Delhi Court October 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Dhananjay @ Bunty vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-08-2018
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A.184/2004 & CRL.M.A.No.7863/2005 DHANANJAY @ BUNTY ..... Appellant Through: Mr. M.K. Sharma, Advocate with Mr. Manish Tanwar, Advocate. versus STATE CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE VINOD GOEL Through: Mr. Hirein Sharma, APP. ..... Respondent JUDGMENT0810.2018 % Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. This is an appeal directed against the judgment dated 17th February 2004 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, New Delhi in SC No.75A/2001 arising out of FIR No.197/2001 registered at PS Najafgarh convicting the Appellant for the offences under Sections 397 and 302 IPC and the order on sentence dated 20th February 2004 whereby, for the offence under Section 302 IPC, he was sentenced to imprisonment for life with fine of Rs.500/- and in default of payment, to undergo rigorous imprisonment for one year; and for the offence under Section 397 IPC, he was sentenced to 7 years rigorous imprisonment with fine of Rs. 500/- and in default of paym...
Shanno Devi & Anr. Vs.the State & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-08-2018
$~76 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + CRL.M.C. 5127/2018 Judgment delivered on:08.10.2018 SHANNO DEVI & ANR. THE STATE & ANR versus ........ Petitioners ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioners : Mr. Dinesh Kumar and Mr. Surinder Kumar, Advocates along with petitioners in person For the... RESPONDENTS : Mr. Hirien Sharma, APP for State with SI Ved Pal Sharma, PS Mangol Puri Ms. Madhvi Gautam and Mr. Nitesh Khatri, Advs. for R-2 along with R-2 in person CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT0810.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) Crl.M.A.33742/2018 (exemption) Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions. CRL.M.C. 5127/2018 1. The petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.366/2017, under Sections 420A/34 IPC, Police Station Burari, based on a settlement.2. Subject FIR emanates out of a dispute with regard to sale CRL.M.C. 5127/2018 Page 1 of 3 transaction of a property.... Petitioners had agreed to sell a property to the co...
Yashpal @ Kallu vs.the New India Insurance Co Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-08-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: October 08, 2018 + MAC.APP. 114/2013 THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO.LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. J.P.N Shahi, Advocate Versus YASHPAL @ KALLU & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Nishant Shaiva, Advocate for respondent No.1 YASHPAL @ KALLU + MAC.APP. 839/2018 Versus ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Yash Pal Sapra, Advocate THE NEW INDIA INSURANCE CO LTD CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR Through: Mr. J.P.N Shahi, Advocate ..... Respondent 1. JUDGMENT (ORAL) Impugned Award of 30th November, 2012 grants compensation of `15,33,872/- with interest @9% per annum to a Milk Vendor-Yashpal (hereinafter referred to as the Injured), aged 24 years, on account of grievous injuries suffered by him in a vehicular accident, which took place on 16th August, 2012. MAC.APP. 114/2013 MAC.APP. 839/2018 Page 1 of 6 2. In the above captioned first appeal, The New India Assurance Company Limited (henceforth referred to as the Insurer) seeks reductio...
Ramesh Sharma vs.jagat Singh Nagar & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-08-2018
$~8 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:08. h October, 2018 + CRL.M.C. 3200/2015 RAMESH SHARMA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. B.S. Joon, Mr. Karan Chaudhary, Mr.Neeraj Balhara and Ms. Akriti Mishra, Advocates versus JAGAT SINGH NAGAR & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Ramesh Gupta, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Arjun Dewan, Mr. Uday Bedi and Mr. Amit Sharma, Advocates for R-1 to 7 Ms. Meenakshi Dahiya, APP for the State with Insp. Vijay Kumar CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. The first information report (FIR) no.1was registered by police station Kalkaji on the basis of statement of the petitioner recorded on 17.03.2010 after he had been examined medically at All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS) Trauma Centre. Upon completion of investigation, report under Section 173 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 was submitted in February 2012 seeking trial of the first to seventh respondents for offences punishable under Sections 365, 506, 379, 35...
Ashwani vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-08-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:30. h August, 2018 Decided on:8. h October, 2018 + ASHWANI CRL.A. 323/2018 & Crl. MB4512018 STATE ...Appellant Through: Mr. Vikram Singh with Mr. Harpreet Sandhu, Mr. Bhanu Pant & Ms. Nidhi Tiwari, Advocates. versus... RESPONDENTThrough: Mr Kewal Singh Ahuja, APP for the State. + CRL.A. 412/2018 & Crl. MBs 587/2018 and 1082/2018 GAURAV ...Appellant STATE Through: Ms. Saahila Lamba, Advocate. versus... RESPONDENTThrough: Mr Hirein Sharma, APP for the State. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE VINOD GOEL JUDGMENT Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. These two appeals are directed against the impugned judgment dated 12th December, 2017 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court, Shahdara, Karkardooma Court, Delhi (hereafter the trial Crl. A. Nos. 323 and 412 of 2018 Page 1 of 36 Court) in Sessions Case No.173/2010 arising out of FIR No.175/2010 registered at Police Station (PS) Vivek Vihar, convicting both Appellants for...
Rajiv @ Monu vs.state of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-08-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on 9th August, 2018 Pronounced on 8th October, 2018 + CRL.A. 192/2017 RAJIV @ MONU ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Anil Dabas, Advocate. versus STATE NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Kewal Singh Ahuja, APP. + POONAM CRL.A. 284/2017 Through: Ms.Anu Narula, Advocate. ..... Appellant versus STATE NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Kewal Singh Ahuja, APP. CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE VINOD GOEL JUDGMENT VINOD GOEL, J.:1. These appeals are directed against the judgment dated 9th December, 2016 passed by the Court of learned Additional Sessions Judge, West, Crl.A.192 & 284/2017 Page 1 of 39 Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi (ASJ) in Case No.56384/2016 arising out of FIR No.190/2013, Police Station (PS) Mundka whereby the appellants were convicted for murdering Sanjay, for the offence punishable under Section 120B of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), Section 302 IPC r/w Section 120B and Section 201 IPC r/w Section 120B IPC. The appellant...
Rajesh Gupta & Ors. Vs.the State (Govt. Of Nct of Delhi) & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-08-2018
$~69 & 81 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:08. 10.2018 CRL.M.C. 4920/2018 RAJESH GUPTA & ORS. ........ Petitioners versus THE STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS + CRL.M.C. 5009/2018 S N GUPTA & ORS. versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR Advocates who appeared in this case: ........ Petitioners ........ RESPONDENTS For the... Petitioner: For the... RESPONDENTS: Mr. Rishi Sood, Adv. (Crl. M.C. 4920/2018) Mr. Govind Rishi, Adv. (Crl. M.C. 5009/2018) Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, APP for the State with Inspr. Gurmail Singh and SI Rajvir Singh Mr. Rishi Sood, Adv. for R-2 with respondent No.2 in person (Crl. M.C. 4920/2018) Mr. Govind Rishi, Adv. for R-2 with R-2 in person (Crl. M.C. 5009/2018) CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT0810.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) CRL.M.C. 4920/2018 & CRL.M.C. 5009/2018 1.... Petitioners, in Crl. M.C. 4920/2018 seek quashing of FIR No.59 of 2017 under Sections 406/409/420/467/468/471/120-B of ...
Haryana Telecom Limited vs.mahanagar Telephone Nigam Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-08-2018
$~14 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:08. 10.2018 + FAO(OS) 205/2017 HARYANA TELECOM LIMITED ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Abhishek Sharma and Ms.Pavitra Singh, Advocate. versus MAHANAGAR TELEPHONE NIGAM LTD ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Raman Kapur, Senior Adv. with Mr. Vivek Malik and Mr.Utsav Mukherjee, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. CHAWLA MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT (OPEN COURT) % The appellant is aggrieved by an order of the learned Single Judge 1. which interfered with the Award of the Arbitral Tribunal under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereafter the Act). The Arbitral Tribunal had held in its Award that the amounts deducted towards liquidated damages had to be paid by the respondent (hereafter MTNL) to the appellant.2. The undisputed facts are that the parties had entered into a contract whereby the appellant agreed to supply a certain quantity of cables which were to be lai...
Jitender Lalwani & Ors. Vs.dhir International Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-08-2018
$~CP-28 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of decision:08. 10.2018 CO.PET. 505/2016 JITENDER LALWANI & ORS. ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Anil K.Kher, Sr.Adv. with Ms.Namita Sharma and Mr.Kunal Kher, Advs. DHIR INTERNATIONAL PVT. LTD. versus ..... Respondent Through Mr.Gaurav Mitra, Ms.Rashmita Roy Chowdhury and Ms.Karnika Bahuguna, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(ORAL) 1. This petition is filed under sections 433(e) 434 and 439 of the Companies Act, 1956 seeking winding up of the respondent company. The case of the petitioners is that the petitioners had let out the premises being industrial property bearing No.299, Phase-II, Udyog Vihar, Gurgaon- 122015, Haryana to the respondent vide Lease Agreement dated 12.09.2002. As per the lease deed an aggregate rent of Rs.6,50,000/- per month was agreed to be paid. A sum of Rs.40,00,000/- was also paid by the respondent as interest free security deposit. The monthly rent was to increase by 20% aft...
Sunita Vaid vs.state & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-08-2018
$~O-15 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:08. h October, 2018 TEST.CAS. 91/2011 SUNITA VAID Through: Ms.Ankita Vashisht, Advocate ........ Petitioner versus STATE & ORS Through: ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The petitioner has filed this petition for grant of letters of administration with well annexed in respect of the will dated 16th March, 2009 of her father, late Mohinder Kumar Datta.2. Late Mohinder Kumar Datta expired on 27th February, 2010. The deceased was survived by three daughters and two sons, namely: (i) Sunita Vaid (ii) Parveen Randhawa (iii) Savina Mehta (iv) Ravinder Datta (v) Sanjeev Datta - - - - - Daughter Daughter Daughter Son Son TEST.CAS.91/2011 Page 1 of 4 3. The deceased has left behind the following estate mentioned in Annexure B (Ex.PW1/3):-"i. PCO Booth, Sector 6, Road No.224, Dwarka, New Delhi, near lawn adjacent to Wall of MTNL Office ii. One-Sixth share in house at village Sidhwan ...
- ‹ Prev
- 49
- 50
- 51
- 52
- 53
- 55
- 56
- 57
- 58
- 59
- Next ›
- Last »