Delhi Court October 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Sunny Paul vs.state of Nct of Delhi & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-03-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on: September 05, 2018 Judgment delivered on: October 03, 2018 + LPA2052017, CM No.11669/2017 SUNNY PAUL Through: Mr. Viresh B. Saharya, Adv. with ..... Appellant Mr. Akshat Agarwal, Adv. versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Satyakam, ASC (GNCTD) with Mr. Mohit Kumar Bafna, Adv. for R-1 Ms. Aakanksha Kaul, Adv. for R-2 & 3 CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO JUDGMENT V. KAMESWAR RAO, J1 The challenge in this appeal by the appellant is to the order dated March 15, 2017 passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P.(C) No.10463/2015 whereby the learned Single Judge has upheld the order dated October 01, 2015 passed by the Maintenance Tribunal constituted under The Maintenance and Welfare of Parents & Senior Citizens Act, 2007 (for short Act of 2007) whereby the appellant and his brother were directed to LPA No.205/2017 Page 1 of 35 vacate H.No.19A, Raj Niwas Marg, Civil ...
The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs.renuka Sharma & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-03-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI * Date of Decision: October 03, 2018 THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD. Through: Mr. Pankaj Seth, Advocate ..... Appellant + MAC.APP. 492/2015 Versus RENUKA SHARMA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Aatreya Singh, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) Impugned Award of 8th April, 2015 grants compensation of 1. 67,49,856/- with interest @ 8% per annum to respondents-Claimants on account of death of IBP Companys Divisional Manager-Ajay Kumar Sharma, aged 46 years, in a vehicular accident on 3rd January, 2006.2. The factual background of this case, as noticed in the impugned Award, is as under:-"This is a petition u/s 166 and 140 of the Motor Vehicle Act, 1988 (hereinafter referred to as M.V. Act) for grant of compensation. This was one of the old MACT cases pending before this Tribunal. In brief the relevant facts of the case as mentioned in the petition are that one Sh. Ajay Kumar Sharma expired in road traffic accident on...
Prehlad Singh & Ors. Vs.state (Nct of Delhi) & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-03-2018
$~12 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:03. 10.2018 CRL.M.C. 4787/2018 PREHLAD SINGH & ORS. versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. Advocates who appeared in this case: ........ Petitioners ........ RESPONDENTS For the... Petitioners : For the... RESPONDENTS : Mr. Yogendra Singh, Advocate with petitioner. Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, APP for the State. SI Rajender Singh Mr. Navin Kumar, Advocate for respondent No.2 with respondent No.2 in person. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT0310.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.149 of 2015 under Sections 323/341/5IPC, Police Station Malviya Nagar, based on a settlement.2. Parties are family members. The subject FIR was registered consequent to a quarrel that took place between the parties over the distribution of family properties. Crl.M.C.4787/2018 Page 1 of 3 3. Learned counsel for the parties submit that the parties have settled their disputes with the intervention...
Ashoo Decor(india) vs.ajay Enterprises Pvt Ltd & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-03-2018
$~20 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:3. d October, 2018 CS (COMM) 1192/2016 & I.A. 3634/2015 ASHOO DECOR(INDIA) ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. A.K. Verma & Mr. Vibhu Verma, Advocates (M-98102788022). versus AJAY ENTERPRISES PVT LTD & ANR ..... Defendants Through: Ms. Vidhi Goel & Mr. Vinod Kapoor, Advocates (M-995860454). CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.(Oral) 1. The present suit has been filed by the Plaintiff seeking recovery of a sum of Rs.1,42,17,569/- against the Defendants. Defendant No.2 is the Managing Director of Defendant No.1. Defendant No.2 is deleted from the array of parties. Defendant No.1 had floated a tender in response to which the Plaintiff had submitted its bid. Vide letter of intent dated 7th July, 2009, the Plaintiff was awarded the project for Supply, Installation, Testing and Commissioning of Aluminum Structural Glazing (Semi Unitized) and ACP Work for the Defendants Project: Eros Corporate Park, Block No.K, Secto...
Rajiv Kumar Rai vs.m/s Indian Agriculture Research Institute (Iari) & ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-03-2018
$~57 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI LPA. 557/2018 Date of Judgment:3. d October, 2018 RAJIV KUMAR RAI ..... Appellant Through Mr. Anuj Aggarwal, Mr. Deepak versus Sinha and Mr. Ashutosh Dixit, Advocates M/S INDIAN AGRICULTURE RESEARCH INSTITUTE (IARI) & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Gagan Mathur and Mr. Varun Kumar, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G.S. SISTANI, J.(ORAL) CM.APPL40601/2018(Exemption) 1.2. Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. CM APPLs 40600/2018 (delay in filing) and 40602/2018 (delay in re- filing) & LPA. 557/2018 3. The present appeal filed by the appellant is directed against the order passed by the learned Single Judge dated 10.10.2013, by which the writ petition has been allowed in part and a compensation awarded to the tune of Rs.20,000/- has been increased to Rs.40,000/-. Along with the appeal, an application (CM.APPL406002018) has b...
Super Cassettes Industries Private Limited vs.shivam Cable Netowrk
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-03-2018
$~23 * + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(COMM) 37/2015 SUPER CASSETTES INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. K.K. Khetan, Advocate versus SHIVAM CABLE NETOWRK Through: None. Date of Decision:03. dOctober, 2018 ..... Defendant CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J: (Oral) 1. It is pertinent to mention that present suit has been filed for permanent injunction restraining infringement of copyright, damages and rendition of accounts etc. The prayers made in the plaint are reproduced hereinbelow:-""39. The Plaintiff prays that this Honble Court may be pleased to grant the following reliefs: the (i) An order of permanent Defendant, their officers, servants, agents, partners and representatives and all others acting for and on their behalf from either engaging in themselves or from authorizing, the injunction restraining CS(COMM) 37/2015 Page 1 of 7 distributing, broadcasting, (lyrics) and Musical works recording, public performance/communicat...
Mohd. Asif vs.the State ( Govt of Nct of Delhi) & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-03-2018
$~9 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + CRL.M.C. 4740/2018 Judgment delivered on:03. 10.2018 MOHD. ASIF ........ Petitioner versus THE STATE ( GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Mr. Kshitiz Mahipal & Mr. Parveen Yadav, Advocates Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioners: For the... RESPONDENTS: CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA Mr. Kamal Kr. Ghai, APP for the State. SI Nisar Ahmed Advocate for BSES-YPL (name not given) JUDGMENT0310.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) Crl.M.A. 32317-18 (Exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. CRL.M.C. 4740/2018 1.... Petitioner impugns the bail order dated 23.08.2018 whereby a condition has been imposed on the petitioner to deposit 35% of the CRL.M.C. 4740/2018 Page 1 of 3 impugned theft assessment bill.2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is the owner of the property and had rented out the same to Mohd. Nadeem and Mohd. Sharif and thereafter physical possession of t...
Manoj Cable Company vs.union of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-03-2018
$-10 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:3. d October, 2018 EX.P.424/2015 MANOJ CABLECOMPANY ..... Decree Holder Through: Mr.I.S. Alag, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Vineet Kumar, Mr.Gurmehar S.Sistani & Mr.Dushyant Kumar, Advs. UNION OF INDIA versus ..... Judgement Debtor Through: Mr.Jagjit Singh, Sr. Standing Counsel for Railways with Mr.Preet Singh & Mr.Vipin Chaudhary, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA NAVIN CHAWLA, J.(Oral) 1. The only dispute left between the parties to be adjudicated is whether the Award dated 30.11.2012 passed by the Sole Arbitrator adjudicating the disputes that had arisen between the parties in relation to the Contract for supply of underground Railway Signalling Cable Size 19 Core x 1.5 sq. mm against the Purchase Orders dated 14.01.2009 and 24.02.2009, Awards pre-reference, pendent lite and post Award interest in favour of the petitioner or not.2. The dispute between the parties was in relation to the claim of the petitioner for pric...
Dinesh Kumar vs.ruchi Ahuja
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-03-2018
$~28 + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:-"3rd October, 2018 CRL. M.C. 5014/2018 and Crl.M.A.33325/2018 DINESH KUMAR ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Anip Sachthey, Advocate with Ms. Anjali Chauhan, & Ms. Ria Sachthey, Advocates versus RUCHI AHUJA Through: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ..... Respondent 1. ORDER (ORAL) The respondent has instituted proceedings against the petitioner and his parents by filing a petition (CC No.229/1/2010) in the court of Metropolitan Magistrate under Section 12 of Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 (for short, the DV Act) seeking various reliefs including protection orders under Section 18 and an order as to right to residence under Section 19 besides other monetary reliefs. The main petition is concededly pending inquiry, it being an admitted case that the parties were married to each other on 14.10.2007 as per Hindu rites and customs, the relations having turned sour which, as per the case of the respondent (wi...
Prabhleen Kaur vs.union of India & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-03-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + W.P.(C) 7974/2017 Judgment delivered on:03. 10.2018 PRABHLEEN KAUR ...Petitioner Versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR ...Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the Respondent Amicus Curiae :Mr Shailendra Bhardwaj and Ms A.Roma S. Bhardwaj. :Mr Sanjib Kumar Mohanty, Senior Panel, Central Govt. counsel UOI with Mr Amit Acharya, Mr Santosh Kumar Pandey, Govt. Pleader, UOI. Mr Sachin Nahar, Mr V.P. Nahar for R-2 with SI Harjinder Singh in person. :Mr Neeraj Kishan Kaul, Senior Advocate. CORAM HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU VIBHU BAKHRU, J JUDGMENT1 The petitioner has filed the present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that the respondents be directed to issue a passport to the petitioner. The petitioner also impugns a letter dated 02.08.2017 (hereafter the impugned communication) issued by the Regional Passport Office, Ministry of External Affairs (hereafter RPO), whereby the petitioners ap...
- ‹ Prev
- 65
- 66
- 67
- 68
- 69
- 71
- 72
- 73
- 74
- 75
- Next ›
- Last »