Delhi Court October 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Laxman Public School Society (Regd) & Ors vs.richa Arora & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-10-2018
$~60 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:10. h October, 2018 + W.P.(C) 10886/2018 LAXMAN PUBLIC SCHOOL SOCIETY (REGD) & ORS Through: Mr. Sanjiv Kakra, Adv. ........ Petitioners versus RICHA ARORA & ANR Through: ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT (ORAL) This writ petition, at the instance of the Laxman Public School 1. Society (Regd.), assails order dated 18th May, 2018, passed by the Delhi School Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as the learned Tribunal) in Appeal bearing No.49/2016, preferred before it by the respondent, Richa Arora.2. 3. The facts are brief. Pursuant to her applying, and being interviewed, for the post, the respondent was appointed as TGT (Computer), on a basic pay of Rs.12,540/- with usual allowances, with effect from 1st July, 2015.4. Clauses 1 and 2 of the terms and conditions of her appointment, W.P.(C) 10886/2018 Page 1 of 6 as contained in the letter dated 22nd May, 2015, read thus: 1. Initially you w...
Rajesh vs.the State & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-09-2018
$~37 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:09. 10.2018 CRL.M.C. 3265/2018 RAJESH versus THE STATE & ANR. ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS Mr. N.K. Rawal, Advocates Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner: For the... RESPONDENTS: CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, APP for the State. ASI Subhash Sharma JUDGMENT0910.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner seeks quashing of FIR No.443 of 2018 under Sections 3of the IPC registered at Police Station Mangol Puri, Delhi, based on a settlement.2. Parties are neighbours. The allegations in the FIR are that the complainant was walking on the road after buying milk from dairy. It is alleged that the petitioner along with co-accused came on the motorcycle and snatched the milk packet and also money from the complainant.3. Learned Addl. PP, under instructions, form the IO submits that the investigation has revealed that only one person was involved i.e. ...
Century Metal Recycling Private Limited vs.sachin Chhabra & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-09-2018
$~ * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on : September 10, 2018 Judgment pronounced on: October 09, 2018 + RFA (OS) (COMM) 4/2018 AND CM APPL. 3577-3578/2018 CENTURY METAL RECYCLING PRIVATE LIMITED ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Rahul Gupta, Mr. V.K. Jain, versus Mr. Shekhar Gupta and Mr. Utkarsh, Advs. SACHIN CHHABRA & ORS. Through: Mr. Akshay Makhija with Ms. Kriti Awasthi, Adv. ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A. K. CHAWLA JUDGMENT A. K. CHAWLA, J1 The appellant (hereafter Century), in this regular first appeal challenges the judgment and order dated 01.12.2017 of the learned Single Judge, in the leave to defend applications by the... RESPONDENTS/defendants (Sachin and TCC respectively hereafter) in the summary suit instituted under Order XXXVII CPC. The impugned judgment dismissed the summary suit against all three defendants RFA (OS) (COMM) 4/2018 Page 1 of 16 including the third defendant (hereafter 'Taru...
Hdfc Ergo General Insurance Co Ltd. Vs.dinesh Sharma & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-09-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: October 09, 2018 + MAC.APP. 364/2018 & 14380/2018 HDFC ERGO GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD .....Appellant Through: Mr. Sameer Nandwani, Advocate Versus POOJA KUMARI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. S.N.Prashar, Advocate for respondent-Pooja Kumari Mr. Pratap Singh & Mr. Sandeep Kaushik, Advocates for newly added respondent-Shalu + MAC.APP. 365/2018 & C.M. 14382/2018 HDFC ERGO GENRAL INSURANCE CO LTD .... Appellant Through: Mr. Sameer Nandwani, Advocate Versus PAWAN SHARMA @ PAWAN KUMAR SHARMA & ORS. Through: Mr. Shrey Chathly, Advocate for respondent No.1 ........ RESPONDENTS + MAC.APP. 366/2018 & C.M. 37034/2018 HDFC ERGO GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD. .....Appellant Through: Mr. Sameer Nandwani, Advocate Versus DINESH SHARMA & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS MAC.APP. 364/2018 MAC.APP. 365/2018 MAC.APP. 366/2018 Page 1 of 10 Through: Ms. Indu Aggarwal, Advocate for Mr. Jatinder Kamra, Advocate for respondents No.1 to 3 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. ...
Sh. Rajnish Khosla vs.m/s Fair Wealth Securities Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-09-2018
$~10 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Decision:09. 10.2018 FAO(OS) 399/2014 SH. RAJNISH KHOSLA ..... Appellant Through : Mr. Praveen Swarup, Adv. along with appellant in person. versus M/S FAIR WEALTH SECURITIES PVT. LTD. .. Respondent Through : Mr. Abhik Kumar and Mr. Amit Gautam, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.CHAWLA S.RAVINDRA BHAT, J.(ORAL) 1. This is an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act. The appellants grievance is with respect to the order of learned Single Judge who rejected his petition under Section 34 of the Act. The appellant has challenged the award by the Appellate Tribunal constituted by virtue of Regulations framed under the National Stock Exchange Act.2. Shorn of the procedural history of the dispute, the brief and conceded facts are that the appellant at the relevant time was an online trader, who transacted business with the stock exchange by purchasing and selling shares. He...
Tradewel Spares (I) Pvt. Ltd vs.m/s Scl Infratech Limited
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-09-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RFA No.550/2016 + % TRADEWEL SPARES (I) PVT. LTD. 9th October, 2018 Through: Mr. ..... Appellant Santhalia, Advocate (M. No.9560622223) Roshan M/S SCL INFRATECH LIMITED versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Ajay Kumar Jha, Advocate (M. No.9811679632). CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) is filed by the plaintiff in the suit impugning the Judgment of the Trial Court dated 06.04.2016 by which the trial court has dismissed the suit for recovery of Rs. 3,26,075/- alongwith interest. The amount claimed in the suit was prayed as being the balance due on account of goods, being spare parts of RFA No.550/2016 Page 1 of 9 construction and mining equipments, supplied by the appellant/plaintiff to the respondent/defendant.2. This Court may note that originally there were two defendants in the suit ...
Anil Kumar vs.delhi Agricultural Marketing Board and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-09-2018
$~58 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 4644/2018 Date of decision:9. h October, 2018 ANIL KUMAR ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Javed Ahmad and Mr. Anis Ahmad, Advs. versus ........ RESPONDENTS DELHI AGRICULTURAL MARKETING BOARD AND ANR. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR Through: JUDGMENT(ORAL) 1. It is already noted, on the last date of hearing i.e. on 3rd October, 2018 that the case of the candidature of the petitioner, for regularisation as Security Supervisor, was rejected only on the ground that he did not fulfil the requirement of the Recruitment Rules, for the said post, in terms of his height.2. Learned counsel for the respondent candidly acknowledges, today, that the petitioner does fulfil the height requirement as stipulated in the Recruitment Rules, inasmuch as his height is 5ft. 7 inch, which is the stipulated height as per the Recruitment Rules.3. He, therefore, submits that the respondent would consider the case of the petitioner, for regularisa...
M/S Wimpy International Ltd. Vs.m/s n.f.t. Carriers Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-09-2018
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RFA No.193/2006 % M/S WIMPY INTERNATIONAL LTD. 9th October, 2018 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Girdhar Govind and Mr. Baljinder Singh, Advocates (Mobile No.9650172263). versus M/S N.F.T. CARRIERS PVT. LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Lokesh Chopra, Advocate (Mobile No.9958806667). CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) is filed by the defendant in the suit impugning the Judgment of the Trial Court dated 16.01.2006 by which the trial court has decreed the suit filed by the respondent/plaintiff for a sum of Rs. 5,60,308/- with interest at 10% per annum and costs. RFA No.193/2006 Page 1 of 13 2. The suit has been decreed on account of the claim of the respondent/plaintiff for monthly charges of a refrigerated van provided by the respondent/plaintiff to the appellant/defendant for transport...
Hdfc Ergo General Insurance Co Ltd vs.pooja Kumari & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-09-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: October 09, 2018 + MAC.APP. 364/2018 & 14380/2018 HDFC ERGO GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD .....Appellant Through: Mr. Sameer Nandwani, Advocate Versus POOJA KUMARI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. S.N.Prashar, Advocate for respondent-Pooja Kumari Mr. Pratap Singh & Mr. Sandeep Kaushik, Advocates for newly added respondent-Shalu + MAC.APP. 365/2018 & C.M. 14382/2018 HDFC ERGO GENRAL INSURANCE CO LTD .... Appellant Through: Mr. Sameer Nandwani, Advocate Versus PAWAN SHARMA @ PAWAN KUMAR SHARMA & ORS. Through: Mr. Shrey Chathly, Advocate for respondent No.1 ........ RESPONDENTS + MAC.APP. 366/2018 & C.M. 37034/2018 HDFC ERGO GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD. .....Appellant Through: Mr. Sameer Nandwani, Advocate Versus DINESH SHARMA & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS MAC.APP. 364/2018 MAC.APP. 365/2018 MAC.APP. 366/2018 Page 1 of 10 Through: Ms. Indu Aggarwal, Advocate for Mr. Jatinder Kamra, Advocate for respondents No.1 to 3 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. ...
Deepak Anand vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-09-2018
$~18 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:-"9th October, 2018 CRL. M.C. 4221/2018 & Crl.M.A. 30384/2018 DEEPAK ANAND STATE & ANR. Through: versus Through:... Petitioner in person. ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Mr. Rahul Mehra, Standing counsel with Mr. Ravi Nayak, APP for State & Insp. V.K.P.S. Yadav, PS Kotla Mubarakpur. Mr.Vikas Pahwa, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Gaurav Gupta, Mr. Mohd. Ali Khan, Mr. Tushar Agarwal & Mr. Shadman Siddiqui, Advs. for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. On 17.01.2014, the wife of the second respondent was found dead inside the bed room of suite No.345 at Hotel Leela Palace, New Delhi. The Station House Officer of police station Sarojini Nagar, New Delhi registered first information report (FIR) No.64/2015 on 06.01.2015 and took up investigation into offences punishable under Sections 306 and 498A of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) in such context. The police having carried out investigation submitted its final report (...
- ‹ Prev
- 44
- 45
- 46
- 47
- 48
- 50
- 51
- 52
- 53
- 54
- Next ›
- Last »