Delhi Court October 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Kapil Kumar & Ors vs.the State Govt. Of Nct of Delhi & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-11-2018
$~82 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + CRL.M.C. 5219/2018 Judgment delivered on:11.10.2018 KAPIL KUMAR & ORS versus THE STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR ........ Petitioners ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : For the... RESPONDENTS : Ms. Reena Singh, Adv. with petitioners in person. Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, Addl. PP for the State with SI Dhan Singh Mr. Deepak Sharma, Adv. for R-2 with R-2 in person. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT1110.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) Crl. M.A. 34089/2018 (Exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. CRL.M.C. 5219/2018 1.... Petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.267 of 2013 under Sections 498A/4IPC registered at Police Station Sabzi Mandi, CRL.M.C. 5219/2018 Page 1 of 3 Delhi, based on a settlement.2. 3. Subject FIR emanates out of matrimonial discord. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that parties have settled their disputes and settlement dated 31.01.2018 has b...
Phool Singh vs.delhi Development Authority
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-11-2018
$~10&11 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RSA3762015, CM No.25651/2015 (for stay) & CM No.25822/2018 (u/S151CPC) PHOOL SINGH Through: Mr. Sunil Sirohi & Mr. J.P.S. Sirohi, ..... Appellant + 1. Advs. Versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Through: Mr. Anuj Chaturvedi, Adv. ..... Respondent AND RSA3802015 & CM No.25859/2015 (for stay) PHOOL SINGH Through: Mr. Sunil Sirohi & Mr. J.P.S. Sirohi, ..... Appellant Advs. Versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Anuj Chaturvedi, Adv. DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW % RSA No.376/2015 arises from a suit filed by the appellant on 7th ORDER1110.2018 January, 2003 for (i) declaration that the house as well as temple constructed, upon a piece of land measuring 9 biswas i.e. 450 sq.yds., by the appellant / plaintiff exists on land bearing Khasra No.1422/662/36min of village Sidhora Khurd, Delhi and is not constructed over acquired land in Khasra No.723/665 of village Khampur Raya, Delhi; (ii) declaration that...
Prem Chand vs.shamim Husain & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-11-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: October 11, 2018 + MAC.APP. 1003/2017 PREM CHAND versus Through: Ms. Pinki Talukdar, Advocate .....Appellant SHAMIM HUSAIN & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mohd. Mustafa, Advocate for respondent No.2 Counsel for respondent No.3 (appearance not given) + MAC.APP. 45/2018 & CMs 1126-27/2018 JAHIR ALAM versus Through: Mohd. Mustafa, Advocate .....Appellant PREM CHAND & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Pinki Talukdar, Advocate for respondent No.1 Counsel for respondent No.3 (appearance not given) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. Impugned Award of 26th April, 2017 grants compensation of `7,90,629/- with interest @ 9% per annum to Injured-Prem Chand, (hereinafter referred to as Injured) aged 25 years, on account of grievous injuries suffered by him in a vehicular accident, which took place on 3rd April, 2012.2. In the above captioned first appeal, Injured-Prem Chand seeks MAC.APP. 1003/2017 & 45/2018 Page 1 ...
Kashmiri Lal Garg vs.state & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-11-2018
$~3 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:11th October, 2018 + CRL.M.C. 577/2015 KASHMIRI LAL GARG ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Manish Bansal, Advocate versus STATE & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Ashish Dutta, APP for the State with Insp. Vijay Kumar Mr. Mukesh Gupta and Mr. Saurabh, Advocate for R-2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. The petitioner is the complainant at whose instance first information report (FIR) no.11/2011 was registered on 18.01.2011 by police station Economic Offences Wing of Delhi Police for investigation into offences allegedly committed under Sections 420, 120B of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC). The second respondent is one of the persons whose complicity has been alleged in the said crimes. On his application (Bail application no.1732/2013), a learned single Judge of this court, by order dated 16.01.2015, had granted anticipatory bail in favour of the second respondent taking note of the Crl. M.C. 577/2015 Page 1 of ...
Association of Apartment Owners of New Delhi House (Regd.) vs.csi Ente ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-11-2018
$~CP-26 * % + CO.PET. 740/2016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:11. 10.2018 ASSOCIATION OF APARTMENT OWNERS OF NEW DELHI HOUSE (REGD.) ........ Petitioner Through Ms.Sunita Bhardwaj, Adv. for the petitioner Mr.Ashok Nagrath, Adv.for the petitioner (both counsel dispute the authority of each other) versus CSI ENTERPRISES PVT. LTD., Through Ms.Liza M.Baruah, Adv. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(ORAL) 1. This petition is filed under section 433(e) and 434 of the Companies Act, 1956 for winding up of the respondent company.2. The case of the petitioner is that the petitioner association is a society registered under the Societies Registration Act, 1860 and is also acting in consonance with the Delhi Apartment Ownership Act, 1986. It is also stated that the petitioner raised invoice Bill No.74 of 2016 for Rs.2,01,000/- against the respondent towards front renovation of the building New Delhi House. The respondent company failed...
New Delhi House Flat Owners Association (Regd.) vs.auto Controls Pvt. ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-11-2018
$~ * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:11. 10.2018 CO.PET. 735/2016 NEW DELHI HOUSE FLAT OWNERS ASSOCIATION (REGD.) ........ Petitioner Through Ms.Sunita Bhardwaj, Adv. for the petitioner. Mr.Ashok Nagrath, Adv.for petitioner (both counsel dispute the authority of each other) the Versus AUTO CONTROLS PVT. LTD. ..... Respondent Through Mr.Peeyoosh Kalra and Ms.Sona Babbar, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(ORAL) 1. This petition is filed under section 433(e) and 434 of the Companies Act, 1956 for winding up of the respondent company. It is stated that the petitioner is an Association being registered under the Societies Registration Act, 1860 and is responsible for renovation of the building New Delhi House which was constructed in 1974. It is further stated that the respondent company is indebted to the petitioner for a sum of Rs.1,02,515/- The petitioner raised invoice/bills bearing No.13 of 2016 for external renovation of the...
Dr. Sukhwinder Singh & Anr. Vs.central Bureau of Investigation
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-11-2018
$~93 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:11. 10.2018 CRL.M.C. 5052/2018 & Crl. M.A. No.33446/2018 DR. SUKHWINDER SINGH & ANR. ........ Petitioners versus CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioners : For the... RESPONDENTS: CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA Mr. Sudhir Nandrajog, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Amarjeet Singh Bedi, Ms. Bhawani Gupta, Ms. Karishma & Mr. Varun Chandiok, Advocates Mr. Sanjeev Bhandari, SPP for CBI with Mr. Prateek Kumar, Advocate JUDGMENT1110.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioners seek quashing of FIR dated 22.04.2010 and charge sheet dated 16.09.2011 arising out of RC No.2-2010-CBI-ACU-IX-ND pending before the Special Judge (PC Act) CBI Court in CC No.09 of 2017 titled CBI vs. Dr. Ketan Desai & Ors. and also seeks setting aside of the impugned order dated 18.08.2018.2. Learned senior counsel for the petitioners contends that charge was framed against ...
Dharmender @ Dharmu & Ors vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-11-2018
$~85 & 86 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:11. 10.2018 CRL.M.C. 5229/2018 DHARMENDER @ DHARMU & ORS STATE & ANR. versus + CRL.M.C. 5231/2018 JAGDISH & ORS STATE & ANR. versus ........ Petitioners ....... RESPONDENTS ........ Petitioners ....... RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner(s) : Mr.Ashish Kapoor, Adv. Crl.M.C.5229/2018 Mr. Paramveer Deswal, Adv. for petitioners in Crl.M.C.5231/2018. for petitioners in For the Respondent(s): Mr. Raghuvinder Verma, Addl. PP for the State with SI Vineet Kumar in both petitions. Ms. Ayushi Chugh and Ms. P. Deswal, Advs. for respondent in Crl.M.C.5229/2018 Mr. Ashish Kapoor, Adv. for respondent No.2 in Crl.M.C.5231/2018. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT1110.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL)... Petitioners in Crl. M.C. 5229/2018 seek quashing of FIR No.1. CRL.M.C. 5229/2018 & 5231/2018 Page 1 of 3 1401/2014 under Sections 323/354/452/5& Section 3(I)(X)(XI)(XV) of the...
Ms Mamta Nagpal vs.ms Baruna Madan & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-11-2018
$~13 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(OS) 514/2018 & I.A.14115-14116/2018 MS MAMTA NAGPAL ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Vikram Singh, Advocate with Mr. C. Shekhar Malhotra, Advocate. versus MS BARUNA MADAN & ORS. % CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN Through: None. ..... Defendants Date of Decision:11. h October, 2018 MANMOHAN, J: (Oral) JUDGMENT1 Present suit has been filed for declaration of the Will dated 22nd February, 2012 as the last executed Will of Testator- Mr. Baldev Raj Madan and declaration of titles of immovable properties and movable assets, possession and injunction in favour of the plaintiff.2. In the plaint, it is averred that the plaintiff, defendant No.1 and defendant No.3 are the daughters of the deceased Testator-Mr. Baldev Raj Madan.3. It is averred in the plaint that Mr. Baldev Raj Madan was the owner of A-38/1, Mayapuri Industrial Area, Phase-I, Mayapuri, Delhi-110064 as well as the built-up third floor with roof rights CS (OS) 514/2018 Page 1 of 3 ...
Seema Begum vs.arun Kumar Singh (United India Insurance Company Limite ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-11-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: October 11, 2018 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Rajiv Ranjan Dwevedi, Advocate Versus + MAC.APP. 380/2016 SEEMA BEGUM ARUN KUMAR SINGH (UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED) ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Deepak Jain, Advocate for respondent No.1 Mr. Mohit Singh, Mr. Sudhir Nagar & Ms. Bhanu Sanoriya, Advocates for respondent No.2 Mr. Animesh Sinha, Advocate for respondent No.3 + MAC.APP. 497/2017 ANIL KUMAR Through: Mr. Deepak Jain, Advocate ..... Appellant Versus M/S UNITED INSURANCE CO LTD & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Animesh Sinha, Advocate for respondent No.1 Mr. Rajiv Ranjan Dwevedi, Advocate for respondents No.2 & 3 Mr. Deepak Jain, Advocate for respondent No.4 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR MAC.APP. 380/2016 MAC.APP. 497/2017 Page 1 of 7 1. JUDGMENT (ORAL) The above captioned two appeals are directed against Award of 30th January, 2016 vide which compensation of `13,05,000/- with interest @ 12% per an...
- ‹ Prev
- 37
- 38
- 39
- 40
- 41
- 43
- 44
- 45
- 46
- 47
- Next ›
- Last »