Delhi Court October 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax -4 vs.green Delhi Bqs Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-05-2018
$~1. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + INCOME TAX APPEAL No.1067/2018 Date of decision:5. h October, 2018 THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -4 Through Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, Advocate. versus ... Appellant GREEN DELHI BQS LTD. ..... Respondent Through Mr. Aniket D. Agrawal, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR SANJIV KHANNA, J.(ORAL): This appeal by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (Act, for short) assails the order dated 7th May, 2018 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (Tribunal, for short) in the case of M/s Green Delhi BQS Limited (respondent-assessee, for short). The appeal pertains to the Assessment Year 2009-10.2. The respondent-assessee, who was primarily engaged in the business of developing, maintaining and operating of Bus-Q-Shelters (BQS), metro stations, highways etc., in its return of income filed on 29th September, 2009 had declared net loss of Rs.8,11,91,801/-.3. The Assessing Offi...
Manoj vs.the State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-05-2018
$~11 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:05. 10.2018 BAIL APPLN. 1010/2018 MANOJ versus ........ Petitioner THE STATE ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Ms.Sanobar Ali, Advocate For the Respondent: Ms.Neelam Sharma, APP for the State CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT0510.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in FIR No.102/2018, under Section 380 IPC, registered at New Ashok Nagar.2. The allegations against the petitioner made by the prosecutrix in the FIR are that she suspects that the petitioner who is her husband had stolen Rs.25,000/- and a gold chain and has handed over the same to the co- accused.3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated and there is no material to connect the petitioner with the subject offence. He submits that the complaint is an offshoot of a BAIL APPLN. 1010/2018 Page 1 of 2 matrimon...
Om Prakash Malik vs.pawan Kumar Malik
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-05-2018
* [ % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:5. h October, 2018. RSA1462018 & CM No.41229/2018 (for stay). OM PRAKASH MALIK ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Surendra Mishra and Ms. Sonal Mishra, Advs. versus PAWAN KUMAR MALIK CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW Through: Mr. Bhavneet Singh, Adv. ..... Respondent Caveat No.928/2018.1. 2. The counsel for the caveator appears. The caveat stands discharged. RSA1462018 & CM No.41229/2018 (for stay).3. This Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) impugns the judgment and decree [dated 19th May, 2018 in MCA/DJ/31/2017 of the Court of the Additional District Judge-05 (West)]. of dismissal of First Appeal under Section 96 of the CPC preferred by the appellant against the judgment and decree [dated 12th April, 2017 of the Court of Civil Judge (West)]. on admissions, under Order XII Rule 6 of the CPC, of ejectment of the appellant/defendant from Shop No.WZ-6/1, Jawalaheri Market,...
The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs.jitender @ Jeetu & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-05-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: October 05, 2018 + MAC.APP. 333/2013 1. THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD. Through: Mr. Pankaj Seth, Advocate ..... Appellant Versus JITENDER @ JEETU & ORS. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR Through: Nemo. .....Respondents JUDGMENT (ORAL) Impugned Award of 23rd January, 2013 grants compensation of `2,11,742/- with interest @ 9% p.a. to respondent-Jitender (henceforth referred to as the Injured), aged 26 years, on account of grievous injuries suffered by him in a vehicular accident, which took place on 25th May, 2007. The facts, as noticed in the impugned Award, are as under:-"Briefly stated the facts giving rise to the petition are that on 25.5.07 at about 5 am, the petitioner alongwith his friends Neeraj and Amarnath were coming back to Delhi in car No.DL8CC8830 which was being driven by the petitioner and he was having valid and effective driving license and when they reached at NHPC Chowk in the meantime, the offending ve...
New Era College of Education vs.national Council for Teacher Education ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-05-2018
#75 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:05. 10.2018. W.P.(C) 10604/2018 NEW ERA COLLEGE OF EDUCATION ........ Petitioner versus NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the... RESPONDENTS : Mr. Sanjay Sharawat, Mr. Divyank Rana and Mr. Ashok Kumar, Advocates : Ms. Arunima Dwivedi, Standing Counsel with Ms. Preeti Kumra, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL JUDGMENT SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J (ORAL) 1. The present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, belatedly impugns the action of the National Council for Teacher Education (for short NCTE), respondent No.1 herein, whereby, the latter returned the petitioner institutions seeking recognition for B.Ed courses all in the year 2013, along with the fee, on the ground of the W.P. (C ) 10604/2018 Page 1 of 6 ban imposed by the State of Haryana on granting of recognition for inter alia, B.Ed and D.El....
Ashok Kumar Sharma vs.land and Building Department and Another
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-05-2018
$~36 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgement:05. th October,2018 + W.P.(C) 605/2018 ASHOK KUMAR SHARMA ...Petitioner Through: Mr. N.S. Dalal, Advocate. versus LAND & BUILDING DEPARTMENT & ANR Respondents Through: Mr. Sachin Nawani, Advocate for L&B/LAC CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. This is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India filed by the petitioner seeking a declaration that the acquisition proceedings with respect to 3 bighas 11 biswas land comprised in Khasra No.7and 4 bighas 5 biswas land comprised in Khasra No.situated in the revenue estate of Village Rithala, Delhi, (hereinafter referred to as the subject land) are deemed to have lapsed in view of Section24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as the 2013 Act), as though the physical possession of the subject l...
Meerut City Transport Service Ltd. Vs.bilqees Khan & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-05-2018
$~10 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:05. h October, 2018 + MAC.APP. 281/2017, CM No.10924/2017 1. MEERUT CITY TRANSPORT SERVICE LTD. Through: Mr. Shadab Khan, Adv. for Ms. Garima Prashad, Adv. ..... Appellant versus BILQEES KHAN & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Dilawar Singh, Adv. for R-1 to 5 along with R-1 & 2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT (ORAL) The appellant has challenged the Award of the Claims Tribunal whereby the compensation of Rs.12,20,196/- has been awarded to respondent nos.1 to 5.2. The accident dated 26th February, 2013 resulted in the death of Mumtaz Khan, the deceased was aged 62 years at the time of the accident and was survived by a widow, one son and three daughters. The deceased was self-employed and was earning Rs.13,753/- per month.3. The Claims Tribunal took the income of the deceased as Rs.13,753/- per month, deducted 1/3rd towards his personal expenses and applied the multiplier of 7 to award Rs.7,70,196/- t...
Mohinder College of Education vs.national Council for Teacher Educatio ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-05-2018
#73 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:05. 10.2018. W.P.(C) 10602/2018 MOHINDER COLLEGE OF EDUCATION ........ Petitioner versus NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the... RESPONDENTS : Mr. Sanjay Sharawat, Mr. Divyank Rana and Mr. Ashok Kumar, Advocates : Ms. Arunima Dwivedi, Standing Counsel with Ms. Preeti Kumra, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL JUDGMENT SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J (ORAL) 1. The present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, belatedly impugns the action of the National Council for Teacher Education (for short NCTE), respondent No.1 herein, whereby, the latter returned the petitioner institutions seeking recognition for B.Ed courses all in the year 2013, along with the fee, on the ground of the W.P. (C ) 10602/2018 Page 1 of 6 ban imposed by the State of Haryana on granting of recognition for inter alia, B.Ed and D.El...
Raju vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-04-2018
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:28. h August, 2018 Decided on:4. h October, 2018 CRL.A. 286/2017 PUSHPA & ORS. ..... Appellants Represented by: Mr. Saurabh Kansal, Advocate for Ms. Pallavi S. Kansal, Advocate. versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Represented by: Mr. Ashok Kumar Garg, APP + RAJU STATE + for the State CRL.A. 764/2017 Represented by: Mr. Saurabh Kansal, Advocate ..... Appellant for Ms. Pallavi S. Kansal, Advocate. versus Represented by: Mr. Ashok Kumar Garg, APP ..... Respondent for the State. CRL.A. 767/2016 VJAY @ VINAY @ BABLE ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr. Saurabh Kansal, Advocate STATE for Ms. Pallavi S. Kansal, Advocate. versus Represented by: Mr. Ashok Kumar Garg, APP ..... Respondent for the State CRL.A. 286/2017, 764/2017 & 767/2017 Page 1 of 11 CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA1 By these appeals, appellants Pushpa, Poonam, Pooja, Raju and Vijay @ Vinay @ Bable challenge the impugned judgment dated 30th Nove...
Birender Kumar Sharma vs.state (Govt. Of Nct of Delhi) & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-04-2018
$~2 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + CRL.M.C. 3114/2018 Judgment delivered on:04. 10.2018 BIRENDER KUMAR SHARMA ........ Petitioner versus STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR Advocates who appeared in this case: ........ RESPONDENTS For the... Petitioner : For the... RESPONDENTS : Mr.P.K. Dash, Advocate. Ms.Neelam Sharma, APP for State with SI Sunil Kumar, PS Begum Pur. Mr.Pawan Kumar, Adv.for R-2 with respondent No.2 in person. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT0410.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner seeks quashing of FIR No.135 of 2015 under Sections 354-D/509 of the IPC registered at Police Station Begumpur, Delhi, based on a settlement.2. The parties were working in the same organization. Subject FIR was registered consequent to a complaint lodged by respondent No.2 on the ground that the petitioner was harassing her. Learned counsels for the parties submit that the parties have 3. Crl .M.C. 3114/2018 Page 1 of 3 settled their disputes an...
- ‹ Prev
- 59
- 60
- 61
- 62
- 63
- 65
- 66
- 67
- 68
- 69
- Next ›
- Last »