Delhi Court October 2018 Judgments

Browse smarter

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.

AI Brief & Ask
Semantic AI Search
Devil's Bench

Try free for 7 days Semantic AI Search

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

Oct 05 2018

Harish Dhalla vs.rajesh Luthra

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Oct-05-2018

$~17 * + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(OS) 2013/2015 HARISH DHALLA ..... Plaintiff Through Mr R.K.Singla, Advocate versus RAJESH LUTHRA Through None ..... Defendant Date of Decision:05. h October, 2018 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J: (Oral) 1. Present suit has been filed for recovery of a total sum of Rs.1,05,96,187/- (Rupees One Crore Five Lacs Ninety Six Thousand One Hundred Eighty Seven Only) along with pendente lite and future interest @ 18% p.a.2. It is stated in the plaint that the plaintiff is engaged in the business of selling jewellery.3. It is the case of the plaintiff that the defendant had, on various occasions, purchased jewellery articles from the plaintiff. He states that, however, since the beginning the defendant had been irregular in making payments to the plaintiff against the aforementioned CS(OS) 2013//2015 Page 1 of 5 purchases. The details of the purchases made by the defendant are reproduced hereinbelow: Sr no Date Invoic...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 05 2018

Kalam @ Kalamuddin vs.dinesh & Ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Oct-05-2018

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI * Date of Decision: October 05, 2018 + MAC.APP. 288/2013 KALAM @ KALAMUDDIN Through: Mr. Pratap Singh, Advocate ..... Appellant versus DINESH & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Arun Yadav, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. Impugned Award of 7th November, 2012 grants compensation of `6,12,261/- with interest @ 7.5% per annum to appellant-Kalam (hereinafter referred to as Injured) aged 35 years and 7 months, on account of grievous injuries suffered by him in a vehicular accident, which took place on 13th August, 2009. The facts as noticed in the impugned Award are as under:-"Briefly stated facts of the petition are that on 13.8.2009 at about 7.30 PM, Kalam @ Kalamuddin (hereinafter the petitioner) was returning back to his residence at Dharmshal situated at Kharkhari Village when a Motorcycle bearing No.HR-36J-1892 Bajaj Pulsar (hereinafter offending vehicle ) driven by Respondent No.1 (in Short R1) with high s...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 05 2018

Rumma Shyam Sunder & Ors vs.shamsher Kalra

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Oct-05-2018

* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RFA No.834/2018 % RUMMA SHYAM SUNDER & ORS5h October, 2018 ..... Appellants Through: Mr. S. Krishnaamorthi and Mr. Manoj Kr. Dwivedi, Advocates (Mobile No.8448465768). versus SHAMSHER KALRA ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Jayant Tripathi and Ms. Nayantara Roy, Advocate (Mobile No.9891871186). CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) CAVEAT No.926/2018 1. Since counsel for the caveator has entered appearance, the caveat stands discharged. RFA No.834/2018 Page 1 of 15 C.M. Appl. No.41167/2018 (for exemption) 2. Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. C.M. stands disposed of. C.M. Appl. No.41169/2018 (for delay) 3. For the reasons stated in the application the delays of 39 days in re-filing the appeal stands condoned, subject to all just exceptions. C.M. stands disposed of. RFA No.834/2018 and C.M. Appl. Nos. 41165/2018 (for stay), 41166/2018 (under Order XLI Rule 5), 41...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 05 2018

Nitin Rose & Anr. Vs.union of India & Ors

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Oct-05-2018

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:05. 10.2018 + W.P.(C) 9921/2015 NITIN ROSE & ANR. ........ Petitioners Through: Ms.Jyoti Singh, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Padma Kumar S., Adv. & Ms.Tinu Bajwa, Adv. Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Sanjeev Narula, CGSC with Mr.Rajat & Mr.Shravan Kumar Shukla, Adv. for UOI. Mr.Deepak Verma, Adv. for R-7, 9 & 10. Gava, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI REKHA PALLI, J (ORAL) C.M. No19422/2018 In view of the order passed in C.M. No.19427/2018 in W.P.(C) No.8437/2015, the present application is allowed in the same terms. OCTOBER05 2018/aa (REKHA PALLI) JUDGE (VIPIN SANGHI) JUDGE 1...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 05 2018

Commissioner of Income Tax vs.maharaja Prithvi Raj

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Oct-05-2018

$~ * % + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on:20.09.2018 Judgment Pronounced on:05.10.2018 ITA1522001 ITA2182002, C.M. APPL.5766/2013 ITA6792004, C.M. APPL.5757/2013 ITA1632005 ITA7502007 ITA7522007 ITA7512007 & ITA7632007 ITR1371983, ITR781981 & ITR3971983 ITR29798/1981 ITR91982 & C.M. APPL.5772/2013 ITR4647/1982 ITR9598/1983 & ITR2211984 ITR13739/1983 C.M. APPL.5770/2013 IN ITR1511983 (disposed off case), ITR15253/1983, ITR2711983 & ITR4381983, C.M. APPL.5775/2013 ITR17071/1985 ITR22124/1985 ITR182000, C.M. APPL.5762/2013 + WTA21999 + WTR32834/1984 & C.M. APPL.5773/2013 + ITR28388/1985 ITA1522001 & connected matters Page 1 of 3 + WTR3001987, C.M. APPL.5759/2013; WTR4042/1987 & WTR10608/1990,C.M. APPL.5767/2013 + WTR31992 & C.M. APPL.5765/2013 + WTR41992 & C.M. APPL.5763/2013 + WTR241995 & C.M. APPL.5758/2013 + WTR2832/1995 & C.M. APPL.5768/2013 + WTR41997 & C.M. APPL.5771/2013 + + + + + + + C.M. APPL.5769/2013 IN ITR2971981 C.M....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 05 2018

Jeet vs.state (Govt. Of Nct) of Delhi

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Oct-05-2018

* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI JEET CRL.A. 556/2016 Decided on:5. h October, 2018 Represented by: Mr. K. Singhal, Advocate ..... Appellant Versus STATE (GOVT. OF NCT) OF DELHI ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr. Ashok Kumar Garg, APP for the State with SI L. Kipgen, PS R.K. Puram. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.(ORAL) 1. Jeet challenges the impugned judgment dated 9th February 2016 convicting him for offence punishable under Section 354 IPC and Section 10 of Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (in short POCSO Act) and the order on sentence dated 29th February, 2016 directing him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of five years and to pay a fine of 25,000/-, in default whereof to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of three months, for offence punishable under Section 354 IPC and rigorous imprisonment for a period of five years and to pay a fine of 25,000/-, in default whereof to undergo simple imprisonment for a p...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 05 2018

commr.of Income Tax vs.lt.col.bhawani Singh

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Oct-05-2018

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 05 2018

r.e.d College of Education vs.national Council for Teacher Education a ...

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Oct-05-2018

#64 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:05. 10.2018. W.P.(C) 10568/2018 R.E.D COLLEGE OF EDUCATION ........ Petitioner versus NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the... RESPONDENTS : Mr. Sanjay Sharawat, Mr. Divyank Rana and Mr. Ashok Kumar, Advocates : Ms. Arunima Dwivedi, Standing Counsel with Ms. Preeti Kumra, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL JUDGMENT SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J (ORAL) 1. The present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, belatedly impugns the action of the National Council for Teacher Education (for short NCTE), respondent No.1 herein, whereby, the latter returned the petitioner institutions seeking recognition for B.Ed courses all in the year 2013, along with the fee, on the ground of the W.P. (C ) 10568/2018 Page 1 of 6 ban imposed by the State of Haryana on granting of recognition for inter alia, B.Ed and D.El.Ed...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 05 2018

Maharaj Prithvi Raj(huf) vs.cit

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Oct-05-2018

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 05 2018

Samrath Gupta vs.m/s Madhuban Electronics Pvt Ltd

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Oct-05-2018

$~CP-6 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of decision:05. 10.2018 CO.PET. 407/2012, CA4192013, 922/2014, 255-256/2015, 823/2017 SAMRATH GUPTA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr Anil Kumar Aggarwal, Advocate. Versus M/S MADHUBAN ELECTRONICS PVT LTD Through: Mr. Rajesh Agrawal, Advocate. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(ORAL) 1. This petition is filed under Sections 433(c) of the Companies Act, 1956 seeking winding up of the respondent - Company.2. The case of the petitioner is that the respondent Company was incorporated on 02.09.2005 but even after the expiry of seven years, the Company has not commenced any business activity.3. The petitioner is a director of the Company. The petitioner along with three other persons, namely, Mr.Girish Bansal, Mr.Ashok Aggarwal and Mr.Anoop Aggarwal had purchased all shares of the Company. The old promoters have resigned from the Company.4. Prior to the purchase of the shares of the Company, the resp...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

‹ Prev
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
Next ›
Last »

Delhi Court October 2018 Judgments

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.