Delhi Court October 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Westat India Social Sciences Private Ltd. (In vol.liqn.) Vs...........
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-12-2018
$~CP-33 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:12. 10.2018 CO.PET. No.23/2018 WESTAT INDIA SOCIAL SCIENCES PRIVATE LTD. (IN VOL.LIQN.) .......Petitioner Through Mr.Kunal Sharma, Advocate on behalf of OL CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(ORAL) 1. This is a petition, filed under Section 497(6) of the Companies Act, 1956(herein referred to as the Act), by the Official Liquidator (OL) for voluntary winding up of WESTAT INDIA SOCIAL SCIENCES PRIVATE LTD. (IN VOL.LIQN.) (herein referred to as the said company) from the date of the filing of the instant petition.2. The record shows that the said Company in issue was incorporated on 21.01.2010, vide registration No.198229, with the Registrar of Companies (ROC), NCT of Delhi and Haryana. The Corporate Identity Number of the said Company is U74900DL2010FTC198229. The registered office of the said Company in issue is stated to be situated at 301-303, Tolstoy House, 15 Tolstoy Marg, New Delhi 110001.3....
Virender & Anr vs.state
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-12-2018
$~ * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on:25. 09.2018 Judgment delivered on:12. 10.2018 CRL.A. 1494/2014 VIRENDER & ANR. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Davlender Hora, Advocate with Mr. Sikandar Khan, Advocate for A-1 along with A-1 in person. Mr. Padam Kant Saxena, Advocate with Mr. Deepak R Dahiya, Advocate (DHCLSC) for A-2 along with A-2 in person. versus Through: Mr.Rajat Katyal, APP for State Inspector Raj Pal Singh, PS-Nihal Vihar ..... Respondent STATE CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE I.S. MEHTA JUDGMENT VIPIN SANGHI, J.1. The present appeal has been preferred by the two appellants Virender and Devraj @ Deva who were arrayed and tried as accused Nos. 1 and 2, to assail their conviction by the Ld. ASJ (FTC) (W): DELHI in Sessions Case Crl.A.1494/2014 Page 1 of 27 No.49/2011, arising out of FIR No.240/2010, under Section 302/34IPC, registered at PS Nihal Vihar, vide judgment dated 08.09.2014 and the order on sentence dated 1...
Dhanlaxmi Bank Ltd vs.aggarsain Jewellers Pvt. Ltd. & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-12-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RFA No.26/2017 + % DHANLAXMI BANK LTD. 12th October, 2018 Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Gaurav Gupta, Advocate (M. No.9871396480). AGGARSAIN JEWELLERS PVT. LTD. & ORS. . versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) is filed by the plaintiff/bank impugning the Judgment of the Trial Court dated 19.10.2016 by which the trial court has dismissed the suit filed by the appellant/plaintiff for recovery of Rs. 5,04,843.65/- alongwith interest. RFA No.26/2017 Page 1 of 6 2. At the outset, it may be noted that there were three defendants in the suit, and they were proceeded exparte, and therefore, there is neither any pleading nor any evidence led by the defendants.3. The facts of the case are that the appellant/plaintiff granted a loan to the respondent no.2/defendant ...
Jitender Gogna vs.ajit Gogna & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-12-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + FAO(OS) 51/2018 Date of decision: October 12, 2018 JITENDER GOGNA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sanjeev Sindhwani, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Siddharth Aggarwal, Adv. versus AJIT GOGNA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Jhumjhum Sarkar, Adv. for R-2 CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO V. KAMESWAR RAO, J.(ORAL) 1. The challenge in this appeal is to the order dated 31st January, 2018 whereby the learned Single Judge has determined the amount of mesne profit with regard to the property in question to be of Rs.40,000/- per month and also held that if the defendant no.1 does not file the original of the Will, the plaintiff or any of the other defendants shall apply to the court for decreeing the suit forthwith.2. Mr. Sanjeev Sindhwani, learned counsel appearing for the appellant would submit that the case in hand being of Partition, the claim, if any, has to be for rendition of accounts not of Mesne Profit. Be that as...
Jasmohan Singh vs.state & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-12-2018
$~23 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:12. h October, 2018 + CRL.M.C. 5246/2018 and Crl.M.A.34193-34194/2018 JASMOHAN SINGH ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Diljit Singh Ahluwalia, Advocate with Mr. Amarjit Singh Bedi, & Mr. Varun Chandiok, Advocates. versus STATE & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Meenakshi Dahiya, APP CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA for the State ORDER (ORAL) 1. On the complaint of the second respondent, Police Station Economic Offences Wing of Delhi Police (EOW) had registered first information report (FIR) No.71/2013 to investigate into the crimes allegedly committed under Sections 409/406/420/468/471/4of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC). The police concluded the investigation and submitted a final report under Section 173 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) dated 18.07.2014 seeking cancellation of the case against which the first informant lodged a protest petition. It appears the petitioner described as proposed accused ...
Social Jurist, a Civil Rights Group vs.government of Nct of Delhi and ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-12-2018
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:08. h October, 2018 Pronounced on:12. h October, 2018 + W.P.(C) 10585/2018 & CM APPL. 41279/2018 SOCIAL JURIST, A CIVIL RIGHTS GROUP ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Ashok Agarwal with Mr.Kumar Utkarsh, Advs. versus GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Rahul Mehra, Senior Standing Counsel, Mr.Ramesh Singh, SC, Mr.Gautam Narayan, ASC with Mr.Chaitanya Gosain, Ms.Mahamaya Chatterjee, Ms. Shivani, Mr. C. Jain and Ms. Nikita Goyal, Advs. for GNCTD. Mr. Ripu Daman Bhardwaj, CGSC for R-2/UOI. Mr. Parvinder Chauhan, Adv. for DUSIB. CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO JUDGMENT RAJENDRA MENON, CHIEF JUSTICE1... Petitioner, claiming to be a public spirited organization, has filed this writ petition seeking quashing of an order dated 01.10.2018 issued by the Medical Director, Guru Teg Bahadur Hospital, Government of NCT of Delhi whereby patients who do not hold a valid Voter ID Car...
Sandhya Bindal vs.govt of Nct of Delhi & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-12-2018
$~10 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:12. h October, 2018 LPA.578/2017 SANDHYA BINDAL ..... Appellant Through Mr. Randhir Jain and Mr. Bhoop Singh, Advocates versus GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Ramesh Singh, Standing Counsel with Ms. Nidhi Raman, Advocates for respondents no.1 to 3 along with Ms. Sangeeta Deswal, DEO, Zone 16. Mr. Atul respondent no.4. Jain, Advocate for CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G.S. SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. The appellant herein had filed a writ petition, seeking the following prayers: i) a writ of certiorari quashing the order dated 20.05.2017 issued by respondent no.3; ii) issue a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to not to take any action in pursuance of impugned order dated 20.07.2017; iii) pass any such other orders as it may deem fit to this Honble Court in the facts and circumstances of the case. LPA.578/2017 Page 1 of 3 2. The writ petitio...
Santosh Enterprises vs.airports Authority of India & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-12-2018
$~71 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 11006/2018 & CM Nos. 42842-42844/2018 SANTOSH ENTERPRISES ........ Petitioner Through: Mr Pradeep K. Bakshi and Mr Kushagra Pandit, Advocates. versus AIRPORTS AUTHORITY OF INDIA & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr K.K. Rai, Senior Advocate with Mr Digvijay Rai, Mr Kustubh Singh, Advocate with Mr Amrit Gargi, AAI, Manager (Comm.), Ms Aakriti, Manager (Law), AAI and Mr Varun Tripathi, JR (Law), AAI. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU % ORDER1210.2018 VIBHU BAKHRU, J Issue notice. The learned counsel appearing for the respondents 1. accepts notice. With the consent of the parties, the petition is taken up for hearing. Introduction The petitioner has filed the present petition, inter alia, impugning a 2. notice dated 06.10.2018 captioned Intimation of Disqualification & Show Cause Notice under Clause 4.16.3, 4.16.4 of RFE (hereafter the impugned notice) issued by respondent no.2 [Executive Director (Commercial), W.P.(C) 11006...
Santosh Kumar vs.col. Satsangi’s Kiran Memorial Aipeccs Educational ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-12-2018
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:12. h October, 2018. RSA1482018 SANTOSH KUMAR ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Avniash Kumar Lakhanpal, Adv. Versus COL. SATSANGIS KIRAN MEMORIAL AIPECCS EDUCATIONAL COMPLEX & ANR Through: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW CM Nos.42968/2018 & 42970/2018 (both for exemption) ........ RESPONDENTS 1.2. Allowed, subject to just exceptions. The applications are disposed of. RSA1482018 & CM No.42969/2018 (for stay) 3. This Regular Second Appeal (RSA) under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (CPC) impugns the judgment and decree [dated 16th August, 2018 in RCA SCJ No.8/17 (CNR No.DLST03-000251-2017) of the Court of Senior Civil Judge (South)]. of dismissal of First Appeal under Section 96 of the CPC filed by the appellant / defendant against the judgment and decree [dated 7th December, 2016 in CS No.83061/2016 of the Court of Civil Judge-02 (South)]. allowing on admissions the suit of the responden...
- ‹ Prev
- 34
- 35
- 36
- 37
- 38
- 40
- 41
- 42
- 43
- 44
- Next ›
- Last »