Delhi Court October 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Sanjay Shah vs.state, Delhi Administration
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-10-2018
$~2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.A. 779/2001 SANJAY SHAH Decided on:10. h October, 2018 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Ashutosh Lohia, Advocate versus STATE, DELHI ADMINISTRATION ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Amit Ahlawat, APP for the State CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. The appellant by the present appeal has challenged the judgment dated 09.10.2001 and order on sentence dated 10.10.2001 passed in Sessions case No.154/2001, whereby he was held guilty and convicted on the charge for offence punishable under Sections 498-A and 304-B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) and awarded punishment in the form of rigorous imprisonment for two years with fine of Rs.5,000/- on the first count and rigorous imprisonment for ten years with fine of Rs.10,000/- on the second count which were to run concurrently.2. The appellant was married to Aruna on 30.04.1986. Two sons took birth out of the said wedlock. The couple with their two children, Crl. A. 779/2001 Page...
Bijender @ Vijendra Singh & Ors vs.the State & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-10-2018
........ Petitioners Judgment delivered on:10. 10.2018 versus THE STATE & ORS CRL.M.C. 5029/2018 BIJENDER @ VIJENDRA SINGH & ORS $~36 & 42 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + + Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioners : For the... RESPONDENTS: THE STATE & ORS CRL.M.C. 5083/2018 SHIV KARAN @ SHOKARAN SINGH & ORS. ...Petitioners versus Mr. Vinay Kumar with Ms. Pavitra Veer Singh and Mr. Lokesh Bharti, Advocates for the petitioners. Mr. Kamal Kumar Ghai, APP for the State with SI Kuldeep, PS Gazipur. Ms. Lalita and Mr. Ashok Kumar Sharma, Advocates for the complainant in CRL.M.C. 5029/2018 ........ RESPONDENTS ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT1010.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) Crl.M.A.33384/2018 (exemption) in CRL.M.C. 5029/2018 Crl.M.A.33571/2018 (exemption) in CRL.M.C. 5083/2018 Exemptions are allowed subject to all just exceptions. CRL.M.C.5029/2018 & Crl.M.C.5083/2018 Page 1 of 3 CRL.M.C. 5029/2018 & CRL.M.C. 5083/2...
Sh. Tejbir Singh & Ors. Vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-10-2018
$~41 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + CRL.M.C. 5192/2018 Judgment delivered on:10. 10.2018 SH. TEJBIR SINGH & ORS. Advocates who appeared in this case: STATE & ANR. versus ........ Petitioners ........ RESPONDENTS Mr. Mahesh Verma, Advocate. For the... Petitioners : . For the... RESPONDENTS : CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA Mr. Kamal Kumar Ghai, APP for the State. SI Azad Singh, PS Ranhola. JUDGMENT1010.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) Crl.M.A.33980/2018 (exemption) Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions. CRL.M.C. 5192/2018 1.... Petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.804/2015 under Sections 498A/4IPC, Police Station Ranhola. Subject FIR emanates out of matrimonial discord.... Petitioner 2. Crl.M.C.5192/2018 Page 1 of 3 No.1 is the husband of respondent No.2.... Petitioner No.2 is the mother-in-law of the respondent No.2.... Petitioner Nos.3 and 4 are the brother-in-law of the respondent No.2.... Petitioner No.5 is the sister-in- law of the respondent N...
National Highway Authority of India vs.gayatri Lalitpur Roadways Limit ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-10-2018
+ IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on:31. 07.2018 Judgment pronounced on:10. 10.2018 O.M.P. (COMM) No.325/2018 & I.A. Nos.10013-15/2018 NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY OF INDIA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Sudhir Nandrajog, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Shailendra Pratap Singh, Mr. Alok Singh, Mr. Deepak Shukla, Mr. Nilendra Pratap Singh, Ms. Seema Singh, Ms. Chandrika Prasad Mishra and Ms. Richa Rajesh, Advs. versus GAYATRI LALITPUR ROADWAYS LIMITED ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Arun Kathpalia, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Angad Mehta, Mr. Samaksh Goyal and Mr. Ram Babu, Advs. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER RAJIV SHAKDHER, J.Prefatory Facts:1. This petition is directed against a unanimous award dated 30.03.2018 passed by an Arbitral Tribunal comprising three Members. Via the award, the Arbitral Tribunal has granted not only the principal claim but also allowed consequential reliefs sought for by the respondent. O.M.P. (COMM.) No.325/2018 Page 1 of 26 2. By virtue of the mai...
Bharti Axa Gen Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs.saurabh Sharma
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-10-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI * Date of Decision: October 10, 2018 + MAC.APP. 1014/2017 BHARTI AXA GEN INSURANCE CO. LTD. Through: Mohammad Mustafa, Advocate ..... Appellant versus SAURABH SHARMA ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rahul Rohtagi and Mr. Syed Ajmal Hasan, Advocates + MAC.APP. 1085/2017 1. SAURABH SHARMA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Rahul Rohtagi and Mr. Syed versus Ajmal Hasan, Advocates BHARTI AXA GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD & ANR .....Respondents Through: Mohammad Mustafa, Advocate for respondent-Insurer CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) Impugned Award of 16th September, 2017 grants compensation of `18,98,228/- with interest @ 9% per annum to Saurabh Sharma (hereinafter referred to as Injured), aged 33 years, on account of grievous injuries suffered by him in a vehicular accident, which took place on 12th December, 2013. MAC.APPs. 10& 1085/2017 Page 1 of 6 2. In the above-captioned first appeal, Bharti Axa General Insurance Co. Ltd. (hereinafter r...
Preeti Priya Darshini & Ors vs.the State Govt of Nct of Delhi & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-10-2018
$~13 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + CRL.M.C. 1677/2018 Judgment delivered on:10.10.2018 PREETI PRIYA DARSHINI & ORS ........ Petitioners versus THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Mr. N.M. Popli, Advocate. Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioners : For the... RESPONDENTS CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA Ms. Neelam Sharma, APP for the State. SI Dushyant Panwar, PS Defence Colony. Mr. Neeraj Yadav, Advocate for respondent Nos.4 to 6 with respondent Nos.4 to 6 in person. : JUDGMENT1010.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) Crl.M.A.6054/2018 (exemption) Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions. Crl.M.A.6053/2018 (for condonation of delay in re-filing) For the reasons stated in the application, the application is allowed. The delay in re-filing the petition is condoned. CRL.M.C. 1677/2018 Page 1 of 3 CRL.M.C. 1677/2018 & Crl.M.A.6052/2018 (directions) 1.... Petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.162/2015 under Sections 506/...
M/S Hbr Chemicals Pvt Ltd. Vs.kailash Nath & Associates & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-10-2018
$~9 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:10. h October, 2018 CS (OS) 276/2014 M/S HBR CHEMICALS PVT LTD. ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Sunil Verma and Mr. K. R. Chawla, Advocates. (M:9811105226) versus KAILASH NATH & ASSOCIATES & ORS. ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Sandeep Kumar, Advocate for D- 2 & 3. (M:9999684531) CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH The present suit for recovery has been filed by the Plaintiff seeking Prathiba M. Singh, J.(Oral) 1. recovery of a sum of Rs.2,09,13,750/-.2. The brief background of the dispute is that the Defendant No.2 was the owner of land measuring about 66.53 acres situated at Bara Hindu Rao/Kishan Ganj, Delhi. Various agreements were entered into by Defendant No.2 (DCM Ltd.) in respect of the said land. A tripartite agreement dated 24th November, 1988 was entered into between Defendants No.1 and 2 and Ansal Properties and Industries. As per this agreement, DCM Ltd. appointed Defendant No.1 - Kailash Nath & Associates to jointly ...
Ashwin Balakrishanan & Ors vs.state & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-10-2018
$~52 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + CRL.M.C. 5207/2018 Judgment delivered on:10.10.2018 ASHWIN BALAKRISHANAN & ORS ........ Petitioners STATE & ANR versus ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : For the... RESPONDENTS : Ms. Ritu Singh Mann and Mr. Dheeraj Kr. Garg, Advs. Mr. Kamal Kr. Ghai, Addl. PP for the State with SI Manvendra, PS Pandav Nagar, Delhi. Mr. Vivek Srivastava, Adv. for R-2 with R-2 in person. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT1010.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) Crl. M.A. 34026/2018 (Exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. CRL.M.C. 5207/2018 1.... Petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.599 of 2017 under Sections 498A/4IPC registered at Police Station Pandav Nagar, CRL.M.C. 5207/2018 Page 1 of 3 Delhi, based on a settlement.2. 3. Subject FIR emanates out of matrimonial discord. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that parties have settled their disputes and settlement dated 15.02....
Sukash @ Sukesh Chandrashekar vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-10-2018
52# $~ * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:10. h October, 2018 BAIL APPLN. 2084/2018 SUKASH @ SUKESH CHANDRASHEKAR ...... Petitioner Represented by: Mr.Chetan Sharma, Senior Advocate with Ms.Kaadambari Puri, Mr.Mayank Tripathi and Mr.Amit Gupta, Advocates versus STATE Represented by: Ms.Rajni Gupta, APP for the State .. Respondent with ACP /ISC Jasbir Singh, Insp.Ritesh and SI Dheeraj, PS Crime Branch CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.(ORAL) 1. By this petition the petitioner seeks bail in case FIR No.56/2017 under Sections 467/468/471/474/170/120B/201 IPC and Section 8 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 registered at PS Crime Branch.2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been in custody since 16th April, 2017 i.e. for a period of 18 months. No further recovery is to be made from the petitioner. The petitioner was granted custody parole for a period of more than 50 days while his wife was unwell which conces...
The Oriental Insurance Co Ltd vs.sukumar Ashok Chavan & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-10-2018
* + 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: October 10, 2018 CM(M) 1240/2018 & CMs 42395-96/2018 THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO LTD ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. S.P. Jain, Mr. Himanshu Gambhir and Ms. Amandeep Kaur, Advocates versus SUKUMAR ASHOK CHAVAN & ANR Through: Nemo .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Neither in the Award of 27th April, 2018 nor in the impugned orders of 30th July, 2018 and 28th August, 2018, the issue of deduction of TDS has been addressed by the concerned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal.... Petitioner is aggrieved as Show-cause Notice has been issued to its Regional Manager to appear in person and to explain. Impugned order of 30th July, 2018 notes that claimant has furnished Form No.15-G under the I.T. Act to assert that the compensation received is not taxable. It is also noted in the impugned order that no written explanation has been furnished on behalf of petitioners Regional Manager.2. Learned counsel for p...
- ‹ Prev
- 42
- 43
- 44
- 45
- 46
- 48
- 49
- 50
- 51
- 52
- Next ›
- Last »