Delhi Court October 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Anand Agarwal vs.union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-08-2018
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:25. h September 2018 Decided on:8. h October 2018 W.P.(CRL) 791/2018 & Crl. M.A. No.4962/2018 ANAND AGARWAL ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Amarendra Sharan, Senior Advocate with Mr. Abhimanyu Bhandari, Mr. Somesh Tiwari, Rohatgi, Mr. Chirag Mr. Nikhil Madan, Mr. Arav and Mr. Shashank Khurana, Advocates Pandit, UNION OF INDIA & ORS. versus Through: Mr. Amit Mahajan, CGSC ........ RESPONDENTS for Respondent No.1/UOI. Mr. Anupam S. Sharma, SPP for CBI/R2 with Mr. Anurag Andley, Mr. Prakarsh Airan, Mr. Shivam Gupta, Ms. Kamakshi Verma, Mr. Ankit Vashisht, Mr. Parikshith, Advocates. Mr.Sandeep Jha, Advocate for State of Chattisgarh / R3. and CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE VINOD GOEL Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.: The issue JUDGMENT1An interesting question of law arises in this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution regarding prior sanction having to be taken by the W.P. (Crl.) 791/2018 Page 1 of 20 Central Bureau of Inv...
Rajni Saxena vs.rajinder Yadav & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-08-2018
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:8. h October, 2018 RSA692017 & CM No.41911/2018 (for restoration of appeal) RAJNI SAXENA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. S.S. Ahluwalia and Mr. Jatin Teotia, Advs. ........ RESPONDENTS Versus RAJINDER YADAV & ORS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW1 Through: None. This Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) was filed impugning the judgment and decree [dated 11th July, 2016 in RCA No.15/2015 of the Court of Additional District Judged (Central)]. of dismissal of First Appeal under Section 96 of the CPC preferred by the appellant against the judgment and decree [dated 12th March, 2015 in Suit No.705/2014 (Unique ID No.0240K0040692011) of the Court of Civil Judge-05 (Central)]. of dismissal of suit filed by the appellant/plaintiff for recovery of possession of immoveable property with mesne profits.2. The appeal came up first before this Court on 3rd March, 2017 and thereafter ...
Poonam vs.state Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-08-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on 9th August, 2018 Pronounced on 8th October, 2018 + CRL.A. 192/2017 RAJIV @ MONU ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Anil Dabas, Advocate. versus STATE NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Kewal Singh Ahuja, APP. + POONAM CRL.A. 284/2017 Through: Ms.Anu Narula, Advocate. ..... Appellant versus STATE NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Kewal Singh Ahuja, APP. CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE VINOD GOEL JUDGMENT VINOD GOEL, J.:1. These appeals are directed against the judgment dated 9th December, 2016 passed by the Court of learned Additional Sessions Judge, West, Crl.A.192 & 284/2017 Page 1 of 39 Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi (ASJ) in Case No.56384/2016 arising out of FIR No.190/2013, Police Station (PS) Mundka whereby the appellants were convicted for murdering Sanjay, for the offence punishable under Section 120B of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), Section 302 IPC r/w Section 120B and Section 201 IPC r/w Section 120B IPC. The appellant...
S N Gupta & Ors. Vs.state of Nct of Delhi & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-08-2018
$~69 & 81 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:08. 10.2018 CRL.M.C. 4920/2018 RAJESH GUPTA & ORS. ........ Petitioners versus THE STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS + CRL.M.C. 5009/2018 S N GUPTA & ORS. versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR Advocates who appeared in this case: ........ Petitioners ........ RESPONDENTS For the... Petitioner: For the... RESPONDENTS: Mr. Rishi Sood, Adv. (Crl. M.C. 4920/2018) Mr. Govind Rishi, Adv. (Crl. M.C. 5009/2018) Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, APP for the State with Inspr. Gurmail Singh and SI Rajvir Singh Mr. Rishi Sood, Adv. for R-2 with respondent No.2 in person (Crl. M.C. 4920/2018) Mr. Govind Rishi, Adv. for R-2 with R-2 in person (Crl. M.C. 5009/2018) CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT0810.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) CRL.M.C. 4920/2018 & CRL.M.C. 5009/2018 1.... Petitioners, in Crl. M.C. 4920/2018 seek quashing of FIR No.59 of 2017 under Sections 406/409/420/467/468/471/120-B of ...
Hindustan Tin Works Limited vs.union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-08-2018
$~21 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:08. 10.2018 + W.P.(C) 10526/2017 HINDUSTAN TIN WORKS LIMITED ........ Petitioner Through Mr. R.K. Krishnan, Adv. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Roshan Lal goel and Ms. Anju Gupta, Adv. for UOI/R-1. Mr. Harpreet Singh, Sr. Sanding Counsel with Ms. Suhani Mathur, Adv. for R-2 & R-3 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.CHAWLA S.RAVINDRA BHAT, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioner seeks a direction to consider its application for refund of Terminal Excise Duty (in the sum of `46,54,295/-) vis-a-vis deemed exports made to Vimal Agro Products Pvt. Ltd. and TATA Coffee Ltd.2. The petitioner manufactures tin containers, which had been supplied to various Export Oriented Units (EOUs). Those EOUs in turn exported the final product using tin containers as packaging W.P.(C) 10526/2017 Page 1 of 12 material. Such supplies made were being treated as deemed export under the provisions ...
Pacific Convergence Corpn. Ltd. Vs.data Access (India) Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-08-2018
$~CP-17 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision:08. 10.2018 CO.PET. 292/2004 PACIFIC CONVERGENCE CORPN. LTD. ........ Petitioner Through versus DATA ACCESS (INDIA) LTD. ..... Respondent Through Mr.Y.P.Narula with Mr.abhey Narula, Advs. for Canara Bank. Sr.Adv. Ms.Haripriya Padmanabhan, Mr.Feroz Ali and Mr.Rohan K. George, Advs. for the applicants. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(ORAL) CA No.31/2014 1. This application was heard in detail on the last date of hearing, namely, on 14.09.2018 when this court had passed the following orders:-"1. This application is filed by Kasturi and Sons Limited seeking modification of the order of this court dated 21.1.2011 to the extent that it concerns the movable and immovable properties of Sporting Passtime India Limited (SPIL). As per the application the company SPIL was originally promoted by the applicant. The applicant acquired a large amount of immovable property of about 435 acres of land for the purp...
Tarun Kumar & Ors vs.state of Nct of Delhi & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-08-2018
$~5 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:08. h October, 2018 + CRL.M.C. 1369/2015 and Crl. M.A. Nos.5003/2015, 10282- 10283/2015 and 21044/2017 TARUN KUMAR & ORS ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Sunil Fernandes and Mr. Arnav Vidyarthi, Advocates versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Arun Bhardwaj, Advocate for R-2 & 3 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. The petitioners are facing prosecution as accused in the criminal case in the court of the Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate (South-East) at Saket Court Complex, arising out of the first information report (FIR) no.involving offences punishable under Sections 120B, 409, 420 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) of police station Economic Offences Wing. On the basis of the report (charge-sheet) under Section 173 of the Code of the Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr. PC) submitted upon conclusion of investigation into the said FIR, the Magisterial court in Delhi took cognizance an...
The New India Assurance Company Limited vs.central Bank of India and A ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-05-2018
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RFA No.421/2006 % THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED5h October, 2018 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Gaurav Mishra and Mr. Siddharth Pandey, Advocates (Mobile No.7359067379). versus CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. S.P. Gairola, Advocate for R-2 (Mobile No.9811671021). CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of the Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) is filed by the defendant No.4/ insurance company, in the suit, impugning the Judgment of the Trial Court dated 02.03.2006 by which the trial court has decreed the suit filed by the respondent No.1/plaintiff/Central Bank of India against all four defendants in the suit. Defendant nos. 1 to 3 in the suit were RFA No.421/2006 Page 1 of 9 partners in a partnership firm who had availed the loan from the respondent no.1/plaintiff/bank. The issue qua th...
Commissioner of Income Tax vs.bhawani Singh
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-05-2018
$~ * % + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on:20.09.2018 Judgment Pronounced on:05.10.2018 ITA1522001 ITA2182002, C.M. APPL.5766/2013 ITA6792004, C.M. APPL.5757/2013 ITA1632005 ITA7502007 ITA7522007 ITA7512007 & ITA7632007 ITR1371983, ITR781981 & ITR3971983 ITR29798/1981 ITR91982 & C.M. APPL.5772/2013 ITR4647/1982 ITR9598/1983 & ITR2211984 ITR13739/1983 C.M. APPL.5770/2013 IN ITR1511983 (disposed off case), ITR15253/1983, ITR2711983 & ITR4381983, C.M. APPL.5775/2013 ITR17071/1985 ITR22124/1985 ITR182000, C.M. APPL.5762/2013 + WTA21999 + WTR32834/1984 & C.M. APPL.5773/2013 + ITR28388/1985 ITA1522001 & connected matters Page 1 of 3 + WTR3001987, C.M. APPL.5759/2013; WTR4042/1987 & WTR10608/1990,C.M. APPL.5767/2013 + WTR31992 & C.M. APPL.5765/2013 + WTR41992 & C.M. APPL.5763/2013 + WTR241995 & C.M. APPL.5758/2013 + WTR2832/1995 & C.M. APPL.5768/2013 + WTR41997 & C.M. APPL.5771/2013 + + + + + + + C.M. APPL.5769/2013 IN ITR2971981 C.M....
c.w.t. Vs.bhawani Singh Ji of Jaipur
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-05-2018
$~ * % + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on:20.09.2018 Judgment Pronounced on:05.10.2018 ITA1522001 ITA2182002, C.M. APPL.5766/2013 ITA6792004, C.M. APPL.5757/2013 ITA1632005 ITA7502007 ITA7522007 ITA7512007 & ITA7632007 ITR1371983, ITR781981 & ITR3971983 ITR29798/1981 ITR91982 & C.M. APPL.5772/2013 ITR4647/1982 ITR9598/1983 & ITR2211984 ITR13739/1983 C.M. APPL.5770/2013 IN ITR1511983 (disposed off case), ITR15253/1983, ITR2711983 & ITR4381983, C.M. APPL.5775/2013 ITR17071/1985 ITR22124/1985 ITR182000, C.M. APPL.5762/2013 + WTA21999 + WTR32834/1984 & C.M. APPL.5773/2013 + ITR28388/1985 ITA1522001 & connected matters Page 1 of 3 + WTR3001987, C.M. APPL.5759/2013; WTR4042/1987 & WTR10608/1990,C.M. APPL.5767/2013 + WTR31992 & C.M. APPL.5765/2013 + WTR41992 & C.M. APPL.5763/2013 + WTR241995 & C.M. APPL.5758/2013 + WTR2832/1995 & C.M. APPL.5768/2013 + WTR41997 & C.M. APPL.5771/2013 + + + + + + + C.M. APPL.5769/2013 IN ITR2971981 C.M....
- ‹ Prev
- 52
- 53
- 54
- 55
- 56
- 58
- 59
- 60
- 61
- 62
- Next ›
- Last »