Delhi Court October 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Subhash Kumar @ Sehdev vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-11-2018
$~6 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI BAIL APPLN. 1729/2017 Judgment delivered on:11. 10.2018 % + SUBHASH KUMAR @ SEHDEV STATE Advocates who appeared in this case: versus ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent For the... Petitioners : Mr. Kamlesh Mahajan, Advocate. For the... RESPONDENTS : Mr. Panna Lal Sharma, APP for the State. Mr. Shiv Gupta with Mr. Jalaj Agarwal, Mr. Z.U. Islam and Mr. Atul Agarwal, Advocates for the complainant. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT1110.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in FIR No.188/2017 under Sections 420/376/495 IPC, Police Station Mansarovar Park.2. The allegations in the FIR against the petitioner are that the petitioner, who was already married, without disclosing the factum of his marriage, contracted the second marriage with the prosecutrix and thereafter misled her into cohabiting with the petitioner.3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been false...
Shailender Singh & Anr vs.the State & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-11-2018
$~83 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + CRL.M.C. 5222/2018 Judgment delivered on:11.10.2018 SHAILENDER SINGH & ANR ........ Petitioners THE STATE & ANR versus ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: Mr. S.R. Gupta, Adv. Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, Addl. PP for the State with SI Vijay Kumar Ms. Nirmal Chawla, Adv. for R-2 with R-2 in person. For the... Petitioner : For the... RESPONDENTS : CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT1110.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.304 of 2005 under Sections 498A/4of the IPC registered at Police Station Farsh Bazar, Delhi, based on a settlement.2. 3. Subject FIR emanates out of matrimonial discord. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that parties have settled their disputes and settlement dated 03.07.2017 has been arrived CRL.M.C. 5222/2018 Page 1 of 3 at between the parties before Delhi Mediation Centre, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi. The marriage between petitioner No.1 a...
Kamal Sharma & Ors vs.m/s Blue Coast Infrastructure Development Pvt Lt ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-11-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(OS) 176/2015 KAMAL SHARMA & ORS ..... Plaintiffs Through: Mr. Abhishek Bhardwaj, Advocate. versus M/S BLUE COAST INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT PVT LTD & ORS ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Vijay Aggarwal, Advocate with Mr. Vishal Bhardwaj, Advocate for defendants No.1, 5 to 8. Mr. Naman Joshi, Advocate for Ms. Avshreya P.S. Rudy, Advocate for defendant No.2. Dr. Sarbjit Sharma, Advocate with Ms. Leeza Taneja and Ms. Yamini Nijhawan, Advocate for defendants No.147 to 149. Mr. Hemant Jain, Advocate for applicants I.As. 14088, 14090, 14092, 14094, 14096 & 14098 of 2018. Ms. Sonal Kumar Singh, Advocate with Ms. Ishita Sharma, Advocate for applicant. Mr. Nitish Chaudhary, Advocate for Mr. Chetan Lokur, Advocate for applicant in I.A. 15031/2017 and 13462/2018. 15, 16 & 17 $~ * + WITH CS(OS) 176/2015, 87/2018 & 88/2018 Page 1 of 17 + CS(OS) 87/2018 + MS. PREETI CHHABRA Through: None. ..... Plaintiff versus M/S. BLUE COAST INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT PVT. L...
Jahir Alam vs.prem Chand & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-11-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: October 11, 2018 + MAC.APP. 1003/2017 PREM CHAND versus Through: Ms. Pinki Talukdar, Advocate .....Appellant SHAMIM HUSAIN & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mohd. Mustafa, Advocate for respondent No.2 Counsel for respondent No.3 (appearance not given) + MAC.APP. 45/2018 & CMs 1126-27/2018 JAHIR ALAM versus Through: Mohd. Mustafa, Advocate .....Appellant PREM CHAND & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Pinki Talukdar, Advocate for respondent No.1 Counsel for respondent No.3 (appearance not given) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. Impugned Award of 26th April, 2017 grants compensation of `7,90,629/- with interest @ 9% per annum to Injured-Prem Chand, (hereinafter referred to as Injured) aged 25 years, on account of grievous injuries suffered by him in a vehicular accident, which took place on 3rd April, 2012.2. In the above captioned first appeal, Injured-Prem Chand seeks MAC.APP. 1003/2017 & 45/2018 Page 1 ...
Dr. Neeraj Goyal vs.state & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-11-2018
$~8 & 9 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:11. h October, 2018 + CRL.M.C. 1158/2016 and Crl. M.A. 4966/2016 Dr. NEERAJ GOYAL ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Siddharth Aggarwal, Mr. Kumar Vaibhav and Ms. Rupali Samuel, Advocates versus STATE & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Ravi Nayak, APP for the State with Dr. Saba Naz, PNDT & MTP, Nodal Officer, Central District + CRL.M.C. 1729/2016 and Crl. M.A. 7356/2016 Dr. H.K SINGH ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Anil Airi, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Krishan Kumar, Ms. I. Grover, Ms. Bindiya, Ms. Sadhna Sharma, Mr. Satyam Bhatia and Ms. Sunita Arora, Advocates versus STATE & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Ravi Nayak, APP for the State with Dr. Saba Naz, PNDT & MTP, Nodal Officer, Central District CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. Both these petitions presented under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.PC) arise out of same proceedings that Crl. M.C. 1158/2016 & 1729/2016 Page 1 o...
Association of Apartment Owners of New Delhi House (Regd.) vs.ranutrol ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-11-2018
$~CP-32 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of decision:11. 10.2018 CO.PET. 751/2016 ASSOCIATION OF APARTMENT OWNERS OF NEW DELHI HOUSE (REGD.) ........ Petitioner Through Ms.Sunita Bhardwaj, Adv. for the petitioner. Mr.Ashok Nagrath, Adv.for petitioner (both counsel dispute the authority of each other) the Versus RANUTROL INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD. ..... Respondent Through Mr.Aaditya Vijay Kumar and Ms.Radhika Khanna, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(ORAL) 1. This petition is filed under section 433(e) and 434 of the Companies Act, 1956 for winding up of the respondent company.2. The case of the petitioner is that the petitioner association is a society registered under the Societies Registration Act, 1860 and is also acting in consonance with the Delhi Apartment Ownership Act, 1986. It is also stated that the petitioner raised invoice Bill No.67 of 2016 for Rs.1,02,515/- against the respondent towards augmented and upgraded electric installations ...
Ravneet Singh Lamba & Ors vs.state & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-11-2018
$~81 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + CRL.M.C. 5218/2018 Judgment delivered on:11.10.2018 RAVNEET SINGH LAMBA & ORS ........ Petitioners STATE & ANR versus ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : For the... RESPONDENTS : Mr. Ajit Singh Arora, Adv. Mr. Kewal Singh Ahuja, Addl. PP for the State with SI Baljit Singh. Mr. Ajit Singh and Ms. Juhi Jha, Advs. for R-2 with R-2 in person. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT1110.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) Crl. M.A. 34088/2018 (Exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. CRL.M.C. 5218/2018 1.... Petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.103 of 2016 under Sections 498A/4IPC registered at Police Station Mianwali Nagar, Delhi, based on a settlement. CRL.M.C. 5218/2018 Page 1 of 3 2.3. Subject FIR emanates out of matrimonial discord. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that parties have settled their disputes and settlement agreement/Memo of Understanding dated 20.0...
New Delhi House Flat Owners Association (Regd.) vs.csi Enterprises Pvt ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-11-2018
$~ * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:11. 10.2018 CO.PET. 734/2016 NEW DELHI HOUSE FLAT OWNERS ASSOCIATION (REGD.) ........ Petitioner Through Ms.Sunita Bhardwaj, Adv. for the petitioner. Mr.Ashok Nagrath, Adv.for petitioner (both counsel dispute the authority of each other) the Versus CSI ENTERPRISES PVT. LTD. ..... Respondent Through Mr.Aaditya Vijaykumar and Ms.Radhika Khanna, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(ORAL) 1. This petition is filed under section 433(e) and 434 of the Companies Act, 1956 for winding up of the respondent company. It is stated that the petitioner is an Association being registered under the Societies Registration Act, 1860 and is responsible for renovation of the building New Delhi House which was constructed in 1974. It is further stated that the respondent company is indebted to the petitioner for a sum of Rs.1,00,500/- The petitioner raised invoice/bills bearing No.87 of 2016 for external renovation of...
Anita Rani Mangla vs.bhagwat Dayal & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-11-2018
* + % RFA No.332/2018 11th October, 2018 ..... Appellant IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI ANITA RANI MANGLA Through: Mr. H.S. Gautam, Advocate (Mobile No.9911483237). versus BHAGWAT DAYAL & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Rupesh Kumar and Mr. Sandeep Sharma, Advocates (Mobile No.9810793688). CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) RFA No.332/2018 and C.M. Appl. No.15540/2018 (for stay) 1. This Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) is filed by the plaintiff in the suit impugning the Judgment of the Trial Court dated 03.04.2018 by which RFA No.332/2018 Page 1 of 7 the trial court has dismissed the suit of the appellant/plaintiff as barred by time. The suit has been held as barred by time on the ground that the suit for cancellation of the impugned documents dated 17.09.1999 has been filed in July, 2017 i.e. beyond the period of three years limitation prescribed unde...
Icetrail Logistics Pvt. Ltd. Vs.kuehne Nagel Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-11-2018
$-2 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:11. h October, 2018 ARB.P. 525/2018 & Crl.M.A. 34071/2018 ICETRAIL LOGISTICS PVT. LTD. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Dayan Krishanan, Sr. Adv.with Mr.Vijay Kaundal and Mr.Nitish K.Sharma, Advs. versus KUEHNE +NAGEL PVT. LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Sudhir Nandrajog, Sr. Adv. with Ms.Radhika Dubey, Ms.Ruchi Choudhary and Mr.Gaurav Gupta, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA NAVIN CHAWLA, J.(Oral) 1. This petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) has been filed by the petitioner seeking appointment of a Sole Arbitrator for adjudicating the disputes that have arisen between the parties in relation to the Agreement dated April, 2013. The said Agreement contains an Arbitration Agreement in form of Clause 22 thereof, which is reproduced hereinbelow: 22. It is mutually decided by both the parties that in case of any dispute or difference of opinio...
- ‹ Prev
- 35
- 36
- 37
- 38
- 39
- 41
- 42
- 43
- 44
- 45
- Next ›
- Last »