Delhi Court October 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Vijay @ Vinay @ Bable vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-04-2018
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:28. h August, 2018 Decided on:4. h October, 2018 CRL.A. 286/2017 PUSHPA & ORS. ..... Appellants Represented by: Mr. Saurabh Kansal, Advocate for Ms. Pallavi S. Kansal, Advocate. versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Represented by: Mr. Ashok Kumar Garg, APP + RAJU STATE + for the State CRL.A. 764/2017 Represented by: Mr. Saurabh Kansal, Advocate ..... Appellant for Ms. Pallavi S. Kansal, Advocate. versus Represented by: Mr. Ashok Kumar Garg, APP ..... Respondent for the State. CRL.A. 767/2016 VJAY @ VINAY @ BABLE ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr. Saurabh Kansal, Advocate STATE for Ms. Pallavi S. Kansal, Advocate. versus Represented by: Mr. Ashok Kumar Garg, APP ..... Respondent for the State CRL.A. 286/2017, 764/2017 & 767/2017 Page 1 of 11 CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA1 By these appeals, appellants Pushpa, Poonam, Pooja, Raju and Vijay @ Vinay @ Bable challenge the impugned judgment dated 30th Nove...
Anil vs.sahab Singh & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-04-2018
$~33 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + CRL.M.C. 3236/2018 Judgment delivered on:04. 10.2018 ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS versus ANIL SAHAB SINGH & ANR. Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner: For the... RESPONDENTS: CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA Mr. Kedar Yadav and Mr. Sanjeev Kr. Baisoya, Advs. Mr. Harkaran Singh, Adv. for R-1 in person. JUDGMENT0410.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner seeks quashing of judgment dated 06.06.2018 of the Appellate Court whereby the appeal of the petitioner impugning the order on conviction dated 03.02.2018 and order on sentence dated 21.03.2018 has been dismissed.2. The petitioner has been convicted of the offence under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act. Cheque subject matter of the complaint was of Rs.90,000/-. CRL.M.C.3236/2018 Page 1 of 2 3.... Petitioner and respondent No.1-complainant have settled their disputes.... Petitioner has agreed to pay a total amount of Rs. 1,15,...
Subhash vs.state (Govt. Of Nct of Delhi) & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-04-2018
$~10 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + CRL.M.C. 4928/2018 & Crl. M A No.33544/2018 Judgment delivered on:04. 10.2018 SUBHASH STATE Advocates who appeared in this case: versus ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent For the... Petitioner : For the... RESPONDENTS : Ms. Anjana Prakash, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Rohit Pandey and Ms.Anushruti Tripathi, Advocates Mr. Raghuvinder Varma, APP for State Mr. Pawan Sharma with Mr. Ravinder Singh, Advocate for the complainant along with complainant, in person. Insp. Mahinder Lal, PS:Govindpuri CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT0410.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner impugns order dated 31.08.2018 of the Revisional Court dismissing the Review Petition filed by the petitioner impugning the order dated 16.07.2018, whereby process under Sections of the Code of Criminal Procedure was initiated against the petitioner in FIR No.193/2018.2. Subsequent to the said orders, order dated 06.09.2018 has been Crl.M.C.4928/2018 ...
Suman @ Mohd Hasan vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-04-2018
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:28. h September, 2018 Decided on:4. h October, 2018 CRL.A. 981/2017 SUMAN @ MOHD HASAN ..... Appellant Represented by: Ms. Naomi Chandra, Advocate STATE versus ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr. Ashok K. Garg, APP for the State with SI Prity Bala, PS New Friends Colony. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.1. By the present appeal, Suman @ Mohd. Hasan challenges the impugned judgment dated 29th August, 2017 convicting him for the offences punishable under Sections 452/506/325/366/354B and SectionsIPC and the order on sentence dated 8th September, 2017 directing him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of three years and to pay a fine of 5,000/-; in default whereof to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of three months for the offence punishable under Section 452 IPC, rigorous imprisonment for a period of one and a half year and to pay a fine of 3,000/- and in default whereof to undergo simple imp...
Ejaz Ahmed Aslam vs.mohammad Azim Ahmed
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-04-2018
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:4. h October, 2018 RSA1182018 EJAZ AHMED ASLAM ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sachin Datta, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Abhishek Kumar, Ms. Rijuta Mohanty and Ms. Prity Sharma, Advs. Versus MOHAMMAD AZIM AHMED ..... Respondent Through: Mr. S.D. Singh, Mr. Rahul Kumar Singh, Mr. Dhiraj Kumar & Mr. Jitender Singh, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW1 This Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) impugns the judgment and decree [dated 20th March, 2018 in RCA No.61419/2016 of the Court of Additional District Judge-06 (Central)]. of dismissal of First Appeal under Section 96 of the CPC preferred by the appellant against the judgment and decree [dated 21st December, 2011 in Suit No.546/2003 of the Court of Civil Judge-02 (Central)]. of dismissal of suit filed by the appellant/plaintiff for recovery of possession of premises at Khasra No.223 min. measuring 185 sq. mtrs. Situated at Abu...
National Highways Authority of India vs.north Bihar Highway Limited
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-04-2018
$~24 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:04. 10.2018 + O.M.P. (T) (COMM.) 104/2018 NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA........ Petitioner Through Mr. Balendu Shekhar, Mr. Sumit Tetorwal, Mr. Ravi Gopal and Mr. Sriansh Prahish, Advs. versus NORTH BIHAR HIGHWAY LIMITED ..... Respondent Through Mr. Ranjit Prakash and Ms. Mahima Sareen, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER RAJIV SHAKDHER, J.(ORAL) I.A. 13662-64/2018 1. Allowed, subject to just exceptions. O.M.P. (T) (COMM.) 104/2018 & I.A. 13661/2018 2. This is a petition filed under Section 14 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (in short 1996 Act).3. In effect, the prayer made in the petition is to terminate the mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal. The Arbitral Tribunal comprises three persons.4. The Tribunal is presided over by a retired Judge of the Patna High Court.5. The main thrust of the petition is that the Arbitral Tribunal needs to be re-constituted in view of the fees that it has decide...
Pushpa & Ors. Vs.state of Nct of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-04-2018
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:28. h August, 2018 Decided on:4. h October, 2018 CRL.A. 286/2017 PUSHPA & ORS. ..... Appellants Represented by: Mr. Saurabh Kansal, Advocate for Ms. Pallavi S. Kansal, Advocate. versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Represented by: Mr. Ashok Kumar Garg, APP + RAJU STATE + for the State CRL.A. 764/2017 Represented by: Mr. Saurabh Kansal, Advocate ..... Appellant for Ms. Pallavi S. Kansal, Advocate. versus Represented by: Mr. Ashok Kumar Garg, APP ..... Respondent for the State. CRL.A. 767/2016 VJAY @ VINAY @ BABLE ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr. Saurabh Kansal, Advocate STATE for Ms. Pallavi S. Kansal, Advocate. versus Represented by: Mr. Ashok Kumar Garg, APP ..... Respondent for the State CRL.A. 286/2017, 764/2017 & 767/2017 Page 1 of 11 CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA1 By these appeals, appellants Pushpa, Poonam, Pooja, Raju and Vijay @ Vinay @ Bable challenge the impugned judgment dated 30th Nove...
Ajit Singh & Ors. Vs.union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-04-2018
$~5 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 4373/2018 AJIT SINGH & ORS ........ Petitioners Through: Mr.Subhro Sanyal with Ms.M. Theepa & Mr.A.K. Pandey, Advs. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Rajat Gava with Mr.Sravan Kumar Shukla, Advs. for Mr.Sanjeev Narula, CGSC for R-1 to 3. Mr.Naresh Kaushik with Mr.Omung Gupta, Advs. for R-4/UPSC. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI % 1. ORDER0410.2018 The present petition has been filed by the petitioners seeking directions to the respondent nos.2 &3/BSF and respondent no.4/UPSC to re-draw the Gradation List, 2016 for Group A General Duty (GD) Officers as also for quashing and setting aside the order dated 17.02.2017, passed by the respondent nos.2 and 3/BSF, rejecting their representation seeking change in the seniority list of Deputy Commandant Gradation List of Group A GD Officers, 2016. W.P.(C) 4373/2018 page 1 of 6 2. On a perusal of the impugned order dated 17.02.20...
Royal Sundaram General Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs.tarsem Kaur and Ors. (Iff ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-04-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: October 04, 2018 + MAC.APP. 202/2018 & C.M. 7057/2018 IFFCO TOKIO GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. .. Appellant Through: Mr. A.K.Soni, Advocate Versus TARSEM KAUR & ORS. ( ROYAL SUNDARAM ALLIANCE INSURANCE CO. LTD.) ....... RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Pankaj Gupta, Advocate for respondent No.6 + MAC.APP. 287/2018 ROYAL SUNDARAM GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. Through: Mr. Pankaj Gupta, Advocate ..... Appellant Versus TARSEM KAUR AND ORS. (IFFCO TOKIO GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD.) ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. A.K.Soni, Advocate for respondent No.3 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) The above captioned two appeals arise out of common impugned 1. Award of 9th January, 2018 pertaining to an accident which occurred on MAC.APP. 202/2018 MAC.APP. 287/2018 Page 1 of 5 13th April, 2009 at about 06:00 AM in Palwal, Haryana. The accident in question had occurred due to collusion of a car and a truck.2. The above captioned first a...
Ndmc Thr Director vs.m.p.dwivedi & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-04-2018
$~2 & 3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision:04. 10.2018 + W.P.(C) 340/2011 & CM APPL. 634/2011 NDMC & ORS. Through: Mr.Jagdeep Kr. Sharma, Standing Counsel for Mr.Gyanendra Kumar, Advocate. ........ Petitioners versus NDMC AUTO WORKSHOP EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Ankur Chhibbar and Ms.Roshini Chopra, Advocates. 3 + W.P.(C) 2337/2013 & CM APPL. 4421/2013 NDMC THR DIRECTOR ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Jagdeep Kr. Sharma, Standing Counsel for Mr.Gyanendra Kumar, Advocate. versus M.P.DWIVEDI & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Ankur Chhibbar and Ms.Roshini Chopra, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.CHAWLA S.RAVINDRA BHAT, J.(ORAL) 1. The New Delhi Municipal Council (NDMC) in its writ petitions challenges two orders of the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT), which had for almost identical reasons, directed benefit of pay parity W.P.(C) Nos.340/2011 & 2337/2013 Page 1 of 8 to the applicants ...
- ‹ Prev
- 61
- 62
- 63
- 64
- 65
- 67
- 68
- 69
- 70
- 71
- Next ›
- Last »