Delhi Court October 2018 Judgments

Browse smarter

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.

AI Brief & Ask
Semantic AI Search
Devil's Bench

Try free for 7 days Semantic AI Search

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

Oct 05 2018

Commissioner of Income Tax vs.bhawani Singhji

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Oct-05-2018

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + GTR21981, C.M. APPL. 5764/2013 & 45861/2016 (lead case) Judgment Reserved on:20.09.2018 Judgment Pronounced on:05.10.2018 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX versus BHAWANI SINGHJI + ITA1522001 COMMISSIONER OF I.T. DELHI-V versus RAJ MATA GAYATRI DEV + ITA2182002, C.M. APPL.5766/2013 CIT versus RAJ MATA GYATRI DEVI OF JAIPUR + ITA6792004, C.M. APPL.5757/2013 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX versus RAJMATA GYATRI DEVI + ITA1632005 ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent ..... Appellant ..... Respondent ..... Appellant ..... Respondent ..... Appellant ..... Respondent COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX DELHI ..... Appellant versus RAJMATA GAYATRI DEVI OF JAIPUR ..... Respondent GTR21981 & Connected Matters Page 1 of 32 + ITA7502007 THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX V ..... Appellant versus MAHARAJA JAI SINGH ..... Respondent + ITA7522007 THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ..... Appellant versus MAHARAJA JAI SINGH INDL. ..... Respondent + ITA7512007 & ITA7632007 THE COMMIS...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 05 2018

Commissioner of Income Tax vs.maharaja Jai Singh

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Oct-05-2018

$~ * % + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on:20.09.2018 Judgment Pronounced on:05.10.2018 ITA1522001 ITA2182002, C.M. APPL.5766/2013 ITA6792004, C.M. APPL.5757/2013 ITA1632005 ITA7502007 ITA7522007 ITA7512007 & ITA7632007 ITR1371983, ITR781981 & ITR3971983 ITR29798/1981 ITR91982 & C.M. APPL.5772/2013 ITR4647/1982 ITR9598/1983 & ITR2211984 ITR13739/1983 C.M. APPL.5770/2013 IN ITR1511983 (disposed off case), ITR15253/1983, ITR2711983 & ITR4381983, C.M. APPL.5775/2013 ITR17071/1985 ITR22124/1985 ITR182000, C.M. APPL.5762/2013 + WTA21999 + WTR32834/1984 & C.M. APPL.5773/2013 + ITR28388/1985 ITA1522001 & connected matters Page 1 of 3 + WTR3001987, C.M. APPL.5759/2013; WTR4042/1987 & WTR10608/1990,C.M. APPL.5767/2013 + WTR31992 & C.M. APPL.5765/2013 + WTR41992 & C.M. APPL.5763/2013 + WTR241995 & C.M. APPL.5758/2013 + WTR2832/1995 & C.M. APPL.5768/2013 + WTR41997 & C.M. APPL.5771/2013 + + + + + + + C.M. APPL.5769/2013 IN ITR2971981 C.M....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 05 2018

Rajmata Gayatri Devi of Jaipur vs.commr.of Income Tax

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Oct-05-2018

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 05 2018

Suhaib Ilyasi vs.state

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Oct-05-2018

$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A.314/2018 and CRL.M.B.439/2018 Reserved on:17. h August 2018 Decided on:5. h October, 2018 SUHAIB ILYASI STATE .....Appellant Through: Ms. Rebecca M. John, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Rajiv Mohan, Mr. Abhimanyu Kampani, Ms. Priyanka Singh, Ms. Rudrani and Mr. M.A. Karthik, Advocates. Tyagi versus ....Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjay Jain, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Kewal Singh Ahuja, APP for State with Ms Siddhi Mittal and Ms Himanshi Yadav, Advocates. Mr. Satender Sharma and Mr. Sachin Tyagi, Advocates for Complainant. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE VINOD GOEL JUDGMENT Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. Did the Appellant murder his wife (hereafter 'the deceased') or was it a case of suicide?. The learned Additional Sessions Judge, Shahdara District, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi (hereafter trial Court) in a judgment dated 16th December 2017, which is under appeal here, held that the Appellant had indeed murdered the deceased. We, however, think not. Our ...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 05 2018

Cwt vs.rajmata Gayatri Devi

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Oct-05-2018

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 05 2018

Commissioner of Income Tax vs.rajmata Gyatri Devi

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Oct-05-2018

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 05 2018

Avdesh Gupta vs.state (Nct of Delhi)

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Oct-05-2018

$~16 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:05. 10.2018 BAIL APPLN. 1776/2018 AVDESH GUPTA ........ Petitioner versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Mr.Sagar Roy & Mr.Prashant Kumar, Advocates For the Respondent : Ms.Neelam Sharma, APP for the State CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT0510.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner seeks regular bail in FIR No.77/2018, under Section 3IPC, registered at PS Sun Light Colony.2. FIR was registered on a complaint that the complainant, who is a TSR driver, was driving his TSR and had picked up two passengers. On the way, one of the passengers held him from the back and alleged to threaten him with knife-like instrument and thereafter stole the TSR. BAIL APPLN. 1776/2018 Page 1 of 3 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated as there is nothing to connect the petitioner to the sub...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 05 2018

Commissioner of Income Tax vs.prithvi Raj

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Oct-05-2018

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 05 2018

Bharat & Ors. Vs.the State (n.c.t. Of Delhi) & Anr.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Oct-05-2018

$~35 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:05. 10.2018 CRL.M.C. 2934/2018 BHARAT & ORS. versus THE STATE (N.C.T. OF DELHI) & ANR. ........ Petitioners ........ RESPONDENTS Mr. Sher Singh Chauhan, Advocates Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner: For the... RESPONDENTS: Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, APP for the State. SI Prabhakaran Mr. R.K. Naveen and Mr. Manish, Advs. for R-2 CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT0510.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner seeks quashing of FIR No.177 of 2013 under Sections 323/341/506/147/141/148/308 of the IPC registered at Police Station Chhawla, Delhi, based on a settlement.2. The subject FIR was registered consequent to a quarrel that took place with regard to use of water. Parties are neighbours and the disputes occurred due to acute shortage of water.3. Learned counsels for the parties submit that with the intervention of other residents of the village, parties have settled their...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 05 2018

Cwt vs.lt.col Bhawani Singh

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Oct-05-2018

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

‹ Prev
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
Next ›
Last »

Delhi Court October 2018 Judgments

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.