Delhi Court October 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Central Bureau of Investigation vs.m/s Earth Enterprises Ltd. & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-09-2018
$~10 + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:-"9th October, 2018 CRL. M.C. 1180/2015 & Crl.M.A. 4325/2015 CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Sanjeev Bhandari, SPP for CBI with Mr. Prateek Kumar, Adv. versus M/S EARTH ENTERPRISES LTD. & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. D.S. Kohli, Adv. for R-1. Ms. Parvinder Kwatra, Adv. for R-3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. The petitioner Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) had registered two cases on the complaint of the fourth respondent who was working at the relevant point of time as Managing Director of National Agricultural Cooperative Marketing Federation of India (NAFED), they being RC No.BD1/2006/E/0009 and RC No.EOU-I- 2007/E-0002. The investigation of the two cases was carried out, almost parallelly and upon conclusion of the said exercise, reports (charge-sheets) under Section 173 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) were submitted almost simultaneousl...
Asian Colour Coated Ispat Limited vs.reserve Bank of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-09-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~205 * + W.P.(C) 4842/2018 & CM Nos. 18639-18640/2018, 20613/2018, 32140/2018, 32821/2018 ASIAN COLOUR COATED ISPAT LIMITED ........ Petitioner Through: Mr Abhinav Vashisht, Sr. Advocate with Ms Mahima Singh, Advocate. versus RESERVE BANK OF INDIA AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr Sandeep Sethi, Sr. Advocate with Mr A. R. Chowdhary, Mr V. P. Singh, Ms Vatsala Rai, Mr P. B. lal, Mr Raghav Seth and Mr A. Modi, Advocates for R-1/RBI. Mr Ankur Mittal, Advocate for R-2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU % ORDER0910.2018 VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The petitioner has filed the present petition, inter alia, impugning the list issued by respondent no.1 (RBI) containing the names of borrowers in respect of which directions have been issued to file proceedings under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (hereafter IBC), to the extent it includes the name of the petitioner. The petitioner further prays that its account be considered for a Resolution P...
B K Structural Contracts Pvt. Ltd vs.gati Kausar India Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-09-2018
$~4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:9. 10.2018 + ARB.P. 372/2018 B K STRUCTURAL CONTRACTS PVT. LTD. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. L.B. Rai and Mr. Mohit Kumar Sharma, Advs. versus CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER GATI KAUSAR INDIA LTD. Through: Mr. Koonal Tanwar, Adv. ..... Respondent RAJIV SHAKDHER, J.(ORAL) 1. This is a petition filed under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (for short 1996 Act) for appointment of an Arbitrator.2. Notice in this petition was issued on 21.5.2018. 2.1 Notice was made returnable on 27.7.2018. 2.2 On that date, the respondent was given time to file a reply to the petition. 2.3 Despite time having been given, no reply has been filed. 2.4 Mr. Tanwar, who, appears for the respondent, seeks another opportunity to file a reply. 2.5 According to me, no further opportunity can be given as nearly five (5) months have passed since notice was issued and nearly two and half (2) months have passed since...
Mcd vs.rajpal and 232 Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-09-2018
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on :27. h September, 2018 Date of decision:9. h October, 2018 + W.P.(C) 170/2011 MCD Through: Ms. Biji Rajesh, Adv. ........ Petitioner versus RAJPAL AND232ORS. .... RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Varun Prasad, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT1 The issue involved in the present writ petition relates to parity of scales of pay of Chowkidars/Security Guards posted in the Health Department of the Municipal Corporation of Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the MCD), vis--vis Chowkidars posted in other departments of the MCD. The dispute arose because Chowkidars/ Security Guards posted in the Health Department of the MCD, were being paid 2610-4000 per month, whereas Chowkidars/Security Guards in other departments of the MCD were paid 2500-3200. The learned Industrial Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as the learned Tribunal) has, vide the impugned Award dated 11th January, 2010, held that Chowkidars/Security Guards, who...
Lalit@lovely Kakkar vs.the State (Nct of Delhi) & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-09-2018
$~88 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + CRL.M.C. 5176/2018 Judgment delivered on:09.10.2018 LALIT@LOVELY KAKKAR ........ Petitioner THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR versus ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the... RESPONDENTS : : Mr. S.S.Bhati, Adv. along with petitioner in person. Mr. Kewal Singh Ahuja, APP for State. SI Rajender Singh Meena with ASI Tulli Ram PS Badar Pur, New Delhi. Respondent No.2 in person. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT0910.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) Crl.M.A.33939/2018 (exemption) Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions. CRL.M.C. 5176/2018 & Crl.M.A.33938/2018 1.... Petitioner seeks quashing of FIR No.20/2016 under Sections 507/506/509 IPC, Police Station Badar Pur.2. Parties are related to each other.... Petitioner is the cousin brother of the husband of the complainant. Subject FIR was registered on the complaint of respondent no.2 that petitioner had misbehaved wit...
Umesh Devi & Ors. Vs.uttar Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation & ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-09-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: October 09, 2018 + MAC. APP. 777/2013 & CM210342018 UTTAR PRADESH STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Garima Prashad and Mr. Shadab Khan, Advocates Versus + MAC. APP. 166/2015 UMESH DEVI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sushant Mukund, Advocate UMESH DEVI & ORS. ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Sushant Mukund, Advocate Versus UTTAR PRADESH STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Garima Prashad and Mr. Shadab Khan, Advocates for respondent No.1 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) The above captioned two appeals are directed against Award of 1. 14th March, 2013 vide which compensation of `12,33,250/- with interest @ 7.5% per annum has been awarded to Claimants.2. In the above-captioned first appeal, appellant- Uttar Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation (henceforth referred to as the Owner) MAC.APPs.777/2013 & 166/2015 Page 1 of 6 seeks reduction in th...
Ishwar Singh vs.delhi State Industrial and Infrastructure Development ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-09-2018
$~19 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 688/2018 & & C.M. No.2948/2018 ISHWAR SINGH ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.R.A. Sharma, Adv. versus DELHI STATE INDUSTRIAL AND INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Gaurang Kanth, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI % ORDER0910.2018 1. The petitioner has challenged an order dated 10.10.2017 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi dismissing OA No.689/2017 filed by him praying inter alia for quashing and setting aside order dated 13.02.2017 passed by the respondents/DSIIDC directing recovery of a sum of Rs.1,04,500/- on the ground that the same had been erroneously paid to him on account of Child Education Allowance (in short CEA), for the year 2010- 2011 to 2013-2014. Further, the petitioner seeks directions to the respondents to refund the amount of CEA already recovered from his salary.2. In a nutshell, the fact...
Slipco Constructions Pvt Ltd vs.bharat Heavy Electricals Limited & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-09-2018
$-15 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:09. 10.2018 O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 233/2018 & IAs 7555, 9936/2018 SLIPCO CONSTRUCTIONS PVT LTD ........ Petitioner Through: Ms.Pallavi Parmar, Adv. along with Mr.S.K.Grover, MD of petitioner is present. versus BHARAT HEAVY ELECTRICALS LIMITED & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms.Priya Singh, Ms.Deepabali Datta, Advs. for R-1-2 Mr.D.Abhinav Rao, Ms.Monalisa Kosaria, Advs. for proposed R-3 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA NAVIN CHAWLA, J.(Oral) 1. This petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) has been filed by the petitioner inter alia seeking the following prayer: i. A. Appoint the Local Commissioner to: take Inventory of the... Petitioners plant & Equipment at project site and keep them same in safe custody till they are released to the Petition, ii. Take measurement of the work done by the... Petitioner in presence of the representative of both the ...
Samara Khan vs.the State ( Govt of Nct of Delhi ) & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-09-2018
$~85 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + CRL.M.C. 5169/2018 Judgment delivered on:09.10.2018 SAMARA KHAN ........ Petitioner THE STATE ( GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI ) & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS versus Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : For the... RESPONDENTS : Khan Zulfiqar Khan, Advocate. Mr. Kewal Singh Ahuja, APP for State. ASI Jafruddin, PS Jamia Nagar, New Delhi. Respondent No.2 in person. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT0910.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) Crl.M.A.33915/2018 (exemption) Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions. CRL.M.C51692018 1.... Petitioner seeks quashing of FIR No.588/2012 initially registered under Sections 341/354/323/365/511 IPC, Police Station Jamia Nagar.2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that after the charge sheet was filed, charge has been framed against the petitioner only under Section 345 IPC.3. Subject FIR was filed consequent to a complaint made by respondent No.2 that the pet...
Sachin Vishwkarma & Ors vs.state of Delhi & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-09-2018
$~13 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:9. h October, 2018 + CRL.M.C. 4114/2015 SACHIN VISHWKARMA & ORS Through: Mr. Onkar Pandey, Adv. ........ Petitioners versus STATE OF DELHI & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Mukesh Kumar, APP for the State with SI Rakesh Sharma, PS Mehrauli. Mr. Rakesh Rao, Adv. for R-2 along with R-2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. The second respondent was married to the first petitioner as per Hindu Rites and Ceremonies on 29.11.2008. From out of their cohabitation, a male child named Kartikey took birth on 29.01.2010. On 15.10.2011, at the instance of the second respondent, first information report (FIR) No.449/2011 was registered by police station Mehrauli, involving offences punishable under Sections 498A/406/325/5of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) against her husband (the first petitioner), his father (the second petitioner) and his mother (the third petitioner). On conclusion of the investigation, Crl. ...
- ‹ Prev
- 47
- 48
- 49
- 50
- 51
- 53
- 54
- 55
- 56
- 57
- Next ›
- Last »