Delhi Court October 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Maharaj Prithvi Raj(huf) vs.cit, Delhi-Viii
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-05-2018
$~ * % + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on:20.09.2018 Judgment Pronounced on:05.10.2018 ITA1522001 ITA2182002, C.M. APPL.5766/2013 ITA6792004, C.M. APPL.5757/2013 ITA1632005 ITA7502007 ITA7522007 ITA7512007 & ITA7632007 ITR1371983, ITR781981 & ITR3971983 ITR29798/1981 ITR91982 & C.M. APPL.5772/2013 ITR4647/1982 ITR9598/1983 & ITR2211984 ITR13739/1983 C.M. APPL.5770/2013 IN ITR1511983 (disposed off case), ITR15253/1983, ITR2711983 & ITR4381983, C.M. APPL.5775/2013 ITR17071/1985 ITR22124/1985 ITR182000, C.M. APPL.5762/2013 + WTA21999 + WTR32834/1984 & C.M. APPL.5773/2013 + ITR28388/1985 ITA1522001 & connected matters Page 1 of 3 + WTR3001987, C.M. APPL.5759/2013; WTR4042/1987 & WTR10608/1990,C.M. APPL.5767/2013 + WTR31992 & C.M. APPL.5765/2013 + WTR41992 & C.M. APPL.5763/2013 + WTR241995 & C.M. APPL.5758/2013 + WTR2832/1995 & C.M. APPL.5768/2013 + WTR41997 & C.M. APPL.5771/2013 + + + + + + + C.M. APPL.5769/2013 IN ITR2971981 C.M....
The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax -7 vs.rambagh Palace Hotels Pvt. Lt ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-05-2018
$~12. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + INCOME TAX APPEAL No.1104/2018 Date of decision:5. h October, 2018 THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -7..... Appellant Through Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, Advocate. versus RAMBAGH PALACE HOTELS PVT. LTD. Through Mr. Aditya Vohra, Advocate. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR SANJIV KHANNA, J.(ORAL): Revenue in this appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (Act, for short), which relates to Assessment Year 2003-2004 impugns the order dated 23rd March, 2018 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (Tribunal, for short) in the case of Rambagh Palace Hotels Private Limited (respondent-assessee).2. The appeal arises from cross appeals ITA Nos. 6024/Del/2014 and 6097/Del/2014 filed by the respondent-assessee and Revenue, respectively before the Tribunal. ITA No.1104/2018 Page 1 of 4 3. The appeal is confined and restricted to deletion of ad hoc disallowance of Rs.1,38,00,058/-,...
Cwt vs.lt Col Bhawani Singh
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-05-2018
$~ * % + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on:20.09.2018 Judgment Pronounced on:05.10.2018 ITA1522001 ITA2182002, C.M. APPL.5766/2013 ITA6792004, C.M. APPL.5757/2013 ITA1632005 ITA7502007 ITA7522007 ITA7512007 & ITA7632007 ITR1371983, ITR781981 & ITR3971983 ITR29798/1981 ITR91982 & C.M. APPL.5772/2013 ITR4647/1982 ITR9598/1983 & ITR2211984 ITR13739/1983 C.M. APPL.5770/2013 IN ITR1511983 (disposed off case), ITR15253/1983, ITR2711983 & ITR4381983, C.M. APPL.5775/2013 ITR17071/1985 ITR22124/1985 ITR182000, C.M. APPL.5762/2013 + WTA21999 + WTR32834/1984 & C.M. APPL.5773/2013 + ITR28388/1985 ITA1522001 & connected matters Page 1 of 3 + WTR3001987, C.M. APPL.5759/2013; WTR4042/1987 & WTR10608/1990,C.M. APPL.5767/2013 + WTR31992 & C.M. APPL.5765/2013 + WTR41992 & C.M. APPL.5763/2013 + WTR241995 & C.M. APPL.5758/2013 + WTR2832/1995 & C.M. APPL.5768/2013 + WTR41997 & C.M. APPL.5771/2013 + + + + + + + C.M. APPL.5769/2013 IN ITR2971981 C.M....
Mohd. Sagir vs.bses and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-05-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~29 * % + W.P.(C) 5553/2012 & CM APPLs. 16422/2016, 41504/2018 Date of Decision:05. h October, 2018 MOHD. SAGIR ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Jawaid Hussain Khan, Mr.V. Elanchozhiyan and Mr.Manzar Anis, Advocates versus BSES AND ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Ravi Gupta, Senior Advocate with Mr.Sunil Fernandes and Mr.Arnav Vidyarthi, Advocates Mr.Ajay Arora, Mr.Kapil Dutta and Mr.Rajat Rajoria, Advocates for SDMC Mr.Navmeet Kumar and Mr.Vikas Bhadana, Advocates for R-3 Mr.Satyakam, ASC-GNCTD with Mr.Mohit Kumar, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The petitioner is seeking compensation from BSES (respondent No.1) and Beer Singh (respondent No.2) for amputation of his right arm due to electrocution.2. On 11th October, 2010 at about 06:30 PM, the petitioner came to the W.P.(C) 5553/2012 Page 1 of 6 property of respondent No.2 where his uncle was working as a mason when respondent No.2 asked the petitioner to l...
Vishwas Gupta vs.state of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-05-2018
$~18 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:05. 10.2018 BAIL APPLN. 1994/2018 VISHWAS GUPTA ........ Petitioner versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : For the Respondent : Mr.Raghav Narayan, Advocate Ms.Neelam Sharma, APP for the State with SI Jitendra Kumar, PS Govindpuri. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT0510.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) CRL. M.A. 33014/2018 1. By way of this application, petitioner seeks amendment in the prayer clause and seeks addition of Section 174-A IPC in the prayer clause.2.3. The application is allowed. The prayer clause of the petitioner is amended accordingly and Section 174-A IPC shall be read in the prayer clause of the petition. BAIL APPLN. 1994/2018 Page 1 of 3 BAIL APPLN. 1994/2018 1.... Petitioner seeks regular bail in FIR No.346/2017, under Sections 307/323/324/174A/34 IPC, registered at PS Govindpuri.2. The allegations against the pe...
Balaji College of Eudcation vs.national Council for Teacher Education ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-05-2018
#74 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:05. 10.2018. W.P.(C) 10603/2018 BALAJI COLLEGE OF EUDCATION ........ Petitioner versus NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the... RESPONDENTS : Mr. Sanjay Sharawat, Mr. Divyank Rana and Mr. Ashok Kumar, Advocates : Ms. Arunima Dwivedi, Standing Counsel with Ms. Preeti Kumra, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL JUDGMENT SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J (ORAL) 1. The present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, belatedly impugns the action of the National Council for Teacher Education (for short NCTE), respondent No.1 herein, whereby, the latter returned the petitioner institutions seeking recognition for B.Ed courses all in the year 2013, along with the fee, on the ground of the W.P. (C ) 10603/2018 Page 1 of 6 ban imposed by the State of Haryana on granting of recognition for inter alia, B.Ed and D.El.E...
Rakesh Jain vs.v.p. Yadav & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-05-2018
$~3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:05. 10.2018 CRL.M.C. 4704/2018 RAKESH JAIN versus V.P. YADAV & ANR Advocates who appeared in this case: ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS For the... Petitioner : Mr.Sumit Kr. Khatri, Advocate. For the... RESPONDENTS : Ms.Neelam Sharma, APP for State with SI Sunil Kumar, PS Begum Pur. Mr.Pawan Kumar, Adv.for R-2 with respondent No.2 in person. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT0510.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) Crl. M.A. 32145/2018 (Exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. CRL. M.A. 32155/2018 (condonation of delay) For the reasons stated in the application, the delay in re-filing the petition is condoned. The application stands allowed. CRL.M.C. 4704/2018 1.... Petitioner impugns order dated 24th July, 2018 whereby the Revisional Court has rejected the revision petition of the petitioner Crl .M.C. 4704/2018 Page 1 of 2 impugning order dated 18th May, 2018 of the trial court dism...
Gyanender Rana vs.the State (Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-05-2018
$~2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:05. h October, 2018 + BAIL APPLN. 881/2018 and Crl. M.A. 7267/2018 GYANENDER RANA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Vishesh Wadhwa, Ms. Bandana Kaur Grover, Ms. Swadha Gupta, Mr. Aditya Swarup Agarwal and Mr. Aditya Gauri, Advocates versus THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Mukesh Kumar, APP for the State with SI Dharmendra Pratap Singh CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. The involvement of the petitioner in the offences alleged in the first information report (FIR) no.2of police station Samaypur Badli registered under Section 420 and 120 B of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) has come up during the course of investigation. He had approached the court of Sessions by bail application (no.907/18) for release on anticipatory bail on the ground that the accusations being leveled against him are false and motivated and no case can possibly be made out to show his complicity. The Sessions court, by its ord...
Babita vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-05-2018
$~38 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.A. 530/2005 BABITA STATE Decided on:05. h October, 2018 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Gautam Khazanchi, Advocate with appellant in person versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Amit Ahlawat, APP for the State CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. The appellant was sent up for trial in Sessions case no.1registered on the basis of report under Section 173 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr. PC) submitted on conclusion of investigation into first information report (FIR) no.3of police station Kamla Market, involving offences punishable under Sections 363, 368, 373, 376, 342, 323, 109, 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) and Sections 3, 4, 5 and 6 of Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956 (ITP Act). Besides her, there were two other persons who were sent up for trial, they being Bhagti Ram Pandey and Shama, the latter having been declared a proclaimed offender. Crl.a 530-05 Page 1 of 9 2. The trial concluded with j...
Hdfc Ergo General Insurance Co Ltd vs.jagram & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-05-2018
$~8 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:05. h October, 2018 FAO5212016 & CM No.41336/2016 HDFC ERGO GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Pankaj Gupta, Advocate versus JAGRAM & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. R.K. Nain, Advocate for R1. Mr.Yogesh K. Chandna, Advocate for R2 and R3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The appellant has challenged the order dated 27th May, 2016 whereby compensation of Rs.10,24,176/- has been awarded to respondent No.1.2. The respondent No.1 filed an application for compensation before the Commissioner, Employees Compensation claiming compensation on the averments that he was employed as a driver on the truck bearing No.HR- 55E-8474 and was coming from Kartarpur near Jalandhar to Delhi; on 20th May, 2011 at about 11:30 P.M, respondent No.1 was cleaning the glass of his truck when suddenly another vehicle in front reversed and hit respondent No.1 who was crushed between the two vehicles;...
- ‹ Prev
- 57
- 58
- 59
- 60
- 61
- 63
- 64
- 65
- 66
- 67
- Next ›
- Last »