.state of ( Nct ) Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-03-2018
BAIL APPLN. 2258/2018 $~1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + VARSHA PANDEY STATE OF ( NCT ) DELHI Advocates who appeared in this case: versus Judgment delivered on:03. 10.2018 ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent For the... Petitioner : Mr. Sudhir Tewatia, Advocate. For the Respondent : Ms. Neelam Sharma, Addl. PP for the State with SI Umesh Yadav, PS Janakpuri. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT0310.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner seeks regular bail in FIR No.265/2018 under Sections 420/120B/34 IPC registered at Police Station Janakpuri.2. The allegations against the petitioner in the FIR are that petitioner along with co-accused was running a fake recruitment agency, conducting interviews and receiving deposits for securing jobs in Delhi Metro as well as the airport. Apart from the BAIL APPLN. 2258/2018 Page 1 of 3 complainant, 45 more complaints, i.e., total 46 complaints, have been received that the amounts were paid to the recruitment ...
Darshna vs.govt of Nct of Delhi & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-03-2018
+ IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on: September 18, 2018 Judgment delivered on: October 03, 2018 LPA5372018 DARSHNA Through: Mr. Rahul Sagar Sahay and ..... Appellant Mr. Siddharth Bangar, Advs. versus GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Naushad Ahmad Khan, ASC (Civil), GNCTD with Mr. Zahid Hanief, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO JUDGMENT V. KAMESWAR RAO, J1 This Appeal has been filed by the appellant challenging the order dated 18th July, 2018 passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P.(C) 6592/2018, whereby the learned Single Judge has dismissed the writ petition challenging the order dated 8th June, 2018 passed by the District Magistrate whereby the appellant has been directed to evict the first floor of house No.2777/21, Beadonpura, Karol Bagh, New Delhi 110005 occupied by her and to hand over the physical possession of the property to LPA5372018 Page 1 of 20 respondent no.2, namely Dhani R...
Sunil Kumar & Ors. Vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-03-2018
$~64 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + CRL.M.C. 5049/2018 Judgment delivered on:03.10.2018 SUNIL KUMAR & ORS. versus STATE & ANR. ........ Petitioners ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Mr. Bhairav Dass & Mr. Mr. Yogesh Dass, Advocates. For the... RESPONDENTS : Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, Addl. PP for the State SI Vijay Kumar, PS Farsh Bazar. Mr. Krishan Kumar & Mr. Vipin Chander, Advocates for R-2. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT0310.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) Crl. M.A. No.33437/2018 (for exemption) Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Crl. M.C. No.5049/2018 & Crl. M.A. No.33436/2018 (for stay) 1. The petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.269/2010 under Sections 498A/4IPC and Section Dowry Prohibition Act, CRL.M.C. 5049/2018 Page 1 of 3 Police Station Farsh Bazar, based on a settlement.2. 3. Subject FIR emanates out of matrimonial discord. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the par...
Chandermal and Ors vs.union of India and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-03-2018
$~32 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgement:3. d October, 2018 + W.P.(C) 2255/2016 CHANDERMAL AND ORS ......Petitioners Through: Mr. Hara Prasad Sahu, Mr. Shiv Kant Mishra & Mr. Kamlesh Kumar Mishra Advocates. Versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. L.C. Singhi &Mr. Mithilesh Pal Advocates for R-1/UOI. Ms. Astha Tyagi, Advocate LAC/L&B. Mr. M.K. Singh, Advocate for DDA. for CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G.S. SISTANI, J.(Oral) 1. This is a petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India filed by the petitioners seeking a declaration that the acquisition proceedings with respect to 1 Bigha 7 Biswas land comprised in Khasra No.15/situated in the revenue estate of village Ali, New Delhi (hereinafter referred as the 'subject land') is deemed to have lapsed in view of Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (h...
Vinod Bhandkoliya vs.union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-03-2018
$~13 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 8571/2015 VINOD BHANDKOLIYA Through: Mr.Anuj Aggarwal, Adv . ........ Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms.Sunieta Ojha with Mr.Talish Ray, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI % 1. ORDER0310.2018 The petitioner has filed the present writ petition seeking directions to the respondent no.3/Staff Selection Commission (SSC) to issue him a letter, for selecting him to the post of Constable (GD) in the CAPF or the post of Rifleman (GD) in the Assam Rifles.2. The brief facts of the case are that in February, 2012, the respondent no.3/SSC had issued an advertisement inviting applications for recruitment to the post of Constable (GD) in the CAPF and Rifleman (GD) in the Assam Rifles. The petitioner had applied for the said posts in the OBC category from Madhya Pradesh. In March, 2012, the petitioner was called for a Physical Efficiency Test wherein he was found ...
M/S Sconce Global Pvt Ltd vs.m/s Real Video Impact Pvt Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-03-2018
$~OS-4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + CS(COMM) 539/2017 Date of Decision:03. 10.2018 M/S SCONCE GLOBAL PVT LTD ..... Plaintiff Through Mr.Amar Khera and Mr. Ashok Kr. Bharti, Advs. Versus M/S REAL VIDEO IMPACT PVT LTD Through Defendant is ex- parte ..... Defendant CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(ORAL) 1. This is a suit for recovery of a sum of Rs. 3,37,03,196/- (Rupees Three Crore Thirty Seven Lakhs Three Thousand One Hundred Ninety Six) from the defendant with pendent lite and future interest @ 18% per annum. Other connected reliefs are also sought.2. Notices of the suit were duly served to the defendant. Learned Counsel for the defendant entered appearance but no written statement was filed despite being given sufficient amount of time. Hence, the defendant has been proceeded ex-parte by virtue of the order of this court dated 23.05.2018. Thereafter plaintiff has led its ex parte evidence by filing an affidavit by way of evidence of one Mr. Ravin...
Sh. Amit Singla vs.state (Nct of Delhi) & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-03-2018
$~13 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + CRL.M.C. 4808/2018 Judgment delivered on:03. 10.2018 SH. AMIT SINGLA versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. Advocates who appeared in this case: ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS For the... Petitioner : For the... RESPONDENTS : Mr. Priyank Sharma, Advocate with petitioner. Mr. Raghuvinder Verma, APP for the State with IO. Mr. S.P. Sharma, Advocate for respondent No.2 with respondent No.2 in person. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT0310.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner seeks quashing of FIR No.149 of 2013 under Sections 341/354-A/509/506 of the IPC registered Police Station K.N. Katju Marg, Delhi, based on a settlement.2. The allegations against the petitioner are that the petitioner had misbehaved with the complainant and used to trail her. He is alleged to have misbehaved with her and even slapped her father. Learned counsel for the parties submit that the parties have 3. Crl.M.C.4808/2018 Page 1 o...
Anita Shukla vs.the State (n.c.t. Of Delhi) & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-03-2018
$~10 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + CRL.M.C. 4772/2018 Judgment delivered on:03. 10.2018 ANITA SHUKLA ........ Petitioner versus THE STATE (N.C.T. OF DELHI) & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Mr. Satyam Sisodia, Advocates Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner: For the... RESPONDENTS: CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA Mr. Hiren Sharma, APP for the State. SI Lokesh Singh Mr. Manish Awasthi, Adv. for R-2 JUDGMENT0310.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) Crl.M.A. 32419/2018 (Exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. CRL.M.C. 4742/2018 1.... Petitioner seeks quashing of FIR No.109 of 2016 under Sections 420/467/4of the IPC registered at Police Station Bhalswa Dairy, Delhi, based on a settlement. CRL.M.C. 4772/2018 Page 1 of 3 2.3. The petitioner was a tenant in the property of respondent No.2. The allegations in the FIR are that for the purpose of obtaining an electricity connection, NOC of respondent No.2 was forged and fabricated by the petitione...
M/S Nccl-Premco (Iv) vs.national Thermal Power Corporation Limited & O ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-03-2018
$~6 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI ARB.P. 608/2018 + M/S NCCL-PREMCO (IV) ........ Petitioner Date of Decision:03. 10.2018 Through: Mr. S. K. Chandwani with Mr.Sameer Chandwani, Advocates. NATIONAL THERMAL POWER CORPORATION LIMITED & ORS. versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Puneet Taneja and Ms. Shaheen, Advocates for R-1/NTPC. Mr. Udit Seth, Advocate for R-32 & 3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER RAJIV SHAKDHER, J.(ORAL) 1. This is a petition filed under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Notice in this petition was issued on 23.08.2018. On that date Mr. Puneet Taneja, Advocate entered appearance on behalf of respondent No.1/NTPC Ltd.2. On return of notice, i.e. today, Mr. Udit Seth enters appearance on behalf of respondent No.2/RITES. 2.1 The only contention of Mr. Seth is that since the Arbitrator has already been appointed by respondent No.2/RITES under the arbitration agreement obtaining between the parties, this petition would not l...
Gautam Navlakha vs.state (Nct of Delhi) & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-01-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI GAUTAM NAVLAKHA $~7 * + CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE VINOD GOEL W.P.(CRL) 2559/2018 ........ Petitioner Through: Ms. Nitya Ramakrishnan, Advocate with Ms. Warisha Farasat, Mr. Ashwath Sitaraman & Mr. Saad Uzzaman, Advocates. versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Rahul Mehra, Standing Counsel (Crl.) with Mr. Chaitanya Gosain & Mr. Tushar Sannu, Advocates for the State of Delhi. Mr. Vinay Navare and Dr. Ravindra Chingale, Advocates for State of Maharashtra. ACP K.G. Tyagi, Sp.Cell. % ORDER0110.2018 Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. The background facts and the orders passed in this petition until 29th August 2018 have already been set out by this Court in a detailed order dated 29th August 2018 which reads as under: 1. The... Petitioner has approached this Court seeking the issuance of a writ of habeas corpus for his release from illegal W.P. (Crl.) 2559/2018 Page 1 of 26 custody and questioning the legality of his arre...
- ‹ Prev
- 67
- 68
- 69
- 70
- 71
- 73
- 74
- 75
- 76
- 77
- Next ›
- Last »