Delhi Court October 2018 Judgments

Browse smarter

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.

AI Brief & Ask
Semantic AI Search
Devil's Bench

Try free for 7 days Semantic AI Search

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

Oct 05 2018

Dronacharya College of Education vs.national Council for Teacher Educa ...

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Oct-05-2018

#61 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:05. 10.2018. W.P.(C) 10552/2018 DRONACHARYA COLLEGE OF EDUCATION ........ Petitioner versus NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the... RESPONDENTS : Mr. Sanjay Sharawat, Mr. Divyank Rana and Mr. Ashok Kumar, Advocates : Ms. Arunima Dwivedi, Standing Counsel with Ms. Preeti Kumra, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL JUDGMENT SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J (ORAL) 1. The present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, belatedly impugns the action of the National Council for Teacher Education (for short NCTE), respondent No.1 herein, whereby, the latter returned the petitioner institutions seeking recognition for B.Ed courses all in the year 2013, along with the fee, on the ground of the W.P. (C ) 10552/2018 Page 1 of 6 ban imposed by the State of Haryana on granting of recognition for inter alia, B.Ed and D...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 05 2018

M/S T G Leisure & Resorts ( P) Ltd & Ors vs.m/s Ram Kumar Gupta ( Huf)

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Oct-05-2018

$~15 to 19 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + + + Decided on:05. h October, 2018 CRL.M.C. 1271/2015 and Crl. M.A. 4630/2015 M/S T G LEISURE & RESORTS (P) LTD & ORS Through: Mr. Sunil K. Mittal, Mr. Vipin K. Mittal and Mr. Anshul Mittal, Advocates ...... Petitioners versus M/S RAM KUMAR GUPTA ( HUF) Through: Mr. Sanjay Mann, Advocate ..... Respondent CRL.M.C. 1272/2015 and Crl. M.A. 4632/2015 T G LEISURE & RESORTS P.LTD. & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Sunil K. Mittal, Mr. Vipin K. Mittal and Mr. Anshul Mittal, Advocates versus RAM KUMAR GUPTA (HUF) Through: Mr. Sanjay Mann, Advocate ..... Respondent CRL.M.C. 1276/2015 and Crl. M.A. 4643/2015 T.G.LEISURE & RESORTS P. LTD. & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Sunil K. Mittal, Mr. Vipin K. Mittal and Mr. Anshul Mittal, Advocates versus RAM KUMAR GUPTA (HUF) ..... Respondent Crl. M.C. No.1271-72/2015, 1276/2015, 1278/2015, 1292/2015 Page 1 of 9 Through: Mr. Sanjay Mann, Advocate CRL.M.C. 1278/2015 and Crl. M.A. 4646/201...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 05 2018

Vavasi Telegence Pvt Ltd vs.sehdev Yadav

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Oct-05-2018

$~176 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:5. h October, 2018 versus CM APPL. 41302/2018 (for stay) VAVASI TELEGENCE PVT LTD ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Sandeepan Pathak, Adv. + W.P.(C) 10598/2018 & CM APPL. 41301/2018(for exemption), SEHDEV YADAV Through: None CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR This writ petition impugns the Award, dated 11th April, 2018, JUDGMENT (ORAL) ..... Respondent % 1. passed by the Labour Court-V, Dwarka (hereinafter referred to as the Labour Court), arising from reference, dated 27th September, 2011, under Sections 10 (1) (c) and 12 (5) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (hereinafter referred to as ID Act).2. The order regarding the dispute contained the following single term of reference: Whether the services of Sh. Sehdev Yadav S/o Sh. Jago Yadav have been terminated illegally and/or unjustifiably by the Management; if yes, to what relief is he entitled and what directions are necessary in this respect ?. 3. Statement of ...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 05 2018

Commissioner of Income Tax vs.rajmata Gayatri Devi of Jaipur

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Oct-05-2018

$~ * % + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on:20.09.2018 Judgment Pronounced on:05.10.2018 ITA1522001 ITA2182002, C.M. APPL.5766/2013 ITA6792004, C.M. APPL.5757/2013 ITA1632005 ITA7502007 ITA7522007 ITA7512007 & ITA7632007 ITR1371983, ITR781981 & ITR3971983 ITR29798/1981 ITR91982 & C.M. APPL.5772/2013 ITR4647/1982 ITR9598/1983 & ITR2211984 ITR13739/1983 C.M. APPL.5770/2013 IN ITR1511983 (disposed off case), ITR15253/1983, ITR2711983 & ITR4381983, C.M. APPL.5775/2013 ITR17071/1985 ITR22124/1985 ITR182000, C.M. APPL.5762/2013 + WTA21999 + WTR32834/1984 & C.M. APPL.5773/2013 + ITR28388/1985 ITA1522001 & connected matters Page 1 of 3 + WTR3001987, C.M. APPL.5759/2013; WTR4042/1987 & WTR10608/1990,C.M. APPL.5767/2013 + WTR31992 & C.M. APPL.5765/2013 + WTR41992 & C.M. APPL.5763/2013 + WTR241995 & C.M. APPL.5758/2013 + WTR2832/1995 & C.M. APPL.5768/2013 + WTR41997 & C.M. APPL.5771/2013 + + + + + + + C.M. APPL.5769/2013 IN ITR2971981 C.M....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 05 2018

Commissioner of Income Tax vs.jagat Singh

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Oct-05-2018

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 05 2018

Cwt vs.smt Gayatri Devi of Jaipur

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Oct-05-2018

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 05 2018

Commissioner of i.t. Delhi-V vs.raj Mata Gayatri Dev

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Oct-05-2018

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 05 2018

Harish Kumar vs.state Nct of Delhi

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Oct-05-2018

$~15 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:05. 10.2018 BAIL APPLN. 1559/2018 HARISH KUMAR ........ Petitioner versus STATE NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Mr.K.Singhal & Mr.Ajay Kumar, Advocates For the Respondent : Ms.Neelam Sharma, APP for the State with SI Karamvir, PS Narela CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT0510.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner seeks regular bail in FIR No.359/2016, under Section 498A/3IPC, registered at PS Narela.2. The allegations against the petitioner in the FIR are that the daughter of the complainant, who was being harassed by the petitioner and the in-laws, had committed suicide. The allegations were that there was demand for dowry.3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner BAIL APPLN. 1559/2018 Page 1 of 3 has been falsely implicated. He submits that the marriage took place in 2002 and the suicide was committed on...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 05 2018

Commissioner of Income Tax vs.maharaja Jai Singh Indl.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Oct-05-2018

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 05 2018

Vaibhav Dattani & Anr. Vs.state & Anr

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Oct-05-2018

$~86 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + CRL.M.C. 5101/2018 Judgment delivered on:05. 10.2018 VAIBHAV DATTANI & ANR. versus STATE & ANR Advocates who appeared in this case: ........ Petitioners ........ RESPONDENTS Mr. Pratyush Miglani with Mr. Nikhil Varma, Advocates For the... Petitioners : For the... RESPONDENTS : Mr. Kewal Singh Ahuja, APP for State Mr. Yogender Mishra, Advocate with Mr. Moti Lal Saini, AR CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT0510.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) Crl. M.A. 33640/2018 (Exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. CRL.M.C. 5101/2018 1.... Petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.80 of 2017 under Sections 406/4of the IPC registered at Police Station Amar Colony, New Delhi, based on a settlement. Crl .M.C. 5101/2018 Page 1 of 3 2. The allegations in the FIR are that there was a commercial transaction between the complainant and the petitioner whereas certain goods were supplied by the complainant to the petitioner and the chequ...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

‹ Prev
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
Next ›
Last »

Delhi Court October 2018 Judgments

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.