Delhi Court October 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
State of Nct of Delhi vs.ashish Kumar
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-03-2018
$~ * + % CRL.A. 477/2018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:03. 10.2018 STATE OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Avi Singh, ASC versus ASHISH KUMAR ..... Respondent Through: Mr. B. Badrinath, Adv (DHCLSC) a/w respondent in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE I.S. MEHTA VIPIN SANGHI, J.(ORAL) 1. The present appeal has been preferred by the State upon grant of leave to assail the judgment dated 30.09.2016 passed by the Ld. ASJ- 01(West) Tiz Hazari Courts: Delhi in Sessions Case No.56/2012 (Old No.), 56241/2016 (New No.), arising out of FIR No.217/2012, under Sections 363/376/511 IPC, registered at PS Uttam Nagar. By the impugned judgment the respondent accused stands acquitted of the charge framed against him under Sections 363/376/511 IPC.2. The prosecutrix was a child who was barely 3 years old on the date of the incident. The date of the incident is 15.05.2012, and the date of birth of Crl.A. 477/2018 Page 1 of 15 the pro...
Shashi Kant Sharma & Ors vs.state (Govt of Nct of Delhi) & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-03-2018
$~50 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + CRL.M.C. 5035/2018 Judgment delivered on:03.10.2018 SHASHI KANT SHARMA & ORS ........ Petitioners versus STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioners : For the... RESPONDENTS : Mr. Mohit Bhardwaj with Ms. Rashmi Bhardwaj and Ms. Sabhya Jain, Advocates. Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, APP for the State. SI Naresh Kumar, PS Mansarovar Park. Respondent No.2 in person. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT0310.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.189/2017 under Sections 498A/4IPC, Police Station Mansarovar Park, based on a settlement.2. The subject FIR emanates out of matrimonial discord.... Petitioner No.1 is the husband of respondent No.2.... Petitioner Nos.2 and 3 are the father-in-law and mother-in-law of the respondent No.2. CRL.M.C. 5035/2018 Page 1 of 3... Petitioner No.4 is the brother-in-law of the respondent No.2 3. L...
Savita Devi vs.lalit Kumar
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-03-2018
$~14. * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CM(M) 1203/2018 & CM No.40978/2018 (for stay). SAVITA DEVI Through: Ms. Rajeshwari H. And Ms. Nupur ........ Petitioner Goswami, Advs. versus Through: None. LALIT KUMAR CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW % ORDER0310.2018 ..... Respondent CM No.40979/2018 (for exemption).1. 2. Allowed, subject to just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. CM(M) 1203/2018 & CM No.40978/2018 (for stay).3. This petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India impugns the order [dated 11th July, 2018 in HMA No.2of the Judge Family Court (South-East)]. of dismissal of objections filed by the petitioner wife against the earlier order of the Family Court issuing a commission for recording evidence in the petition for divorce filed by the respondent husband under Section 13(1)(ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 for dissolution of marriage with the petitioner wife.4. The petitioner wife objected to the issuance of commission contendin...
Amit Chhikara vs.union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-03-2018
$~47 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision :3. d October, 2018 + W.P.(C) 10518/2018 AMIT CHHIKARA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Nitin K. Gupta and Mr. Rahul Sinha, Advs. versus ........ RESPONDENTS UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. Through: Mr. Arun Bhardwaj, CGSC for R-1 & 2 with Mr. Nikhil Bhardaj, Ms. Gauraan and Mr. Shashwat Sharma, Advs. Mr. Manoj, SC-FCI with Ms. Aparna Sinha, Adv. for R-3 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT (ORAL) % 1. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, this writ petition is being taken up and disposed of at the admission stage itself, as it involves a very short issue.2. On 29th October, 2011, the Staff Selection Commission (hereinafter referred to as the SSC) issued an advertisement, for W.P.(C) 10518/2018 Page 1 of 13 recruitment of Assistant Grade III in the Food Corporation of India (FCI) to be filled by examination.3. The petitioner appeared in the said examination, and was declared qualified on 18th August, 2...
Nirmal Bot Ltd. Vs.national Highway Authority of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-03-2018
$~14 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:03. 10.2018 + O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 198/2018 NIRMAL BOT LTD. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Dayan Krishnan, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Sanjeev Seshadari, Mr. Rishi Agrawala, Mr. Pranjit Bhattacharya & Ms. Shruti Arora, Advs. versus NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY OF INDIA ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Gunjan Sinha Jain with Ms. Soumya Priyadarshinee, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER RAJIV SHAKDHER, J.(ORAL) 1. This is a petition in which the following substantive prayer is sought:-"(i) Restrain the Respondent from recovering / making any deductions from the 17th Contractual Annuity Payment of Rs.28,30,00,000 or... Petitioner's Escrow Account towards alleged damages or any other amount, during the pendency of the dispute before the Ld. Arbitral Tribunal; 2. Briefly, the record of the case shows that the captioned petition came to be filed in the background of following facts and circumstances. 2.1 The petitioner entered into...
Shri Virender Kumar & Ors vs.state & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-03-2018
$~6 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:03. 10.2018 CRL.M.C. 4703/2018 SHRI VIRENDER KUMAR & ORS STATE & ANR versus Through ........ Petitioners ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the... RESPONDENTS : : Ms. Padma Priya, Mr. Arpit Agrawal, Mr. Sanjeev Rawat and Ms. Maulshree Pathak, Advs. Mr. Kewal Singh Ahuja, APP for the State with ASI Arun Kumar & ASI Teja Ram CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT0310.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) Crl. M.A. 32149/2018 (Exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Crl. M.A. 32150/2018 (condonation of delay in re-filing) For the reasons stated in the application, the delay in re-filing the petition is condoned. The application is disposed of. CRL.M.C. 4703/2018 Page 1 of 3 CRL.M.C. 4703/2018 1.... Petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.122 of 2012 under Sections 498A/4of the IPC registered at Police Station Najafgarh, Delhi, based on a settlement.2. 3. ...
Sunny Chauhan & Ors vs.state (Nct of Delhi) & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-03-2018
$~52 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + CRL.M.C. 5038/2018 Judgment delivered on:03.10.2018 SUNNY CHAUHAN & ORS ........ Petitioners versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Mr. Tarun Kumar Malhotra, Advocate. Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioners : For the... RESPONDENTS : Mr. Raghuvinder Verma, APP for the State. SI Rajender Singh, PS Geeta Colony. Mr. Devi Singh, Advocate for respondent No.2 with respondent No.2 in person. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT0310.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) Crl.M.A.33402/2018 (exemption) Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions. CRL.M.C. 5038/2018 1.... Petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.838/2014, under Sections 498A/4IPC, Police Station Geeta Colony. CRL.M.C. 5038/2018 Page 1 of 3 2. It is contended that petitioner No.1 is the husband of the respondent No.2.... Petitioner Nos.2 and 3 are the father-in-law and mother-in-law of the respondent No.2.... Petitioner No.4 is the...
Padam Chand Kanodia vs.union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-03-2018
$~23 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:3. d October, 2018 + W.P.(C) 2489/2015 PADAM CHAND KANODIA ......Petitioner Through: Mr. Ankit Banati, Advocate. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Vivek Goyal, CGSC for UOI. Jyoti Tyagi, Advocates Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel with Ms for LAC/L&B. Mr. Danesh Relan, Standing Counsel with Ms. Gauri Chaturvedi and Ms. Mrinalini Sharma, Advocates for DDA. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G.S. SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. This is a petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India filed by the petitioner seeking a declaration that the acquisition proceedings with respect to 1 Bigha land of the... Petitioner comprised in Khasra No.49/3, situated in the revenue estate of village Prehlad Pur Bangar, New Delhi (hereinafter referred as the 'subject land') is deemed to have lapsed in view of Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Lan...
M/S Db Corp Ltd. Vs.m/s Chd Developers Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-03-2018
$~56 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI FAO(OS) (COMM) 225/2018 Date of Judgment:3. d October, 2018 M/S DB CORP LTD. ..... Appellant Through Mr. Dhruv Mehta, Senior Advocate with Ms. Nikita Chitale, Advocate versus M/S CHD DEVELOPERS LTD. ..... Respondent Through Mr. Jeevesh Nagrath and Mr. Chandan Dutta, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G.S. SISTANI, J.(ORAL) CAV.PET.919/2018 1.2. Counsel for the caveator has entered appearance. The caveat petition stands disposed of. CM.APPL41080/2018(Exemption) 3.4. Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. FAO(OS) (COMM) 225/2018 5. The present appeal is filed under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereafter the Act)read with Section 13 of the Commercial Courts, Commercial Division & Commercial Appellate Division of the High Court Act, 2015 directed against the order dated 31.08.2018 passed by the learned Sing...
Indrajit Kumar Singh vs.the State (Govt of Nct of Delhi) & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-03-2018
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on:26. h September, 2018 Judgment Delivered on:3. d October, 2018 W.P.(CRL.) 3486/2016 INDRAJIT KUMAR SINGH ........ Petitioner Represented by: Mr.A.K.Srivastava and Mr.Arvind Tiwari, Advocates versus THE STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Represented by: Mr.Rahul Mehra, Standing Counsel for the State with Mr.Jamal Akhtar and Mr.Chaitanya, Advocates and ASI Virendera Singh, PS Crime Branch. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA1 By this petition, the petitioner seeks directions to respondents to conduct a fair and thorough inquiry into the case and the circumstances of the death of petitioners wife Late Smt.Aahana Rajput who died on 16th August, 2014 allegedly by committing suicide while living with her parents, brother and sister at Police Colony, Narela, Delhi as also registration of FIR based on the complaints and information provided by the petitioner to the respondents.2. Case of the petitioner ...
- ‹ Prev
- 66
- 67
- 68
- 69
- 70
- 72
- 73
- 74
- 75
- 76
- Next ›
- Last »