Delhi Court October 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Chandigarh Clinical Laboratories vs.dr. Lals Path Labs P. Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-04-2018
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:4. h October, 2018. RFA8172005 & CM No.16289/2005 (for stay) CHANDIGARH CLINICAL LABORATORIES ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Irfan Ahmed, Adv. Versus Through: Mr. Abhishek Swaroop, Adv. ..... Respondent DR. LAL'S PATH LABS P. LTD. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW1 This First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) impugns the judgment and decree [dated 13th July, 2005 in Suit No.213/2004 of the Court of Additional District Judge (ADJ), Delhi]. allowing the suit filed by the respondent / plaintiff for recovery of Rs.5,51,979.26 paise with pendente lite and future interest at the rate of 18% per annum jointly and severally from the appellant / defendant and its Director Mr. Ravi Khanna, in the sum of Rs.4,83,500/- with pendente lite and future interest at the rate of 9% per annum against the appellant / defendant and not against its Director Mr. Ravi Khanna.2. The appeal came up first bef...
Balwan Singh vs.international Airport Authority of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-04-2018
$~2 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:4. h October, 2018 RFA(OS) 33/2018 & CM Nos.21511-21512/2018, 37751/2018 BALWAN SINGH Israel Ali, Advocate. Through: ..... Appellant versus INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT AUTHORITY OF INDIA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Digvijay Rai and Mr.Kustubh Singh, Advocates for R-1/AAI. Mr.Akshay Chandra, Advocate 2/DDA. Mr.Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel with Ms.Jyoti Tyagi, Advocate for R-3. for R- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. The present appeal is directed against the order dated 27.04.2018 passed by the learned Single Judge by which a chamber appeal filed by the appellant herein against the order dated 09.07.2015 in OA No.156/2017 along with an application IA No.14047/2017 seeking condonation of delay of two and half years were dismissed as no sufficient cause was found for the delay. This order is in continuation of the earlier orders dated 28.11.201...
Vijay Kumar Puri vs.rajinder Nath Puri (Since Deceased) Thr Lrs
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-04-2018
* + % + RFA No.833/2018 VIJAY KUMAR PURI IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RFA Nos. 833/2018 & 831/2018 4th October, 2018 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. R.B.Singhal, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Siddharth Sengar and Mr. Anurag Bindal, Advocates. (9868152850) versus RAJINDER NATH PURI (SINCE DECEASED) THR LRS ........ RESPONDENTS Through AND + RFA No.831/2018 VIJAY KUMAR PURI & ANR ..... Appellants Through: Mr. R.B.Singhal, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Siddharth Sengar and Mr. Anurag Bindal, Advocates. (9868152850) RFA Nos. 833/2018 & 831/2018 Page 1 of 15 versus RAJINDER NATH PURI (SINCE DECEASED) THR LRS ........ RESPONDENTS Through CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) CM No.41153/2018 (Exemption) 1. Exemption allowed subject to just exceptions. CM stands disposed of. CM No.41154/2018 (delay in re-filing) 2. For the reasons stated in the application, delay in re-filing is condoned. CM stands disposed of. RFA No.833/2018 & CM No.4115...
The Oriental Insurance Co Ltd vs.arjun Dass & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-04-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: October 04, 2018 + MAC.APP. 582/2013 + MAC.APP. 584/2013 THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO LTD Through: Mr. A.K. Soni, Advocate ..... Appellant versus ARJUN DASS & ORS SHANTI DEVI & ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Anshuman Bal, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. In the above captioned appeals, recovery rights are sought against driver and owner of insured vehicle. Since these appeals arise out of common impugned Award, therefore, with the consent of learned counsel for the parties, both the appeals have been heard together and are being decided by this common judgment.2. The challenge in these appeals to impugned Award of 6th April, 2013 rendered by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as the Tribunal) survives qua respondents No.9 & 10 i.e. driver and owner of insured vehicle against whom appellants seek recovery rights. The facts as noticed in the impugned Award are as under:-"...
Gaurav Sachdeva & Anr vs.state & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-04-2018
$~75 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + CRL.M.C. 5067/2018 Judgment delivered on:04.10.2018 GAURAV SACHDEVA & ANR STATE & ANR versus ........ Petitioners ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: Mr. Anil Khosla, Adv. with petitioner in person. Mr. Kamal Kr. Ghai, Addl. PP for the State with SI Vijay Kumar For the... Petitioners : For the... RESPONDENTS CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA : JUDGMENT0410.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.435 of 2012 under Sections 498A/4IPC registered at Police Station Prashant Vihar, based on a settlement.2. 3. Subject FIR emanates out of matrimonial discord. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the parties have settled their disputes before the Delhi Mediation Centre, Rohini CRL.M.C. 5067/2018 Page 1 of 3 Courts on 01.05.2018. The parties have already been divorced by way of a decree of divorce by mutual consent passed on 31.05.2018.4. As per the settlement, the resp...
National Telecom of India Limited vs.bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-04-2018
$-25 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:04. 10.2018 OMP (ENF.) (COMM.) 165/2016 & IA15182018 NATIONAL TELECOM OF INDIA LIMITED ..... Decree Holder Through: Mr.Raman Kapur, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Pramod Singh, Mr.Anmol Stephen, Mr.Sanjay Kumar, Advs. versus BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LIMITED Through: Mr.Chandan Kumar, Adv. ..... Judgment Debtor CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA NAVIN CHAWLA, J.(Oral) 1. The present application bearing No.1518/2018 has arisen due to very peculiar circumstances that have occurred because of the delay in final adjudication of the disputes that had arisen between the parties in relation to the Advance Purchase Order dated 11.12.1996 placed by the respondent on the petitioner. By the said Purchase Order, the respondent had agreed to purchase the following goods from the petitioner: (i) Subscriber Line Concentrators -lines of 266 nos. @ Rs.51,792/- per unit (all inclusive) for a total value of Rs.1,37,76,672/- (Rupees One Crore, Thirty Sev...
Pradeep @ Vicky @Arjun vs.state Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-04-2018
$~11 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:4. h October 2018 CRL. A. 725/2018 & CRL. MB10992018 + PRADEEP @ VICKY @ARJUN ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Kanhaiya Singhal, Advocate STATE NCT OF DELHI versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr. K.S. Ahuja, APP for State CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE VINOD GOEL % JUDGMENT Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. This appeal is directed against the order dated 26th May 2018 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, North District, Rohini Courts in SC No.24/2018 arising out of FIR No.610/2017 whereby the Appellant was convicted for the offences punishable under Sections 302 and 341 IPC. The appeals also seeks to challenge the order on sentence dated 28th May 2018 whereby, for the offence punishable under Section 302 IPC, the Appellant was sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life along with fine of Rs.5,000/- and in default of payment of fine, to undergo simple imprisonment for one year. As for the offence punishable under Section...
The New India Assurance Company Limited vs.munesh Devi and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-04-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: October 04, 2018 + MAC.APP. 1109/2017 & C.M. 46361/2017 THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED Through: Ms. Neerja Sachdeva, Advocate ..... Appellant Versus MUNESH DEVI AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Aruna Mehta, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) Impugned Award of 10th October, 2017 grants compensation of 1. `22,01,473/- with interest @ 9% p.a. to respondents-claimants on account of death of a Security Supervisor Mangal Sain, aged 44 years, in a vehicular accident on 9th August, 2015.2. The factual background of this case, as noticed in the impugned Award, is as under:-"Present DAR pertains to an accident taking place on 09.08.2015 at about 8:45 a.m. at Main Wazirabad Road going towards Ghaziabad in front of Kapoor Petrol Pump, Gokalpuri within the jurisdiction of PS Gokulpuri involving TRUCK No.HR-74-0348, which was being driven by its driver/ defendant no.1 at a very fast speed, rash...
Sandeep Sinha & Anr. Vs.state of Nct, Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-04-2018
$~15 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:-"4th October, 2018 + CRL.M.C. 2667/2016 & Crl.M.A. 2748/2018 SANDEEP SINHA & ANR. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Ashutosh Bhattacharjee, Adv. versus STATE OF NCT, DELHI & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Ashish Dutta, APP for State with SI Dharamvir Singh, PS CWC Nanak pura. Mr. Mukul Dhawan, Adv. for R-2 & R-3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. The marriage of the third respondent with the first petitioner was agreed upon sometime in July, 2011, a formal engagement ceremony having been held on 03.07.2011, the marriage having been fixed to be held on 19.02.2012. Some disputes arose including on account of allegation of illicit demand for dowry and against such backdrop first information report (FIR) No.92/2013 was lodged with the Crime Against Women Cell on 13.06.2013 by the second respondent, he being the father of the third respondent, the investigation having been taken up into offences allegedly co...
Ram Sumer & Anr. Vs.state & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-04-2018
$~82 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:04. 10.2018 CRL.M.C.5077/2018 RAM SUMER & ANR. STATE & ORS. versus ........ Petitioners ........ RESPONDENTS Mr. Sanjeev Kr. Sarwal, Advocate Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner: For the... RESPONDENTS: CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA Mr. Hiren Sharma, APP for the State with SI Saeem Ali JUDGMENT0410.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) Crl.M.A. 33530/2018 (Exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. CRL.M.C. 5077/2018 1.... Petitioner seeks quashing of FIR No.542 of 2017 under Sections 323/341/3of the IPC registered at Police Station Gokul Puri, Delhi, based on a settlement.2. The subject FIR was registered when the complainant objected to the petitioners drinking alcohol which led to a quarrel and the complainant sustained injuries.3. Parties are neighbours. Learned counsel for the parties submit that CRL.M.C. 5077/2018 Page 1 of 2 the parties have settled their disputes with...
- ‹ Prev
- 62
- 63
- 64
- 65
- 66
- 68
- 69
- 70
- 71
- 72
- Next ›
- Last »