Delhi Court October 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Smt. Bhawana Goel & Anr. Vs.the State & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-04-2018
$~4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + CRL.M.C. 4410/2018 Judgment delivered on:04. 10.2018 ........ Petitioners versus SMT. BHAWANA GOEL & ANR. THE STATE & ANR Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner: For the... RESPONDENTS: Mr. Piyush Gupta with Mr. Apoorv Bansal, Advocates ......... RESPONDENTS Ms. Neelam Sharma, APP for State Mr. Jitin Kumar, Advocate for R-2 Along with R-2, present in person. SI Sudhir, PS: Kesham Puram CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT0410.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner seeks quashing of FIR No.442/2012 under Section 420 IPC Police Station, Keshav Puram, based on a settlement.2. Allegations in the FIR are that the father of the respondent had CRL.M.C. 4410/2018 Page 1 of 3 advanced the loan to the petitioners and after his death, petitioners had refused to refund the same.3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submit that the loan was secured against deposit of title deeds and when part of the amou...
Mukhtar Ali vs.state (Govt. Of Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-04-2018
$~24 + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:-"4th October, 2018 CRL. M.C. 5061/2018 and Crl.M.A.33487-33490/2018 MUKHTAR ALI ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Ashu Singh, Advocate Versus STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) .... Respondent Through: Mr. Ravi Nayak, APP for the State with SI Mintu Singh, PS Geeta Colony. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA1 ORDER (ORAL) The petition at hand has been brought under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) to assail the order dated 24.07.2018 passed by the District & Sessions Judge (East District) on the file of Sessions Case No.1590/2016, titled State vs. Govind Chauhan @ Govinda Etc., the petitioner concededly being one of the accused persons facing the said prosecution, it having arisen out of First Information Report (FIR) No.455/2014 of Police Station Geeta Colony, involving offences punishable under Section 3of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC). Crl. M.C. No.5061/2018 Page 1 of 3 2. The petitioner admittedly, h...
Neeraj Safi vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-04-2018
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A.694 of 2017 Reserved on:29. h August 2018 Decided on:4. h October 2018 NEERAJ SAFI .....Appellant Through: Mr. S.B. Dandapani, Advocate STATE versus (DHCLSC). ....Respondent Through: Mr. Rajesh Mahajan, ASC for State with Ms. Jyoti Babbar, Advocate and Mr. Hirein Sharma, APP. Mr. Amit Khemka along with Mr. Rishi Sehgal, Advocates for the Complainant. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE VINOD GOEL JUDGMENT Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. This appeal is directed against the judgment dated 31st January, 2017 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge , South East, Saket Courts, New Delhi in Sessions Case No.2(renumbered as 1204/16) arising out of FIR No.2registered at Police Station (PS) CR Park, New Delhi convicting the Appellant for the offences under Sections 302, 376 and 201 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC). The appeal is also directed Crl.A.694/2017 Page 1 of 83 against the order on sentence dated 21st February, 2017, whereby for the ...
Aditi Sharma vs.government of Nct of Delhi and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-04-2018
#80 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:4. h October, 2018 W.P.(C) 10422/2018 ADITI SHARMA GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR versus ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the Respondent : Ms. Deepali Gupta, Advocate. : Ms. Ekta Sikri and Ms. Jasbir Bidhuri, Advocates for respondent No.2/GGSIPU. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL JUDGMENT SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J (ORAL) CM No.40614/2018 (Exemption) Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. W.P.(C) 10422/2018 1. The present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, has been instituted on behalf of a student, praying as follows:-"W.P.(C) 10422/2018 Page 1 of 8 To declare the selection/counseling procedure 1. held for admission to LL.M Programme for the session arbitrary, 2018-2019 discriminatory, hence illegal. improper, unjustified and at GGSIPU Delhi as To Quash the selection/shortli...
Vinod Kumar & Ors. Vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-04-2018
$~30 & 31 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + CRL.M.C. 2705/2018 Judgment delivered on:04. 10.2018 VINOD KUMAR & ORS. STATE & ANR. + CRL.M.C. 2711/2018 VINOD KUMAR & ORS. ........ Petitioners ........ RESPONDENTS ........ Petitioners versus ........ RESPONDENTS versus STATE & ANR. Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner: For the... RESPONDENTS: CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA Mr. Durgesh Kumar, Mr. Arvind Kumar and Mr. Amit Chauhan, Advocates (in both petitions) Mr. Kamal Kr. Ghai, APP for the State. Inspr. Ramesh Chandra Mr. Randeep Pundir and Ms. Beanty Singh, Advs. for R-2 with respondent No.2 in person (in both the petitions) JUDGMENT0410.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) CRL.M.C.2705 & 2711/2018 Page 1 of 4 CRL.M.C. 2705/2018 & CRL.M.C. 2711/2018 1.... Petitioners, in Crl. M.C. 2705/2018 seek quashing of FIR No.101 of 2009 under Sections 420/467/468/471/406/506/120-B/34 of the IPC registered at Police Station Chhawala, New Delhi and petitioner...
Ayush Hotels & Resorts Llp, Through Its Director Shri Naveen Rana, S/O ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-04-2018
$~5 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:04. 10.2018 ARB.P. 720/2018 AYUSH HOTELS & RESORTS LLP, THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR SHRI NAVEEN RANA, S/O SHRI RAMPHAL RANA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. S.S. Dalal, Mr, Yogesh Saini, Mr. Vipin Rathee and Mr. Simanta Kumar, Advs. Versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Amit Seth, Adv. SHRI NITIN DEV CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER RAJIV SHAKDHER, J.(ORAL) 1 Notice in this petition was issued on 26.09.2018. Mr. Amit Seth had appeared on advance notice. The objection, which Mr. Seth had taken on that date with respect to the maintainability of the petition, was that the lease agreement was not registered. I had indicated in the order that if that was the only objection, then, the same was not, prima facie, sustainable. Since, Mr. Seth sought time to file a reply, liberty was given to him in that behalf. 2 Admittedly, no reply has been filed. Mr. Seth, however, says that apart from the objection taken on that date, he has...
Iffco Tokio General Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs.tarsem Kaur & Ors. ( Royal S ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-04-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: October 04, 2018 + MAC.APP. 202/2018 & C.M. 7057/2018 IFFCO TOKIO GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. .. Appellant Through: Mr. A.K.Soni, Advocate Versus TARSEM KAUR & ORS. ( ROYAL SUNDARAM ALLIANCE INSURANCE CO. LTD.) ....... RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Pankaj Gupta, Advocate for respondent No.6 + MAC.APP. 287/2018 ROYAL SUNDARAM GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. Through: Mr. Pankaj Gupta, Advocate ..... Appellant Versus TARSEM KAUR AND ORS. (IFFCO TOKIO GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD.) ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. A.K.Soni, Advocate for respondent No.3 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) The above captioned two appeals arise out of common impugned 1. Award of 9th January, 2018 pertaining to an accident which occurred on MAC.APP. 202/2018 MAC.APP. 287/2018 Page 1 of 5 13th April, 2009 at about 06:00 AM in Palwal, Haryana. The accident in question had occurred due to collusion of a car and a truck.2. The above captioned first a...
Ndmc & Ors. Vs.ndmc Auto Workshop Employees Association
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-04-2018
$~2 & 3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision:04. 10.2018 + W.P.(C) 340/2011 & CM APPL. 634/2011 NDMC & ORS. Through: Mr.Jagdeep Kr. Sharma, Standing Counsel for Mr.Gyanendra Kumar, Advocate. ........ Petitioners versus NDMC AUTO WORKSHOP EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Ankur Chhibbar and Ms.Roshini Chopra, Advocates. 3 + W.P.(C) 2337/2013 & CM APPL. 4421/2013 NDMC THR DIRECTOR ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Jagdeep Kr. Sharma, Standing Counsel for Mr.Gyanendra Kumar, Advocate. versus M.P.DWIVEDI & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Ankur Chhibbar and Ms.Roshini Chopra, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.CHAWLA S.RAVINDRA BHAT, J.(ORAL) 1. The New Delhi Municipal Council (NDMC) in its writ petitions challenges two orders of the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT), which had for almost identical reasons, directed benefit of pay parity W.P.(C) Nos.340/2011 & 2337/2013 Page 1 of 8 to the applicants ...
Shri Moolchand Kharaiti Ram Trust vs.nirulas Corner House Private Limi ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-04-2018
$~CP-9 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + CO.PET. 404/2014 Date of decision:04. 10.2018 SHRI MOOLCHAND KHARAITI RAM TRUST ........ Petitioner Through: Mr Gaurav Bahl and Ms Aakanksha Kaul, Advocates. versus NIRULAS CORNER HOUSE PRIVATE LIMITED. .... Respondent Through: Ms Chetanya Puri, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(ORAL) This petition is filed under Sections 433(e), 434 and 439 of the 1. Companies Act, 1956 seeking winding up of the respondent Company.2. The case of the parties is that the parties entered into an arrangement on 31st March, 2009 whereby the respondent were to provide food and catering services in the cafeteria, canteen and rooms to the patients, attendants, doctors etc.3. On 21.09.2012, the arrangement was further renewed with effect from 01.04.2012 and was executed for a period of two years. On 31.03.2014, no further extension was agreed upon.4. It is the case of the petitioner that the arrangement dated 21.09.2012 expired...
Images Consumer Media Pvt. Ltd. Vs.spa Luxuary Lifestyle Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-04-2018
$~CP-13 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision:04. 10.2018 + CO.PET. 439/2016 IMAGES CONSUMER MEDIA PVT. LTD. ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Kanti Mohan Rustagi, Mr.Shubho Jana and Mr.Arpit Arora, Advs. versus SPA LUXUARY LIFESTYLE LTD ..... Respondent Through Mohd. Kamran and Mr.Saurabh Chaturvedi, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(ORAL) This petition is filed under Sections 433(e), (f), 434(1)(a) and 439 of 1. the Companies Act, 1956 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) seeking winding up of the respondent Company.2. It is the case of the petitioner that the parties entered into an arrangement whereby the petitioner had to publish advertisements of the products of the respondents company in its publication named Livingetc commencing from February, 2010 till March, 2011. It is stated that the petitioner published full page colour ads of the products of the respondent company in the monthly issues of Livingetc and corresponding to each s...
- ‹ Prev
- 60
- 61
- 62
- 63
- 64
- 66
- 67
- 68
- 69
- 70
- Next ›
- Last »